天然气地质学

砂岩气藏充注含气饱和度实验研究

展开
  • 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2.中国石油天然气集团公司天然气成藏与开发重点实验室,河北 廊坊 065007;
    3.中国石油长庆油田苏里格气田研究中心,陕西 西安 710018;
    4.东北石油大学,黑龙江 大庆 163318
胡勇(1978-),男,重庆人,高级工程师,主要从事石油天然气开发与实验研究. E-mail:huy69@petrochina.com.cn.

收稿日期: 2016-03-21

  修回日期: 2016-09-27

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-09

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“致密砂岩气有效开发评价技术”(编号:2011ZX05013-002)资助.

The experimental research of filling gas saturation in sandstone gas reservoir

Expand
  • 1.Research Institute of Exploration and Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China;2.The Key Laboratory of
    Gas Reservoir Formation and Development,Langfang 065007,China;3.Research Center of Sulige Gasfield,
    ChangqingOilfield Company,PetroChina,Xi’an 710018,China;4.Northeast Petroleum University,Daqing 163318,China

Received date: 2016-03-21

  Revised date: 2016-09-27

  Online published: 2019-09-09

摘要

针对低渗致密砂岩储层充注含气饱和度难以准确测试技术难题,综合考虑储层展布及物性差异特征、充注动力、地温条件、盖层封闭等要素,建立一套全序列砂岩储层充注含气饱和度测试实验方法,分别对渗透率为0.034×10-3μm2、0.075×10-3μm2、0.244×10-3μm2、0.505×10-3μm2、0.683×10-3μm2、1.12×10-3μm2、1.47×10-3μm2、4.77×10-3μm2、10.7×10-3μm2、38.1×10-3μm2、49.1×10-3μm2、99.4×10-3μm2、126×10-3μm2的砂岩储层,开展了气源压力为0.1MPa、0.2MPa、0.3MPa、0.5MPa、0.7MPa、0.9MPa、1.0MPa、1.2MPa、1.5MPa、1.8MPa、2.0MPa、2.5MPa、2.8MPa、3.0MPa、3.5MPa、4.0MPa、4.5MPa、5.0MPa、5.5MPa、6.0MPa、7.0MPa、8.0MPa、10.0MPa、15.0MPa、20.0MPa、25.0MPa、30.0MPa下逐级增压充注实验,记录了充注过程中各渗透率储层孔隙压力变化特征,在此基础上,采用充注实验与核磁共振实验结合的方法,对充注过程中含气饱和度变化进行了量化评价。研究结果表明:①低渗致密储层充注时具有高于门限压力进气,源、储压力平衡缓慢以及高压聚气三大特征,进气门限压力与储层渗透率关系密切,建立了门限压力与渗透率关系图版;②认识了含气饱和度(Sg)、地层压力(P)与储层渗透率(K)变化规律,拟合了含气饱和度经验计算公式,以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例,通过实验测试、密闭取心分析与经验公式计算结果对比,建立了含气饱和度与储层渗透率关系图版,为低渗致密砂岩气藏储层含气性评价提供指导;③以取心井为基础,根据含气饱和度、储层渗透率、孔隙度、厚度等参数,建立不同渗透率储层储量辟分方法,为储量分类评价提供了依据。

本文引用格式

胡勇, 徐轩, 李进步, 王继平, 朱秋影, 谢坤, 石林辉 . 砂岩气藏充注含气饱和度实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016 , 27(11) : 1979 -1984 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.11.1979

Abstract

Aimed at the problem of the determination of charging gas saturation of low permeability in tight gas reservoir,a set of testing method of full sequence charging gas saturation of sandstone reservoir is established,taking into account the reservoir distribution,reservoir petrophysical property difference,driving force,geothermal condition and cap sealing capacity.The pressurized charging gas testing has been carried out on the sandstone with permeability of 0.034×10-3μm2 ,0.075×10-3μm2,0.244×10-3μm2,0.505×10-3μm2,0.683×10-3μm2,1.12×10-3μm2,1.47×10-3μm2,4.77×10-3μm2,10.7×10-3μm2,38.1×10-3μm2,49.1×10-3μm2,99.4×10-3μm2,and 126×10-3μm2,and the gas source pressure are 0.1MPa,0.2MPa,0.3MPa,0.5MPa,0.7MPa,0.9MPa,1.0MPa,1.2MPa,1.5MPa,1.8MPa,2.0MPa,2.5MPa,2.8MPa,3.0MPa,3.5MPa,4.0MPa,4.5MPa,5.0MPa,5.5MPa,6.0MPa,7.0MPa,8.0MPa,10.0MPa,15.0MPa,20.0MPa,25.0MPa,and 30.0MPa.In the charging gas testing,the varying law of pore pressure is recorded and the gas saturation is quantitatively evaluated by the nuclear magnetic resonance.The research shows that:①Higher intake gas pressure than the threshold pressure,slow balance progress of gas source pressure and reservoir pressure and gas gathering in high pressure are the three characteristics of the low permeability sandstone tight gas reservoir in the gas charging testing.The intake gas threshold pressure is related to the reservoir permeability closely and their relation chart is established.②The varying law of gas saturation with pore pressure and reservoir permeability is got and the gas saturation empirical formula is established by fitting the testing data.Taking the Sulige gas reservoir in the Ordos Basin as an example,the empirical formula of gas saturation is verified by lab testing and confined coring analysis and the relation chart of gas saturation and permeability is established,which can guide the gas content evaluation in the low permeability tight sandstone gas reservoir.③The reserve splitting method of different permeability reservoir is established,which takes into account gas saturation,reservoir permeability,porosity and thick,providing a basis for reserve classification evaluation.

参考文献

[1]Li Mingcheng.Oil and Gas Migration[M].3rd Edition.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:179-180.[李明诚.石油与天然气运移[M].第3版.北京:石油工业出版社,2004:179-180.]
[2]Yang Baolin,Ye Jiaren,Wang Zisong,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation modelsand main controlling factors in Liaodong Bay Depression[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geoscience,2014,39(10):1507-1519.[杨宝林,叶加仁,王子嵩,等.辽东湾断陷油气成藏模式及主控因素[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2014,39(10):1507-1519.]
[3]Song Yan,Hong Feng,Xia Xinyu,et al.Syngenesis relationship between abnormal overpressure and gas pool formation:With Kuqa Depression as an example[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(3):303-306.[宋岩,洪峰,夏新宇,等.异常压力与油气藏的同生关系——以库车坳陷为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):303-306.]
[4]Zhuang Wenshan,Sun Yi,Fang Xuqing.Event of oil-gas reservoir formation and hydrocarbon enrichment in beach area of Shengli petroliferous province[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2007,14(5):46-49.[庄文山,孙怡,方旭庆.胜利滩海地区油气成藏事件与油气富集[J].油气地质与采收率,2007,14(5):46-49.]
[5]Zhang Shouchun,Zhang Linye,Zha Ming,et al.Control of pressure system development on reservoir formation in the Dongying Sag,Shengli Oilfield,east China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(3):289-296.[张守春,张林晔,查明,等.东营凹陷压力系统发育对油气成藏的控制[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(3):289-296.]
[6]Bao Youshu,Zhang Linye,Zhang Shouchun,et al.Distribution of phase type of hydrocarbon resources in Dongying Depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(4):530-535.[包友书,张林晔,张守春,等.东营凹陷油气资源相态类型分布规律[J].石油学报,2009,30(4):530-535.]
[7]Jiang Qigui,Wang Yanbin,Qin Jianzhong,et al.Kinetics of the hydrocarbon generation process of marine source rocks in south China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(2):174-180.[蒋启贵,王延斌,秦建中,等.中国南方海相烃源岩生烃过程动力学研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(2):174-180.]
[8]Hu Yong,Li Xizhe,Wan Yujin,et al.Physical simulation on gas percolation in tight sandstone[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(5):580-584.[胡勇,李熙喆,万玉金,等.致密砂岩气渗流特征物理模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(5):580-584.]
[9]Hu Yong,Shao Yang,Lu Yongliang,et al.Experimental study on occurrence models of water in pores and the influencing to the development of tight gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(1):176-180.[胡勇,邵阳,陆永亮,等.低渗气藏储层孔隙中水的赋存模式及对气藏开发的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(1):176-180.]
[10]Hu Yong,Li Xizhe,Lu Xiangguo,et al.Varying law of water saturation in the depletion-drive development of sandstone gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,[JP3]2014,41(6):723-726.[胡勇,李熙喆,卢祥国,等.砂岩气藏衰竭开采过程中含水饱和度变化规律[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(6):723-726.]
文章导航

/