天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

陆相湖盆深水底流改造砂：沉积特征、成因及其非常规油气勘探意义

  

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院，甘肃 兰州 730020；
    2.中国石油天然气集团公司油藏描述重点实验室，甘肃 兰州 730020；
    3.中国石油吉林油田公司，吉林 松原 138001；
    4.中国石油大庆油田公司，黑龙江 大庆 163000
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-11 修回日期:2014-01-20 出版日期:2014-10-10 发布日期:2014-10-10
  • 作者简介:潘树新（1974-）,男,甘肃临洮人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事沉积学及油气勘探研究. E-mail：ltpan@126.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划（编号：2007CB209604）|青西老君庙构造带整体评价研究（编号：2013E-3304）|中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大专项（编号：2014B-0302）联合资助.

Deepwater Bottom Current Rework Sand (BCRS) in Lacustrine Basins:Sedimentary Characteristics,Identification Criterion,Formation Mechanismand Its Significance for Unconventional Oil/Gas Exploration

  1.  

    (1.Northwest Branch of Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,Lanzhou 730020,China；
    2.Key Laboratory of Reservoir Description,CNPS,Lanzhou 730020,China；
    3.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Jilin Oilfield,Songyuan 138001,China；
    4.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Daqing Oilfield,Daqing 163000,China)
  • Received:2013-12-11 Revised:2014-01-20 Online:2014-10-10 Published:2014-10-10

PDF (PC)

691

摘要：

深水底流改造砂是海相盆地重要的储集层之一。与海相盆地相比，陆相湖盆深水区是否存在大规模底流改造砂及其沉积特征、识别标志、形成机制、分布规模、外部形态、与深水重力流砂体的差异性及其油气勘探价值都值得去探索。利用松辽盆地的岩心及青海湖卫星照片资料，对上述问题进行了探讨和深入研究。陆相湖盆底流改造砂由泥质粉细砂岩和粉细砂岩组成，单层厚度为0.5~280cm|发育冲刷面和截切等底面侵蚀构造，常见的层理有交错层理、平行层理、透镜状层理及饥饿层理等。湖泊底流改造砂具有与湖相暗色泥页岩呈互层展布、细粒、发育牵引流构造和常与重力流交替出现这4个基本特征。研究表明，风驱底流对三角洲前缘和深水重力流砂体的再改造是形成深水底流改造砂的主要成因。深水底流改造砂在沉积特征、展布方向及成因机制等方面与深水重力流砂体存在显著差异。底流改造砂体在陆相盆地深水区广泛分布，厚层的底流改造砂可以形成致密油气藏，同时底流改造砂的广泛分布提高了泥页岩脆性矿物的含量，其分布区也是泥页岩油气藏勘探的甜点区。研究结果对于拓展我国陆相盆地非常规油气藏的勘探领域具有重要的意义。


关键词: 底流, 底流改造砂体, 细粒沉积, 非常规油气藏, 陆相盆地, 松辽盆地

Abstract:

Bottom current rework sand (BCRS) of deep water is the most important reservoir in marine basins.Compared with marine basins,whether the large scale BCRS was developed in the deep water area of continental lacustrine basins or not,and its sedimentary characteristics,identification criterion,formation mechanism,distribution,external morphology,differences with deep water gravity sandbody,and its value in oil/gas exploration are the important issues worth exploration.Based on core,seismic data,laboratory analysis and satellite photos of Qinghai Lake,the above issues have been discussed in this paper.BCRS of continental lacustrine basins was composed of muddy siltstone-fine sandstone and siltstone-fine sandstone,where the thickness of single layer was 0.5-280cm.Cross bedding,parallel bedding,lenticular bedding,and starvation bedding were well developed.BCRS has four basic features which include fine-grain interbedded with lacustrine black shale,sedimentary structure formed by tractive current,and interacted with gravity flow.The results show that delta front and deep water gravity sandbodies reworked by wind-driven bottom current is the main reason for the development of deep water BCRS.Significant differences can be found between deep water BCRS and deep water gravity sandbodies in sedimentary characteristics,distribution direction,mechanism,and etc.BCRS were widely distributed in deep water area of continental lacustrine basins.Tight oil/gas reservoir can be developed in thick BCRS.The abroad distribution of BCRS can improve the content of brittle minerals in muddy shale.The distribution area of BCRS can be “sweet points” for oil/gas exploration in shale.The study results of this paper played an important role in expanding the unconventional oil/gas exploration in continental basins of China.
 

Key words: Bottom current, BCRS, Fine-grain, Unconventional oil, gas reservoir, Continental basins, Songliao Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.1
［1］Gao Z,Eriksson K A.Internal-tide deposits in an Ordovician submarine channel:Previously unrecognized facies[J].Geology,1991,19:734-737.
[2]Stow D A V,Mayall M.Deep-water sedimentary systems:New models for the 21st Century[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2000,17:125-135.
[3]Shanmugam G.50 years of the turbidite paradigm(1950s-1990s)deep water processe sand facies models-a critical perspective[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2000,17:285-342.
[4]Shanmugam G.Deep marine tidal bottom current sand their reworked sands in modern and ancient submarine canyons[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2003,20:471-491.
[5]Shanmugam G.New perspectives on deep-water sandstones:Origin,recognition,initiation,and reservoir quality[J].Amsterdam:Elsevier,2012:154-179.
[6]He Y B,Luo J X,Li X D ,et al.Evidence of internal-wave and internal-tide deposits in the Middle Ordovician Xujiajuan Formation of the Xiangshan group,Ningxia,China[J].Geo-Marine Letters,2011,31(5/6):509-523.
[7]McCave I N,Lonsdale R E,Hollister C D ,et al.Sediment transport over the Hatton and Gardar contourite drifts[J].J.Sediment.Petrol.,1980,50(4):1049-1062.
[8]Faugères J C,Mwzerais M L,Stow DAV.Contourite drift types and their distribution in the north and south Atlantic Ocean Basins[J].Sedimentary Geology,1993,82:189-205.
[9]Robinson S G,McCave I N.Orbital forcing of bottom current enhanced sedimentation on Feni Drift,NE Atlantic,during the mid-Pleistocene[J].Paleoceanography,1994,9(6):943-972.
[10]Rhein M,Stramma L,Send U.The deep western boundary current:Water masses and transport[J].J Geophys.Res.,1995,100(C2):2441-2458.
[11]Zhao Jidong,Zheng Junwei.Development status and trends of science and technology of deepwater oil and gas[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(4):741-746.[赵纪东,郑军卫.深水油气科技发展现状与趋势[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(4):741-746.]
[12]Wu Shiguo,Qin Yunshan.The research of deepwater depositional system in the northern South China Sea[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(5):922-930.[吴时国,秦蕴珊.南海北部陆坡深水沉积体系研究[J].沉积学报,2009,27(5):922-930.]
[13]Zheng Rongcai,Ma Qike,Yang Baoquan ,et al.Characteristics of Miocene Zhujiang Formation submarine fan sandstone reservoirs in Baiyun Sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2012,39(5):455-462.[郑荣才,马启科,杨宝泉,等.白云凹陷珠江组深水扇砂岩储层特征及控制因素[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2012,39(5):455-462.]
[14]Zou Caineng,Zhao Wenzhi,Zhang Xingyang ,et al.Formation and distribution of shallow-water deltas and central-basin sandbodies in large open depression lake basins[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(6):813-824.[邹才能,赵文智,张兴阳,等.大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布[J].地质学报,2008,82(6):813-824.]
[15]Wang Dongpo,Liu Zhaojun,Liu Li.Evolution of Songliao Basin and Sea Level Fluctuation[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1994.[王东坡,刘招君,刘立.松辽盆地演化与海平面升降[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.]
[16]Pan Shuxin,Wei Pingsheng,Wang Tianqi ,et al.Discovery of Easten provenance in Songliao Basin and its implications on petroleum geology[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(6):1021-1027.[潘树新,卫平生,王天奇,等.松辽盆地东部物源的发现及其石油地质意义[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(6):1021-1027.]
[17]Pan Shuxin,Guo Weihua,Ma Fengliang ,et al.Sedimentary facies and exploratory potential of Quantou-Nenjiang Formations of Yushu river system in Songliao Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2010,31(1):47-50.[潘树新,郭维华,马凤良,等.松辽盆地榆树水系泉头组—嫩江组沉积相特征及勘探潜力[J].新疆石油地质,2010,31(1):47-50.]
[18]Pan Shuxin,Wei Pingsheng,Wang Tianqi ,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of flood-overlake in large depression basin:Taking the 4th member,Quantou Formation,Lower Cretaceous,in Southern Songliao Basin as an example[J].Geological Review,2012,58(1):41-52.[潘树新,卫平生,王天奇.等.大型坳陷湖盆“洪水—河漫湖”沉积——以干旱背景下的松南泉四段为例[J].地质论评,2012,58(1):41-52.]
[19]Pan Shuxin,Wang Tianqi,Tian Guangrong ,et al.Dynamics study of fuyang oil layer accumulation in Songliao Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(2):126-132.[潘树新,王天琦,田光荣,等.松辽盆地扶杨油层成藏动力探讨[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(2):126-132.]
[20]Pan Shuxin,Wei Pingsheng,Yuan Jianying ,et al.Expressway of hydrocarbon migration and the thought to find the reservoirs beyond the region of source rock[J].Acta Sedimentology Sinica,2011,29(2):599-604.[潘树新,卫平生,袁剑英,等.论油气运移的“高速公路”及源外找油思想[J].沉积学报,2011,29(2):599-604.]
[21]Pan Shuxin,Wang Jiangong,Liu Caiyan ,et al.Sedimentary features,distribution pattern and accumulation mechanism of lakeshore bar:An example of Qingshankou Formation in the southern of Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2012,42(supplement 2):70-78.[潘树新,王建功,刘彩燕,等.坳陷湖盆沿岸坝沉积特征、分布规律及成藏机制——以松辽盆地南部青山口组为例[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(增刊2):70-78.]
[22]Pan Shuxin,Liang Sujuan,Shi Yongsu ,et al.Origin of Ostracod extinction event of the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Paleogeography,2010,12(4):409-414.[潘树新,梁苏娟,史永苏,等.松辽盆地上白垩统青山口组介形虫群集性死亡事件成因[J].古地理学报,2010,12(4):409-414.]
[23]Wang Yingmin,Wang Hairong,Qiu Yan ,et al.Process of dynamics and its response of deep-water sedimentation[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2007,25(4):495-504.[王英民,王海荣,邱燕,等.深水沉积的动力学机制和响应[J].沉积学报,2007,25(4):495-504.]
[24]Wu Jiapeng,Wang Yingmin,Wang Hairong ,et al.The interaction between deep-water turbidity and bottom currents:A review[J].Geological Review,2012,58(6):1110-1120.[吴嘉鹏,王英民,王海荣,等.深水重力流与底流交互作用研究进展[J].地质论评,2012,58(6):1110-1120.]
[25][KG*7/8]Chen Bintao,Yu Xinghe,Wang Tianqi ,et al.Sedimentary response to the interaction between alongslope and downslope currents in Daihai Lake,north China[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2014,39(4):399-410.[陈彬滔,于兴河,王天奇,等.岱海湖盆沿坡流与顺坡流相互作用的沉积响应[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2014,39(4):399-410.]
[26]Hollister C D.Sediment Distribution and Deep Circulation in the Western North Atlantic[D].New York:Columbia University,1967:467.
[27]Laine E P,Hollister C D.Geological effects of the Gulf Stream system on the northern Bermuda Rise[J].Mar.Geol.,1981,39:277-310.
[28]Yuan Jin.The sedimentary characteristics and models of Paleogene tempestites in Huimin Sag,Shandong province[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2006,24(1):43-49.[袁静.山东惠民凹陷古近系风暴岩沉积特征及沉积模式[J].沉积学报.2006,24(1):43-49.]
[29]Cheng Shichang,Lu Bin.The characteristics of the lake current of Poyang Lake[J].Jiangxi Hydraulic Science & Technology,2003,29(2):105-107.[程时长,卢兵.鄱阳湖湖流特征[J].江西水利科技,2003,29(2):105-107.]
[30]Pan Shuxin,Wei Pingsheng,Wang Tianqi ,et al.Mass-transport deposits of the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,Songliao Terrestrial Basin,Northeast China:Depositional characteristics,recognition criteria and external geometry[J].Acta Geologica Sinica:English Edition,2014,88(1):in pressing.
[31]Pan Shuxin,Zheng Rongcai,Wei Pingsheng ,et al.Deposition characteristics,recognition mark and form mechanism of mass transport deposits in terrestrial lake basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(2):9-18.[潘树新,郑荣才,卫平生,等.陆相湖盆块体搬运体:沉积特征、识别标志与形成机制[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):9-18.]
[32]Li Xiangbo,Liu Huaqing,Wan Yanrong ,et al.First discovery of the sandy debris flow from the Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(3):19-21.[李相博,刘化清,完颜容,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组砂质碎屑流储集体的首次发现[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(3):19-21.]
[33]Xian Benzhong,Wan Jinfeng,Jiang Zaixing ,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and model of gravity flow deposition in the depressed belt of rift lacustrine basin：A case study from Dongying Formation in Nanpu Depression[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):121-135.[鲜本忠,万锦峰,姜在兴,等.断陷湖盆洼陷带重力流沉积特征与模式——以南堡凹陷东部东营组为例[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):121-135.]
[34]Wang Yin,Wang Xiaozhou,Wang Yingmin ,et al.Depositional model of gravity flow of slope in large down warped lake Basins[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(6):1076-1083.[王颖,王晓州,王英民,等.大型坳陷湖盆坡折带背景下的重力流沉积模式[J].沉积学报,2009,27(6):1076-1083.]
[35]Middleton G V,Hampton M A.Sediment-gravity flows:mechanics of flow and deposition[C]//Middleton G V,Bouma A H,Eds.Turbidites and Deep-Water Sedimentation.Pacific Section of the Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Short Course Lecture Notes,Los Angeles,1973:1-38.
[36]Coussot P,Meunier M.Recognition,classification and mechanical description of debris flows[J].Earth-Science Reviews,1996,(40):209-227.
[37]Jia Chengzao,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong ,et al.Assessment criteria,main types,basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):333-350.[贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):333-350.]
[38]Li Jianzhong,Guo Bincheng,Zheng Min ,et al.Main types,geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(4):607-615.[李建忠,郭彬程,郑民,等.中国致密砂岩气主要类型、地质特征与资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(4):607-615.]
[39]Zhao Jingzhou.Conception,classification and resource potential of unconventional hydrocarbons[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(3):393-406.[赵靖舟.非常规油气有关概念、分类及资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(3):393-406.]
[40]Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao ,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.[邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.]

 
[1] 王俊,高银山,王洪君,王新星,鲍志东,张红静. 基于正演模拟的水下分流复合河道内单一河道划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1310-1322.
[2] 卢文涛，李继庆，郑爱维，梁榜，张谦，杨文新. 涪陵页岩气田定产生产分段压裂水平井井底流压预测方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 437-442.
[3] 吴靖，姜在兴，王欣. 湖相细粒沉积岩三—四级层序地层划分方法与特征——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 199-210.
[4] 白雪峰, 梁江平, 张文婧, 付丽, 彭建亮, 薛涛, 杨立伟, 刘继莹. 松辽盆地北部深层天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1443-1454.
[5] 王颖, 邓守伟, 范晶, 邹晓品, 杨静. 松辽盆地南部重点断陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1455-1464.
[6] 周翔，舒萍，于士泉，陈曦. 松辽盆地徐深9区块营一段火山岩气藏储层特征及综合评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 62-72.
[7] 任丽华，代俊杰，林承焰，曹铮. 松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部青山口组超压特征及油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1020-1030.
[8] 张超，张立强，陈家乐，罗红梅，刘书会. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系细粒沉积岩岩相类型及判别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 713-723.
[9] 黄玉龙，刘春生，张晶晶，高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系火山岩气藏有效储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 420-428.
[10] 孙辉，吕福亮，范国章，刘少治，鲁银涛，陈宇航. 三级层序内受底流影响的富砂深水沉积演化规律——以东非鲁武马盆地中中新统为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 106-115.
[11] 张少敏，操应长，朱如凯，王尉，涂建琪，毛治国，白斌. 雅布赖盆地小湖次凹细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积环境探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(2): 309-319.
[12] 陈彬滔，潘树新，方乐华，张庆石，李成刚，梁苏娟. 松辽盆地齐家—古龙凹陷青山口组泥页岩层段储层特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(2): 298-308.
[13] 陈瑞银，王汇彤，陈建平，刘玉莹. 实验方法评价松辽盆地烃源岩的生排烃效率[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(5): 915-921.
[14] 刘超，印长海，卢双舫. 变系数ΔLgR烃源岩测井评价技术关键参数厘定方法及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(10): 1925-1931.
[15] 王卓卓,施立志，张永生. 松辽盆地北部大庆长垣浅层气成藏特征分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(9): 1350-1357.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!