气田开发

一种检验试井解释有效渗透率合理性的方法

展开
  • 1.中国石油大学,北京102249;2.大港油田分公司,天津 300280;
    3.渤海钻探工程技术研究院,天津 300280;4.渤海钻探第二录井公司,河北 任丘 062552
张枫(1974-),女,四川南部人,博士后,主要从事油气田开发及数值模拟研究工作.

收稿日期: 2010-03-23

  修回日期: 2010-05-13

  网络出版日期: 2010-06-10

A Method of Testing Reasonability of Effective Permeability by Well Test Interpretation

Expand
  • 1.China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China;
     2. Dagang Oilfield Company PetroChina, Tianjin 300280, China;
    3. Bohai Drilling Engineering and Technology Research Institute, Tianjin 300280, China;
    4. Second Mud Logging Branch Under Bohai Drilling Engineering Co.Ltd.,CNPC,Renqiu  062552, China

Received date: 2010-03-23

  Revised date: 2010-05-13

  Online published: 2010-06-10

Supported by

null

摘要

针对试井解释结果具有多解性,且解释结论的可靠性评价没有专门的技术方法这一问题,采用试井解释和岩心图版对比的方法来检验试井解释结论是否合理。根据相对渗透率试验数据建立了有效渗透率和绝对渗透率之间的关系式,应用该关系式把试井解释的有效渗透率校正到绝对渗透率并与岩心分析校正后的绝对渗透率进行对比,可对试井解释的有效渗透率是否合理做出准确地判断。

本文引用格式

张枫, 王振升, 马立军, 于凤梅, 陈红, 孙卫刚 . 一种检验试井解释有效渗透率合理性的方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010 , 21(3) : 367 -370 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2010.03.367

Abstract

Since there is the ambiguity of well test interpretation and no special technique method for the reliability evaluation of interpreted result, we try to use the well test interpretation and core permeability pattern to examine whether or not the integrated result is reasonable. The relational expression between effective permeability and absolute permeability is deduced by the relative permeability of test data. Then the effective permeability is corrected to the absolute permeability by means of the relational expression. Finally, we compare two kinds of permeability to make the accurate judgment for the effective permeability of the well test interpretation.

参考文献

[1]Well Test Manual  Write Grouping.Well Test Manual(Part Ⅱ)[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1991.[《试井手册》编写组.试井手册(下)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991.]
[2]Luo Wanjing,Wang Xiaodong,Li Yijuan.The general method to determine the permeability and their relationship[J].West-China Exploration Engineering,2006,117(1):63-66.[罗万静,王晓冬,李义娟.渗透率的常用确定方法及其相互关系[J].西部探矿工程,2006,117(1):63-66.]
[3]An Xiaoping,Li Xiangfang,Cheng Shiqing,et al.Comparativea analysis for permeability acquired from different methods [J].Well Testing,2005,14(5):14-17.[安小平,李相方,程时清,等.不同方法获取渗透率的对比分析[J].油气井测试,2005,14(5):14-17.]
[4]Yang Shenglai,Wei Junzhi.Reservoir Physics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004.[杨胜来,魏俊之.油层物理学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004.]
[5]Zeng Ping,Zhao Jinzhou,Li Zhiping,et al.Experimental study concerning the effect of temperature,effective stress and water saturation on the permeability of tight sandstone[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(1):31-34.[曾平,赵金洲,李治平,等.温度、有效应力和含水饱和度对低渗透砂岩渗透率影响的实验研究[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(1):31-34.]
[6]Yang Fan,Li Zhiping.Reservoir damage caused by paraffin precipitation[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(6):848-850.[杨帆,李治平.石蜡沉积对储层孔隙度和渗透率的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(6):848-850.]
[7]Stewart F,Wittmann M.Interpretation of the Pressure Response of the Repeat Formation Tester[C].Paper SPE8362 Presented at the 1979 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,1979,Spetember:23-26.
[8]Jiang Lishang,Chen Zhongxiang.Theoretical Basis of Well Test Analysis[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1985:73-92.[姜礼尚,陈钟祥.试井分析理论基础[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985:73-92.]
[9]Lei Ting,Li Zhiping.The advance of applying artificial intelligence in well test analysis[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(3):374-377.[雷霆,李治平.人工智能技术在试井解释中的应用及进展[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(3):374-377.]
[10] Cui Disheng,Xu Jianping,He Zilun,et al.Analysis of acided-fracturing effect by transient well test for Qianmiqiao buried hill condensated gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2003,14(4):302-305.[崔迪生,徐建平,贺子伦,等.利用不稳定试井分析千米桥潜山凝析气藏酸压效果[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(4):302-305.]
[11]Ma Zhiyuan,Gao Yawen.Relative Permeability of Reservoir[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1989.[马致远,高雅文.油藏相对渗透率[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989.]

文章导航

/