天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油滞留聚集机理及资源潜力探讨

邱振1,2，卢斌1，施振生1，董大忠1,2，王红岩1，周杰1，陶辉飞3，郑民2，吴晓智2，郭和坤1
  

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院，河北 廊坊065007；
    2.中国石油勘探开发研究院，北京 100083；
    3.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所兰州油气资源研究中心，甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-02 修回日期:2016-04-21 出版日期:2016-10-10 发布日期:2016-10-10
  • 作者简介:邱振(1984-)，男，安徽亳州人，工程师，博士，主要从事沉积学及非常规油气地质研究. E-mail:〖WTBZ〗qiuzhen316@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目(编号:2013CB228000;2014CB23900)；中石油第四次油气资源评价重大专项(编号:2011ZX05001)；中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(编号:XDB10010103)联合资助.

Residual accumulation and resource assessment of shale oil from the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag

Qiu Zhen1,2，Lu Bin1，Shi Zhen-sheng1，Dong Da-zhong1,2，Wang Hong-yan1，Zhou Jie1，Tao Hui-fei3，Zheng Min2，Wu Xiao-zhi2，Guo He-kun1   

  1. 1.Langfang Branch,PetroChina Exploration and Development Research Institute,Langfang 065007,China;
    2.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China;
    3.Lanzhou Center for Oil and Gas Resources,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China
  • Received:2016-02-02 Revised:2016-04-21 Online:2016-10-10 Published:2016-10-10

PDF (PC)

283

摘要： 近些年来，北美地区海相页岩气的成功开发及致密油、页岩油的勘探突破，带动了全球在烃源岩层内寻找油气的热潮。准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为一套半深湖—深湖相烃源岩，显示良好的页岩油勘探前景。基于岩心描述、薄片观察、地球化学(TOC、RO、Rock-Eval等测定)、XRD、压汞、核磁共振等实验数据及资料，研究表明:①芦草沟组烃源岩厚度大，有机质丰度高，主要处于低熟—成熟阶段，为一套优质烃源岩；②页岩油储集空间类型为微裂缝和基质孔隙两大类，前者以纹层理(缝)为主，后者以粒间溶孔为主，大小一般为100～1 000nm。其中纳米级孔喉占孔喉总体约98%，是页岩油储集空间的主体。依据芦草沟组页岩油含量(S1)与TOC、RO关系及页岩油(即滞留烃量)富集因素分析，综合研究认为芦草沟组中RO值为0.7%~1.0%、TOC≥2.0%的烃源岩段是寻找页岩油的最有利层段，页岩油整体上具有“有机质大量吸附，纳米级孔喉大量聚集，微裂缝(纹层缝)有效汇聚” 滞留聚集特征。基于页岩油评价的关键参数及核磁共振等实验结果，采用小面元体积法，初步估算凹陷内芦草沟组页岩油地质资源总量约为25.5×108t，(理论)可采资源量约为4.16×108t，技术可采资源量约为0.40×108t，其富集中心位于吉30井、吉174井、吉251井、吉32井等附近。这些认识对该地区页岩油勘探开发具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: 页岩油, 资源潜力, 滞留聚集, 烃源岩, 芦草沟组, 吉木萨尔凹陷

Abstract: In recent years,successful development of marine shale gas and rapid exploration of tight and shale oil in North America had driven petroleum exploration and development into the source rocks in the world.The Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag,Junggar Basin has been recognized as a series of semi-deep lake to deep lake source rocks,showing good prospect of shale oil exploration.Based on detailed-description of cores,slice observation,organic geochemical analyses,mercury injection and nuclear magnetic resonance of the Lucaogou Formation,it is concluded as follows:(1)Source rocks of the Lucaogou Formation show large thickness,high TOC and low maturity to maturity;(2)The shale reservoir space mainly included microstructural fractures of lamination bedding and matrix pores.The latter mainly consists of dissolved intra-particle pores,which were generally 100-1 000nm.The nano-size pore-throats are the main reservoir space with a ratio of 98% in the total space.Based on analyses of relationship among S1 content,TOC and RO of source rocks from the Lucaogou Formation and enrichment condition discussion of shale oil,it is considered that sources rocks with RO ranging from 0.7% to 1.0% and TOC≥2.0% are the favorable sections for shale oil and the residual hydrocarbon accumulation of shale oil has some characteristics,such as “adsorption of organic materials,store in nano-size pore throats and flow in the micro-fractures”.Key assessment parameters of shale oil and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses by the small patch method were used to preliminarily calculate the resources.Shale oil in Jimusar Sag have great potentiality with in-place resources of 2.55 billion tons,(theoretically)recoverable resources of 0.42 billion tons and technically recoverable resources of 0.04 billion tons, which are richly distributed around Well 30,Well 174,Well 251 and Well 32.These above understandings have important implication for shale oil exploration in Jimusar Sag.

Key words: Shale oil, Resource assessment, Residual accumulation, Source rock, Lucaogou Formation, Jimusar Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1

[1]Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Cui Jingwei,et al.Formation mechanism,geological characteristics,and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):14-26.[邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26.]
[2]Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Zhang Guosheng,et al.Conventional and unconventional petroleum “orderly accumulation”:Concept and practical significance[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):14-27.[邹才能,杨智,张国生,等.常规—非常规油气“有序聚集”理论认识及实践意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):14-27.]
[3]EIA.Review of Emerging Resources:U.S.Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays[R/OL].EIA.2011
[4]Maugeri L.The Shale Oil Boom:A U.S.Phenomenon[R/OL].Harvard University,the Harvard Kennedy School,2013:55.
[5]Qiu Zhen,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Unconventional petroleum resources assessment:Progress and future prospects[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):238-246.[邱振,邹才能,李建忠,等.非常规油气资源评价进展与未来展望[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):238-246.]
[6]Kuang Lichun,Tang Yong,Lei Dewen,et al.Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock,Junggar Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):657-667.[匡立春,唐勇,雷德文,等.准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):657-667.]
[7]Kuang Lichun,Hu Wenxuan,Wang Xulong,et al.Research of the tight oil reservoir in the Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag:Analysis of lithology and porosity characteristics[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2013,19(3):529-535.[匡立春,胡文瑄,王绪龙,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层初步研究:岩性与孔隙特征分析[J].高校地质学报,2013,19(3):529-535.]
[8]Qiu Zhen.Geological Characteristics and Resource Assessment of Tight Oil/Shale Oil for Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag[R].Beijing:Post-doctoral report,Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,2014:1-158.[邱振.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油/页岩油地质特征与资源评价[R].北京:中石油勘探开发研究院,2014:1-158.]
[9]Fang Shihu,Song Yan,Xu Huaimin,et al.Relationship between tectonic evolution and petroleum system formation:Taking the Jimsar Sag of eastern Junggar Basin as an example[J].Petroleum Geology & Expression,2007,29(2):149-153.[方世虎,宋岩,徐怀民,等.构造演化与含油气系统的形成——以准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(2):149-153.]
[10]Chen Xinfa,Qu Guosheng,Ma Zongjin,et al.Tectonic frameworks and potential oil-gas traps in Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2008,29(4):425-430.[陈新发,曲国胜,马宗晋,等.准噶尔盆地构造格局与油气区带预测［J］.新疆石油地质,2008,29(4):425-430.]
[11]Si Chunsong,Chen Nenggui,Yu Chaofeng,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation,Jimsar Sag［J］.Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2013,35(5):528-533.[斯春松,陈能贵,余朝奉,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油储层沉积特征［J］.石油实验地质,2013,35(5):528-533.]
[12]Wang Chengyun,Kuang Lichun,Gao Gang,et al.Difference in hydrocarbon generation potential of the shaly source rocks in Jimusar Sag,Permian Lucaogou Formation[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(2):385-390.[王成云,匡立春,高岗,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组泥质岩类生烃潜力差异性分析[J].沉积学报,2014,32(2):385-390.]
[13]Yang Haibo,Chen Lei,Kong Yuhua.A novel classification of structural units in Junaar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2004,25(6):686-688.[杨海波,陈磊,孔玉华.准噶尔盆地构造单元划分新方案[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(6):686-688.][JP]
[14]Zhao Zhengzhang,Du Jinhu.Tight Oil and Gas[M].Beijing:Science Press,2012:199.[赵政璋,杜金虎.致密油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2012:199.]
[15]Xiang Baoli,Liao Jiande,Zhou Ni,et al.Organic geochemical features of permian source rock from Lucaogou Formation in Well Ji174 of Jimsar Depression[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(32):9636-9640.[向宝力,廖健德,周妮,等.吉木萨尔凹陷吉174 井二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩地球化学特征[J].科学技术与工程,2013,13(32):9636-9640.]
[16]Zhen Qiu,Huifei Tao,Caineng Zou et al.Lithofacies and organic geochemistry of the Middle Permian Lucaogou[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2016,140:97-107.
[17]Qiu Zhen,Tao Huifei,Lu Bin,et al.Source rock evaluation and enrichment conditions of shale oil for Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2016,51(2):533-546.[邱振,陶辉飞,卢斌,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组烃源岩评价及页岩油富集条件探讨[J].地质科学,2016,51(2):533-546.][JP]
[18]Liu Guangdi.Petroleum Geology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009:345.[柳广弟.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009:345 ]
[19]Wang Yutao.Geochemical characteristics of low-maturity crude oil in the Xinjiang Jimsar Depression and its petroliferous potential[J].Petroleum Geology & Expression,1993,15(4):385-393.[王屿涛.新疆吉木萨尔凹陷低成熟原油地球化学特征及含油远景[J].石油实验地质,1993,15(4):385-393.]
[20]Zeng Jun,Chen Shijia,Kang Sufang,et al.Geochemical charter of oil reserveoir formation in the eastern slope of Jmusaer Sag[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2005,27(2):6-9.[曾军,陈世加,康素芳,等.吉木萨尔凹陷东斜坡区成藏地球化学特征[J].西南石油学院学报,2005,27(2):6-9.]
[21]Ambrose R J,Hartman R C,Diaz-Campos M,et al.New Pore-scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations[R].Society of Petroleum Engineers Unconventional Gas Conference,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,February 23-25,SPE Paper 131772.2010:17.
[22]Passey Q R,Bohacs K M,Esch W L,et al.Fromoil-prone Source Rock to Gas-producing Shale Reservoir:Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale-gas Reservoirs[R].International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.Beijing,China,June 8-10,SPE Paper 131350.2010:29.[JP]
[23]Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[24]Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79:848-861.
[25]Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.[邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864.]
[26]Liang Shijun,Huang Zhilong,Liu Bo,et al.Formation mechanism and enrichment conditions of Lucaogou Formation shale oil from Malang Sag,Santanghu Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):588-594.[梁世君,黄志龙,柳波,等.马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油形成机理与富集条件[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):588-594.]
[27]Wang Min,Chen Xiang,YanYongxin,et al.Geological characteristics and evaluation of continental shale oil in Biyang sag of Nanxiang Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,15(5):663-671.[王敏,陈祥,严永新,等.南襄盆地泌阳凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与评价[J].古地理学报,2013,15(5):663-671.][JP]
[28]Pang Xiongqi,Luo Xiaorong,Jiang Zhenxue,et al.Accumulation and Dissipation of Petroleum and Quantitative Simulation in China’s Typical Superimposed Basin[M].Beijing:Science Press,2007:212.[庞雄奇,罗晓蓉,姜振学,等.中国典型叠合盆地油气聚散机理与定量模拟[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:212][JP]
[29]Lu Shuangfang,Huang Wenbiao,Chen Fangwen,et al.Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:Discussion and application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):249-256.[卢双舫,黄文彪,陈方文,等.页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):249-256.]
[30]Liu Bo,Lv Yanfang,Zhao Rong,et al.Formation overpressure and shale oil enrichment in the shale system of Lucaogou Formation,Malang Sag,Santanghu Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):699-705.[柳波,吕延防,赵荣,等,三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷芦草沟组泥页岩系统地层超压与页岩油富集机理[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):699-705.]
[31]Kang Yuzhu.Characteristics and exploration prospect of unconventional shale gas reservoirs in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,32(4):1-5.[康玉柱.中国非常规泥页岩油气藏特征及勘探前景展望[J].天然气工业,2012,32(4):1-5.]
[32]Jiang Naihuang,Jia Fengying,Shen Jieming.The primary oil migration and effective hydrocarbon expelling thikness of source rocks in Biyang Depression[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1986,13(2):19-24.[姜乃煌,贾凤英,沈捷明.泌阳凹陷核桃园组生油岩的排烃能力和排烃厚度初探[J].石油勘探与开发,1986,13(2):19-24.]
[33]Cui Jingwei.The Reservoir Characteristics and Mechanism of Petroleum Accumulation of Shale Oil and Tight Oil of Chang 7 in The Yanchang Formation of Triassic,Ordos Basin[R].Post-doctoral report,Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,2013.[崔景伟.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7页岩油与致密油储层表征与石油聚集机制[R].博士后出站报告,中石油勘探开发研究院,2013.]
[34]Jarvie D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas:Part 2-Shale-oil resource systems[M]//Breyer J A.Shale reservoirs-Giant Resources for the 21st Century.AAPG Memoir,2012,97:89-119.
[35]Li Jian,Wang Yifeng,Ma Wei,et al.Evaluation on occluded hydrocarbon in deep-ultra deep ancient source rocks and its cracked gas resources[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(11):9-15.[李剑,王义凤,马卫,等.深层一超深层古老烃源岩滞留烃及其裂解气资源评价[J].天然气工业,2015,35(11):9-15.][JP]
[36]Cui Jingwei,Zhu Rukai,Cui Jinggang.Relationship of porous evolution and residual hydrocarbon:Evidence from modeling experiment with geological constrains[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2013,87(5):730-736.[崔景伟,朱如凯,崔京钢.页岩孔隙演化及其与残留烃量的关系:来自地质过程约束下模拟实验的证据[J].地质学报,2013,87(5):730-736.]
[37]Zhang Jinchuan,Lin Lamei,Li Yuxi et al.Classification and evalution of shale oil[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(5):322-331.[张金川,林腊梅,李玉喜,等.页岩油分类与评价[J].地学前缘,2012,19(5):322-331.]
[38]Song Guoqi,Zhang Linye,Lu Shuangfang,et al.Resource evaluation method for shale oil and its application[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):221-228.[宋国奇,张林晔,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源评价技术方法及其应用[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):221-228.]
[39]Modica C,Lapierre S G.Estimation of kerogen porosity in source rocks as a function of thermal transformation:Example from the Mowry Shale in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(1):87-108.
[40]Guo Qiulin,Chen Ningsheng,Wu Xiaozhi,et al.Method for assessment of tight oil resources[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2013,18(2):67-76.[郭秋麟,陈宁生,吴晓智,等.致密油资源评价方法研究[J].中国石油勘探,2013,18(2):67-76.][JP]
[41]Guo Qiulin,Chen Ningsheng,Liu Chenglin,et al.Research advance of hydrocarbon resource assessment method and a new assessment software system[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(10):1305-1314.[郭秋麟,陈宁生,刘成林,等.油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统[J].石油学报,2015,36(10):1305-1314.]
[1] 崔景伟, 朱如凯, 李森, 齐亚林, 时晓章, 毛治国, . 坳陷湖盆烃源岩发育样式及其对石油聚集的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 982-996.
[2] 杨帆, 宋永, 陈洪, 龚德瑜, 卞保力, 刘海磊. 准噶尔盆地阜东地区石炭系松喀尔苏组烃源岩评价及气源对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1018-1026.
[3] 吴海, 严少怀, 赵孟军, 卓勤功, 王龙, 白东来, 张月, 沙威. 库车前陆盆地东西部油气成藏过程差异性分析——以吐北1和迪那2构造为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1027-1036.
[4] 吴小奇, 倪春华, 陈迎宾, 朱建辉, 李贶, 曾华盛. 鄂尔多斯盆地定北地区上古生界天然气来源[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 819-827.
[5] 唐友军, 杨易卓, 孟宪新, 王霆, 何大祥, 李梦茹, 季长军, 孙鹏, 蔡意兰. 火山活动对南羌塘盆地曲色组烃源岩地球化学特征影响探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 721-728.
[6] 王伟锋, 张仲达. 准噶尔盆地五彩湾地区石炭系烃源岩演化及油气成藏过程[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 447-455.
[7] 唐友军, 郑磊, 李永飞, 郜晓勇, 宗文明, 孙求实, 何大祥. 凌源—宁城盆地牛营子坳陷侏罗系海房沟组烃源岩芳烃地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 433-446.
[8] 刘树根, 孙玮, 宋金民, 雍自权, 王浩, 赵聪. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组天然气勘探的关键地质问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 151-167.
[9] 张帆, 冉清昌, 吴玉明, 任志高. 松辽盆地北部古中央隆起带天然气地球化学特征及成藏条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 126-132.
[10] 于聪, 胡国艺, 陈瑞银. 不同煤系烃源岩热解气地球化学差异及其在苏里格气田的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 133-142.
[11] 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 肖敦清, 李洪香, 官全胜, 林伶, 曲宁. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油形成条件及富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1323-1332.
[12] 石军, 邹艳荣, 余江, 刘家靖. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷芦草沟组高有机碳页岩发育的古环境[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1138-1150.
[13] 傅宁, 刘建升. 北部湾盆地流二段3类烃源岩的生烃成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 932-941.
[14] 贾智彬, 侯读杰, 孙德强, 姜玉涵, 张自鸣, 洪梅. 贵州地区牛蹄塘组底部烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1031-1041.
[15] 程志强，王飞宇，师玉雷，冯伟平，谢佩宇，任利兵，吴子强,江涛，赵志刚. 二连盆地乌里雅斯太凹陷南洼烃源岩有机相与生烃特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 696-707.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘洪军;贾亚妮;李振宏;郑聪斌;. 岩溶盆地中微隆起带的存在及意义――以鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶纪岩溶古地貌为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 490 -493 .
[2] 李桂菊, 庄新国. 多年冻土区沉积物中甲烷的生成[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(5): 516 -518 .
[3] 达江;宋岩;洪峰;赵孟军;傅国友;方世虎;. 中国中西部前陆盆地成藏特征的初步分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 452 -455 .
[4] 杨宁,吕修祥,陈梅涛,赵风云,张亚光,郑多明 . 英买力地区碳酸盐岩古风化壳油气聚集模式探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 35 -39 .
[5] 宁 宁;陈孟晋;刘锐娥;孙庆伍;蔺 杰;肖红平;张春林. . 鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界石英砂岩储层成岩及孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(3): 334 -338 .
[6] 曹刚;李其荣;安辉;. 川南地区下二叠统茅口组“岩溶型气藏”地震、地质特征探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(3-4): 76 -81 .
[7] 吴时国;袁圣强;. 世界深水油气勘探进展与我国南海深水油气前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(6): 693 -699 .
[8] 何家雄;夏斌;王志欣;刘宝明;孙东山;. 中国东部及近海陆架盆地不同成因CO2运聚规律与有利富集区预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 622 -631 .
[9] 倪金龙;周莉;赵小花;刘东 . 柴达木盆地红沟子鼻状构造新生代油气成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(1): 107 -110 .
[10] 朱维耀;宋洪庆; 何东博;王明 ;贾爱林;胡永乐 . 含水低渗气藏低速非达西渗流数学模型及产能方程研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(05): 685 -689 .