天然气开发

水驱气藏气井见水风险评价新方法

展开
  • 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;2.中国石油天然气股份有限公司天然气与管道分公司,北京 100007
李勇(1982-),男,山东淄博人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气田开发研究. E-mail:liyongph@gmail.com.

收稿日期: 2015-04-02

  修回日期: 2015-09-18

  网络出版日期: 2016-01-10

基金资助

国家科技重大专项项目“高压气藏高效安全开发技术研究”(编号:2011ZX05015-002)资助.

New method of aquifer influx risk classification for wells in gas reservoir with aquifer support

Expand
  • 1.PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2.PetroChina Natural Gas and Pipeline Company, Beijing 100007, China

Received date: 2015-04-02

  Revised date: 2015-09-18

  Online published: 2016-01-10

摘要

在边底水能量较强的气藏开发中,如何综合动静态参数定量评价单井见水的风险等级,从而对见水井做出准确的预警是一个亟待解决的问题。针对该问题,提出了一套系统的单井见水风险定量评价的方法。首先建立了一套影响气井见水的动静态参数评价指标体系,然后应用层次分析和模糊综合评判对气井见水风险等级进行分类评价,最后通过灰色综合评价方法对气井见水顺序做出准确定量预测。以塔里木盆地克拉2大型异常高压有水气田为例,阐述了如何使用该评价体系进行定量水侵风险评价,将所有气井按见水风险等级划分为4类,确定了气井的见水顺序,现场实际气井生产动态资料验证了方法的可靠性。该方法为水驱气藏产量调配提供了依据,有效保证了气田平稳高效开发。

本文引用格式

李勇,张晶,李保柱,夏静,郭凯,胡云鹏,王代刚 . 水驱气藏气井见水风险评价新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016 , 27(1) : 128 -133 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.01.0128

Abstract

During the development of gas reservoirs with strong bottom or edge aquifer support,how to quantitatively evaluate the risk of water breakthrough comprehensively considering the variety of dynamic and static parameters and make early warning for the wells which the water coning will break through are urgent problems to be solved.Currently,the published literatures on these questions are relatively one-sided.Aiming at the questions mentioned above,firstly,the evaluation index system of static and dynamic parameters associated with water breakthrough in gas reservoirs is established.Then based on the index system,the paper used analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy evaluation to evaluate the risk of water breakthrough.And finally water breakthrough sequence of gas wells can be quantitatively evaluated.The paper took Kela2 abnormal high pressure gas reservoir with bottom and edge aquifer drive for example to illustrate how to use the method to evaluate aquifer influx risk of all gas wells.And all gas wells are classified into 4 types based on the risks of aquifer influx,and water breakthrough sequence of all wells are also determined.Actual gas well performances validate this new method.Furthermore,the evaluation results are very useful for well production rate optimization and gas field effective development.

参考文献

[1]Yang Furong,Fan Pingtian,He Jing,et al.An approach to predict water breakthrough time in high gas rate wells of gas reservoirs with edge water[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(29):8745-8747.[杨芙蓉,樊平天,贺静,等.边水气藏高产气井见水时间预测方法[J].科学技术与工程,2013,13(29):8745-8747.]
[2]Li Yong,Li Baozhu,Hu Yongle,et al.The application of modern production decline analysis in the dynamic analysis of gas condensate reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(2):304-308.[李勇,李保柱,胡永乐,等.现代产量递减分析在凝析气田动态分析中的应用[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(2):304-308.]
[3]Kang Xiaodong,Li Xiangfang,Zhang Guosong.Methods to identify early water influx of gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2004,15(6):637-639.[康晓东,李相方,张国松.气藏早期水侵识别方法[J].天然气地球科学,2004,15(6):637-639.]
[4]Fan Huaicai,Zhong Bing,Li Xiaoping,et al.Studies on water invasion mechanism of fractured-watered gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(6):1179-1184.[樊怀才,钟兵,李晓平,等.裂缝型产水气藏水侵机理研究[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(6):1179-1184.]
[5]Li Jin,Wang Xinhai,Zhu Liyao,et al.A study of comprehensive discriminant methods of the source of water-yielding in gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(6):1185-1190.[李锦,王新海,朱黎鹞,等.气藏产水来源综合判别方法研究[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(6):1185-1190.]
[6]Hu Junkun,Li Xiaoping,Zhang Jiantao,et al.A new convenient method for calculating dynamic reserves and water influx in water driving gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(6):1175-1178.[胡俊坤,李晓平,张健涛,等.计算水驱气藏动态储量和水侵量的简易新方法[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(6):1175-1178.]
[7]Kuo M C T.A Simplified Method for Water Coning Predictions[R].SPE 12067.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,5-8 October,San Francisco,California,1983.
[8]Lee S H,Tung W B.General Coning Correlations Based on Mechanistic Studies[R].SPE 20742.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,23-26 September,New Orleans,Louisiana,1990.
[9]Moran O O,Samaniego V F,Arevalo V J A.Advances in the Production Mechanism Diagnosis of Gas Reservoirs through Material Balance Studies[R].SPE 91509.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,26-29 September,Houston,Texas,2004.
[10]Elahmady M,Wattenbarger R A.A Straight-Line P/Z Plot is Possible in Waterdrive Gas Reservoirs[R].SPE 103258.Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology Symposium,16-18 April,Denver,Colorado,U.S.A.,2007.
[11]Tao Shiping,Feng Xi,Xiao Shihong.Using transient testing to identify early water invasion of gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2003,23(4):68-70.[陶诗平,冯曦,肖世洪.应用不稳定试井分析方法识别气藏早期水侵[J].天然气工业,2003,23(4):68-70.]
[12]Blasingame T A,McCray T L,Lee W J.Decline Curve Analysis for Variable Pressure Drop/Variable Flowrate Systems[R].SPE 21513.SPE Gas Technology Symposium,22-24 January,Houston,Texas,1991.
[13]Mattar L,McNeil R.The Flowing Gas Material Balance[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1998,37(2):37-42.
[14]Li Yong,Li Baozhu,Xia Jing,et al.New method of aquifer influx status classification for single well in gas reservoir with aquifer support[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(10):1951-1955.[李勇,李保柱,夏静,等.有水气藏单井水侵阶段划分新方法[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(10):1951-1955.]
[15]Liang Junping,Peng Qiyuan,Wang Ying,et al.Effectevaluation method for the through transport of railway enterprise based on multilevel grey method[J].China Railway Science,2011,32(2):121-125.[梁军平,彭其渊,王莹,等.基于多层次灰色方法的路企直通运输效果评价方法[J].中国铁道科学,2011,32(2):121-125.]

文章导航

/