气体滑脱及有效应力对煤岩气相渗透率的控制作用

李俊乾，刘大锰，姚艳斌，蔡益栋，王 磊

doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2013.05.1074

天然气地球科学 >

2013 , Vol. 24 >Issue 5: 1074 - 1078

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2013.05.1074

非常规天然气

气体滑脱及有效应力对煤岩气相渗透率的控制作用

展开

国家煤层气工程中心煤储层实验室，中国地质大学能源学院，北京 100083

李俊乾(1987-)，男，河南商丘人，博士研究生，主要从事煤储层物性方面的研究. E-mail：lijunqian1987@126.com.

收稿日期: 2012-12-13

修回日期: 2013-02-20

网络出版日期: 2013-10-10

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(编号：2011ZX05034-001；2011ZX05062-006)；国家自然科学基金委员会,中国石油天然气集团公司石油化工联合基金(编号：U1262104)；中央高校基本科研业务费(编号：2652013007)；北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师基金(编号：YB20101141501)；中国石油创新基金(编号：2010D-5006-0101);新世纪优秀人才支持计划(编号：NCET-11-0721)联合资助.

收起

Controls of Gas Slippage and Effective Stress on the Gas Permeability of Coal

Expand

Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of CBM Development and Utilization, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

Received date: 2012-12-13

Revised date: 2013-02-20

Online published: 2013-10-10

Fold

摘要

动态的煤储层渗透率影响煤层气的开采，已引起广泛关注。针对6块采自沁水盆地南部煤矿的无烟煤样品，测试了4.3MPa围压条件下煤岩气相(氦气)渗透率变化特征，基于气体滑脱及有效应力效应分析进一步探讨了渗透率变化的控制机理。结果表明,气体压力降低过程中:①渗透率呈现“先降低后升高”的变化趋势，转折点进口气体压力约为1.9MPa(对应于平均气体压力1.0MPa)；②平均气体压力小于1.0MPa时，氦气产生滑脱现象；③渗透率—有效应力之间呈近似负相关关系；④进口气体压力大于1.9MPa时，为有效应力负效应作用阶段，导致渗透率降低；进口气体压力降至1.9MPa以下时，有效应力与气体滑脱效应同时作用，此阶段气体滑脱正效应强于有效应力负效应，引起渗透率升高。


关键词： 无烟煤; 氦气; 渗透率; 气体滑脱; 有效应力

本文引用格式

李俊乾，刘大锰，姚艳斌，蔡益栋，王磊 . 气体滑脱及有效应力对煤岩气相渗透率的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013 , 24(5) : 1074 -1078 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2013.05.1074

Abstract

Dynamic coal reservoir permeability impacts the production of coalbed methane (CBM)and has been extensively studied.Gas (Helium)permeability change was measured under a 4.3MPa confining stress condition for 6 anthracite coal cores from the southern Qinshui Basin.Furthermore,controlling factors of the permeability change were investigated by comprehensively analyzing the effects of gas slippage and effective stress on the permeability.Results show that during gas pressure decline：①the permeability initially decreases but subsequently increases,during which the rebound begins at an inlet gas pressure of about 1.9MPa(corresponding to a mean gas pressure of 1.0MPa);②gas slippage phenomenon appears as the mean gas pressure falls bellow 1.0MPa;③the permeability is approximately negatively related to effective stress;④the permeability decreases due to the negative effect from effective stress as the inlet gas pressure is greater than 1.9MPa;while it increases when the pressure falls below 1.9MPa because the positive effect from gas slippage is stronger than the negative effect from effective stress.

Key words： Anthracite coals; Helium; Permeability; Gas slippage; Effective stress

参考文献

［1］ Durucan S,Edwards J S.The effects of stress and fracturing on permeability of coal［J］.Mining Science and Technology,1986,3(3):205-216.

［2］ Mckee C R,Bumb A C,Koenig R A.Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal and other geologic formations［J］.SPE Formation Evaluation,1988,3(1):81-91.

［3］ Zhang Yapu,He Yingfu,Yang Zhengming,et al.Experimental research on stress sensitivity of coalbed reservoir［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(3):518-521.［张亚蒲，何应付，杨正明，等.煤层气藏应力敏感性实验研究［J］.天然气地球科学,2010,21(3)：518-521.］

［4］Yang Manping,Wang Gang,Xu Shengyang,et al.Steady flow productivity equation for stress sensitivity coal-bed methane gas well［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(2):467-471.［杨满平,王刚,许胜洋,等.考虑应力敏感性的煤层气稳定流动气井产能方程［J］.天然气地球科学,2011,22(2)：467-471.］[JP]

［5］ Harpalani S,Schraufnagel R A.Shrinkage of coal matrix with release of gas and its impact on permeability of coal［J］.Fuel,1990,69(5):551-556.

［6］ Levine J R.Model Study of the Influence of Matrix Shrinkage on Absolute Permeability of Coalbed Reservoirs［C］.London:Special Publication,1996:197-212.

［7］ Harpalani S,Chen G.Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal［J］.Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,1997,15(4):303-325.

［8］ Xiao Xiaochun,Pan Yishan.Experimental study on gas slippage effects in hypotonic coal reservoir［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2008,27(2):3409-3515.［肖晓春,潘一山.低渗煤储层气体滑脱效应试验研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(2)：3409-3515.］

［9］ Fu Xuehai,Li Dahua,Qin Yong,et al.Experimental research of influence of coal matrix shrinkage on permeability［J］.Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2002,31(2):129-137.［付雪海,李大华,秦勇,等.煤基质收缩对渗透率影响的实验研究［J］.中国矿业大学学报,2002,31(2)：129-137.］

［10］ Fu Xuehai,Qin Yong,Zhang Wanhong.Coupling correlation between high-rank coal matrix mechanic effect and coal reservoir permeability［J］.Geological Journal of China Universities,2003,9(3):373-377.［付雪海,秦勇,张万红.高煤级煤基质力学效应与煤储层渗透率耦合关系分析［J］.高校地质学报,2003,9(3)：373-377.］

［11］ Shi J Q,Durucan S.A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane recovery［J］.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2005,8(4):291-299.

［12］ Liu S,Harpalani S,Pillalamarry M.Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production:part 2-modeling results［J］.Fuel,2012,94:117-124.[JP]

［13］Massarotto P,Golding S D,Rudolph V.Constant Volume CBM Reservoirs:An Important Principle［C］.Texas:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2009.

［14］ Liu H H,Rutqvist J.A new coal-permeability model:internal swelling stress and fracture-matrix interaction［J］.Transport in Porous Media,2010,82(1):157-171.

［15］ Randolph P L,Soeder D J,Chowdiah P.Porosity and Permeability of Tight Sands［C］.Texas:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1984.[JP]

［16］ Zhao Y S,Hu Y Q,Wei J P,et al.The experimental approach to effective stress law of coal mass by effect of methane［J］.Transport in Porous Media,2003,53(3):235-244.

［17］Mitra A,Harpalani S,Liu S.Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production:part 1-laboratory results［J］.Fuel,2012,94:110-116.［18］ Huo Lingjing,Yang Zhengming,Zhang Shuo.On the empirical relation of slippage factor［J］.Journal of Wuhan Polytechnic University,2009,28(3):36-41.［霍凌婧,杨正明,张硕.滑脱因子的经验关系式研究［J］.武汉工业学院学报,2009,28(3)：36-41.］

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献