天然气地球科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 674–683.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2011.04.674

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏北盆地白驹凹陷古近系层序地层及生储盖组合分析

 魏祥峰, 张廷山, 魏祥华, 梁兴, 姚秋昌   

  1. 1.西南石油大学资源与环境学院,四川 成都 610500;
    2.中国石化中原油田公司,河南 濮阳 457001;
    3.中国石油浙江油田公司,浙江 杭州 310023
  • 收稿日期:2010-05-05 修回日期:2011-05-31 出版日期:2011-08-10 发布日期:2011-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 魏祥峰weixiangfeng1984@163.com E-mail:weixiangfeng1984@163.com
  • 作者简介:魏祥峰(1984-),男,山东济宁人,博士研究生,主要从事沉积学、层序地层学研究.

Paleogene Sequence Stratigraphy and Source-Reservoi-Cap Rock Assemblage in Baiju Sag

 WEI  Xiang-Feng, ZHANG  Ting-Shan, WEI  Xiang-Hua, LIANG  Xin, YAO Qiu-Chang   

  1. 1.Institute of Resources and Environment,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China;
    2.Zhongyuan Oil Field Branch Company of SINOPEC,Puyang 457001,China;
    3.Zhejiang Oilfield Company of PetroChina,Hangzhou 310023,China
  • Received:2010-05-05 Revised:2011-05-31 Online:2011-08-10 Published:2011-08-10

摘要:

在Vail经典层序地层学理论指导下,综合利用岩心、钻井、测井以及地震等资料,在白驹凹陷古近系共识别出6个层序界面,划分出1个Ⅰ级层序、2个Ⅱ级层序、5个Ⅲ级层序,并认为Ⅲ级层序SQ1—SQ4、SQ5分别与盆地坳陷—断陷阶段和强烈断陷阶段相对应。运用等时对比理论和技术方法,建立了白驹凹陷古近系层序地层格架,并详细地讨论了古近系Ⅲ级层序与生储盖组合的关系,认为低水位及晚期高水位体系域为有利储层的发育位置,湖侵体系域及早期高水位体系域则为烃源岩和盖层的发育位置,之间相互组合形成了3套生储盖组合,其中下生储盖组合为白驹凹陷古近系最好的一套生储盖组合。

关键词: 层序地层, 生储盖组合, 古近系, 白驹凹陷

Abstract:

Based on drilling core,bore well,well logs and seismic data,we use the calssical Vail theory of sequence stratigraphy to identify six sequence boundaries in Paleogene Baiju sag,which is divided into one first-order sequence,two second\|order sequences,and five three-order sequences.The third-order sequences of SQ1-SQ4 and SQ5 are corresponding to the basin's subsiding-fault depressing stage and strong fault-depressing stage.We use the isochronous correlation to establish the Paleogene sequence stratigraphic framework in the Baiju sag,and discuss the relationship between source-reservoir-cap rock assemblages and third-order sequences.The low water level and later high water level system fields are the favorable place of reservoir development.The transgressive and early high water lelve system fields are the profitable place of source and cap rock formation.Three sets of source-reservoir-cap assemblages are formed among these fields,and the lower assemblage is the best one in Paleogene in the Baiju sag.

Key words: Sequence stratigraphy, Source-reservoir-cap rock assemblage, Paleogene, Baiju Sag.

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3+4

[1]Liu Chenglin,Zhu Xiaomin,Fei Anwei,et al.Study on hydrocarbon reservoir forming of mid shallow strata in Baiju sag of Subei basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2003,10(3):28-30.[刘成林,朱筱敏,费安玮,等.苏北盆地白驹凹陷中浅层油气成藏研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2003,10(3):28-30.]
[2]Liu Chenglin,Zhu Xiaomin,Fei Anwei,et al.A study on petroleum accumulation of deep strata in Baiju depression of Subei basin[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2003,25(5):23-25.[刘成林,朱筱敏,费安玮,等.苏北盆地白驹凹陷深层油气成藏研究[J].西南石油学院学报,2003,25(5):23-25.] 
[3]Gu Jiayu.Framework concepts and models of sequence stratigraphy in nonmarine petroliferous basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1995,22(4):6-10.[顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):6-10.]
[4]Li Sitian,Lin Changsong,Xie Xinong,et al.Approaches of nonmarine sequence stratigraphy:A case study on the Mesozoic Ordos basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,1995,2(3/4):133-148.[李思田,林畅松,解习农,等.大型陆相盆地层序地层学研究——以鄂尔多斯中生代盆地为例[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3/4):133-148.]
[5]Deng Hongwen,Wang Hongliang,Li Xizhe.Identification and correlation techniques of sequence stratigraphic base-levels and their application[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1996,17(3):177-184.[邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆.层序地层地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-184.]
[6]Xu Huaida.Some problems in study of continental sequence stratigraphy[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1997,18(2):83-89.[徐怀大.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):83-89.]
[7]Currie B S.Sequence stratigraphy of nonmarine Jurassic-Cretaceous rocks,central cordillenan forel and basin system[J].GSA Bulletin,1997,109(6):1206-1222.[8]Martinsen O J,Ryseth A,Helland Hansen W,et al.Stratigraphic base level and fluvial architecture:Ericson sandstone(Campanian),rock springs uplift,SW Wyoming,USA[J].Sedimentology,1999,46(2):235-259.
[9]Liu Haitao,Chen Shaoping.Division of high-resolution sequence formation in the middle member of Shahejie Ⅲ in Tiankou and its contiguous block in Linnan oil field and prediction of petroliferous formations[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2003,14(3):200-202.[刘海涛,陈少平.临南油田田口区块邻区沙三中亚段高分辨率层序地层的划分和含油气层系预测[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(3):200-202.]
[10]Liu Jianfeng,Peng Jun,Zhou Kang,et al.High resolution sequence stratigraphy analysis of 2nd member of Xujiahe Formation in middle and south Sichuan transitional zone[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(2):199-203.[刘建锋,彭军,周康,等.川中—川南过渡带须家河组二段高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(2):199-203.]
[11]Xing Weidong,Xiang Zan,Qian Bin,et al.Methods on establishment of  fine equitime stratigraphic framework of the 1st member of the Kongdian Formation in Zaoyuan oilfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(4):617-620.[邢卫东,向赞,钱斌,等.枣园油田孔一段精细等时地层格架建立方法[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(4):617-620.]
[12]Ke Guangming,Zheng Rongcai,Shi He.Lithofacies and paleogeography of Paleogene tectonic sequences in the Subei basin and their evolution[J].Geology in China,2006,33(6):1305-1311.[柯光明,郑荣才,石和.苏北盆地古近纪构造—层序岩相古地理特征与演化[J].中国地质,2006,33(6):1305-1311.][JP]
[13]Tang Yongmei,Liang Xing,Zhou Songyuan,et al.Application of logging evaluation technique for thin layer in Baiju sag[J].Petroleum Geophysics,2009,31(4):251-255.[汤永梅,梁兴,周松源,等.薄层测井评价技术在白驹凹陷的应用[J].油气地球物理,2009,31(4):251-255.] 
[14]Tao Li,Zhang Tingshan,Dai Chuanrui,et al.The sediment source of 1st member of Taizhou Formation in Baiju depression,Subei basin[J].Geology in China,2010,37(2):414-420.[陶丽,张廷山,戴传瑞,等.苏北盆地白驹凹陷泰州组一段沉积物源分析[J].中国地质,2010,37(2):414-420.]
[15]Luo Huaizhong,Liang Xing,Zhang Jiehui,et al.Hydrocarbon enrichment patterns and pooling modes in Baiju sag,Subei basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(9):22-24.[罗怀忠,梁兴,张介辉,等.苏北盆地白驹凹陷油气富集规律与成藏模式[J].天然气工业,2010,30(9):22-24.]
[16]Liu Baojun,Zeng Yunfu.Elements in Lithopalaeo-geolography and Its Working Methods[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1985:1-432.[刘宝珺,曾允孚.岩相古地理基础和工作方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1985:1-432.]
[17]Zhao Chenglin,Zhu Xiaomin.Sedimentary Petrology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2000:6-24.[赵澄林,朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000:6-24.]
[18]Jiang Zaixing.Sedimentary[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003:7-498.[姜在兴.沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:7-498.]
[19]Vail P R.Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy:Part 1,seismic stratigraphy interpretation proceduce(in Atlas of seismic startigraphy,Bally)[J].AAPG Studies in Geology,1987,27(1):1-10.
[20]Xu Huaida.The Theory of Sequence Stratigraphy[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1993:1-519.[徐怀大.层序地层学原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993:1-519.]
[21]Ji Youliang,Zhang Shiqi.The Sequence Stratigraphy of the Fault-depression Lake Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1996:1-130.[纪友亮,张世奇.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996:1-130.]
[22]Ji Youliang,Zhang Shiqi.The Theory of Sequence Stratigraphy and Mechanic Patterns of Formation Cause of Sequence[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1998:1-196.[纪友亮,张世奇.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:1-196.]
[23]Chi Qiu′e,Gong Fuhua.The Basis and the Application of Sequence Stratigraphy[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2001:1-228.[池秋鄂,龚福华.层序地层学基础与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:1-228.]
[24]Qiu Haijun,Xu Zhiqin,Qiao Dewu.Progress in the study of the tectonic evolution of the Subei basin[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2006,25(9/10):1117-1120.[邱海峻,许志琴,乔德武.苏北盆地构造演化研究进展[J].地质通报,2006,25(9/10):1117-1120.]

[1] 李梦茹,唐友军,刘岩,胡辉,贺其川. 江陵凹陷不同地区原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1240-1251.
[2] 李红哲,马峰,谢梅,杨巍,张成娟,王朴,赵健. 柴达木盆地阿尔金东段基岩气藏盖层特征及控藏机制#br# [J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1102-1110.
[3] 吕正祥,王先东,吴家洋,卿元华. 渤海海域中部古近系湖相碳酸盐岩储层成岩演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 921-931.
[4] 曹颖辉,李洪辉,闫磊,王洪江,张君龙,杨敏,赵一民. 塔里木盆地满西地区寒武系台缘带分段演化特征及其对生储盖组合的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 796-806.
[5] 杨丽杰,侯读杰,陈晓东,刁慧. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中部古近系地层水化学特征及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 559-571,596.
[6] 吴靖,姜在兴,王欣. 湖相细粒沉积岩三—四级层序地层划分方法与特征——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 199-210.
[7] 肖敦清, 姜文亚, 蒲秀刚, 王娜, 岳云福, 孙超囡, 代昆, 滑双君. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷中深层天然气成藏条件与资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1409-1421.
[8] 王媛,林畅松,李浩,孙彦达,何海全,王清龙,姬牧野,张曼莉. 高频层序地层格架中碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究——以哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区下石炭统谢尔普霍夫阶为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 28-41.
[9] 任宇泽,林畅松,高志勇,刘景彦,宋宁宁. 塔里木盆地西南坳陷白垩系层序地层与沉积充填演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1298-1311.
[10] 刘英杰,黄传炎,岳家恒,郭来源. 陆相湖盆层序地层格架内有机质发育及控制因素分析——以中上扬子建南地区侏罗系东岳庙段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 930-938.
[11] 廖计华,王华,甘华军,孙鸣,王颖,蔡露露,郭帅,郭佳. 莺歌海盆地东方区中新统黄流组一段高精度层序地层特征与隐蔽油气藏预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 241-253.
[12] 康海亮,林畅松,牛成民,叶冬青,庄兴燕. 渤海西部海域沙垒田凸起古近系边缘断裂构造样式与沉积充填响应[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 254-261.
[13] 魏玮,蒋有录,杨德相,刘华,王鑫. 渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷河间洼槽古近系砂岩储层成岩—成藏耦合关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(8): 1477-1488.
[14] 陈波,王波,管斌,蔡智洪,孙国强,史基安. 柴北缘西段古近系优质储层孔隙成因类型及其控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(8): 1454-1465.
[15] 王振升,汤戈,苏俊青,胡俊刚,周育文,王冠群. 尼日尔Moul凹陷白垩系Yogou组海陆过渡相沉积与成藏条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1153-1163.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!