天然气地球科学

• 天然气开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

致密气藏多级压裂水平井产能预测新方法

位云生,贾爱林,何东博,王军磊   

  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-16 修回日期:2015-12-21 出版日期:2016-06-10 发布日期:2016-06-10
  • 作者简介:位云生(1979-),男,河南项城人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事致密气与页岩气开发与评价研究. E-mail:weiys@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“天然气开发关键技术”项目(编号:2011ZX05015)资助.

A new method of predicting productivity of multi-stagefractured horizontal well in tight gas reservoir

Wei Yun-sheng, Jia Ai-lin, He Dong-bo, Wang Jun-lei   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2015-07-16 Revised:2015-12-21 Online:2016-06-10 Published:2016-06-10

摘要: 致密气藏多级压裂水平井的渗流规律复杂,影响气井产能的因素较多。首先引入单裂缝评价的思路,在基质中建立了有限导流裂缝引起的渗流数学模型,通过Fourier积分变换求解,以此为基础,在裂缝中建立了考虑井筒聚流作用的变流量渗流模型,通过数值求解Fredholm型积分方程拟合出了裂缝导流能力影响函数,最终得到了单一裂缝的产能公式。利用井筒管流作用建立了多级压裂水平井从地层到井底全过程流动的产能预测方程组,同时考虑相邻裂缝间的相互干扰,并给出了完整的算法。应用该方程组计算了实例气井及各压裂段在不同井底流压下的产量,并分析了该井水平段压降和产量分布及无阻流量随有效裂缝半长和导流能力的变化情况,为评价各裂缝参数和压裂效果提供了依据。

关键词: 致密气藏, 水平井多级压裂, 单裂缝, 裂缝干扰, 产能预测

Abstract: The general completion technique for horizontal wells in tight gas is by multi-stages hydraulically fracturing,and the flow characteristics in horizontal well with multiple transverse fractures are very complicated.Conventional methods,taking well as an evaluation unit,are difficult to accurately predict production capacity of each fracture and productivity differences between wells with different number of fractures.So single fracture is as the minimum evaluation unit,matrix,fractures and lateral wellbore model are combined integrally to approximate horizontal well with multiple transverse hydraulic fractures in tight gas.This paper presents a new semi-analytical methodology for predicting the production capacity of horizontal well with multiple transverse hydraulic fractures in tight gas reservoirs.Firstly,mathematical flow model in matrix,which is disturbed by finite-conductivity vertical fractures and rectangular shaped boundaries,is established and solved by Fourier integral transform.Then the idea of single stage fracture analysis is incorporated to establish linear flow model within single fracture with variable rate.Fredholm integral numerical solution is applicable for the fracture conductivity function.Finally,pipe flow model along lateral wellbore is employed to couple multi-stages fracture mathematical models,and the equation group of predicting productivity of multi-stage fractured horizontal well,considering the whole process flow from matrix to bottom hole and production interference between adjacent fractures,is established.Meanwhile,corresponding iterative algorithm of the equations is given.In this case analysis,the productions of actual well and every fracture are calculated under the different bottom hole flowing pressure,and this method also contributes to obtain the distribution of pressure drop and production for every horizontal segment and its changes with effective fracture half-length and conductivity.Application of this technology will provide gas reservoir engineers with a better tool for predicting well and every fracture productivity,and optimizing transverse hydraulic fractures configuration and conductivity along lateral wellbore.

Key words: Tight gas, Multi-stage hydraulically fractured horizontal well, Single fracture, Production interference between adjacent fractures, Productivity prediction

中图分类号: 

  • TE371

[1]Parts M.Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior-incompressible fluid case[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1961,1(2):105-118.
[2]Cinco-Ley H,Dominguez N.Transient pressure behavior for a well with a finite-conductivity vertical fracture[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1978,18(4):253-264.
[3]Liao Y Z,Lee W J.New Solutions for Wells with Finite-conductivity Fractures Including Wellbore Storage and Fracture-face Skin[C].SPE Eastern Regional Meeting,2-4 November,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.SPE 26912.1993.
[4]Zerzar A,Bettam Y.Interpretation of Multiple Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells in Closed Systems[C].SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific,20-21 October,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia.SPE 84888.2003.
[5]Brown M,Ozkan E,Raghavan R,et al.Practical Solutions for Pressure Transient Responses of Fractured Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs[C].SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,4-7 October,New Orleans,Louisiana.SPE 125043.2009.
[6]Joshi S D.Argumentation of well productivity with sland and horizontal wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1988,8(6):729-739.
[7]Joshi S D.Production Forecasting Methods for Horizontal Wells[C].International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering,1-4 November,Tianjin,China.SPE 17580.1988.
[8]Raghavan R,Joshi S D.Productivity of multiple drainholes or fractured horizontal wells[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1993,8(1):1-16.
[9]Wang X D,Li G H,Wang F.Productivity analysis of horizontal wells intercepted by multiple finite-conductivity fractures[J].Petroleum Science,2010,(7):367-371.
[10]Wang Junlei,Jia Ailin,He Dongbo,et al.Rate decline of multiple fractured horizontal well and influence factors on productivity in tight gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):278-285.[王军磊,贾爱林,何东博,等.致密气藏分段压裂水平井产量递减规律及影响因素[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):278-285.]
[11]Li Bo,Jia Ailin,He Dongbo,et al.Productivity evaluation of horizontal wells in Sulige tight gas reservoir with strong heterogeneity[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(3):539-549.[李波,贾爱林,何东博,等.苏里格气田强非均质性致密气藏水平井产能评价[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(3):539-549.]
[12]Li Qin,Chen Cheng,Xun Xiaoquan.A new method of predicting gas wells’ productivity of fractured horizontal well of low-permeability tight gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):633-638.[李琴,陈程,荀小全.低渗致密气藏压裂水平井产能预测新方法[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):633-638.]
[13]Wei Yunsheng,Jia Ailin,He Dongbo,et al.A new way of evaluation productivity of staged fracturing horizontal well in tight gas reservoir[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2012,35(1):32-34.[位云生,贾爱林,何东博,等.致密气藏分段压裂水平井产能评价新思路[J].钻采工艺,2012,35(1):32-34.]
[14]Li Shilun.Natural Gas Engineering[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008.[李士伦.天然气工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008.]
[15]Hao Mingqiang,Hu Yongle,Li Fanhua.Production decline laws of fractured horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):269-273.[郝明强,胡永乐,李凡华.特低渗透油藏压裂水平井产量递减规律[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):269-273.]
[16]Xu Yanbo,Qi Tao,Yang Fengbo,et al.New model for productivity test of horizontal well after hydraulic fracturing[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(1):89-91.[徐严波,齐桃,杨凤波,等.压裂后水平井产能预测新模型[J].石油学报,2006,27(1):89-91.]
[17]Riley M F,Brigham W E,Horne R N.Analytic Solutions for Elliptical Finite-Conductivity Fractures[C].SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,6-9 October,Dallas,Texas.SPE 22656.1991.
[18]Prats M.Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior:Incompressible fluid case[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1961,1(2):105-118.
[19]Prats M,Hazebroek P,Strickler W R.Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior:Compressible-fluid case[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1962,2(2):87-94..
[20]Wang Xiaodong,Zhang Yitang,Liu Ciqun.Productivity evaluation and conductivity optimization for vertically fractured wells[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(6):78-81.[王晓冬,张义堂,刘慈群.垂直裂缝井产能及导流能力优化研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(6):78-81.]
[21]Yao Tongyu,Zhu Weiyao,Li Jishan,et al.Fracture mutual interference and fracture propagation roles in production of horizontal gas wells in fractured reservoir[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2013,44(4):1487-1492.[姚同玉,朱维耀,李继山,等.压裂气藏裂缝扩展和裂缝干扰对水平井产能影响[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,44(4):1487-1492.]
[22]Deng Jia,Zhu Weiyao,Ma Qian.A new seepage model for shale gas reservoir and productivity analysis of fractured well[J].Fuel,2014(124):232-240.

[1] 张磊, 徐兵祥, 辛翠平, 乔向阳, 穆景福, 许阳, 韩长春. 考虑主裂缝的页岩气产能预测模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 247-256.
[2] 朱宽亮, 吴晓红, 康毅力, 游利军, 田键, 宋静晗. 致密火山岩气藏水相和油相圈闭损害实验评价——以南堡凹陷5号构造沙河街组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1042-1050.
[3] 吴明涛, 王晓冬, 姚天福. 致密气藏气井非稳态线性渗流特征分析新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1060-1066.
[4] 吕志凯, 贾爱林, 唐海发, 刘群明, 王泽龙. 大型致密砂岩气藏水平井产能评价与新认识[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 873-879.
[5] 严谨,何佑伟,史云清,郑荣臣,程时清,于海洋,李鼎一. 致密气藏水平井压裂缝不均匀产气试井分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 839-845.
[6] 田冷,李鸿范,马继翔,谢全,顾岱鸿,任效星. 基于启动压力梯度与应力敏感的致密气藏多层多级渗流模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1898-1907.
[7] 丁景辰. 高含水致密气藏水平井稳产原因分析及启示——以鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 127-134.
[8] 杨兆中, 黄馨, 覃兆勇, 雷腾蛟, 易良平. 致密油藏层内爆燃压裂缝网渗流及产能特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(6): 1092-1100.
[9] 陈雨龙, 张冲, 石文睿, 郭冀宁, 秦瑞宝, 余杰, 周兴波. 鄂尔多斯盆地某地区石盒子组低渗透天然气储层产能测井预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2216-2222.
[10] 欧阳伟平, 张冕, 刘曰武, 万义钊, 袁冬蕊, 李杉杉. 基于三参数非线性渗流的致密气藏数值试井分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(11): 2030-2036.
[11] 任东, 董家辛, 王志平, 时文. 火山岩气藏气井生产动态规律及预测方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(11): 2037-2042.
[12] 李旺, 李连崇, 唐春安. 水平井平行裂缝间诱导应力干扰机制的数值模拟研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(11): 2043-2053.
[13] 李波,贾爱林,何东博,李学营. 低渗致密气藏压裂水平井产能预测新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(9): 1793-1802.
[14] 莫邵元,何顺利,雷刚,刘广峰,盖少华. 致密气藏气水相对渗透率理论及实验分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(11): 2149-2154.
[15] 景成,蒲春生,周游,任杨,孙威,张志营. 基于成岩储集相测井响应特征定量评价致密气藏相对优质储层——以SULG东区致密气藏盒8上段成岩储集相为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(5): 657-664.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 付广;王剑秦. 地壳抬升对油气藏保存条件的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 18 -23 .
[2] 黄安敏;裴建翔;陈志宏;李绪深;李林;. 油气储层预测技术在琼东南盆地BD13区的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 518 -522 .
[3] 胡守志,付晓文,王廷栋,李延均 . 储层中的沥青沉淀带及其对油气勘探的意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(1): 99 -103 .
[4] 曾宪斌;. 封盖层突破时间和周期浅析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1998, 9(1): 43 -46 .
[5] 刘文汇;黄第藩;熊传武;徐永昌;. 成烃理论的发展及国外未熟―低熟油气的分布与研究现状[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(1-2): 1 -22 .
[6] 胡雄;李延钧;陈新领;江波;马立协;付晓文;王强;梁艳;. 柴北缘马海地区油气全烃地球化学特征与成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 612 -616 .
[7] 吴时国;袁圣强;. 世界深水油气勘探进展与我国南海深水油气前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(6): 693 -699 .
[8] 张朝;张廷山;魏祥峰;戴传瑞;王秀林 . 也门X区块下白垩统沉积相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(06): 835 -839 .
[9] 朱维耀;宋洪庆; 何东博;王明 ;贾爱林;胡永乐 . 含水低渗气藏低速非达西渗流数学模型及产能方程研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(05): 685 -689 .
[10] 成永生 陈松岭. 南堡凹陷外围地区古生界地层油气成藏分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 108 -112 .