天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

典型致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构分类及其意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地盒8段为例

吴浩1,2,刘锐娥3,纪友亮1,2,张春林3,周勇1,2,张云钊4   

  1. 1.中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京 102249;
    2.中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京 102249;
    3.中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院,河北 廊坊 065007;
    4.中国石油大学(北京) 非常规天然气研究院,北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-20 修回日期:2015-10-11 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2016-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 纪友亮(1962-),男,山东博兴人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事石油地质学、沉积学和层序地层学方面的研究和教学工作. E-mail:jiyouliang@cup.edu.cn.
  • 作者简介:吴浩(1990-),男,陕西定边人,博士研究生,主要从事沉积学与储层地质学研究. E-mail:H.Wu1990@outlook.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41272157);国家科技重大专项(编号:2016ZX05007-003);中国石油科技创新基金(编号:2014D-5006-0101);中国石油大学(北京)科研基金(编号:2462013YJRC038,2462015YQ0108)联合资助.

Classification of pore structures in typical tight sandstone gas reservoir and its significance:A case study of the He8 Member of Upper Palaeozoic Shihezi Formation in Ordos Basin,China

Wu Hao1,2,Liu Rui-e3,Ji You-liang1,2,Zhang Chun-lin3,Zhou Yong1,2,Zhang Yun-zhao4   

  1. 1.College of Geoscience,China University of Petroleum (Beijing),Beijing 102249,China;
    2.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting,Beijing 102249,China;
    3.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Langfang Branch,PetroChina,Langfang 065007,China;
    4.Unconventional Natural Gas Research Institute,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing 102249,China)
  • Received:2015-09-20 Revised:2015-10-11 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2016-05-10

摘要: 在分析目前储层孔隙结构分类方法的基础上,根据鄂尔多斯盆地盒8段265块典型致密气储层砂岩样品的压汞测试数据,提出了适应于盒8段致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构的分类方案。分类鉴于反映孔隙结构的参数间信息具有一定的重迭,聚类分析前,利用Q型主因子分析将优选出的孔隙度(φ)、渗透率(K)、排驱压力(Pd)、中值压力(P50)、中值半径(R50)、分选系数(Sp)和最大进汞饱和度(Smax)等7个孔隙结构参数提取为3个主因子,依据主因子所涵盖的综合信息特征,分别命名为孔喉大小因子、孔渗因子及孔喉分选因子。以3个主因子作为聚类分析的新变量,并结合毛管压力曲线特征、镜下孔隙特征等,将典型致密气砂岩孔隙结构划分为4种类型。运用Fisher判别法对聚类结果进行了回符检验,判别正确率达87.5%。在此基础上,建立了定量的典型判别函数来划分孔隙结构类型:Ⅰ型(Y1>2.51),Ⅱ型(Y1=-0.12~2.51),Ⅲ型(Y1=-3.72~-0.12)和Ⅳ型(Y1<-3.72)。研究结果表明:Ⅰ型或Ⅱ型孔隙结构的致密砂岩气储层为有利储层,据此分类与试气结果十分吻合,可对今后寻找有利储层、致密气的规模勘探开发提供有效地质依据。

关键词: 致密砂岩气, 孔隙结构, Q型主因子聚类分析, Fisher判别分析, 盒8段, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Based on the existing classification methods of reservoir pore structure and 265 samples of mercury injection experiments from the tight gas reservoir of Upper Palaeozoic He 8 member in Ordos Basin,this paper discussed the classification of pore structures in typical tight sandstone gas reservoir.Considering that certain overlaps exist between the pore structure parameters which reflect the classification information,three factors were extracted from the seven parameters including porosity (Φ),permeability (K),displacement pressure (Pd),median pressure (P50),median pore throat radius (R50),sorting coefficient (Sp) and maximum mercury saturation (Smax) using Q-model principal factor analysis.According to comprehensive information characteristics from the main factors,three main factors were named as pore throat size factor,porosity-permeability factor and pore throat sorting factor,respectively.Taking the three principal factors as cluster new variables,combining characteristics of capillary pressure curve and arthroscopic characteristic,pore structures of typical tight sandstone gas reservoir are divided into four types.Through Fisher discriminant method,the correct discrimination rate of clustering results can reach 87.5%,and accordingly,discriminant functions are established to divide the type of pore structure:Type Ⅰ (Y1>2.51),Type Ⅱ (Y1=-0.12-2.51),Type Ⅲ (Y1=-3.72--0.12),and Type Ⅳ (Y1<-3.72).The results show that Type Ⅰ and Type Ⅱ pore structures are in most favor of tight sandstone gas reservoir,and they also present that this classification is consistent with the test gas data.It will also provide solid geological evidence for high quality reservoirs and further regional exploration and development of tight gas in the Ordos Basin.

Key words: Tight sandstone gas, Pore structure, Q-model principal factor clustering analysis, Fisher discriminant analysis, He8 member of Shihezi Formation, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2

[1]Wang Yutao,Lü Chungang,Yao Aiguo,et al.Tight sandstone gas resource potential and exploration prospect in the Junggar Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(5):855-860.[王屿涛,吕纯刚,姚爱国,等.准噶尔盆地致密砂岩气资源潜力及勘探前景[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(5):855-860.]
[2]Surdam R C.A new paradigm for gas exploration in anomalously pressured “tight gas sands” in the Rocky Mountain Laramide Basin[C]//AAPG Memoir 67:Seals,traps,and the petroleum system.Tulsa:AAPG,1997.
[3]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Yuan Xuanjun,et al.Global importance of “continuous” petroleum reservoirs:Accumulation,distribution and evaluation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(6):669-682.[邹才能,陶士振,袁选俊,等.“连续型”油气藏及其在全球的重要性:成藏、分布与评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2009,36(6):669-682.]
[4]Xing Enyuan,Pang Xiongqi,Xiao Zhongyao,et al.Type discrimination of Yinan 2 gas reservoir in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2011,35(6):21-27.[邢恩袁,庞雄奇,肖中尧,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷依南2气藏类型的判别[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(6):21-27.]
[5]Spencer C W.Geologic aspects of tight gas reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain region[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,1985,37(7):1308-1314.
[6]Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.[邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187.]
[7]He Wenxiang,Yang Le,Ma Chaoya,et al.Effect of micro-pore structure parameter on seepage characteristics in ultra-low permeability reservoir:A case from Chang6 reservoir of Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):477-481.[何文祥,杨乐,马超亚,等.特低渗透储层微观孔隙结构参数对渗流行为的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地长6储层为例[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):477-481.]
[8]Chen Huanqing,Cao Chen,Liang Shuxian,et al.Research advances on reservoir pores[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):227-237.[陈欢庆,曹晨,梁淑贤,等.储层孔隙结构研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):227-237.]
[9]Liu Yuan,Zhu Xiaomin,Zhang Simeng,et al.Microcosmic pore structure in low-moderate permeability reservoir of Fuyu oil layer in Sanzhao Sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(2):270-275.[刘媛,朱筱敏,张思梦,等.三肇凹陷扶余油层中-低渗透储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(2):270-275.]
[10]Xie Wuren,Yang Wei,Yang Guang,et al.Pore structure features of sandstone reservoirs in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the central part of Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(3):435-440.[谢武仁,杨威,杨光,等.川中地区上三叠统须家河组砂岩储层孔隙结构特征[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(3):435-440.]
[11]Wang Ruifei,Chen Mingqiang,Sun Wei.Classification and evaluation of micro-pore structures in the ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J].Acta Geoscientica Sinica,2008,29(2):213-220.[王瑞飞,陈明强,孙卫.特低渗透砂岩储层微观孔隙结构分类评价[J].地球学报,2008,29(2):213-220.]
[12]Ran Xinquan,Wu Shenghe,Fu Jing,et al.Research on the pore structure classification of low permeability reservoir of the Yanchang Formation in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2013,20(2):77-85.[冉新权,吴胜和,付晶,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组低渗透储层孔隙结构分类研究[J].地学前缘:中国地质大学(北京),2013,20(2):77-85.]
[13]Fan Aiping,Zhao Juan,Yang Renchao,et al.Pore structure of reservoir rocks in Shan1 and He8 members,the east Ⅱ block of Sulige Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):482-487.[樊爱萍,赵娟,杨仁超,等.苏里格气田东二区山1段、盒8段储层孔隙结构特征[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):482-487.]
[14]Yang Yong,Da Shipan,Xu Xiaorong.Pore structure study of P1-2sh8 reservoir in Sulige Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(4):50-52.[杨勇,达世攀,徐晓蓉.苏里格气田盒8段储层孔隙结构研究[J].天然气工业,2005,25(4):50-52.]
[15]Ge Xinmin,Fan Yiren,Tang Limin,et al.Pore structure typing of heterogeneous clastic reservoir using information entropy-fuzzy spectral clustering algorithm[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2015,46(6):2227-2235.[葛新民,范宜仁,唐利民,等.基于信息熵—模糊谱聚类的非均质碎屑岩储层孔隙结构分类[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,46(6):2227-2235.]
[16]Zou Caineng,Zhao Wenzhi,Zhang Xingyang,et al.Formation and distribution of shallow-water deltas and central-basin sandbodies in large open depression lake basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(6):813-825.[邹才能,赵文智,张兴阳,等.大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布[J].地质学报,2008,82(6):813-825.]
[17]Johnson D.Applied multivariate methods for data analysts[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,2005:147-270.
[18]Lv Honghua,Ren Mingda,Liu Jincheng,et al.Application of Q-model principal factor analysis and clustering method in evaluation on sandstone reservoirs of the Neogene in Huatugou Oilfield,Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2006,42(6):740-745.[吕红华,任明达,柳金诚,等.Q型主因子分析与聚类分析在柴达木盆地花土沟油田新近系砂岩储层评价中的应用[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2006,42(6):740-745.]
[19]Yang Zhaoshuan,Lin Changsong,Yin Hong,et al.Application of principal component analysis in carbonate lithology identification of the Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Tazhong area[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(1):54-59.[杨兆栓,林畅松,尹宏,等.主成分分析在塔中地区奥陶系鹰山组碳酸盐岩岩性识别中的应用[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(1):54-59.]
[20]Jiang Zaixing,Wu Mingrong,Lu Hongbo,et al.Discriminant analysis on deep-water sedimentary environment of Jurassic coal-bearing bed of Yanqi Basin in Xinjiang area[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China:Edition of Natural Science,1999,23(2):1-5.[姜在兴,吴明荣,鲁洪波,等.新疆焉耆盆地中生界含煤地层深水成因的判别分析[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,1999,23(2):1-5.]
[21]Wang Shufen.Statistics Application[M].Beijing:Peking University Press,2007:146-149.[王淑芬.应用统计学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007:146-149.]
[22]Wu Hao,Guo Yinghai,Zhang Chunlin,et al.Characteristics and classifications of micro-pore structure in tight oil reservoir[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(6):12-17.[吴浩,郭英海,张春林,等.致密油储层微观孔吼结构特征及分类[J].东北石油大学学报,2013,37(6):12-17.]
[23]Chen Shangbin,Xia Xiaohong,Qin Yong,et al.Classification of pore structures in shale gas reservoir at the Longmaxi Formation in the south of Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):760-765.[陈尚斌,夏筱红,秦勇,等.川南富集区龙马溪组页岩气储层孔隙结构分类[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(5):760-765.]
[24]Cao Yingchang,Du Lianghui,Wang Yanzhong,et al.Reservoir sedimentary-diagenetic synthetic facies and its logging identification of Sangonghe Formation in block 1 of central Junggar Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(6):1016-1027.[操应长,杜亮慧,王艳忠,等.准噶尔盆地中部Ⅰ区块三工河组储层沉积成岩综合相及其测井识别[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(6):1016-1027.]

[1] 吴松涛, 林士尧, 晁代君, 翟秀芬, 王晓瑞, 黄秀, 徐加乐. 基于孔隙结构控制的致密砂岩可动流体评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区上三叠统长6致密砂岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1222-1232.
[2] 尤源, 梁晓伟, 冯胜斌, 牛小兵, 淡卫东, 李卫成, 王芳, . 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密储层主要黏土矿物特征及其地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1233-1241.
[3] 崔景伟, 朱如凯, 李森, 齐亚林, 时晓章, 毛治国, . 坳陷湖盆烃源岩发育样式及其对石油聚集的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 982-996.
[4] 李阳, 倪小明, 王延斌, 陶传奇. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界压力特征及其成因机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 997-1005.
[5] 李勇, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 肖正录, 何清波, 苏恺明, 李俊良. 近源间互式煤系致密砂岩气成藏主控因素——以川中地区须家河组天然气为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 798-808.
[6] 吴小奇, 倪春华, 陈迎宾, 朱建辉, 李贶, 曾华盛. 鄂尔多斯盆地定北地区上古生界天然气来源[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 819-827.
[7] 吴伟涛, 王一, 赵靖舟, 杨特波, 李军, 黄正良. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部奥陶系马家沟组中组合天然气成藏规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 828-839.
[8] 位云生, 贾爱林, 郭智, 孟德伟, 王国亭. 致密砂岩气藏多段压裂水平井优化部署[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 919-924.
[9] 张成龙, 陶士振, 白斌, 王倩茹. 基于支持向量机模型的烃源岩有机碳含量预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 761-768.
[10] 刘晓鹏, 赵会涛, 闫小雄, 贾亚妮, . 克拉通盆地致密气成藏地质特征与勘探目标优选——以鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 331-343.
[11] 高阳, 王志章, 易士威, 佘源琦, 林世国, 李明鹏, 张春林, . 鄂尔多斯盆地天环地区盒8段致密砂岩岩石矿物特征及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 344-352.
[12] 孔庆芬 , 张文正, 李剑锋, 昝川莉, . 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系盐下天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 423-432.
[13] 孙兵华, 张廷山, . 鄂尔多斯盆地张家湾地区长7页岩油气储集特征及其影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 274-284.
[14] 李文镖, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 张鹏飞, 陈晨, 王思远. 南方海相页岩物质组成与孔隙微观结构耦合关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 27-38.
[15] 张道锋, 姚泾利, 高星, 席明利, 赵会涛, 闫小雄, 付勋勋. 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马五5亚段白云岩储层形成机理与展布规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 74-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 倪金龙;夏斌;. 济阳坳陷坡折带组合类型及石油地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 64 -68 .
[2] 李桂菊, 庄新国. 多年冻土区沉积物中甲烷的生成[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(5): 516 -518 .
[3] 达江;宋岩;洪峰;赵孟军;傅国友;方世虎;. 中国中西部前陆盆地成藏特征的初步分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 452 -455 .
[4] 杨宁,吕修祥,陈梅涛,赵风云,张亚光,郑多明 . 英买力地区碳酸盐岩古风化壳油气聚集模式探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 35 -39 .
[5] 肖芝华;胡国艺;李志生. 封闭体系下压力变化对烃源岩产气率的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(2): 284 -288 .
[6] 吴向华,程同锦,邓天龙 . 油气化探分析检测技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 78 -81 .
[7] 李士祥;胡明毅;李霞;. 榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(2): 200 -205 .
[8] 倪金龙;周莉;赵小花;刘东 . 柴达木盆地红沟子鼻状构造新生代油气成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(1): 107 -110 .
[9] 陈凤喜 王勇 张吉 杨勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田盒8气藏开发有利区块优选研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 94 -99 .
[10] 白斌, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 翟文亮, 刘柳红, 戴朝成, 张健, 杜红权, 毛治国. 利用露头、自然伽玛、岩石地球化学和测井地震一体化综合厘定层序界面——以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(1): 78 -86 .