天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

柴北缘西段古近系优质储层孔隙成因类型及其控制因素

陈波1,2,3，王波4，管斌5，蔡智洪4，孙国强2，史基安2   

  1. 1.广西高校北部湾石油天然气资源有效利用重点实验室,钦州学院,广西 钦州 535011；2.甘肃省油气资源研究重点实验室/中国科学院油气资源研究重点实验室，甘肃 兰州 730000；
    3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049;4.中国石油青海油田分公司勘探开发研究院，甘肃 敦煌 736202；5.中国石油青海油田勘探事业部，甘肃 敦煌 736202
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-13 修回日期:2015-09-14 出版日期:2016-08-10 发布日期:2016-08-10
  • 作者简介:陈波(1985-)，男，浙江衢州人，讲师，博士，主要从事油气储层地质学及油气藏开发研究. E-mail:cbo-11@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展规划“973”项目(编号：2011CB201104)；国家科技重大专项(编号：2011ZX05000-01-06)；
    甘肃省重点实验室专项(编号：1309RTSA041)联合资助.

Pore genetic types and its controlling factors on Paleogene strata in the northern margin of the Qaidam Basin,China

Chen Bo1,2,3，Wang Bo4，Guan Bin5，Cai Zhi-hong4，Sun Guo-qiang2，Shi Ji-an2   

  1. 1.Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Oil and Natural Gas Resource Effective Utilization,Qinzhou University,Qinzhou 535011,China;
    2.Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources,Gansu Province/Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research,
    Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu,China;
    3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;
    4. Exploration & Production Research Institute of Qinghai Oilfield Company,petroChina,Dunhuang,Gansu 736202,China;
    5.Petroleum Exploration Division,PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company,Dunhuang,Gansu 736202,China
  • Received:2015-07-13 Revised:2015-09-14 Online:2016-08-10 Published:2016-08-10

PDF (PC)

175

摘要： 分析孔隙成因类型及其控制因素，对于确定优质储层有重要意义。通过铸体薄片、扫描电镜及测录井资料分析认为，柴北缘西段古近系储层发育原生孔隙、次生孔隙和微裂缝三大类孔隙类型，原生孔隙可细分为压实残余粒间孔和胶结残余粒间孔，次生孔隙包括粒内溶孔、粒间溶孔和晶间微孔，微裂缝根据形成原因可分为压实微裂缝、溶蚀微裂缝。研究区储层孔隙类型主要发育以残余粒间孔为主的原生孔隙，其次发育粒内溶孔和粒间溶孔等次生孔隙，同时发育少量的压实微裂缝。柴北缘西段古近系储层孔隙类型主要受到沉积作用的控制，成岩作用次之，沉积作用对孔隙类型的控制体现在水动力强度的不同，水动力条件较强且成熟度较高的辫状河心滩、河床滞留及辫状河三角洲平原的分流河道、前缘水下分流河道储层砂体原生孔隙较为发育，在相同成岩作用背景下原生孔隙保留最完整，最有可能形成优质储层聚集区。

关键词: 柴达木盆地, 古近系, 孔隙成因类型, 主控因素, 优质储层

Abstract: Analysis of pore genetic types and controlling factors,has great significance to determine the high quality reservoirs.Using casting thin sections identification,scanning electron microscopy (SEM)and combining with logging and mud logging data,the results show that Paleogene reservoir developed three kinds of pore types in the northern margin of Qaidam Basin,i.e.,primary pore,secondary pore and microfracture pore.The primary pore can be subdivided into compacted residual intergranular pores and cemented remnant intergranular pores.The secondary pores include intragranular dissolved pores,intergranular dissolved pores and intergranular micropores.Microfracture pore can be divided into compacted microfracture pore and corrosion microfracture pore according to the formation reasons.The pore types of reservoir in the study area are mainly primary pores of the residual intergranular pores,and secondary pores such as the intragranular dissolved pores and intergranular dissolved pores,with a small amount of compacted microfracture pore.The Paleogene reservoir pore type is mainly controlled by sedimentation,followed by controlled diagenesis which located in northern margin of Qaidam Basin.The control of the pore types is different from the hydrodynamic intensity.The strong hydrodynamic conditions and high maturity of braided river island,riverbed detainment and braided river distributary channel of delta plain and front underwater distributary channel sand body reservoir primary pores are well developed under the background of the same diagenesis.The primary pore retention is the most completed,and most likely to form high quality reservoir accumulation area.

Key words: Qaidam Basin, Paleogene, Pore genetic types, Main controlling factors, High quality reservoirs

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2

[1]Gu Tuan.Characteristics of abnormally high porosity zone and favorable reservoir facies prediction in deep Cenozoic horizon of Qingshui Sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(3):37-43.[谷团.辽河盆地西部凹陷清水洼陷新生界深层异常高孔带特征与有利储集相预测研究[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(3):37-43.]
[2]Schmidt  V,McDonald D A.Secondary Reservoir Porosity in the Course of Sandstone Diagenesis［C］.AAPG Continuing Education Course Series No.12,1979.
[3]Yang Hua,Zhong Dakang,Yao Jingli,et al.Pore genetic types and their controlling factors in sandstone reservoir of Yangchang Formation in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(2):73-80.[杨华,钟大康,姚泾利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组砂岩储层孔隙成因类型及其控制因素[J].地学前缘,2013,20(2):73-80.]
[4]Qiu Longwei,Xu Ningning,Liu Kuiyuan,et al.Anomalous high porosity zone and formation mechanism of high quality reservoir of Ess4 in Bonan Sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(1):1-12.[邱隆伟,徐宁宁,刘魁元,等.渤南洼陷沙四上亚段储层异常高孔带及优质储层成因机制[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(1):1-12.]
[5]Salman K,Lander R H,Bonnell L.Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs:Origin and predictability[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(2):301-328.
[6]Ehrenberg S N.Preservation of anomalously high porosity in deeply buried sandstones by grain-coating chlorite:Examples from the Norwegian Continental Shelf[J].AAPG Bulletion,1993,77(7):1260-1286.
[7]Zhu Xiaomin,Wang Yingguo,Zhong Dakang,et al.Pore types and secondary pore evolution of Paleogene reservoirin the Jiyang Sag[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2007,81(2):197-204.[朱筱敏,王英国,钟大康,等.济阳坳陷古近系储层孔隙类型与次生孔隙成因[J].地质学报,2007,81(2):197-204.]
[8]Wilkinson M,Darby D,Haszeldine R S,et al.Secondary porosity generation during deep burial associated with overpressure leak-off:Furmar Formation,United Kingdom Central Graben[J].AAPG Bulletion,1997,81(5):803-813.
[9]Yuan Guanghui,Cao Yingchang,Jia Zhenzhen,et al.Research progress on anomalously high porosity zones in deeply buried clastic reservoirs in petroliferous basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(1):28-42.[远光辉,操应长,贾珍臻,等.含油气盆地中深层碎屑岩储层异常高孔带研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(1):28-42.]
[10]Chen Guojun,Lü Chengfu,Wang Qi,et al.Characteristics of pore evolution and its controlling factors of Baiyun Sag in deepwater area of Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(4):50-56.[陈国俊,吕成福,王琪,等.珠江口盆地深水区白云凹陷储层孔隙特征及影响因素[J].石油学报,2010,31(4):50-56.]
[11]Cao Yingchang,Yuan Guanhui,Li Xiaoyan,et al.Types and characteristics of anomalously high porosity zones in Paleogene mid-deep buried reservoirs in the northern slope,Dongying Sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(4):683-691.[操应长,远光辉,李晓艳,等.东营凹陷北带古近系中深层异常高孔带类型及特征[J].石油学报,2013,34(4):683-691.]
[12]Dong Yonghui,Chen Kaiyuan,Lin Yibing,et al.Reservoir pore types and controlling factors of the fourth member of Quantou Formation in GD area,southern Songliao Basin[J].Lihtologic Reservoirs,2014,26(1)：86-91.[邓永辉,陈开远,林易兵,等.松辽盆地南部GD区泉四段储层孔隙成因类型及控制因素分析[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(1)：86-91.]
[13]Shi Ji’an,Wang Qi.A disscussion on main controlling factors on the properties of clastic gas reservoirs[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1995,13(2):128-139.[史基安,王琪.影响碎屑岩天然气储层物性的主要控制因素[J].沉积学报,1995,13(2):128-139.]
[14]Qiu Longwei,Jiang Zaixing,Cao Yingchang,et al.Alkaline diagenesis and its influence on a reservoir in Biyang Depression[J].Science in China:Series D,2002,45(7):643-653.
[15]Wang Guihong,Ma Da’de,Zhang Qiquan,et al.Basin-mountain tectonic pattern and hydrocarbon exploration domain in north margin of Qaidam Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2008,35(6):668-673.[王桂宏,马达德,张启全,等.柴达木盆地北缘盆山构造关系与油气勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(6):668-673.]
[16]Men Xiangyong,Zhao Wenzhi,Yu Huilong.A study on oil and gas accumulation in Lenghu area of thenorthern margin of Qaidam Basin and some relevant exploration suggestions[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2001,28(4):4-7.[门相勇,赵文智,余辉龙.柴达木盆地北缘冷湖地区油气成藏条件研究与勘探建议[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(4):4-7.]
[17]Fu Ling,Guan Pin,Zhao Weiyong,et al.Heavy mineral feature and provenance analysis of Paleogene Lulehe Formation in Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,29(8):2867-2875.[付玲,关平,赵为永,等.柴达木盆地古近系路乐河组重矿物特征与物源分析[J].岩石学报,2013,29(8):2867-2875.]
[18]Chen Ji,Shi Ji’an,Long Guohui,et al.Sedimentary facies and models for the Palaeogene-Neogene deposits on the northern margin of the Qaidam Basin,Qinghai[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geolog,2013,33(3):16-26.[陈吉,史基安,龙国徽,等.柴北缘古近系—新近系沉积相特征及沉积模式[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2013,33(3):16-26.]
[19]Jian Bin,Li Fengjie,Zheng Rongcai,et al.Sedimentary facies of Paleogene Lulehe Formation in western segmentof northern margin of Qaidam Basin[J].Lihtologic Reservoirs,2010,22(1):48-52.[蒋斌,李凤杰,郑荣才,等.柴达木盆地北缘西段古近系路乐河组沉积相特征研究[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):48-52.]
[20]Sun Guoqiang,Du Zhongming,Jia Yanyan,et al.Sedimentary model since Paleogene in northern margin of Qaidam Basin[J].Lihtologic Reservoirs,2012,24(4):16-21.[孙国强,杜忠明,贾艳艳,等.柴达木盆地北缘西段古近纪以来沉积模式研究[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(4):16-21.]
[21]Li Fengjie,Meng Lina,Fang Chaogang,et al.Palaeogeographic evolution of the Paleogene and Neogene in north margin of Qaidam Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2012,14(5):596-606.[李凤杰,孟立娜,方朝刚,等.柴达木盆地北缘古近纪—新近纪古地理演化[J].古地理学报,2012,14(5):596-606.]
[22]Nie Fengjun,Jian Meizhu,Li Sitian,et al.The responses of sandstone to hot fluid flow and their identified markers:A case study from the western part of the Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2005,12(4):581-591.[聂逢君,姜美珠,李思田,等.砂岩对热流体作用的响应及识别标记：以珠江口盆地西部为例［J］.地学前缘,2005,12(4):581-591.]
[23]Wang Ruifei,Sun Wei.Main factors controlling the evolution of physical properties during the process of reservoir sedimentation-diagenesis[J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica,2009,29(3):125-130.[王瑞飞,孙卫.储层沉积—成岩过程中物性演化的主控因素[J].矿物学报,2009,29(3):125-130.]
[24]Cao Guoqiang,Chen Shiyue,Xu Fengyin,et al.Ceno-Mesozoic sedimentary and tectonic evolution in the western Qaidam Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2005,32(1):33-40.[曹国强,陈世悦,徐凤银,等.柴达木盆地西部中—新生代沉积构造演化[J].中国地质,2005,32(1):33-40.]
[25]Huang Sijing,Xie Lianwen,Zhang Meng,et al.Formation mechanism of authigenic chlorite and relation to preservation of porosity in nonmarine Triassic reservoir sandstones,Ordos Basin and Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2004,31(3):273-280.[黄思静,谢连文,张萌,等.中国三叠系陆相砂岩中自生绿泥石的形成机制及其与储层孔隙保存的关系[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2004,31(3):273-280.]
[26]Yao Jingli.Wang Qi,Zhang Rui,et al.Origin and spatial distribution of carbonate cements in Yangchang Fm.(Triassic)sandstones within the lacustrine center of Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(6):943-950.[姚泾利,王琪,张瑞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中部延长组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物成因与分布规律研究[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(6):943-950.]
[27]Sang Shuxun,Zheng Yongfei,Zhang Hua,et al.Researches on carb on and oxygen stable isotopes of Lower Paleozoic Carbonates in Xuzhou area[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2004,20 (3):707 -716.[桑树勋,郑永飞,张华,等.徐州地区下古生界碳酸盐岩的碳、氧同位素研究[J].岩石学报,2004,20(3):707-716.]
[28]Sun Guoqiang,Lv Jingwen,Zhao Mingjun,et al.Diagenesis and sedimentary environment of Miocene Series in Eboliang Ⅲ area[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(2):337-347.[孙国强,吕婧文,赵明君,等.柴达木盆地鄂博梁Ⅲ号中新统成岩作用及沉积环境[J].沉积学报,2015,33(2):337-347.]
[29]Sun Guoqiang,Chen Bo,Zheng Yongxian,et al.Diagenesis and sedimentary environment of Miocene in Lenghu Ⅴ tectonic belt[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(4):679-688.[孙国强,陈波,郑永仙,等.柴北缘冷湖五号构造中新统成岩作用及沉积环境[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(4):679-688.]
[1] 王勇飞, 赵向原, 刘成川. 川东北元坝地区长兴组礁滩相储层裂缝特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 973-981.
[2] 李勇, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 肖正录, 何清波, 苏恺明, 李俊良. 近源间互式煤系致密砂岩气成藏主控因素——以川中地区须家河组天然气为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 798-808.
[3] 张振宇, 张立宽, 罗晓容, 曹斌风, 林会喜, 曾治平, 秦峰, 贺文君, 李超, 雷裕红. 准噶尔盆地中部地区深层西山窑组砂岩成岩作用及其对储层质量评价的启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 686-700.
[4] 李延丽, 苟迎春, 马新民, 李程程, 王朴, 陈芳芳. 柴达木盆地坪西地区基岩气藏储层特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 219-227.
[5] 郭旭升. 四川盆地涪陵平桥页岩气田五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 1-10.
[6] 李梦茹, 唐友军, 刘岩, 胡辉, 贺其川. 江陵凹陷不同地区原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1240-1251.
[7] 曾旭, 李剑, 田继先, 王波, 国建英, 沙威.  柴达木盆地腹部晚期构造带成藏模拟实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1301-1309.
[8] 李红哲, 马峰, 谢梅, 杨巍, 张成娟, 王朴, 赵健. 柴达木盆地阿尔金东段基岩气藏盖层特征及控藏机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1102-1110.
[9] 吕正祥, 王先东, 吴家洋, 卿元华. 渤海海域中部古近系湖相碳酸盐岩储层成岩演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 921-931.
[10] 杨智峰, 曾溅辉, 韩菲. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组7段致密油充注影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 961-972.
[11] 周叶骏, 关平, 吴颜雄, 刘沛显, 丁晓楠, 谭宇, 庞磊. 柴达木盆地西部咸水湖相沉积有机质中二苯并噻吩类组成特征及环境意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 908-920.
[12] 刘喜杰，马遵敬，韩冬，王海燕，马立涛，葛东升. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块致密砂岩优质储层形成的主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 481-490.
[13] 杨丽杰，侯读杰，陈晓东，刁慧. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中部古近系地层水化学特征及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 559-571,596.
[14] 陈跃，马东民，吴圣，李新虎，方世跃，郭晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘煤系伴生泥页岩孔隙特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 189-198.
[15] 石新朴, 覃建强, 丁艳雪, 杨丹, 史全党, 胡清雄, 李波, 齐洪岩, 张吉辉, 孙德强, 赵振, 饶远, 习成威. 准噶尔盆地滴南凸起火山岩气藏成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(12): 1706-1714.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 付广;王剑秦. 地壳抬升对油气藏保存条件的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 18 -23 .
[2] USGS,郑军卫（译）. 美国地质调查局油气资源研究计划[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2002, 13(3-4): 15 .
[3] 李桂菊, 庄新国. 多年冻土区沉积物中甲烷的生成[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(5): 516 -518 .
[4] 达江;宋岩;洪峰;赵孟军;傅国友;方世虎;. 中国中西部前陆盆地成藏特征的初步分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 452 -455 .
[5] 黄安敏;裴建翔;陈志宏;李绪深;李林;. 油气储层预测技术在琼东南盆地BD13区的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 518 -522 .
[6] 杨宁,吕修祥,陈梅涛,赵风云,张亚光,郑多明 . 英买力地区碳酸盐岩古风化壳油气聚集模式探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 35 -39 .
[7] 肖芝华;胡国艺;李志生. 封闭体系下压力变化对烃源岩产气率的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(2): 284 -288 .
[8] 张顺存，;王凌;石新璞;方琳浩，;董文举，;孔玉华 . 准噶尔盆地腹部陆西地区石炭系火山岩储层的物性特征及其与电性的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(2): 198 -203 .
[9] 李士祥;胡明毅;李霞;. 榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(2): 200 -205 .
[10] 倪金龙;周莉;赵小花;刘东 . 柴达木盆地红沟子鼻状构造新生代油气成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(1): 107 -110 .