天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

致密砂岩气藏有效厚度确定方法及应用探讨

胡林楠,赵靖舟   

  1. 西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-23 修回日期:2012-12-17 出版日期:2013-02-10 发布日期:2013-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 胡林楠youlingumu@yahoo.com.cn E-mail:youlingumu@yahoo.com.cn
  • 作者简介:胡林楠(1988-),女,陕西西安人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气成藏地质学、非常规油气地质与勘探研究. E-mail:youlingumu@yahoo.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重大科技专项“中国大型气田形成条件、富集规律及目标评价”(编号:2011ZX05007-604)资助.

A Discussion on the Determination Way to Effective Thickness of Tight Sandstone Gas Pools

HU Lin-nan,ZHAO Jing-zhou   

  1. School of Earth Science and Engineering,Xi′an Shiyou University,Xi′an 710065,China
  • Received:2012-09-23 Revised:2012-12-17 Online:2013-02-10 Published:2013-02-10

摘要:

致密砂岩气藏作为非常规油气资源的主力,已经越来越受到重视。由于致密砂岩气藏不同于常规气藏,具有储层致密、物性差、电性响应不明显的特点,因此有必要针对致密砂岩气藏的有效厚度下限进行研究。以鄂尔多斯盆地某气田上古生界致密砂岩气层为例,在“四性”关系研究的基础上,较为系统地阐述了致密砂岩气藏有效厚度下限确定的方法,重点探讨了测试法、经验统计法、压汞参数法和测井曲线法。实际试气数据和横向对比验证表明,这些方法确定的有效厚度下限合理,符合研究区实际地质特点,操作简单,应用效果好。

关键词: 有效厚度, 物性下限标准, 电性下限标准, 致密砂岩气藏

Abstract:

There is more and more attention being paid to the tight sandstone gas pools which have been the major force of the unconventional petroleum resources.As the tight sandstone gas pools are different from the conventional ones,whose reservoirs are tight,the rock property is bad,and the electrical response is unclear,thus it is necessary to clarify the lower limit of effective thickness for the tight sandstone gas pools.Based on the study of “the four property relationship”,this article takes the Upper Paleozoic tight sandstone gas reservoir of some gas field in Ordos basin as example,and systematically describes the method of determining effective thickness lower limit of tight sandstone gas pools,and the test method,the experience statistics method,the mercury injection parameter method and the logging curves method are respectively discussed.Compared with the actual gas testing data,the effective thickness lower limit determined by these methods is reasonable and meets up with the actual geological characters,of which the operation is simple and applies well.

Key words: Effective thickness, The property lower limit, The electrical lower limit, The tight sandstone gas pools

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.2




[1]Zhao Jingzhou,Fu Jinhua,Yao Jingli,et al.Quasi-continuous accumulation model of large tight sandstone gas field in Ordos basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(supplement1):37-52.[赵靖舟,付金华,姚泾利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地准连续型致密砂岩大气田成藏模式[J].石油学报,2012,33(增刊1):37-52.]

[2]Zhao Jingzhou.Conception,classification and resource potential of unconventional hydrocarbons[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(3):393-406.[赵靖舟.非常规油气有关概念、分类及资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(3):393-406.]

[3]Gao Xingjun,Song Ziqi,Cheng Zhongping,et al.Geologic factors influencing the water drive development of sandstone reservoirs and their comprehensive evaluation using Grey System Theory[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(2):68-69.[高兴军,宋子齐,程仲平,等.影响砂岩油藏水驱开发效果的综合评价方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(2):68-69.]

[4]Sulllivain K B,Mcbride E F.Diagenes of sandstones at shale contacts and diagenetic heterogeneity,Frio Formation,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletion,1991,75(1):121-138.

[5]Yang Yihua,Bao Hongping,Jia Yani,et al.Analysis on control factors of sandstone reservoir of the upper Paleozoic in Ordos basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2008,10(1):25-32.[杨奕华,包洪平,贾亚妮,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界砂岩储集层控制因素分析[J].古地理学报,2008,10(1):25-32.]

[6]Fang Chao,Xu Zhenyong,Zhang Kexin,et al.The main reservoir in D oilfield four property relationship study[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2009,(13):130-132.[方超,徐振永,张克鑫,等.D油田主力储层四性关系研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2009,(13):130-132.]

[7]DZ/T 0217-2005.Regulation of Petroleum Reserves Estimation[S].Beijing:Ministry of Land and Resources of the People′s Republic of China,2005.[DZ/T 0217-2005.石油天然气储量计算规范[S].北京:中华人民共和国国土资源部,2005.]

[8]Yang Tongyou,Fan Shangjiong,Chen Yuanqian,et al.Petroleum and Natural Gas Reserves Calculation Method[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1990:31-46.[杨通佑,范尚炯,陈元千,等.石油及天然气储量计算方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1990:31-46.]

[9]Guo Rui.Supplement to determining method of cut-off value of net pay[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(5):140-144.[郭睿.储集层物性下限值确定方法及其补充[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(5):140-144.]

[10]Yang Shenglai,Wei Junzhi.Reservoir Physics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008:219-229.[杨胜来,魏俊之.油层物理学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:219-229.]

[11]Zhong Shumin,Liu Chuanping,Yang Qingshan.A method for determining the effective thickness of ultra low permeable sandstone reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,1999,18(5):46-48.[钟淑敏,刘传平,杨青山.一种有效确定特低渗透砂岩储层有效厚度的方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1999,18(5):46-48.]

[12]Wang Xiangrong,Zhang Jian,Li Guojun,et al.Reservoir parameter interpretation with conventional electric resistivity logging and its application[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2005,24(6):97-100.[王向荣,张建,李国君,等.普通电阻率测井解释储层参数的方法及应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(6):97-100.]

[13]Liu Jinyun.Research on the minimum net pay thickness in low permeability reservoirs[J].Offshore Oil,2008,28(3):70-73.[柳锦云.低渗透油藏有效厚度下限标准研究[J].海洋石油,2008,28(3):70-73.]

[14]Geng Longxiang,Tang Xingwang,Yang Hongbin.Study of effective pay thickness division for hydrocarbon zone in Dongpu depression[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,1998,5(4):26-18.[耿龙祥,汤兴旺,杨宏斌.东濮凹陷油气层有效厚度划分研究[J].断块油气田,1998,5(4):26-18.]

[16]Zhao Wenzhi,Bi Haibin.Differences of net pay estimation between China and SEC[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(3):125-129.[赵文智,毕海滨.浅析中国与西方在储量计算中确定有效厚度之差异[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):125-129.]

 


 
[1] 黄禹忠,刁素,栗铁峰,何红梅. 致密砂岩气藏压裂伤害及对策——以川西坳陷ZH构造JS12气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 579-585.
[2] 王颖, 邓守伟, 范晶, 邹晓品, 杨静. 松辽盆地南部重点断陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1455-1464.
[3] 张吉,侯科锋,李浮萍,田敏,张志刚. 基于储层地质知识库约束的致密砂岩气藏储量评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏14区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1322-1329.
[4] 黄禹忠,刁素,尹琅,栗铁峰,刘琦. 致密砂岩气藏水平井细分段适应性分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 460-465.
[5] 盛军,孙卫,段宝虹,刘艳妮,张弢,曹雷. 致密砂岩气藏水锁效应机理探析——以苏里格气田东南区上古生界盒8段储层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(10): 1972-1978.
[6] 李奇,高树生,杨朝蓬,冯全乐,叶礼友. 致密砂岩气藏阈压梯度对采收率的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(9): 1442-1450.
[7] 胡勇,李熙喆,卢祥国,焦春艳,王庆生,朱秋林. 高含水致密砂岩气藏储层与水作用机理[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(7): 1072-1076.
[8] 孙同文,付广,吕延防,胡 明,刘 哲,王浩然. 南堡1号构造中浅层油气富集主控因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(7): 1042-1051.
[9] 徐梦雅,冉启全,李宁,沈冠中. 应力敏感性致密气藏压裂井动态反演新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(12): 2058-2064.
[10] 费世祥,王东旭,林刚,潘晓丽,王勇,张保国,徐运动,刘雪玲. 致密砂岩气藏水平井整体开发关键地质技术——以苏里格气田苏东南区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(10): 1620-1629.
[11] 王少飞,安文宏,陈鹏,刘道天,梁鸿军. 苏里格气田致密气藏特征与开发技术[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1): 138-145.
[12] 游利军,李雷,康毅力,石玉江,张海涛,杨小明. 考虑有效应力与含水饱和度的致密砂岩气层供气能力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(4): 764-769.
[13] 赵靖舟, 王力, 孙兵华, 白玉彬, 吴伟涛. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部构造演化对上古生界大气田形成的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(6): 875-881.
[14] 罗文军;李延钧;李其荣;杨坚;袁霞;郭瑞超 . 致密砂岩气藏高渗透带与古构造关系探讨—以川中川南过渡带内江—大足地区上三叠统须二段致密砂岩气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(1): 70-74.
[15] 董晓霞;梅廉夫;全永旺. . 致密砂岩气藏的类型和勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(3): 351-355.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 聂采军,赵军,夏宏权, 刘之的. 地层破裂压力测井预测的统计模式研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(6): 633 -636 .
[2] 杨满平,李允. 考虑储层初始有效应力的岩石应力敏感性分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(6): 601 -603 .
[3] 谢兴礼;朱玉新;冀光;夏静;. 气藏产能评价方法及其应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(3): 276 -279 .
[4] 胥洪俊;范明国;康征;常志强;张绍俊 . 考虑渗透率应力敏感的低渗气藏产能预测公式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(1): 145 -147 .
[5] 张 乐,姜在兴,郭振廷. 构造应力与油气成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(1): 32 -36 .
[6] 相建民;. 塔里木油田水平井优化设计方法及跟踪效果评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 435 -438 .
[7] 王天祥;朱忠谦;李汝勇;陈朝晖;吴震;. 大型整装异常高压气田开发初期开采技术研究――以克拉2气田为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 439 -444 .
[8] 朱华银;陈建军;李江涛;胡勇;. 疏松砂岩气藏出砂机理研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(3): 296 -299 .
[9] 王善聪;赵 玉;李江涛;梅 洪;胡昌德 . 三层分采及分层测压技术在涩北气田的应用研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(2): 307 -311 .
[10] 刘吉余;马志欣;孙淑艳 . 致密含气砂岩研究现状及发展展望[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(3): 316 -319 .