库车前陆乌什凹陷东部构造—岩性油气藏储层物性及含油性主控因素

doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.06.0994

天然气地球科学

库车前陆乌什凹陷东部构造—岩性油气藏储层物性及含油性主控因素

周延钊^1,2，鲁雪松^2,3，刘华¹，杨宪彰⁴，陈延贵⁴，桂丽黎^2,3，李秀丽^2,3

1.中国石油大学（华东）地球科学与技术学院，山东青岛 266580;
2.中国石油天然气集团公司盆地构造与油气成藏重点实验室，北京 100083;
3.中国石油勘探开发研究院，北京 100083;
4.中国石油塔里木油田勘探开发研究院，新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2015-11-24 修回日期:2016-03-21 出版日期:2016-06-10 发布日期:2016-06-10
通讯作者: 鲁雪松（1982-），男，安徽安庆人，高级工程师，博士，主要从事油气成藏综合分析及油气资源评价研究. E-mail:luxs@petrochina.com.cn.
作者简介:周延钊（1990-），男，山东济南人，硕士研究生，主要从事油气成藏和油气资源评价研究. E-mail:zyz_1024@126.com.
基金资助:
国家重大专项“前陆盆地油气成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”（编号：2011ZX05003）资助.

The main controlling factors of reservoir physical property and oiliness in the structural-lithologic reservoirs in the east of Wushi Sag,Kuqa foreland basin

Zhou Yan-zhao^1,2，Lu Xue-song^2,3，Liu Hua¹，Yang Xian-zhang⁴，Chen Yan-gui⁴，Gui Li-li^2,3，Li Xiu-li^2,3

1.College of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum,Qingdao 266580,China;
2.Key Laboratory of Basin Structure and Hydrocarbon Accumulation,CNPC,Beijing 100083,China;
3.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China;
4.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company,Korla 841000,China

Received:2015-11-24 Revised:2016-03-21 Online:2016-06-10 Published:2016-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 库车前陆盆地乌什凹陷东部依拉克凝析气藏和神木1油藏为构造—岩性油气藏，白垩系舒善河组储层沉积相及物性变化快，油气水关系复杂，储层物性和含油性控制因素不清。根据常规储层物性分析、基于高压压汞和氮气吸附的微观孔喉分析和储层定量荧光对含油性的定量分析结果，对储层物性和含油性的主控因素进行了分析。研究表明:储层沉积相、岩性是控制储层物性的关键因素，沉积相上以扇三角洲前缘河口坝微相、分流河道微相和辫状河三角洲前缘分流河道微相的储层物性最好，岩性上以位于扇三角洲前缘亚相的粗、中砂岩储层物性最好。研究区本地无烃源岩，油气从东部的塔拉克地区经不整合面—断裂输导体系组合长距离运移至乌什地区，储层含油性一方面受沟通油气源的断裂控制，油气主要聚集在断裂附近的局部高部位;另一方面受储层物性的控制，在油气藏内部同一砂组范围内储层物性控制了含油性差异。往研究区东部即油气来源的方向，寻找有利的构造—岩性圈闭是该区下一步的勘探方向，加强目的层构造图和砂体沉积相的精细刻画是该区勘探开发研究的关键。

关键词: 储层物性, 含油性, 主控因素, 构造, 岩性油气藏, 储层定量荧光, 乌什凹陷

Abstract: The Yilake condensate gas reservoir and Shenmu-1 oil reservoir are structural-lithologic reservoirs in the east of Wushi Sag,Kuqa foreland basin.The sedimentary facies and physical properties of the Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation had a very fast change,and the distribution of oil,gas and water is very complex.The controlling factors of reservoir physical properties and oiliness are unclear,which were analyzed in this paper,based on conventional reservoir physical property analysis,micro pore throat analysis by Nitrogen Adsorption and Mercury Injection experiment,and the oiliness analysis by Quantitative Fluorescence Technique.The result shows that reservoir sedimentary facies and lithology are the key factors to control reservoir physical properties.Themouth bars,distributary channelsin fan delta front and braided delta front deposits are better than other sedimentary facies.The gritstone and medium-grained sandstone in fan delta front have the best physical properties.The study area has no native source rock,hydrocarbon migrates a long distance from the east Talake area to Wushen area through the unconformity-fault pathway combination,so there are two factors controlling the oiliness of reservoirs.One is the fault that controls oil and gas migration,hydrocarbon accumulate in the local high positions near fault;the other is the physical property of reservoir,in the same sand sets reservoir physical property controls the oiliness.The favorable structural-lithologic traps are the next exploration direction to the east of Wushi Sag,the direction to petroleum sources.Meticulous depiction of local structure map and sand body is the key for the exploration and development in the study area.

Key words: Reservoir physical property, Oiliness, Main controlling factors, Structural-lithologic reservoir, Quantitative fluorescence technique, Wushi Sag

中图分类号:

TE122.2⁺3

周延钊, 鲁雪松, 刘华, 杨宪彰, 陈延贵, 桂丽黎, 李秀丽. 库车前陆乌什凹陷东部构造—岩性油气藏储层物性及含油性主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(6): 994–1002.

Zhou Yan-zhao, Lu Xue-song, Liu Hua, Yang Xian-zhang, Chen Yan-gui, Gui Li-li, Li Xiu-li. The main controlling factors of reservoir physical property and oiliness in the structural-lithologic reservoirs in the east of Wushi Sag,Kuqa foreland basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(6): 994–1002.

参考文献

[1]Ma Dade,Shou Jianfeng,Hu Yong.Analysis of the main controlling factors on the formation of clastic reservoirs in the southwestern area of the Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Sedmentolohica Sinica,2005,23(4):589-595.[马达德,寿建峰,胡勇.柴达木盆地柴西南区碎屑岩储层形成的主控因素分析[J].沉积学报,2005,23(4):589-595.]
[2]Zhang Lijuan,Li Duoli,Sun Yushan,et al.Analysis of characteristics of sedimentary reservoir between Cretaceous and Palaeogene in the western part of the Kuqa Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(3):355-360.[张丽娟,李多丽,孙玉善,等.库车坳陷西部古近系_白垩系沉积储层特征分析[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(3):355-360.]
[3]Hong Feng,Jiang Lin,Hao Jiaqing.Analysis of the oil/gas-bearing possibility and causes of heterogeneity of oil and gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(4):608-615.[洪峰,姜林,郝加庆.油气储集层非均质性成因及含油气性分析[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(4):608-615.]
[4]Ji Lidan,Gu Jiayu,Zhao Liang.Research on sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of Lower Cretaceous in eastern Wushi Sag Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2009,31(5):478-484.[季丽丹,顾家裕,赵亮.塔里木盆地乌什凹陷东部下白垩统沉积相及储层特征研究[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(5):478-484.]
[5]Yang Fan,Jia Jinhua.Alluvial fan and fan-delta sedmientary facies and favorable assemblage of reservoir and seal of Wushi Sag(Cretaceous) in Tarmi Basin[J].Acta Sedmentolohica Sinica,2006,24(5):681-689.[杨帆,贾进华.塔里木盆地乌什凹陷白垩系冲积扇—扇三角洲沉积相及有利储盖组合[J].沉积学报,2006,24(5):681-689.]
[6]Zhou Xingxi,Jia Jinhua,Zhou Dongyan.Gas pool forming process in Wushi Sag of Kuqa Depression,Tarmi Basin[J].Petroleum Exploratin and Development,2006,33(2):184-188.[周兴熙,贾进华,周东延.库车坳陷乌什凹陷东部成藏作用初步研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(2):184-188.]
[7]Ji Lidan,Gu Jiayu,Zhao Liang,et al.Sedimentary facies and reservoir properties of the Shushanhe Formation in eastern Wushi Sag,Xinjiang[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(6):884-889.[季丽丹,顾家裕,赵亮,等.新疆乌什凹陷东部舒善河组沉积相及其储集性能研究[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(6):884-889.]
[8]Zhou Kang,Peng Jun,Geng Mei.Analysis on main controlling factors of physical property of tight sandstone reservoir[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2008,15(2):8-11.[周康,彭军,耿梅.川中—川南过渡带致密砂岩储层物性主控因素分析[J].断块油气田,2008,15(2):8-11.]
[9]Zhang Fengqi,Pang Xiongqi,Leng Jigao.Quantitative prediction of fullness degree of lithologic Trapin west sag of Liaohe Depression[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(2):114-118.[张凤奇,庞雄奇,冷济高.辽河西部凹陷岩性圈闭含油性定量预测模型[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(2):114-118.]
[10]Zheng Min,Peng Gengxin,Lei Ganglin,et al.Structural pattern and its control on hydrocarbon accumulations in Wushi Sag,Kuche Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Exploratin and Development,2008,35(4):444-451.[郑民,彭更新,雷刚林,等.库车坳陷乌什凹陷构造样式及对油气的控制[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(4):444-451.]
[11]Zhao Libin,Ma Yujie,Yang Xianzhang,et al.Charactrristics of hydrocarbon pooling in Wushi Sag of Kuqa Foreland Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(10):21-24,135.[赵力彬,马玉杰,杨宪彰,等.库车前陆盆地乌什凹陷油气成藏特征[J].天然气工业,2008,28(10):21-24,135.]
[12]Gong Deyu,Li Ming,Li Qiming.Geochemical characteristics and origins of the oils in Wushi Sag,Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,12(1):62-69.[龚德瑜,李明,李启明,肖中尧,陶小晚,黄士鹏.塔里木盆地乌什凹陷原油地球化学特征及油源分析[J].天然气地球科学,2014,12(1):62-69.]
[13]Liu Yukui,Min Lei,Feng Youwen.Petroleum geologic features of Wushi Sag in The Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2007,27(1):24-26,148.[刘玉魁,闵磊,冯游文,等.塔里木盆地乌什凹陷石油地质特征[J].天然气工业,2007,27(1):24-26,148.]
[14]Zhang Zhenghong,Lv Xiuxiang,Yang Minghui,et al.Petrogeologic feature of Wushi Sag in Talimu Basin[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition,2004,19(4):29-31,65.[张振红,吕修祥,杨明慧,等.塔里木盆地乌什凹陷石油地质特征[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2004,19(4):29-31,65.]
[15]Liu Guangdi.Petroleum and Natural Gas Geology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press，2008:33-34.[柳广弟.石油地质学[M].石油工业出版社，2008:33-34.]
[16]Liu K,Eadington P.Quantitative fluorescence techniques for detecting residual oils and reconstructing hydrocarbon charge history[J].Organic Geochemistry,2005,36(7):1023-1036.
[17]Li Zhuo,Jiang Zhenxue,Li Feng.Quantitative grain fluorescence responds to residual oil zone and paleo-oil zones[J].Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2012,32(11):3073-3077.[李卓,姜振学,李峰,2012.古油层和残余油层的定量颗粒荧光响应[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2012,32(11):3073-3077.]
[18]Lu Xuesong,Liu Keyu,Zhuo Qingong,et al.Palaeo-fluid evidence for the multi-stage hydrocarbon charges in Kela-2 Gasfield,Kuqa foreland basin,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Exploratin and Development,2012,39(5):537-544.[鲁雪松,刘可禹,卓勤功,等.库车克拉2气田多期油气充注的古流体证据[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(5):537-544.]
[19][JP2]Liu K,Eadington P,Middleton H,et al.Applying quantitative fluorescence techniques to investigate petroleum charge history of sedimentary basins in Australia and Papuan New Guinea[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2007,57(1):139-151.[JP]
[20]Li Sumei,Pang Xiongqi,Liu Keyu,et al.A new approach to discriminate oil fluid inclusions Quickly-Quantitative Grain Fluore Scence(QGF) techniques and its application[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2006,28(4):386-390.[李素梅,庞雄奇,刘可禹,等.一种快速检测油包裹体的新方法——颗粒包裹烃定量荧光分析技术及其初步应用[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(4):386-390.]

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

库车前陆乌什凹陷东部构造—岩性油气藏储层物性及含油性主控因素

The main controlling factors of reservoir physical property and oiliness in the structural-lithologic reservoirs in the east of Wushi Sag,Kuqa foreland basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王勇飞, 赵向原, 刘成川. 川东北元坝地区长兴组礁滩相储层裂缝特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 973-981.
[2]	李勇, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 肖正录, 何清波, 苏恺明, 李俊良. 近源间互式煤系致密砂岩气成藏主控因素——以川中地区须家河组天然气为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 798-808.
[3]	胡东风. 四川盆地东南缘向斜构造五峰组—龙马溪组常压页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 605-615.
[4]	曾旭, 林潼, 王薇, 闫占冬, 郝翠果, 边滢滢, 王军. 柴达木盆地上侏罗统碎屑锆石LA-ICP-MS定年及指示意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 662-672.
[5]	郭旭升. 四川盆地涪陵平桥页岩气田五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 1-10.
[6]	包建平, 朱翠山, 申旭. 金刚烷类化合物与库车坳陷克拉2构造凝析油的形成机理研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1217-1230.
[7]	曾旭, 李剑, 田继先, 王波, 国建英, 沙威. 柴达木盆地腹部晚期构造带成藏模拟实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1301-1309.
[8]	朱立文, 王震亮, 张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[9]	杨海军, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 王珂, 王俊鹏, 唐雁刚, 周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[10]	杨智峰, 曾溅辉, 韩菲. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组7段致密油充注影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 961-972.
[11]	刘小兵, 温志新, 王兆明, 贺正军, 宋成鹏. 中东扎格罗斯盆地构造演化与油气分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 973-981.
[12]	杨敏, 赵一民, 闫磊, 李洪辉, 张欣欣, 徐振平, 罗浩渝. 塔里木盆地东秋里塔格构造带构造特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 826-833.
[13]	倪斌, 汤良杰, 李萌, 宋智华. 塔里木盆地鸟山东断裂带构造特征、形成机制及油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 834-844.
[14]	余川, 曾春林, 周洵, 聂海宽, 余忠樯. 大巴山冲断带下寒武统页岩气构造保存单元划分及分区评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 853-865.
[15]	崔鑫，李江海，姜洪福，王运增，齐林海,杨少英. 断陷盆地扇三角洲朵叶“叠置型”沉积样式及其油气地质意义——以海拉尔盆地苏德尔特构造带兴安岭组Ⅰ、Ⅱ油组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 682-695.