天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

库车前陆盆地吐北2构造油气充注过程分析

吴海1,2,赵孟军1,2,白东来3,周延钊4,周彦臣5   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京100083;
    2.中国石油天然气集团公司盆地构造与油气成藏重点实验室,北京100083;
    3.东北石油大学地球科学学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    4.中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院,山东 青岛 266580;
    5.长江大学地球科学学院,湖北 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-12 修回日期:2015-08-17 出版日期:2016-04-10 发布日期:2016-04-10
  • 作者简介:吴海(1989-),男,湖北黄冈人,硕士研究生,主要从事含油气系统定量分析研究. E-mail:wuhai2012@hotmail.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家油气重大专项(编号:2016ZX05003-002);中国石油科技开发项目(编号:2016B-0502)联合资助.

Hydrocarbon charge process analysis of Tubei 2 structure in Kuqa foreland basin,western China

Wu Hai1,2, Zhao Meng-jun1,2, Bai Dong-lai3, Zhou Yan-zhao4, Zhou Yan-chen5   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration&Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.Key Laboratory of Basin Structure and Hydrocarbon Accumulation,CNPC,Beijing 100083,China;
    3.College of Geosciences,Northeast Petroleum University,Daqing 163318,China;
    4.School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum,Qingdao 266580,China;
    5.School of Geosciences,Yangtze University,Wuhan 430100,China
  • Received:2015-05-12 Revised:2015-08-17 Online:2016-04-10 Published:2016-04-10

摘要: 基于定量颗粒荧光、流体包裹体等技术,结合埋藏史、热史及生烃史对库车前陆盆地吐北2构造的油气充注史进行分析。分析结果表明,储层的QGF指数均大于5,表示测点的深度层段均为古油层段;而大部分层段的QGF-E强度都大于20pc,显示出残余油层的特点;TSF显示油质成分单一,说明现今储层烃类具有同源的特点。结合流体包裹体及储层沥青分析表明吐北2构造经历了3期油气充注:中新世康村组晚期(11~6Ma)经历了成熟油气的充注,包裹体显示出黄色、黄白色的荧光,由于后期断层穿盐导致古油藏破坏形成储层沥青;随着埋深加大,膏盐岩发生强烈的塑性流动使断裂愈合,同时伴随着轻质油的充注(4.5~2Ma),对应的包裹体显示出蓝色的荧光;上新世库车组末期(2.5Ma)储层又经历一期高过成熟气的充注,与第二期轻质油充注连续无间断。由于研究区白垩系储层普遍发育泥岩隔层,导致部分层段现今仍存在残余油层。

关键词: 库车前陆盆地, 吐北2, 定量颗粒荧光, 流体包裹体, 油气充注过程

Abstract: The hydrocarbon charge process of Tubei 2 structure in Kuqa foreland basin was unraveled by the analysis of quantitative fluorescence,fluid inclusion,trap development history,geothermal history,burial and evolution histories.The result shows that the QGF index of the samples in the reservoir are all larger than 5,showing the characteristic of paleo-oil zone.The QGF-E intensity of most formation in Well Tubei 2 is larger than 20pc which means it is the residual oil zone.TSF showsthe hydrocarbon nowadays in the reservoir is not mixed source.By combining palaeo-fluid evidence and reservoir bitumen analysis,it is believed that Tubei 2 structure has experienced three stages of hydrocarbon charges.In the first stage,the matured oil was charged in Late Miocene(11-6Ma)and the fluorescence color of the related fluid inclusions is yellow,after that the fault cut through the salt seal which led to the escape of the hydrocarbon and left some bitumen in the reservoir.The salt transferred into plastic with deeper burial which led to the regaining of sealing ability.In the second stage(4.5-2Ma),the reservoir experienced the charge of light oil and condensate,the related fluid inclusions color is blue.In the third stage(2.5Ma),the reservoir experienced the charge of gas following the second stage without interruption.There is still some residual liquid oil in some strata nowadays mainly because of the presence of shale interlayer.

Key words: Kuqa foreland basin, Tubei 2, Quantitative grain fluorescence, Fluid inclusion, Hydrocarbon charge history

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2

[1]Zhao Mengjun,Wang Zhaoming,Zhang Shuichang,et al.Accumulation and features of natural gas in Kuqa Foreland Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2005,79(3):414-422.[赵孟军,王招明,张水昌,等.库车前陆盆地天然气成藏过程及聚集特征[J].地质学报,2005,79(3):414-422.]
[2]Wei Guoqi,Jia Chengzao,Shi Yangshen,et al.Tectonic characteristics and petroleum prospects of Cenozoic compound rejuvenatin foreland basins in Tarim[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2000,74(2):123-133.[魏国齐,贾承造,施央申,等.塔里木新生代复合再生前陆盆地构造特征与油气[J].地质学报,2000,74(2):123-133.]
[3]Jia C,Wei G.Structural characteristics and petroliferous features of Tarim Basin[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2002,47(1):1-11.
[4]Zhao Mengjun,Lu Shuangfang.Two periods of reservoir forming and their significance for hydrocarbon distribution in Kuqa Depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(5):16-25.[赵孟军,卢双舫.库车坳陷两期成藏及其对油气分布的影响[J].石油学报,2003,24(5):16-25.]
[5]Zhao Jingzhou.Geochronology of petroleum accumulation:New advances and the future trend[J].Advance in earth sciences,2002,17(3):378-383.[赵靖舟.油气成藏年代学研究进展及发展趋势[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(3):378-383.]
[6]Liang D,Zhang S,Zhao M,et al.Hydrocarbon sources and stages of reservoir formation in KuqaDepression,Tarim Basin[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2002,47(1):62-70.
[7]Lu X,Liu K,Zhuo Q,et al.Palaeo-fluid evidence for the multi-stage hydrocarbon charges in Kela-2 Gasfield,Kuqa Foreland Basin,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(5):574-582.
[8]Zhao Mengjun,Song Yan,Pan Wenqing,et al.The overall approach of hydrocarbon filling periods and process in sedimentary basins[J].Advance in Earth Sciences,2004,19(6):939-946.[赵孟军,宋岩,潘文庆,等.沉积盆地油气成藏期研究及成藏过程综合分析方法[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(6):939-946.][JP]
[9]Warren J K.Evaporites:sediments,resources and hydrocarbons[M].Berlin Heidelberg:Springer Science & Business Media,2006:711.
[10]Zhuo Qingong,Li Yong,Song Yan,et al.Evolution of paleogene saline deposits and effectiveness of traps in Kelasu tectonic zone,Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(1):42-47.[卓勤功,李勇,宋岩,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带古近系膏盐岩盖层演化与圈闭有效性[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(1):42-47.]
[11]Zhuo Qingong,Zhao Mengjun,Li Yong,et al.The delay of Paleogene Evaporate on the gas generation peak of source rocks and its significance in Kuqa foreland basin[J].Natural Gas Geosciences,2014,25(12):1903-1912.[卓勤功,赵孟军,李勇,等.库车前陆盆地古近系岩盐对烃源岩生气高峰期的迟缓作用及其意义[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(12):1903-1912.][JP]
[12]Liu K,Eadington P.Quantitative fluorescence techniques for detecting residual oils and reconstructing hydrocarbon charge history[J].Organic Geochemistry,2005,36(7):1023-1036.
[13]Liu K,Eadington P,Middleton H,et al.Applying quantitative fluorescence techniques to investigate petroleum charge history of sedimentary basins in Australia and Papuan New Guinea[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2007,57(1):139-151.
[14]Liu K,George S C,Lu X,et al.Innovative fluorescence spectroscopic techniques for rapidly characterising oil inclusions[J].Organic Geochemistry,2014,72:34-45.
[15]Liu K,Fenton S,Bastow T,et al.Geochemical evidence of multiple hydrocarbon charges and long distance oil migration in the Vulcan Sub-Basin,Timor sea[J].APPEA  Journal,2005,45:493-509.
[16]Gui Lili,Liu Keyu,Liu Shaobo,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of Hongliuquan lithologic reservoirs in south area of weatern Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(1):50-59.[桂丽黎,刘可禹,柳少波,等.柴达木盆地西部南区红柳泉岩性油气藏成藏特征[J].石油学报,2015,36(1):50-59.]
[17]McLimans R K.The application of fluid inclusions to migration of oil and diagenesis in petroleum reservoirs[J].Applied Geochemistry,1987,2(5):585-603.
[18]Parnell J,Carey P F,Monson B.Fluid inclusion constraints on temperatures of petroleum migration from authigenic quartz in bitumen veins[J].Chemical Geology,1996,129(3):217-226.[JP]
[19]Parnell J,Middleton D,Honghan C,et al.The use of integrated fluid inclusion studies in constraining oil charge history and reservoir compartmentation:examples from the Jeanne d’Arc Basin,offshore Newfoundland[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2001,18(5):535-549.
[20]Zhao Mengjun,Zhang Baomin.Source rocks for a giant gas-accumulation areas in the Kuqa Foreland Depression[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2002,37(supplement):35-44.[赵孟军,张宝民.库车前陆坳陷形成大气区的烃源岩条件[J].地质科学,2002,37(增刊):35-44.]
[21]Guo Jigang,Pang Xiongqi,Liu Dandan,et al.Hydrocarbon expulsion for middle-lower Jurassic coal measures and evaluation of potential resource in Kuqa Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(2):327-334.[郭继刚,庞雄奇,刘丹丹,等.库车坳陷中、下侏罗统煤系烃源岩排烃特征及资源潜力评价[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(2):327-334.]
[22]Lu Xuesong,Song Yan,Zhao Mengjun,et al.Thermal history modeling of complicated extrusional section and source rock maturation characteristics in Kuqa foreland basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(10):1547-1557.[鲁雪松,宋岩,赵孟军,等.库车前陆盆地复杂挤压剖面热演化历史模拟及烃源岩成熟度演化特征[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(10):1547-1557.][JP]
[23]Zeng Lianbo.Characteristics and petroleum geological significance of Himalayan orogeny in Kuqa Foreland Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2004,25(2):175-179.[曾联波.库车前陆盆地喜马拉雅运动特征及其油气地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):175-179.]
[24]Ma Yujie,Zhuo Qingong,Yang Xianzhang,et al.Petroleum dynamic accumulation process and its significance in Kelasu structural belt,Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(3):249-254.[马玉杰,卓勤功,杨宪彰,等.库车坳陷克拉苏构造带油气动态成藏过程及其勘探启示[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(3):249-254.]
[25]Zhuo Qingong,Zhao Mengjun,Xie Huiwen,et al.Relationship between reservoir bitumen and hydrocarbon migration in Dabei region,Kuqa foreland basin[J].Petroleum Geology& Experiment,2011,33(2):193-196.[卓勤功,赵孟军,谢会文,等.库车前陆盆地大北地区储层沥青与油气运聚关系[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(2):193-196.]
[26]Zhuo Q G,Meng F W,Song Y,et al.Hydrocarbon migration through salt:Evidence from Kelasu tectonic zone of Kuqa foreland basin in China[J].Carbonates and Evaporites,2014,29(3):291-297.
[27]Wang Xin,Jia Chenzao,Yang Shufeng.The time of deformation on the Kuqa-and-thrust belt in the southern Tianshan-based on the Kuqa river area[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2002,76(1):55-63.[汪新,贾承造,杨树锋.南天山库车冲断褶皱带构造变形时间——以库车河地区为例[J].地质学报,2002,76(1):55-63.]
[28]Lu Huafu,Jia Dong,Chen Chuming,et al.Nature and timing of the Kuqa Cenozoic structures[J].Earth Science Frontiers,1999,6(4),215-221.[卢华复,贾东,陈楚铭,等.库车新生代构造性质和变形时间[J].地学前缘,1999,6(4):215-221.]

[1] 吴海, 严少怀, 赵孟军, 卓勤功, 王龙, 白东来, 张月, 沙威. 库车前陆盆地东西部油气成藏过程差异性分析——以吐北1和迪那2构造为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1027-1036.
[2] 魏强, 李贤庆, 孙可欣, 李瑾, 肖中尧, 梁万乐, 张亚超, . 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深大气田深层天然气成藏地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 897-907.
[3] 孙可欣, 李贤庆, 魏强, 梁万乐, 李剑, 张光武. 利用流体历史分析技术研究库车坳陷大北气田油气充注史[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1289-1300.
[4] 杨超,贺永红,马芳侠,雷裕红,陈义国. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组有机流体活动期次划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 655-664.
[5] 陈兰朴,李国蓉,吴章志,朱亚林,符浩,高鱼伟,王雨辰,王冬娅,何赛,胡静. 塔里木盆地塔河油田东南斜坡海西晚期奥陶系热液作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 410-419.
[6] 王琳,赵孟军,孟庆洋,王鹏,王科,袁海莉,申磊军,雷刚. 柴达木盆地英西地区中深层油气成藏过程分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1846-1854.
[7] 孙先如,贾超,李振生,李建勋,曹高社. 南华北盆地寒武系底部马店组气源岩演化的流体包裹体分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(11): 1625-1636.
[8] 王萍, 潘文蕾, 陈迎宾, 吴小奇, 王保华. 川西坳陷中段须四段天然气成藏期次研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(8): 1419-1426.
[9] 赵洪,罗晓容,张立宽,林会喜,许涛,胡才志,杨彬,雷裕红,路永扬. 准噶尔盆地中部1区块三工河组流体包裹体特征及对油气多期充注—调整过程的指示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(3): 466-476.
[10] 孟庆洋,桂丽黎,陈琰,袁莉,杨帆,隋立伟,白东来. 柴达木盆地西南地区典型油田油气充注期研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(2): 252-260.
[11] 曹青,高俊梅,范立勇,庞长旭,余金柱. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部上古生界流体包裹体特征及其意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(12): 2245-2253.
[12] 刘建良,姜振学,刘可禹,桂丽黎,李峰,邢金艳. 库车前陆盆地牙哈构造带油气成藏过程研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(1): 43-53.
[13] 陈哲龙,柳广弟,卢学军,黄志龙,丁修建. 应用流体包裹体研究储层油气充注特征——以二连盆地为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(1): 60-70.
[14] 马剑,黄志龙,范彩伟,张新顺,朱建成. 应用定量颗粒荧光技术研究宝岛13-1气田油气成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(8): 1188-1196.
[15] 李峰,姜振学,李 卓,肖中尧,袁文芳,曹少芳,杜忠明. 库车坳陷迪北气藏2期油气充注古流体证据[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(7): 1033-1041.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 付广;王剑秦. 地壳抬升对油气藏保存条件的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 18 -23 .
[2] 李桂菊, 庄新国. 多年冻土区沉积物中甲烷的生成[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(5): 516 -518 .
[3] 周兴熙;. 库车油气系统油气藏相态分布及其控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(3): 205 -213 .
[4] 张顺存,;王凌;石新璞;方琳浩,;董文举,;孔玉华 . 准噶尔盆地腹部陆西地区石炭系火山岩储层的物性特征及其与电性的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(2): 198 -203 .
[5] 李士祥;胡明毅;李霞;. 榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(2): 200 -205 .
[6] 刘文汇;黄第藩;熊传武;徐永昌;. 成烃理论的发展及国外未熟―低熟油气的分布与研究现状[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(1-2): 1 -22 .
[7] 胡雄;李延钧;陈新领;江波;马立协;付晓文;王强;梁艳;. 柴北缘马海地区油气全烃地球化学特征与成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 612 -616 .
[8] 吴时国;袁圣强;. 世界深水油气勘探进展与我国南海深水油气前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(6): 693 -699 .
[9] 张朝;张廷山;魏祥峰;戴传瑞;王秀林 . 也门X区块下白垩统沉积相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(06): 835 -839 .
[10] 朱维耀;宋洪庆; 何东博;王明 ;贾爱林;胡永乐 . 含水低渗气藏低速非达西渗流数学模型及产能方程研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(05): 685 -689 .