天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深地区白垩系低孔砂岩储层“三重介质特征”

赵力彬1，杨学君1，昌伦杰2，张同辉1，孙雄伟1，冯建伟3   

  1. 1.中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院，新疆 库尔勒 841000；
    2.中国石油塔里木油田分公司开发事业部，新疆 库尔勒 841000；
    3.中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院，山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-20 修回日期:2016-12-18 出版日期:2017-02-10 发布日期:2017-02-10
  • 作者简介:赵力彬(1979-)，男，河北定州人，高级工程师，硕士，主要从事油气田开发研究. E-mail：zhaolb-tlm@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    中国石油重大科技专项“塔里木油田勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号：2014E-2104)；国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”(编号：2016ZX05015-005)；国家自然基金面上项目(编号：(41572124)7)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(编号：14CX05016A)联合资助.

Tri-media reservoir characteristic of fractured tight gas reservoirof gasfield A,Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin

Zhao Li-bin1，Yang Xue-jun1，Chang Lun-jie2，Zhang Tong-hui1，Sun Xiong-wei1，Feng Jian-wei3   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Exploration and Development,Tarim Oilfield Company,PetroChina,Korla 841000,China;
    2.Department of Development,Tarim Oilfield Company,PetroChina,Korla 841000,China;
    3.School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum,Qingdao 266580,China
  • Received:2016-09-20 Revised:2016-12-18 Online:2017-02-10 Published:2017-02-10

PDF (PC)

675

摘要：

塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田巴什基奇克组属于低孔裂缝性砂岩储层，储层埋藏深度大，基质致密，裂缝发育。由于该气田储层孔喉细小、结构复杂，传统孔喉表征技术难以定量系统表征，综合激光共聚焦扫描、场发射扫描电镜、微米CT、氮气吸附和核磁共振等先进孔喉表征技术，首次发现库车坳陷克深气田储层基质微观呈“三重介质”特征，即大孔喉介质、小孔喉介质和裂缝，其中大孔喉介质和小孔喉介质所占储集空间比重相当，但大孔喉介质对基质渗透率贡献率达95%以上；储层孔喉配置关系以大孔隙_粗喉道、小孔隙_细喉道配置为主，其次为小孔隙_粗喉道。研究区裂缝孔隙度仅占储集空间的1.8%～2.8%，但裂缝性砂岩岩心渗透率比基质渗透率高1～2个数量级。基于此建立了研究区砂岩储层“三重介质”概念模型，该模型可以很好解释储层渗流特征。
〖ＨＴ５Ｈ〗关键词〖HTSS〗：〖ＨＴ５Ｋ〗

关键词: 库车坳陷, 非常规, 致密砂岩, 孔喉表征, 多重介质

Abstract:

The reservoir of gasfield A,which located in Kuqa Depression of Tarim Basin,has features of large burial depth,and belongs to fractured tight gas reservoir.As the pore-throat is small and the pore structure is complex,it’s difficult to do the pore throat structure characterization by conventional methods.In this paper,lots of advanced technologies,such as LSCM,FESEM,Micro-CT,Nitrogen adsorption and NMR,are used to do the pore throat structure characterization.It’s found for the first time that,the reservoir of gasfield A has microscopic characteristic of tri-media,which contain large pore-throat medium,small pore-throat medium and fractures.The volume of large pore-throat medium approximately equals to the volume of small pore-throat medium,but large pore-throat medium’s contribution to the matrix permeability accounted for 95%.The pore and throat collocations are mainly big pore-coarse throat,small pore-fine throat,and small pore-coarse throat are secondary.Absolute fracture porosity is only about 0.01%-0.5%,1.8%-2.8% of total reservoir porosity,but fracture is main seepage channel of reservoir,the permeability of fractured samples is about 10 times or 100 times of samples without fracture.Based on the research of reservoir characteristics above,the conceptual model of tri-media reservoir is established,which can interpret the reservoir seepage characteristics well.The research idea in this paper will be helpful to other similar reservoir.

Key words: Kuqa Depression, Unconventional gas reservoir, Tight gas reservoir, Pore-throat characterization, Tri-media reservoir

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+3

[1]Zou Caineng,Zhai Guangming,Zhang Guangya,et al.Formation,distribution,potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resource[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):13-24.[邹才能，翟光明，张光亚，等.全球常规—非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测[J].石油勘探与开发，2015，42(1)：13-24.]
[2]Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica，2011，27(6):1857-1864.[邹才能，朱如凯，白斌，等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报，2011,27(6)：1857-1864.]
[3]Bai Bin,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Multi-scale method of Nano(Micro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):329-333.[白斌，朱如凯，吴松涛，等.利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J].石油勘探与开发，2013,40(3)：329-333.]
[4]Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Kong Detao,et al.Pore structure of shales from high pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption method[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):450-455.[杨峰，宁正福，孔德涛，等.高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J].天然气地球科学，2013,24(3)：450-455.]
[5]Lin Tong,Ran Qigui,Wei Hongxing,et al.Pore-throat characteristics of tight sandstones and its influence onreservoirs in Dibei area of the Kuqa Depression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(6):696-703.[林潼，冉启贵，魏红兴，等.库车坳陷迪北地区致密砂岩孔喉形态特征及其对储层的影响[J].石油实验地质2015,37(6):696-703.]
[6]Xue Miaomiao,Zhang Haining,Liu Tangyan,et al.Novel Method to quantitatively evaluate pore structures by sphere-cylinder model[J].Well Logging Technology,2014,38(1):59-64.[薛苗苗，章海宁，刘堂宴，等.定量评价储层孔隙结构的新方法[J].测井技术，2014,38(1)：59-64.]
[7]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M].Beijing:Geology Press,2013.[邹才能，陶士振，侯连华，等.非常规油气地质[M].北京：地质出版社，2013.]
[8]Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,Cui Jingwei,et al.Research advances of microstructure in unconventional tight oil and gasreservoirs[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,15(5):615-623.[朱如凯，白斌，崔景伟，等.非常规油气致密储集层微观结构研究进展[J].古地理学报，2013，15(5)：615-623.]
[9]Golab A,Knackstedtm,Averdunkh,et al.3D porosity and mineralogy characterization in tight gas sandstones[J].The Leading Edge,2010(12):1476-1483.
[10]Sokrm,Varslott,Ghousa,et al.Pore scale characterization of carbonates at multiple scales:integra-tion of micro-CT,BSEM and FIBSEM:23rd International Symposium of Core Analysts,Noordwijk,The Netherlands[C].New Brunswick Canada:SCA Society of Core Analysts,2009:128-142.
[11]Chen Huanqing,Cao Chen,Liang Shuxian,et al.Research advances on reservoir pores[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):227-237.[陈欢庆，曹晨，梁淑贤，等.储层孔隙结构研究进展[J].天然气地球科学，2013,24(2)：227-237.]
[12]Jiang Ping,Mu Longxin,Zhang Ming,et al.Differences of reservoir characteristics between domestic and oversea tight gas of CNPC and its developing trends[J],Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(6):1095-1105.[蒋平，穆龙新，张铭，等.中石油国内外致密砂岩气储层特征对比及发展趋势[J].天然气地球科学，2015,26(6)：1095-1105.]
[13]Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Kong Detao,et al.Pore structure of shales from high pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption method[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):450-455.[杨峰，宁正福，孔德涛，等.高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J].天然气地球科学，2013,24(3)：450-455.]
[14]Bi Mingwei,Chen Shiyue,Zhou Zhaohua,et al.Characteristics and significance of microscopic pore structure in tight sandstone reservoir of the 8th member of Lower Shihezi Formation in the Su 6 area of Sulige Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(10):1851-1861.[毕明威，陈世悦，周兆华，等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏6区块盒8段致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征及其意义[J].天然气地球科学，2015,26(10):1851-1861.]
[15]He Wenxiang,Yang Le,Ma Chaoya,et al.Effect of Micro-Pore Structure Parameter on Seepage Characteristics in Ultra-Low Permeability Reservoir:A Case from Chang 6 Reservoir of Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):477-481.[何文祥，杨乐，马超压，等.特低渗储层微观孔隙结构参数对渗流行为的影响[J].天然气地球科学，2011，22(3)：477-481.]
[1] 包建平, 朱翠山, 申旭. 金刚烷类化合物与库车坳陷克拉2构造凝析油的形成机理研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1217-1230.
[2] 张荣虎，王珂，王俊鹏，孙雄伟，李君，杨学君，周露. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深构造带克深8区块裂缝性低孔砂岩储层地质模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1264-1273.
[3] 朱立文，王震亮，张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[4] 杨海军，张荣虎，杨宪彰，王珂，王俊鹏，唐雁刚，周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[5] 游利军，王哲，康毅力，张杜杰. 致密砂岩孔渗对盐析的响应实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 866-872.
[6] 苏佳纯,张金川，朱伟林. 非常规天然气经济评价对策思考[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 743-753.
[7] 葛岩，朱光辉，万欢，潘新志，黄志龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘紫金山侵入构造对上古生界致密砂岩气藏形成和分布的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 491-499.
[8] 赵力彬，张同辉，杨学君，郭小波，饶华文. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深区块深层致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征与成因机理[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 500-509.
[9] 黄禹忠，刁素，栗铁峰，何红梅. 致密砂岩气藏压裂伤害及对策——以川西坳陷ZH构造JS12气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 579-585.
[10] 何文军，杨海波，费李莹，王学勇，杨彤远，杨翼波，鲍海娟. 准噶尔盆地新光地区佳木河组致密砂岩气有利区资源潜力综合分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 370-381.
[11] 高文杰，李贤庆，张光武，魏强，张吉振，祁帅，陈金明. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带深层致密砂岩气藏储层致密化与成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 226-235.
[12] 张艳，张春雷，高世臣. 基于SOM和HSV染色技术的致密砂岩储层地震相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 259-267.
[13] 李国欣, 易士威, 林世国, 高阳, 李明鹏, 李德江, 王昌勇. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部地区下侏罗统储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1506-1517.
[14] 王颖, 邓守伟, 范晶, 邹晓品, 杨静. 松辽盆地南部重点断陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1455-1464.
[15] 张吉，侯科锋，李浮萍，田敏，张志刚. 基于储层地质知识库约束的致密砂岩气藏储量评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏14区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1322-1329.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曹运兴，柴学周，刘同吉，冯培文，田林，石玢，曹永恒，周丹. 潞安矿区山西组3#煤储层低压特征及控制因素研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(11): 2077 -2085 .
[2] 任茜莹，代金友，穆中奇. 气藏采收率影响因素研究与启示——以靖边气田A井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1376 -1382 .