收稿日期: 2015-04-19
修回日期: 2015-12-18
网络出版日期: 2016-01-10
基金资助
中国博士后科学基金面上项目（编号：2014M561324）；教育部重点实验室开放性课题（编号：NEPU-EOR-2014-008）联合资助.
The method and application of using generalized-ΔLgR technology to predict the organic carbon content of continental deep source rocks
Received date: 2015-04-19
Revised date: 2015-12-18
Online published: 2016-01-10
受强压实作用和较高的导电组分影响，陆相深层烃源岩在孔隙度和电阻率曲线上响应微弱，利用传统ΔLgR技术预测有机碳含量效果很差。针对这一问题，在保留ΔLgR技术具有削弱孔隙度干扰优势的基础上，利用对深层烃源岩响应相对敏感的自然伽马曲线替代传统模型中的成熟度参数，建立了利用自然伽马、声波时差和电阻率测井曲线预测有机碳含量的广义ΔLgR技术，并将其应用于松辽盆地徐家围子断陷深层沙河子组源岩有机碳含量预测。结果表明：广义ΔLgR技术预测得到的徐家围子断陷深层沙河子组烃源岩有机碳含量更符合其实测有机碳的变化趋势，有机碳预测误差比传统方法预测误差平均降低了25.3%。表明广义ΔLgR技术用于预测陆相深层强压实烃源岩有机碳是可行的。
胡慧婷，苏瑞，刘超，孟令威 . 广义ΔLgR技术预测陆相深层烃源岩有机碳含量方法及其应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016 , 27(1) : 149 -155 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.01.0149
Since strong compaction and higher conductive component may cause a weak response of continental source rocks on porosity and resistivity curve,using traditional ΔLgR technology to predict the content of organic carbon will have a poor effect.Aimed at this problem,on the basis of continuing the advantages of porosity interference in ΔLgR technology,using natural gamma curve which is more sensitive to deep source rocks instead of the maturity parameters in traditional model,we developed the generalized-ΔLgR technology which employs natural gamma,AC acoustic and resistivity logging curves to predict the content of organic carbon.Furthermore,the generalized-ΔLgR technique was applied to Shahezi Formation of Xujiaweizi Fault Depression.The results show that it can provide a more reliable TOC profile,and the TOC predicting error was reduced by 25.3% compared to the conventional ΔLgR technique.It indicates that the generalized ΔLgR provides a new TOC predicting method for continental source rocks with deep burial depth and strong compaction.
[1]Passey Q R,Creaney S,Kulla J B.A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(5):1777-1794.
[2]Kamali M R,Mirshady A A.Total organic carbon content determined from well logs using ΔLogR and Neuro Fuzzy techniques[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2004,45(3/4):141-148.
[3]Ritesh K S,Satinder C,Amit K R.Seismic Characterization of Montney Shale Formation Using Passey’s approach[C]//SEG Annual Meeting.Colorado,USA:Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2014.
[4]Adeniji A A,Onayemi J R.Source rock analysis of the Agbada shales of Niger Delta Basin,Nigeria,using well log data and attribute analysis[C]//SEG Annual Meeting.Colorado,USA:Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2014.
[5]Parmjit S,Riyasat H,Ahmed R,et al.Understanding geophysical responses for identification of sweet spot for Oxfordian shale oil/gas plays in Kuwait[C]//SEG Annual Meeting.Houston:Texas Publication,2013.
[6]He Junling,Deng Shouwei,Chen Wenlong,et al.Evaluation of oil shale in the southern Songliao Basin using logging techniques[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2006,34(6):909-914.[贺君玲,邓守伟,陈文龙，等.利用测井技术评价松辽盆地南部油页岩[J].吉林大学学报：地球科学版,2006,34 (6):909-914.]
[7]Yang Taotao,Fan Guozhang,Lv Fuliang,et al.The logging features and identification methods of source rock[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):414-422.[杨涛涛,范国章,吕福亮,等.烃源岩测井响应特征及识别评价方法[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):414-422.]
[8]Jin Tao,Gao Risheng,Gao Caixia,et al.Suggestion of exploration prospect in Raoyang Sag of Jizhong Depression from the logging evaluation results of source rock[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(3)：406-412.[金涛,高日胜,高彩霞,等.从烃源岩测井评价结果看冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷勘探前景[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(3):406-412.]
[9]Wang Zhensheng,Hua Shuangjun,Yu Xuemin,et al.Grading evaluation and high quality source rock distribution in Qikou Sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(12):1896-1902.[王振升,滑双君,于学敏,等.歧口凹陷沙河街组烃源岩分级评价及优质烃源岩分布[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(12):1896-1902.]
[10]Guo Zeqing,Sun Ping,Liu Weihong.The carbon calculation by ΔlogR technology in Sanhu area of Qaidam Basin[J].Progress in Geophysics,2012,27(2):626-633.[郭泽清,孙平,刘卫红.利用ΔlogR技术计算柴达木盆地三湖地区第四系有机碳[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(2):626-633.]
[11]Wang Zongli,Li Jun,Luo Qiang,et al.Fine evaluation of source rock with logging data in Langgu Sag of Jizhong Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(3):430-437.[王宗礼,李君,罗强,等.利用测井资料精细评价冀中坳陷廊固凹陷烃源岩[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(3):430-437.]
[12]Yang Shaochun,Wang Na,Li Mingrui,et al.The logging evaluation of source rocks of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Chongxin area,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):470-476.[杨少春,王娜,李明瑞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地崇信地区三叠系延长组烃源岩测井评价[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):470-476.]
[13]Lu Shuangfang,Ma Yanling,Cao Ruicheng,et al.Evaluation criteria of high-quality source rocks and its applications:Taking the Wuerxun Sag in Hailaer Basin as an example[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geocsiences,2012,37(3):535-544.[卢双舫,马延伶,曹瑞成,等.优质烃源岩评价标准及其应用:以海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷为例[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2012,37(3):535-544.]
[14]Zhu Guangyou,Jin Qiang,Zhang Linye.Using log information to analyze the geochemical characteristics of source rocks in Jiyang Depression[J].Well Logging Technology,2003,27(2):104-109.[朱光有,金强,张林晔.用测井信息获取烃源岩的地球化学参数研究[J].测井技术,2003,27(2):104-109.]
[15]Hu Huiting,Lu Shuangfang,Liu Chao,et al.Models for calculating organic carbon content from logging information:Comparison and analysis[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2011,29(6):1199-1205.[胡慧婷,卢双舫,刘超,等.测井资料计算源岩有机碳含量模型对比及分析[J].沉积学报,2011,29(6):1199-1205.]
[16]Liu Chao.Evaluating Source Rock Using Logging Data-Improvement and Application[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2011:15-21.[刘超.测井资料烃源岩评价方法改进及应用[Ｄ].大庆:东北石油大学,2011:9-33.]
[17]Liu Chao,Lu Shuangfang,Xue Haitao.Variable-coefficient ΔlogR model and its application in shale organic evaluation[J].Progress in Geophysics,2014,29(1):312-317.[刘超,卢双舫,薛海涛.变系数ΔlogR方法及其在泥页岩有机质评价中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2014,29(1):312-317.]
[18]Wang Zhihong,Luo Xia,Li Jingkun,et al.Effective source rock forecasting in deep layers of northern Songliao Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(2):204-209.[王志宏,罗 霞,李景坤,等.松辽盆地北部深层有效烃源岩分布预测[J]天然气地球科学,2008,19(2):204-209.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
甘公网安备 62010202000678号