天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地球化学 • 上一篇    下一篇

济阳坳陷深层裂解气成因鉴别及其成藏差异性

杨显成,蒋有录，耿春雁   

  1. 1.中国石油大学(华东),山东 青岛 257061； 
    2.中国石化股份有限公司胜利油田分公司地质科学研究院，山东东营257000
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-26 修回日期:2013-12-30 出版日期:2014-08-10 发布日期:2014-08-10
  • 作者简介:杨显成(1969-)，男，四川岳池人，高级工程师，博士，主要从事油气地质综合研究. E-mail:yangxch215@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化攻关项目“断陷盆早期充填层系成藏要素与油气富集” (编号:P00708)资助.
     

Origin and Accumulation of Cracking Gas in the Deep Buried Horizons in Jiyang Depression

YANG Xian-cheng，JIANG You-lu，GENG Chun-yan   

  1. 1.China University of Petroleum(Huadong),Qingdao 257061,China;
    2.Geological Scientific Research Institute,Shengli Oil Field Subsidiary Company,SINOPEC,Dongying 257000,China
  • Received:2013-10-26 Revised:2013-12-30 Online:2014-08-10 Published:2014-08-10

PDF (PC)

597

摘要：

济阳坳陷深层裂解气藏成因较为复杂，影响了深层天然气的认识和勘探。利用天然气组分和碳同位素等鉴别了原油裂解气和干酪根裂解气，进一步分析了2类成因的成藏差异性。原油裂解气表现为Ln(C2/C3)值随Ln(C1/C2)值增大而增大；干酪根裂解气随Ln(C1/C2)值的增大，Ln(C2/C3)值基本不变。在有机质类型和热演化程度大致相当的情况下，原油裂解气δ13C1值、δ13C2值、δ13C3值与相应的干酪根裂解气的最大差值分别为-12.4‰、-8.8‰和7.5‰；随着δ13C1值或(δ13C1-δ13C2)值的增大，干酪根裂解气(δ13C2-δ13C3)值快速减小，而裂解气(δ13C2-δ13C3)值变化微弱。干酪根裂解气藏表现为早期油气扩散、断裂活动停止和后期天然气充注，原油裂解气藏体现为早期油气充注、岩性侧向封堵和后期古油藏裂解的成藏规律。2种裂解气成因开启了深层天然气勘探的新思路，并指出了其勘探方向，对深层勘探具有重要的指导意义。
 

关键词: 济阳坳陷, 深层, 干酪根裂解气, 原油裂解气, 成藏差异性

Abstract:

The origin of cracking gas in the deep buried horizons is very complicated,and it is one of the main limits for gas exploration in Jiyang Depression.Based on gas component and carbon isotope analysis,it is possible to distinguish between oil cracking gas and kerogen cracking gas.Oil cracking gas is featured by ln(C2/C3) increasing with ln(C1/C2);but as for kerogen cracking gas,ln(C2/C3) was almost constant despite of the increase of ln(C1/C2).When the organic matter type is the same and thermal maturity is similar,the difference of δ13C1,δ13C2,and  δ13C3  between oil cracking gas and kerogen cracking gas can be up to -12.4‰,-8.8‰ and 7.5‰,respectively.With the increase ofδ13C1or (δ13C1-δ13C2),(δ13C2-δ13C3) of kerogen cracking gas decreased rapidly,while that value of oil cracking gas are almost constant.This study also demonstrated the differences in gas accumulation between these two kinds of gas reservoir.As for kerogen cracking gas,fault activities damaged oil and gas reservoir that formed in early period,and gas reservoir formed in lithologic traps in low lying structural belt during late period when fault activity stopped.As for oil cracking gas,oil and gas accumulated in early period sealed by lithology difference,and oil cracked in late period to form cracking gas reservoir.Understanding in the origin of the two kinds of cracking gas reservoir opened a new concept in gas exploration,and this is significant for exploration in deep buried horizons.
 

Key words:

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+13

［1］Wang Wenlin.Formation conditions of deep-seated condensate gas reservoir in the Paleogene in Dongying Sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2007,14(3):55-57.［王文林.东营凹陷古近系深层凝析气藏形成条件[J].油气地质与采收率,2007,14(3):55-57.］
［2］Li Xiaojun,Li Wentao,Zhang Haijun.Cracking gas reservoir-forming analysis and exploration orientation in Jiyang Depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2005,12(1):42-45.［李孝军,李文涛,张海君.济阳坳陷裂解气成藏条件及勘探方向[J].油气地质与采收率,2005,12(1):42-45.］
［3］Yang Xiancheng,Sui Fenggui.The main controlling factors of deep cracked gas accumulation in Dongying Sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2007,28(5):363-565.［杨显成,隋风贵.东营凹陷深层裂解气成藏主控因素[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(5):363-565.］
［4］Wang Li,Jin Qiang,Lin Lamei, et al. The geochemical characteristics of nature gas and discussion on gas source in Bogu 4 buried hill[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(5):715-719.［王力,金强,林腊梅,等.济阳坳陷孤北—渤南地区渤古4潜山天然气地球化学特征及气源探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(5):715-719.］
［5］Song Mingshui,Zhang Xuecai.Discussion on deep gas geochemical characteristics and genesis of Bonan sag in Jiyang Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2004,15(6):646-649.［宋明水,张学才.济阳坳陷渤南深层天然气的地球化学特征及成因探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2004,15(6):646-649.］
［6］Li Yanjun,Song Guoqi,Li Wentao, et al. A fossil oil reservoir and the gas origin in the Lower Sha-4 member of the well Fengshen 1 area,the north Dongying zone of the Jiyang Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2010,31(2):173-179.［李延军,宋国奇,李文涛,等.济阳坳陷东营凹陷北带丰深1井区深层沙四下古油藏与天然气成因[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(2):173-179.］
［7］Chen Rongshu.Natural Gas Geology[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,1989.［陈荣书.天然气地质学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989.］
［8］Li Xiangchen.Study on effective hydrocarbon source rocks and relationship between them and nature gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2003,14(1):53-56.［李祥臣.有效气源岩及其与天然气藏的关系探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(1):53-56.］
［9］Zhu Guangyou,Jin Qiang,Zhang Shanwen, et al. Salt lake-saline lake sedimentary combination and petroleum accumulation in the Bonan Sag[J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica,2004,24(1):25-30.［朱光有,金强,张善文,等.渤南洼陷盐湖—咸水湖沉积组合及其油气聚集[J].矿物学报,2004,24(1):25-30.］
［10］Wang Juan,Jin Qiang,Ma Guozheng, et al. Catalytic action of sulphate evaporates in pyrolytic gas generation of source rocks[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(1):26-31.［王娟,金强,马国政,等.高成熟阶段膏岩等盐类物质在烃源岩热解生烃过程中的催化作用[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(1):26-31.］
［11］Yuan Dongshan,Zhang Zhihuan,Zeng Yantao, et al. Organic matter types and organic facies of source rocks in the 4thmember of Shahejie Formation in Bonan Sub-sag Zhanhua Sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(1):125-128.［袁东山,张枝焕,曾艳涛,等.沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙四段烃源岩有机相[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(1):125-128.］
［12］Ren Yongjun,Zhou Yaoqi,Zha Ming, et al. Maturity of Lower Tertiary source rocks in Dongying Depression[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2006,30(2):6-10.［任拥军,周瑶琪,查明,等.东营凹陷古近系烃源岩成熟度特征[J].中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版,2006,30(2):6-10.］
［13］Behar F,Kressmann S.Experimental simulation in Confined system and kinetic modeling of kerogen and oil cracking[J].Organic Geochemistry,1991,19(19):173-189.
［14］Prinzhofer A,Alain Y.Genetic and post-genetic molecular and isotopic fractionations in natural gases[J].Chemical Geology,1995,126(3):281-290
［15］Chen Shijia,Fu Xiaowen,Ma Lining, et al. Genetic identification method of kerogen-cracked gases oil-cracked gases[J].Experimental Petroleum Geology,2002,24(4):364-366.［陈世加,付晓文,马力宁,等.干酪根裂解气和原油裂解气的成因判识方法[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(4):364-366.］
［16］Wang Zhenping,Fu Xiaotai,Lu Shuangfang, et al. An analogue experiment of gas generating by crude oil cracking,Characters of products and its significance[J].Natural Gas Industry,2001,21(3):12-15.［王振平,付晓泰,卢双舫,等.原油裂解成气模拟实验、产物特征及其意义[J].天然气工业,2001,21(3):12-15.］
［17］Zhao Mengjun,Zeng Fangang,Qin Shengfei, et al. Two pyrolytic gases found and proved in Talimu Basin [J].Natural Gas Industry,2001,21(1):35-39.［赵孟军,曾凡刚,秦胜飞,等.塔里木发现和证实两种裂解气[J].天然气工业,2001,21(1):35-39.］
［18］Zhao Wenzhi ,Wang Zecheng,Wang Yigang, et al. Formation mechanism of highly effective gas pools in the Feixianguan Formation in the NE Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Review,2006,52(5):708-718.［赵文智,汪泽成,王一刚,等.四川盆地东北部飞仙关组高效气藏形成机理[J].地质论评,2006,52(5):708-718.］
［19］Gao Shengjun,Chen Yicai,Li Yanjun, et al. Pyrolysis on crude oil and characteristics of Sha 4 member cracking gas,Dongying Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(1):32-35.［高生军,陈义才,李延军,等.东营凹陷沙四段原油裂解热模拟及产物特征[J].天然气地质科学,2009,20(1):32-35.］
［20］Tian Hui,Xiao Xianming,Li Xianqing, et al. Comparison of gas generation and carbon isotope fractionation of methane from marine kerogen-and crude oil-cracking gases[J].Geochimica,2007,36(1):71-76.［田辉,肖贤明,李贤庆,等.海相干酪根与原油裂解气甲烷生成及碳同位素分馏的差异研究[J].地球化学,2007,36(1):71-76.］
［21］Zhao Wenzhi,Wang Zhaoyun,Zhang Shuichang, et al. Successive generation of natural gas from organic materials and its significance in future exploration[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(2):1-7.［赵文智,王兆云,张水昌,等.有机质“接力生气”模式的提出及其在勘探中的意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(2):1-7.］
[1] 杨海军，张荣虎，杨宪彰，王珂，王俊鹏，唐雁刚，周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[2] 朱光有，曹颖辉，闫磊，杨海军，孙崇浩，张志遥，李婷婷，陈永权. 塔里木盆地8 000m以深超深层海相油气勘探潜力与方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 755-772.
[3] 陈斐然，张义杰，朱光有，张宝收，卢玉红，张志遥. 塔里木盆地台盆区深层天然气地球化学特征及成藏演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 880-891.
[4] 倪新锋，沈安江，韦东晓，乔宇婷，王莹. 碳酸盐岩沉积学研究热点与进展：AAPG百年纪念暨2017年会及展览综述[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 729-742.
[5] 龙胜祥，冯动军，李凤霞，杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[6] 高文杰，李贤庆，张光武，魏强，张吉振，祁帅，陈金明. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带深层致密砂岩气藏储层致密化与成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 226-235.
[7] 于京都, 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 郭秋麟. 我国深层天然气资源潜力、勘探前景与有利方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1398-1408.
[8] 肖敦清, 姜文亚, 蒲秀刚, 王娜, 岳云福, 孙超囡, 代昆, 滑双君. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷中深层天然气成藏条件与资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1409-1421.
[9] 白雪峰, 梁江平, 张文婧, 付丽, 彭建亮, 薛涛, 杨立伟, 刘继莹. 松辽盆地北部深层天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1443-1454.
[10] 沈安江，付小东，张友，郑兴平，刘伟，邵冠铭,曹彦清. 塔里木盆地塔东地区震旦系—下古生界碳酸盐岩油气生储条件与勘探领域[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 1-16.
[11] 徐春春，邹伟宏，杨跃明，段勇，沈扬，罗冰，倪超，付小东，张建勇. 中国陆上深层油气资源勘探开发现状及展望[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1139-1153.
[12] 姚根顺，伍贤柱，孙赞东，余春昊，葛云华，杨贤友，文龙，倪超，付小东，张建勇. 中国陆上深层油气勘探开发关键技术现状及展望[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1154-1164.
[13] 张建勇，倪新峰，吴兴宁，李文正，郝毅，陈娅娜，吕学菊，谷明峰，田瀚，朱茂. 中国主要克拉通盆地深层白云岩优质储层发育主控因素及分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1165-1175.
[14] 刘岩，杨池银，肖敦清，廖前进，周立宏，于学敏，国建英，蒲秀刚，姜文亚，邹磊落，聂国振，刘庆新，滑双君. 裂陷湖盆深层烃类赋存相态极限的动力学过程分析——以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 703-712.
[15] 陈杰，张剑，方杰. 阿联酋二叠系Khuff组气藏成藏模式与成藏过程分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 521-528.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!