段云江(1988-),男,云南玉溪人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事构造地质研究. E-mail:dyjiang-tlm@petrochina.com.cn. |
收稿日期: 2022-07-04
修回日期: 2022-11-22
网络出版日期: 2023-05-06
Discussion on balance restoration of salt structure deformation and related problems in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin
Received date: 2022-07-04
Revised date: 2022-11-22
Online published: 2023-05-06
Supported by
The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019YFC0605505)
塔里木盆地库车坳陷发育古近系和新近系2套膏盐岩,盐下中生界已经落实万亿方天然气储量,是我国重要的天然气产区。库车坳陷盐下中生界构造型油气藏是油气勘探的重点,盐构造样式解析、盐构造变形机制、盐构造平衡恢复及变形期次分析是库车坳陷盐构造研究的难点。利用高精度三维地震拼接剖面、钻井和区域地质资料,选取库车坳陷西段和东段2条典型剖面,通过3DMove软件进行盐构造平衡恢复,分别恢复盐上层、盐下层和盐层的构造变形,复原构造变形前地震剖面。并针对复原过程中的具体问题,从盐构造恢复方法、变形特征、演化、变形机制等4个方面进行讨论。研究结果表明盐层的恢复需要满足2个基本假设:一是忽略由于挤压造成的岩石内部缩短量;二是近似认为弱变形区或未变形区盐层的厚度不变。库车坳陷发育2期盐构造:渐新世—中新世(构造稳定期)盐层上覆地层重力差异作用诱发早期盐构造,发育盐底辟、盐丘等盐构造;上新世—全新世(构造活动期)破坏和改造早期盐构造,发育挤压型盐构造。挤压作用、盐层塑性流动是盐构造形成的主要原因:盐上层发育盐滑脱逆冲断层,盐层塑性变形形成盐背斜、盐席、盐墙;盐下层发育叠瓦状逆冲断层,靠近造山带附近发育大型构造楔。沉积差异负载是诱发早期盐构造形成的主要因素,盐丘、盐底辟等早期盐构造主要发育于冲积扇前端。中生界滑脱层和基地古隆起控制盐下冲断构造的边界。膏盐层的厚度、分布范围控制着盐下逆冲推覆构造发育的数量和规模,库车坳陷西部仍然是油气勘探的重点。中生界向古隆起超覆沉积带,有利于地层岩性油气藏的发育和保存,是重要的油气勘探领域。
段云江 , 黄少英 , 罗彩明 , 朱铁 , 张慧芳 , 王振鸿 , 娄洪 , 杨果 , 周思宇 , 王川 . 塔里木盆地库车坳陷盐构造变形平衡恢复及相关问题讨论[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023 , 34(5) : 780 -793 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2022.11.006
Kuqa Depression has developed two sets of Palaeogene and Neogene paste salt rocks, with trillion cubic meters of natural gas reserves in pre-salt Mesozoic, which is an important natural gas production area in China. The structural oil and gas reservoir of Lower Mesozoic in Kuqa Depression is the focus of oil and gas exploration. The analysis of salt structure style, salt structure deformation mechanism, salt structure balance recovery and deformation period analysis are the difficulties of salt structure research in Kuqa Depression. In this paper, using high-precision three-dimensional seismic splicing profile, drilling and regional geological data, two typical sections of the western and eastern sections of the Kuqa Depression are selected. The structural balance recovery is carried out by 3DMove software, and the structural deformation of the upper salt layer, the lower salt layer and the salt layer are restored respectively. The seismic profile before structural deformation is restored. In view of the specific problems in the recovery process, the salt structure recovery method, salt structure deformation characteristics, salt structure evolution, and salt structure deformation mechanism are discussed. The results show that the recovery of the salt layer needs to meet two basic assumptions: One is to ignore the amount of internal rock shortening caused by extrusion; the other is that the thickness of salt layer in the weakly deformed or undeformed area is approximately constant. Kuqa Depression developed two salt structures: Oligocene-Miocene (tectonic stable period) on the salt layer formation gravity difference induced early salt structure, developed salt dioper, salt mound structure. Oligocene to Miocene (tectonic stable period) overlying strata gravity difference induced the early salt structure, salt diapir, salt dome and other structures, Pliocene to Holocene (tectonic active period) destroyed and reformed the early salt structure, the development of extrusion salt structure. Extrusion action and plastic flow of salt layer are the main reasons for the formation of salt structure. The salt slip and unthrust fault develops in the upper salt layer, and the plastic deformation of the salt layer forms the salt anticline, salt mat and salt wall to develop in the lower salt layer, and the large structural wedge develops near the orogenic belt. Deposition differential load is the main factor inducing the formation of the early salt structure. The early salt structure such as salt mound and salt diopia mainly develops at the front end of the alluvial fan. The boundary of Mesozoic and base ancient uplift. The thickness and distribution range of the paste salt layer control the quantity and scale of the thrust cover structure development under the salt, and the west of Kuqa Depression is still the focus of oil and gas exploration. The overlying sedimentary zone from the Mesozoic boundary is conducive to the development and preservation of the formation of lithological oil and gas deposits, and it is an important field of oil and gas exploration.
1 |
黄少英,王月然,魏红兴.塔里木盆地库车坳陷盐构造特征及形成演化[J].大地构造与成矿学,2009, 33(1):117-123.
HUANG S Y, WANG Y R, WEI H X. Characteristics of salt structural and its evolution in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009, 33(1): 117-123.
|
2 |
王招明.试论库车前陆冲断带构造顶蓬效应[J].天然气地球科学,2013, 24(4):671-677.
WANG Z M. Discussion of ceiling effect in foreland thrust belt of Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(4):671-677.
|
3 |
李德江,易士威,冉启贵,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷东秋里塔格构造样式及勘探前景[J].天然气地球科学,2016, 27(4):584-590.
LI D J, YI S W, RAN Q G, et al. Structural characters and potentiality of the east Qiulitage anticline belt in Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(4):584-590.
|
4 |
徐振平,谢会文,李勇,等.库车坳陷克拉苏构造带盐下差异构造变形特征及控制因素[J].天然气地球科学,2012, 23(6):1034-1038.
XU Z P, XIE H W, LI Y, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of the subsalt differential structure in the Kelasu structural belt,Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(6):1034-1038.
|
5 |
杨敏,赵一民,闫磊,等.塔里木盆地东秋里塔格构造带构造特征及其油气地质意义[J].天然气地球科学,2018, 29(6): 826-833.
YANG M, ZHAO Y M, YAN L, et al. Structural features of the eastern Qiulitage tectonic belt and petroleum geological significance[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(6):826-833.
|
6 |
李艳友,漆家福.库车坳陷克拉苏构造带分层收缩构造变形及其主控因素[J].地质科学,2012,47(3):607-617.
LI Y Y, QI J F. Delamination contractional deformation and it main controlled factors of Kelasu structural zone in Kuqa Depression[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2012,47(3):607-617.
|
7 |
漆家福,李勇,吴超,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷收缩构造变形模型若干问题的讨论[J].中国地质,2013,40(1):106-120.
QI J F,LI Y,WU C,et al.The interpretation models and discus-sion on the contractive structure deformation of Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Geology in China,2013,40(1):106-120.
|
8 |
汤良杰,金之钧,贾承造,等.库车前陆褶皱—冲断带前缘大型盐推覆构造[J].地质学报,2004(1):17-25,147-148.
TANG L J, JIN Z J, JIA C Z, et al.A large-scale salt nappe complex in the leading edge of the Kuqa Foreland Fold-Thrust Belt, Tarim Basin, Northwest China[J]. Acta Geologic Sinica, 2004(1): 17-25,147-148.
|
9 |
邬光辉,王招明,刘玉魁,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷盐构造运动学特征[J].地质论评,2004,50(5):476-483.
WU G H, WANG Z M, LIU Y K,et al.Kinematics characteristics of the Kuqa Depression in the Tarim Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2004,50(5): 476-483.
|
10 |
汪新,唐鹏程,谢会文,等. 库车坳陷西段新生代盐构造特征及演化[J].大地构造与成矿学,2009,33(1):57-65.
WANG X,TANG P C,XIE H W,et al.Cenozoic salt structu-res and evolution in the western Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin,China[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2009,33(1):57-65.
|
11 |
汪伟,尹宏伟,周鹏,等.塔里木盆地含盐褶皱冲断带变形特征与变形机[J].新疆石油地质, 2019,40(1):68-73.
WANG W, YIN H W, ZHOU P, et al. Deformation characteristics and mechanism of salt-related fold thrust belt in Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(1): 68-73.
|
12 |
唐鹏程,李世琴,雷刚林,等.库车褶皱—冲断带拜城凹陷盐构造特征与成因[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2012, 37(1): 69-76,92.
TANG P C, LI S Q, LEI G L, et al.Characteristics and formation of salt structures in Baicheng Sag, Kuqa Fold-and-Thrust Belt[J].Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2012, 37(1): 69-76,92.
|
13 |
汪新,王招明,谢会文,等.塔里木库车坳陷新生代盐构造解析及其变形模拟[J].中国科学(地球科学),2010,40(12):1655-1668.
WANG X, WANG Z M, XIE H W, et al. Cenozoic salt tectonics and physical models in the Kuqa Depression of Tarim Basin China[J]. Science China(Earth Science),2010,40(12):1655-1668.
|
14 |
段云江,罗浩渝,谢会文,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷秋里塔格构造带中秋—东秋段盐相关构造特征及变形机理[J].天然气地球科学,2021,32(7):993-1008.
DUAN Y J, LUO H Y, XIE H W, et al. Salt-related structural characteristics and deformation mechanism of the Zhongqiu-Dongqiu section of the Qiulitag structural belt,Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021,32(7):993-1008.
|
15 |
赵博,汪新,冯许魁,等.库车褶冲带博孜敦底辟新生代盐构造变形期次:来自盐动力层序的证据[J].大地构造与成矿学,2016,40(5):919-927.
ZHAO B, WANG X, FENG X K, et al.Evolution of Cenozoic salt-related structures of Bozidun salt diapir, Kuqa Depression:Evidence from halokinetic sequences[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2016, 40(5):919-927.
|
16 |
段云江,黄少英,李维波,等.用离散元数值拟法研究克拉苏构造带盐构造变形机理[J].新疆石油地质,2017,38(4):414-419.
DUAN Y J, HUANG S Y, LI W B, et al. Using discrete element numerical simulation method to study salt tectonic deformation mechanism of Kelasu Structural Belt[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(4):414-419.
|
17 |
徐雯峤,汪伟,尹宏伟,等. 库车坳陷东西段盐下构造变形差异演化数值模拟分析[J]. 地质学报,2020,94(6):1740-1751.
XU W Q, WANG W, YIN H W, et al. Numerical simulation of different subsalt structural features and their evolution in the eastern and western segments of the Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(6): 1740-1751.
|
18 |
谢会文,罗浩渝,章学岐,等. 秋里塔格构造带盐下层构造变形特征及油气勘探潜力[J]. 新疆石油地质,2020,41(4):111-117.
XIE H W, LUO H Y, ZHANG X Q, et al. Structural deformation and petroleum exploration potential of subsalt layer in Qiulitage structural belt, Kuqa Depression[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020,41(4):111-117.
|
19 |
卢华复,贾承造,贾东,等.库车再生前陆盆地冲断构造楔特征[J].高校地质学报,2001,7(3):257-271.
LU H F,JIA C Z,JIA D,et al. Features of the thrust wedge of deformation belt in Kuqa rejuvenation Foreland Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2001.7(3):257-271.
|
20 |
余一欣,汤良杰,李京昌,等. 库车前陆褶皱—冲断带基底断裂对盐构造形成的影响[J]. 地质学报,2006,80(3):330-336.
YU Y X, TANG L J, LI J C, et al. Influnce of basement faults on the development of salt structures in the Kuqa foreland fold-and-thrust belt in the northern Tarim Basin[J], Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006,80(3):330-336.
|
21 |
高麟,汪新,饶刚. 库车坳陷西段盐构造二维平衡恢复与复原构造剖面分析[J].地质学报,2020, 94(6):1727-1739.
GAO L,WANG X,RAO G. Two-dimensional balanced restoration of salt structures and analysis of restored cross sections in the western Kuqa Depression[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2020,94(6):1727-1739.
|
22 |
谭秀成,王振宇,李凌,等.库车前陆盆地第三系沉积相配置及演化研究[J].沉积学报,2006,24(6):790-797.
TAN X C, WANG Z Y, LI L, et al. Arrangement and evolution of tertiary sedimentary facies in Kuche foreland basin, Xinjiang[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2006,24(6):790-797.
|
23 |
王招明,钟大康,孙海涛,等.库车坳陷中部新近系—第四系砾岩层的沉积特征及分布规律[J].沉积学报,2013,31(2):282-290.
WANG Z M, ZHONG D K, SUN H T, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and distribution of neogene-quaternary gravel layers in the middle of Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(2):282-290.
|
24 |
王清华,杨明慧,吕修祥. 库车褶皱冲断带秋里塔格构造带东、西分段构造特征与油气聚集[J]. 地质科学,2004,39(4):523-531.
WANG Q H, YANG M H, LV X X. Features of structural segmentation and accumunation of oil and gas in the Qiulitage structural belt, Kuqa fold-and-thrust belt[J].Chinese Journal of Geology, 2004,39(4):523-531.
|
25 |
李维波,李江海,王洪浩,等.库车前陆冲断带克拉苏构造带变形影响因素分析——基于离散元数值模拟研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,2017, 41(6):1001-1010.
LI W B, LI J H, WANG H H, et al. Deformation mechanisms of kelasu tectonic belt in Kuqa foreland thrust belt:Insight from discrete element numerical simulation[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2017, 41(6):1001-1010.
|
26 |
KOYI H A,GHASEMI A,HESSAMI K,et al. The mechanical relationship between strike-slip faults and salt diapirs in the Zagros fold-thrust belt[J]. Journal of the Geological Society,2009,165(6):1031-1044.
|
27 |
FUCHS S,SCHÜTZ F,FÖRSTER H J,et al. Evaluation of common mixing models for calculating bulk thermal conductivity of sedimentary rocks:Correction charts and new conversion equations[J]. Geothermics,2013,47:40-52.
|
28 |
万桂梅,汤良杰,金文正,等.盐岩在库车拗陷中的作用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(1):14-17.
WANG G M, TANG L J, JIN W Z, et al. Function of salt rock in Kuqa Sag[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition) , 2008, 30 (1): 14-17.
|
29 |
URAI J L,SPIERS C J,ZWART H J,et al.Weakening of rock salt by water during long-term creep[J].Nature,1986,324:554-557.
|
30 |
王燮培,费琦,张家骅. 石油勘探构造分析[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1990.
WANG X P,FEI Q, ZHANG J H. Structural Analysis of Petroleum Exploration[M]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press, 1990.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |