收稿日期: 2015-01-24
修回日期: 2015-04-22
网络出版日期: 2015-09-10
基金资助
国家油气重大专项“页岩气重点地区资源评价”(编号:2011ZX05018-001)；国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”计划)项目(编号:2013CB228001)联合资助.
A Comparative Study of the Geological Feature of Marine Shale Gas between China and the United States
Received date: 2015-01-24
Revised date: 2015-04-22
Online published: 2015-09-10
通过中国海相页岩气详细研究和美国典型页岩气区带解剖，对比研究了中美页岩气地质特征的异同，这些研究对指导我国四川盆地海相页岩气的研究具有重要理论和实践意义。 ①美国Barnett页岩、Marcellus页岩和Haynesville页岩气区带的盆地类型为前陆盆地，中国四川早古生代盆地为克拉通。沉积环境均为深水陆棚，岩石类型以硅质和硅质钙质页岩为主，脆性矿物含量高。②Barnett页岩TOC值为3%~13%，平均为4.5%，Marcellus页岩TOC值为3%~12%，平均为4.0%，Haynesville页岩TOC值为0.5%~4%。四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组和筇竹寺组页岩TOC值分别为1.5%~3%和2.5%~4.5%。③美国三大页岩成熟度适中，四川盆地海相页岩处于过成熟阶段。Barnett页岩、Marcellus页岩和Haynesville页岩RO值分别为0.5%~2.1%、1.2%～3.5%和1.2%~3%。四川盆地筇竹寺组页岩RO值一般为2.5%~4.5%，平均为3.5%，龙马溪组页岩RO值为1.5%~3%。 ④Barnett页岩核心区厚度为30~180m，总孔隙度为4%~5%，基质渗透率小于1×10-3μm2，Marcellus页岩厚度为 15～60m，孔隙度平均为10%，渗透率小于1×10-3μm2， Haynesville页岩厚度为70~100m，孔隙度为8%~9%，渗透率小于5×10-3μm2，四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩厚度为25~120m，孔隙度为3%~10%，渗透率为(0.01~)×10-3μm2，筇竹寺组页岩厚度为40~100m，孔隙度为0.1%~3%，渗透率为(0.01~42)×10-3μm2。⑤Barnett页岩、Marcellus页岩和Haynesville页岩含气量分别为4.2~9.9m3/t、1.70～2.83m3/t和2.5~9m3/t。四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组和筇竹寺组页岩含气量分别为1.7~4.5m3/t和0.55~1.2m3/t。中国海相页岩吸附气含量大于美国。⑥美国海相页岩埋深为1 220~3 990m,中国海相页岩埋深可高达5 000m，一般为1 500~4 000m;Barnett页岩和筇竹寺组页岩为正常地层压力，压力系数分别为0.99~1.01和1，Marcellus页岩，Haynesville页岩和五峰组—龙马溪组为异常高压，地层压力系数分别为0.9~1.4、1.61~2.07和1~2.3。⑦除四川盆地筇竹寺组页岩外，其他4套页岩均具有良好封盖层，有利于天然气保存。⑧美国地表条件更有利，多以平原为主，而四川多为丘陵。 ⑨四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气地质资源量为17.5×1012m3，技术可采资源量为1.77×1012m3，筇竹寺组页岩气地质资源量为8.86×1012m3，技术可采资源量为0.886×1012m3。
关键词： 页岩气; 龙马溪组; 筇竹寺组; Barnett页岩; Marcellus页岩; Haynesville页岩
王淑芳，董大忠，王玉满，李新景，黄金亮，管全中 . 中美海相页岩气地质特征对比研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015 , 26(9) : 1666 -1678 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.09.1666
Through detailed studies of marine shale gas in China and investigation of typical shale gas zones in the United States,similarities and differences of geological features of the shale gas in USA and China were summarized.The comparative study is of important theoretical and practical significance for marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin.(1)Barnett,Marcellus and Haynesville shale basins are foreland basin,while Sichuan basin in Paleozoic is intra-craton basin.Their depositional environments are deep water shelf,mainly siliceous and calcareous shale,with high brittleness mineral content.(2)TOC of Barnett shale is 3%-13%，averaged at 4.5%;Marcellus is 3%-12%,averaged at 4.0%;and Haynesville shale is 0.5%-4%.TOC of Wufeng-Longmaxi and Qiongzhusi is 1.5%-3% and 2.5%-4.5%,respectively.(3)Maturity of three major shale formations is moderate,while that of Sichuan Basin is at over-mature stage.The RO values of the Barnett,Marcellus and Haynesville formations are 0.5%-2.1%，1.2%-3.5%，and 1.2%-3%,respectively.However,the ROvalues of the Longmaxi and Qiongzhusi formations are 2.5%-4.5% and 1.5%-3%,respectively.(4)Barnett shale has thickness of 30-180m,porosity of 4%-5%,and permeability less than 1×10-3μm2;Marcellus shale has thickness of 15-60m,porosity averagely of 10%,and permeability less than 1×10-3μm2;Haynesville shale has thickness of 70-100m,porosity of 8%-9%,and permeability less than 5×10-3μm2.Longmaxi shale has thickness of 25-120m,porosity of 3%-10%,and permeability of(0.01-1)×10-3μm2;Qiongzhuxi shale has thickness of 40-100m,porosity of 0.1%-3%,and permeability of(0.01-42)×10-3μm2.(5)Gas contents of Barnett,Marcellus and Haynesville shale are 4.2-9.9,1.70-2.83 and 2.5-9m3/t,respectively,and that of Longmaxi and Qiongzhusi shale are 1.7-4.5 and 0.55-1.2 m3/t,respectively.(6)Except Qiongzhuxi shale,the other four shale formations have good sedimentary cover,which is conducive to gas preservation.(7)American shales have more favorable surface conditions,mostly plains,while mostly hills in Sichuan Basin.(8)Except Haynesville shale,fractures are well developed in other shale formations.(9)Shale gases from both the USA and China have rich resource potential.The Geological and technically recoverable resources of Longmaxi Formation are 17.5×1012m3 and 1.77×1012m3,respectively while that of Qiongzhusi Formation are 8.86×1012m3 and 0.886×1012m3,respectively.
［1］Rach N M.Drilling expands in Texas′ largest gas field［J］.Oil & Gas Journal,2004,102(3):45-50.
［2］Berman A E.Shale plays and lower natural gas prices:A time for critical thinking［J］.World Oil,2009,230(1):15.
［3］Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional Petroleum Geology［M］.2nd Edition.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2013.［邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质［M］.第2版.北京:地质出版社,2013.］
［4］Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Zhang Guosheng,et al.Conventional and unconventional petroleum “orderly accumulation”:Concept and practical significance[J].Petroleum exploration and development,2014,41(1):14-27.［邹才能,杨智,张国胜,等.常规—非常规油气“有序聚集”理论认识及实践意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):14-27.］
［5］Liu Shugen,Li Zhiwu,Sun Wei,et al.Basic geological features of superimposed basin and hydrocarbon accumulation in Sichuan Basin,China［J］.Chinese Journal of Geology,2011,46(1):233-257.［刘树根,李智武,孙玮,等.四川含油气叠合盆地基本特征［J］.地质科学,2011,46(1):233-257.］
［6］[JP2]Walper J L.Plate tectonic evolution of the Fort Worth Basin[C]//Martin C A,ed.Petroleum Geology of the Fort Worth Basin and Bend Arch Area.Dallas Geological Society,1982,237-251.
［7］Pollastro R M,Jarvie D M,Hill R J,et al.Geologic framework of the Mississippian Barnett Shale,Barnett-Paleozoic total petroleum system,Bend arch-Fort Worth Basin,Texas［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):405-436.
［8］[JP2]Lash G G,Engelder.Thickness trends and sequence stratigraphy of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Formation,Appalachian Basin:Implications for Acadian foreland basin evolution[J]:AAPG Bulletin,2011,95:61-103.
［9］Schieber J,Zimmerle W,Sethi P S.Shales and mudstones I[C]//Basin Studies,Sedimentology,and Paleontology.Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung,Germany:Stuttgart,1998:384.
［10］Locks R G,Ruppel S C.Mississippian Barnett shale:Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin,Texas［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):579-601.
［11］[JP2]Brett C E,Baird G C.Middle Devonian sedimentary cycles and sequences in the northern Appalachian Basin［C］//Witzke B J,Ludvigson G A,Day J,et al.Paleozoic Sequence Stratigraphy:Views from the North American Craton Boulder,Colorado:Geological Society of America Special Paper,1996:213-241.
［12］Ulmishe G F,Klemme H D.Depositional controls,distribution,and effectiveness of world’s petroleum source rocks［J］.US Geological Survey Bulletin,1990,1931:59.
［13］John B C.Fractured shale gas systems［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
［14］Chalmers R G,Bustin R M,Power M I.Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry,pycnometry,surface area and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses:Examples from the Barnett,Woodford,Haynesville,Marcellus,and Doig units［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1099-1119.
［15］Hammes U,Hamlin H S,Ewing T E.Geologic analysis of the Upper Jurassic Haynesville shale in east Texas and west Louisiana[J].AAPG,2011,95(10):1643-1666.
［16］Kitty L M,William L E,Robert MR,et al.Grain assemblages and stronge diagenetic overprinting in siliceous mudrcoks,Barnett Shale Mississippian,Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(8):1553-1578.
［17］Liang Digang,Guo Tonglou,BianLizeng,et al.Some progresses on studies of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation in marine sedimentary regions,southern China( part 3):Controlling factors on the sedimentary facies and development of paleozoic marine source rocks[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2009,14(2):1-19.［梁狄刚,郭彤楼,边立曾,等,中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(三):南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的沉积相及发育的控制因素[J].海相油气地质,2009,14(2):1-19.］
［18］Wang G,Timothy R C.Organic-rich Marcellus shale lithofacies modeling and distribution pattern analysis in the Appalachian Basin［J］.AAGP Bulletin,2013,97(12):2173-2205.
［19］Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.［邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力［J］.石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.］
［20］Huang Jinliang,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Shale gas generation and potentional of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin,China［J］.Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):69-76.［黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气形成条件及资源潜力［J］.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):69-76.］
［21］Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
［22］Slat R M,O’Brien N R.Pore types in Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contributions to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(11):2017-2030.
［23］Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,genesis and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale［J］.Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
［24］Li Xinjing,Hu Suyun,Cheng Keming,Suggestions from the development of fractured shale gas in North America［J］.Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(4):392-400.［李新景,胡素云,程克明,北美裂缝性页岩气勘探开发的启示［J］.石油勘探与开发,2007,34(4):392-400.］
［25］Wang Xiang,Liu Yuhua,Zhang Min,et al.Conditons of Formation and Accumulation for shale gas［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(2):350-356.［王祥,刘玉华,张敏,等.页岩气形成条件及成藏影响因素研究［J］.天然气地球科学,2010,21(2):350-356.］
［26］Zhang Jinchuan,Jin Zhijun,Yuan Mingsheng,Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution［J］.Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(7):15-18.［张金川,金之钧,袁明生.页岩气成藏机理和分布［J］.天然气工业,2004,24(7):15-18.］
［27］Gale J F W,Reed RM,Holder J.Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):603-622.
［28］Engelder TG,Lash G,Uzcategui R S.Joint sets that enhance production from Middle and Upper Devonian gas shales of the Appalachian Basin［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(7):857-889.
［29］Daniel J K,Ross R,MarcBustin.Sediment geochemistry of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member,northeastern British Columbia［J］.Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2006,54(4):337-365.
［30］Zhang Linye,Li Zheng,Zhu Rifang.The formation and exploitation of shale gas［J］.Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(1):124-128.［张林晔,李政,朱日房.页岩气的形成与开发［J］.天然气工业,2009,29(1):124-128.］
[31]EIA.Annual energy outlook 2011[J/OL].[2010-12-16].http//www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383er(2011).pdf
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
甘公网安备 62010202000678号