天然气地球科学

• 天然气开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗致密气藏压裂水平井产能预测新方法

李波,贾爱林,何东博,李学营   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2.中国石化胜利油田定向井公司,山东 东营 257064
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-21 修回日期:2015-01-16 出版日期:2015-09-10 发布日期:2015-09-10
  • 作者简介:李波(1985-),男,贵州思南人,博士研究生,主要从事气藏工程与多相管流研究. E-mail:libosonova@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”课题“天然气开发关键技术研究”(编号:2011ZX05015)资助.

A New Method for Predicting Productivity of Fractured Horizontal Wells in Low-permeability Tight Gas Reservoir

LI Bo,JIA Ai-lin,HE Dong-bo,LI Xue-ying   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.SINOPEC Shengli Directional Drilling Company,Dongying 257064,China
  • Received:2014-11-21 Revised:2015-01-16 Online:2015-09-10 Published:2015-09-10

摘要:

应用位势理论、叠加原理和流体力学的相关原理,建立了考虑裂缝干扰、污染表皮、裂缝非均匀分布、裂缝与井筒有限导流,以及裂缝—井筒汇聚流、裂缝内高速非达西流动的压裂水平井稳态流动数学模型,给出了模型的数值求解方法,并运用模型预测了实际水平井产能,分析了产能的影响因素。结果表明,该模型适用性强,能用于各种复杂情况下的水平井产能预测,预测精度较高;由于裂缝间的干扰作用,各条裂缝产量存在差异,水平井筒两端裂缝产量高,中间裂缝产量低;水平井产能随水平段长度、裂缝半长、裂缝导流能力的增大而增大;裂缝污染表皮对产能影响显著,产能随表皮系数的增加而急剧下降,因此应尽量减少压裂作业对地层的伤害;在相对合理裂缝间距范围内,裂缝分布形式对产能影响不明显;井筒半径对井筒压降有影响,应根据水平井产能的高低,设计合理的井筒半径。

关键词: 低渗致密气藏, 压裂水平井, 裂缝, 井筒, 产能, 影响因素

Abstract:

Adopting potential theory,the superposition principle and the related principle of fluid mechanics,a steady mathematical model for fractured horizontal well is established considering interactive disturbance among fractures,pollution skin,non-uniform distribution of fracture,finite conductivity flow in fracture and wellbore,and fracture-wellbore convergent flows,non-Darcy flow in fracture.Then the numerical solution to the model is derived.The model is applied to predict an actual productivity of horizontal wells and to analyze the influence factors of productivity.Result shows that the model can be used for horizontal well productivity prediction with various complicated situations and it shows high accuracy.Due to the fracture′s mutual interference,the production rate of fracture differs.Fractures on both ends of the horizontal wellbore have high yield,while fractures in middle have low yield.Horizontal well productivity increases with the growth of horizontal interval length,fracture half-length,and fracture conductivity.Pollution skin of fracture has significant effects on productivity.The increase of it leads to a sharp decline of productivity.Thus it is important to reduce the damage of fracturing operation on formation as much as possible.Within relatively reasonable fracture spacing scope,the effect of fracture distribution pattern on productivity is not obvious.Since wellbore radius affects wellbore pressure drop,its design should be in accordance with the productivity of the horizontal wells.

Key words: Low-permeability tight gas reservoir, Fractured horizontal wells, Fracture, Wellbore, Productivity, Influencing factors

中图分类号: 

  • TE32
[1]Holditch S A.Tight gas sands[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,2006,58(6):86-93.
[2]Dai Jinxing,Ni Yunyan,Wu Xiaoqi.Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(3):257-264.[戴金星,倪云燕,吴小奇.中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(3):257-264.]
[3]Ma Xinhua,Jia Ailin,Tan Jian,et al.Tight sand gas development technologies and practices in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(5):572-579.[马新华,贾爱林,谭健,等.中国致密砂岩气开发工程技术与实践[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(5):572-579.]
[4][JP2]He Dongbo,Jia Ailin,Ji Guang,et al.Well type and pattern optimization technology for large scale tight sand gas,Sulige Gas Field[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):79-89.[何东博,贾爱林,冀光,等.苏里格大型致密砂岩气田开发井型井网技术[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):79-89.]
[5]Lu Tao,Zhang Ji,Li Yuegang,et al.Horizontal well development technology for tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(8):38-43.[卢涛,张吉,李跃刚,等.苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏水平井开发技术及展望[J].天然气工业,2013,33(8):38-43.]
[6]Yang Zhilun,Zhao Weilan,Chen Qiwen,et al.High efficiency and productivity technology for horizontal wells in the Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(8):44-48.[杨志伦,赵伟兰,陈启文,等.苏里格气田水平井高效建产技术[J].天然气工业,2013,33(8):44-48.]
[7]Giger F M.The Reservior Engineering Aspects of Horizontal Well[R].SPE 13024.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,16-19 September,Houston,Texas,1984.
[8]Mukherjee H,Economides M J.A parametric comparison of horizontal and vertical well performance[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1991,6(2):209-216.
[9]Joshi S D.Augmentation of Well Productivity Using Slant and Horizontal wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1988,40(6):729-739.
[10]Prats M.Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior—Incompressible fluid case[J].SPE Journal,1961,1(2):105-118.
[11]Raghavan R,Joshi S D.Productivity of multiple drainholes or fractured horizontal wells[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1993,8(1):11-16.
[12]Lang Zhaoxing,Zhang Lihua,Cheng Linsong.Investigation on productivity of fractured horizontal well[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,1994,18(2):43-46.[郎兆新,张丽华,程林松.压裂水平井产能研究[J].石油大学学报,1994,18(2):43-46.]
[13]Han Shugang,Cheng Linsong,Ning Zhengfu.A new method for predicting productivity of fractured horizontal wells in gas reservoir[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2002,26(4):36-39.[韩树刚,程林松,宁正福.气藏压裂水平井产能预测新方法[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2002,26(4):36-39.]
[14]Ning Zhengfu,Han Shugang,Cheng Linsong,et al.Productivity calculation method of fractured horizontal wells in lowpermeability oil or gas field[J].Acta Petroleum Sinica,2002,23(2):68-72.[宁正福,韩树刚,程林松,等.低渗透油气藏压裂水平井产能计算方法[J].石油学报,2002,23(2):68-72.]
[15]Li Tingli,Li Chunlan,Wu Ying,et al.A new way to calculate fractured horizontal wells productivity in low permeability oil reservoirs[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2006,30(2):48-52.[李廷礼,李春兰,吴英,等.低渗透油藏压裂水平井产能计算新方法[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2006,30(2):48-52.]
[16]Fan Zifei,Fang Hongchang,Niu Xinnian.A steady solution formula of horizontal well productivity in a fractured reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1996,23(3):52-57.[范子菲,方宏长,牛新年.裂缝性油藏水平井稳态解产能公式研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1996,23(3):52-57.]
[17]Zhang Feng,Zhao Shimin,Qin Jianmin,et al.Productivity of the horizontal well with finite-conductivity fractures[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(5):817-821.[张枫,赵仕民,秦建敏,等.有限导流裂缝水平井产能研究[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(5):817-821.]
[18]Cinco-Ley H,Samaniego-V F,Domínguez N.Transient pressure behavior of a well with a finite-conductivity vertical fracture[J].SPE Journal,1978,18(4):253-264.
[19]Riley M F.Analytical Solutions for Elliptical Finite-Conductivity Fractures[R].SPE 22656.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,6-9 October,Dallas,Texas,1991.
[20]Guo B,Yu X,Khoshgahdam M.A simple analytical model for predicting productivity of multi-fractured horizontal wells[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2009,12(6):879-885.
[21][KG*5/6]Wang Zhiping,Zhu Weiyao,Yue Ming,et al.A method to predict the production of fractured horizontal wells in low/ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing,2012,34(7):750-754.[王志平,朱维耀,岳明,等.低、特低渗透油藏压裂水平井产能计算方法[J].北京科技大学学报,2012,34(7):750-754.]
[22]Wang Zhiping,Ran Qiquan,Tong Min,et al.New forecasting method of fractured horizontal well productivity in volcanic gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(11):1868-1874.[王志平,冉启全,童敏,等.火山岩气藏压裂水平井产能预测新方法[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(11):1868-1874.]
[23][JP2]Aguilera R.Knudsen′s permeability correction for tight porous media[J].Transport in Porous Media,2012,91(1):239-260.
[24]Zhang F,Yang D.Determination of fracture conductivity in tight formations with Non-Darcy flow behavior[J].SPE Joural,2014,19(1):34-44.
[25]Chen N H,An explicit equation for friction factor in pipe[J].Ind.Eng.Chem.Fundamen.,1979,18(3):296-297.
[26]Dikken B J.Pressure drops in horizontal wells and its effects on their production performance[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1990,42(11):1426-1433.
[1] 徐加祥,丁云宏,杨立峰,王臻,刘哲,高睿. 基于扩展有限元的水力压裂缝间干扰及裂缝形态分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1356-1363.
[2] 赵文韬,荆铁亚,吴斌,周游,熊鑫. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制——以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344.
[3] 任茜莹,代金友,穆中奇. 气藏采收率影响因素研究与启示——以靖边气田A井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1376-1382.
[4] 杨海军,张荣虎,杨宪彰,王珂,王俊鹏,唐雁刚,周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[5] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[6] 朱维耀,马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852.
[7] 吕志凯,贾爱林,唐海发,刘群明,王泽龙. 大型致密砂岩气藏水平井产能评价与新认识[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 873-879.
[8] 翁定为,付海峰,包力庆,胥云, 梁天成,张金. 水平井平面射孔实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 572-578.
[9] 史文洋,姚约东,程时清,石志良,高敏. 裂缝性低渗透碳酸盐岩储层酸压改造油井动态压力特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 586-596.
[10] 段毅,吴应忠,赵阳,曹喜喜,马兰花. 草本沼泽泥炭加水热解产物烃类气体氢同位素特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 305-310.
[11] 孟凡坤,雷群,徐伟,何东博,闫海军,邓惠. 应力敏感碳酸盐岩复合气藏生产动态特征分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 429-436.
[12] 卢文涛,李继庆,郑爱维,梁榜,张谦,杨文新. 涪陵页岩气田定产生产分段压裂水平井井底流压预测方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 437-442.
[13] 张云钊,曾联波,罗群,张晨,吴浩,吕文雅,代全齐,朱德宇. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密储层裂缝特征和成因机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 211-225.
[14] 巫修平,张群. 碎软低渗煤层顶板水平井分段压裂裂缝扩展规律及控制机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 268-276.
[15] 左罗,蒋廷学,罗莉涛,吴魏,赵昆. 基于渗流新模型分析页岩气流动影响因素及规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 296-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!