用数值模拟法开展裂缝型储层电阻率控制因素研究

张兆辉，高楚桥，高永德

doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.02.252

天然气地球科学 >

2014 , Vol. 25 >Issue 2: 252 - 258

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.02.252

天然气勘探

用数值模拟法开展裂缝型储层电阻率控制因素研究

展开

1.中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院,甘肃兰州 730020;
2.长江大学地球物理与石油资源学院，湖北荆州 434023;
3.中海油南海西部研究院，广东湛江 524057

张兆辉(1982-)，男，陕西蒲城人，工程师，主要从事沉积储层、测井评价方面的研究. E-mail：zhangzhaohui_123@163.com.

收稿日期: 2013-04-17

修回日期: 2013-05-14

网络出版日期: 2014-02-10

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目(编号：2012CB214804)资助.

收起

A study of the Controlling Factors on the Resistivity of FracturedReservoir Using the Numerical Simulation

Expand

1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Northwest (NWGI),Lanzhou 730020,China;
2. Geophysics and Oil Resource Institute,Yangtze University,Jingzhou 434023,China;
3.Research Institute,West of South Sea of CNOOC,Zhanjiang 524057,China

Received date: 2013-04-17

Revised date: 2013-05-14

Online published: 2014-02-10

Fold

摘要

裂缝型储层导电机理复杂，电阻率影响因素众多。基于双侧向测井原理，通过构建合理的地质模型，理论模拟裂缝全含水、全含油时岩石电阻率，并对各种影响因素逐一进行分析，这些因素主要包括地层水电阻率、基质电阻率、裂缝倾角、裂缝宽度、基质孔隙度及M值等，进一步探讨了各因素对储层电阻率的影响程度。结果表明：①岩石电阻率随着基质电阻率的增大而增大，且裂缝全含油岩石电阻率的增大率要高于裂缝全含水的情况;随着基质电阻率的增大，流体性质对岩石电阻率的影响程度也增大。②固定基质电阻率，岩石电阻率随着地层水电阻率和裂缝倾角的增大而增大，随着裂缝宽度的增大而减小，且对裂缝全含水岩石电阻率的影响程度要高于裂缝全含油情况;地层水电阻率和裂缝倾角越小、裂缝宽度越宽，流体性质对岩石电阻率的影响越大。③基质电阻率由阿尔奇公式确定，岩石电阻率随着基质孔隙度的增大而减小，随着M值的增大而增大，且对裂缝全含油岩石的影响程度要高于裂缝全含水的情况;基质孔隙度越小、M值越大，流体性质对岩石电阻率的影响越大。④M值、基质电阻率对岩石电阻率的影响最大，其次是裂缝倾角与裂缝宽度，而地层水电阻率的影响最小。

关键词： 裂缝型储层; 地质模型; 理论模拟; 电阻率

本文引用格式

张兆辉，高楚桥，高永德 . 用数值模拟法开展裂缝型储层电阻率控制因素研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014 , 25(2) : 252 -258 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.02.252

Abstract

Many factors affects the resistivity of fractured reservoir,and the reservoir conductive mechanism is complex.Based on the dual laterolog principle,through the construction of reasonable geological model,the resistivity of water saturated fractured rock and oil saturated fractured rock was simulated theoretically,and the factors are analyzed.The factors include resistivity of formation water,resistivity of matrix,fracture dip,fracture width,porosity of matrix,M value,and so on.At last,the affecting degree to resistivity of reservoir is discussed.The simulated results showed that:(1)With the increasing of the resistivity of matrix,the resistivity of reservoir gradually increases,and the increasing degree of oil saturated fractured rock is bigger than that of the water saturated fractured rock.The affecting degree of fluid properties for the resistivity of reservoir increases gradually with the increase of the resistivity of matrix.(2)The resistivity of matrix is fixed.With the increasing of the resistivity of formation water and fracture dip,the resistivity of reservoir gradually increases,but for the fracture width,the condition is opposite.The affecting degree of water saturated fractured rock is bigger than that of the oil saturated fractured rock,and the affecting degree of fluid properties for the resistivity of reservoir increases gradually with the reduction of the resistivity of formation water and fracture dip and the increasing of fracture width.(3)The resistivity of matrix was determined by archie formula.With the increasing of the porosity of matrix,the resistivity of reservoir gradually reduced,but for the M value,the condition is opposite.The affecting degree of oil saturated fractured rock is bigger than that of the water saturated fractured rock,and the affecting degree of fluid properties for the resistivity of reservoir increases gradually with the reduction of the porosity of matrix and increasing of M value.(4)The affecting degree of M value and the resistivity of matrix for the resistivity of reservoir are the largest,followed by the factors including fracture dip and fracture width,and the influence of the resistivity of formation water is the smallest.

Key words： Fractured reservoir; Geological model; Theoretical simulation; Resistivity

参考文献

［1］Sibbit A M,Faivre O.The Dual Laterolog Response in Fractured Rock［R］.Dallas Texas:SPWLA 26th Annual Logging Symposium,1985:17-20.

［2］Pezard P A,Anderson R N.In Situ Measurements of Electrical Resistivity,Formation Anisotropy and Tectonic Context［R］.Lafayette,Louisiana:SPWLA 31st Annual Logging symposium,1990:24-27.

［3］Li Shanjun,Xiao Chengwen,Wang Hanming,et al.Mathmatical model of laterolog response to fracture and quantitative interpretation of fracture porosity［J］.Chinese Journal of Geophysics,1996,39(6):843-852.［李善军,肖承文,汪涵明,等.裂缝的双侧向测井响应的数学模型及裂缝孔隙度的定量解释［J］.地球物理学报,1996,39(6):843-852.］

［4］Li Shanjun.Inverting fracture porosity and dip of limestone fractured reservoir using 3D FEM［J］.Well Logging Technology,1998,22(6):412-415.［李善军.用三维有限元素法反演单一灰岩裂缝性储层的裂缝孔隙度和裂缝倾角［J］.测井技术,1998,22(6):412-415.］

［5］Li Shanjun,Wang Hanming,Xiao Chengwen,et al.Quantitative interpretation of fracture porosity in carbonates［J］.Well Logging Technology,1997,21(3):205-214.［李善军,汪涵明,肖承文,等.碳酸盐岩地层中裂缝孔隙度的定量解释［J］.测井技术,1997,21(3):205-214.］

［6］Wang Hanming,Zhang Gengji,Li Shanjun,et al.The dual laterolog response of the single dipping fracture［J］.Journal of the University of Petroleum,1995,19(6):21-24.［汪涵明,张庚骥,李善军,等.单一倾斜裂缝的双侧向测井响应［J］.石油大学学报,1995,19(6):21-24.］

［7］Shi Ge,He Tao,Wu Yueqi,et al.A study on the dual laterolog response to fractures using the forward numerical modeling［J］.Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2004,47(2):359-363.［史謌,何涛,仵岳奇,等.用正演数值计算方法开展双侧向测井对裂缝的响应研究［J］.地球物理学报,2004,47(2):359-363.］

［8］Deng Shaogui,Wang Xiaochang,Fan Yiren.Response of dual laterolog to fractures in fractured carbonate formation and its interpretation［J］.Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2006,31(6):846-850.［邓少贵,王晓畅,范宜仁.裂缝性碳酸盐岩裂缝的双侧向测井响应特征及解释方法［J］.地球科学：中国地质大学学报,2006,31(6):846-850.］［9］Liu Diren,Xia Pei,Wan Wenchun,et al.Characteristics of dual laterolog response of carbonate fracture reservoirs in horizontal well［J］.Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(3):1-4.［刘迪仁,夏培,万文春,等.水平井碳酸盐岩裂缝型储层双侧向测井响应特性［J］.岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):1-4.］

［10］Tan Tingdong.Well Logging Interpretation Model and Evaluation Method for Fractured Reservoir［M］.Beijing:Publishing House of Oil Industry,1987.［谭廷栋.裂缝性油气藏测井解释模型与评价方法［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,1987.］

［11］Li Song,Kang Yili,Li Daqi,et al.ANSYS simulation of fracture width variation in fracture-cavity reservoirs［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(2):460-466.［李松,康毅力,李大奇,等.缝洞型储层井壁裂缝宽度变换ANSYS模拟研究［J］.天然气地球科学,2011,22(2):460-466.］

［12］Lai Fengpeng,Li Zhiping,Li Guangtao,et al.Single well numerical simulation under complicated conditions in volcanic gas reservoir［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,23(3):577-582.［赖凤鹏,李治平,李光涛,等.复杂条件下火山岩气藏单井数值模拟研究［J］.天然气地球科学,2011,23(3):577-582.］

［13］Zhang Gengji.Electrology［M］.Beijing:Publishing House of University of Petroleum,1996.［张庚骥.电法测井［M］.北京:石油大学出版社,1996.］

［14］Gao Chuqiao.Well Logging Evaluation of Complex Reservoirs［M］.Beijing:Publishing House of Oil Industry,2003.［高楚桥.复杂储层测井评价方法［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,2003.］

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献