天然气地球科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 129–134.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2012.01.129

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

矿物成分和微结构对泥质岩储层应力敏感性的影响

何金钢,康毅力,游利军,杜新龙,程秋菊   

  1. 1.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 四川 成都 610500;
    2.中国石化华北分公司,河南 郑州 450006
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-29 修回日期:2011-12-26 出版日期:2012-02-10 发布日期:2012-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 何金钢hjg0501010638@sina.com. E-mail:hjg0501010638@sina.com.
  • 作者简介:何金钢(1986-),男,黑龙江大庆人,硕士研究生,主要从事非常规气藏开发、储层保护理论与技术研究.E-mail:hjg0501010638@sina.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家“973”计划课题(编号:2010CB226705)资助.

Effects of Mineral Composition and Microstructure on Stress-sensitivity of Mudrocks

He Jin-gang,Kang Yi-li,You Lijun,Du Xin-long,Cheng Qiu-ju   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology
    and Exploitation,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China;
    2.Huabei Branch Company,China Petrochemical Corporation,Zhengzhou 450006,China
  • Received:2011-09-29 Revised:2011-12-26 Online:2012-02-10 Published:2012-02-10

摘要:

富含粘土的页岩、泥质粉砂岩和粉砂岩等泥质岩的储层矿物成分、微组构和微孔结构复杂,使得泥质岩储层的应力敏感性存在较大差别。以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组泥质岩为研究对象,开展应力敏感性实验评价研究,并与典型致密砂岩储层进行对比。结果表明,页岩的应力敏感程度强,泥质粉砂岩中等—偏强,致密砂岩弱;在30MPa有效应力作用下,岩石呈现塑性变形。分析指出,岩石的变形主要受到岩石的组分、胶结物类型和含量\,微裂缝系统、孔隙结构参数、骨架颗粒形态、接触方式\,粒度分布、粘土微结构等参数的影响。针对3类岩石的应力敏感性差异,应区别对待,尽力控制储层应力敏感性损害的发生。

关键词: 应力敏感性, 矿物成分, 微结构, 泥质岩, 页岩

Abstract:

The mudrocks which are rich in clays have the differences of stress sensitivity,because of the complexity of mineral composition,micro-construction and microporous-structure.This paper carried out a study of stress sensitivity evaluation on clay shale and sandstone reservoirs of Yanchang Group in Ordos basin and compared the differences of stress sensitivity.The results showed that: shale has a strong stress sensitivity; silty sandstone has a medium-partial strong stress sensitivity; tight sandstone has a weak stress sensitivity; under the effective stress of 30MPa,the rock presents plastic deformation.Rock deformation is mainly affected by the composition of rock,cementing type and content,micro-fracture system,pore structure parameters,morphology contacting way and distribution of the particles,and clay mineral content and microstructure.The stress sensitivity differences of the three rocks reflect the influence of the composition and microstructure of mineral rock on stress sensitivity.Therefore,for different lithologic reservoirs,reasonable production pressure difference should be adopted to avoid the occurrence of reservoir stress sensitivity damage.

Key words: Stress-sensitivity, Mineral composition, Microstructure, Mudrocks, Shale.

中图分类号: 

  • TE122

[1]Zhang Jinchuan,Xue Hui,Bian Changrong,et al.Remarks on unconventional gas exploration in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(12):53-56.[张金川,薛会,卞昌蓉,等.中国非常规天然气勘探雏议[J].天然气工业,2006,26(12):53-56.]
[2]Ning Ning,Wang Hongyan,Yong Hong,et al.The unconventional natural gas resources and exploitation technologies in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(9):9-12.[宁宁,王红岩,雍洪,等.中国非常规天然气资源基础与开发技术[J].天然气工业,2009,29(9):9-12.]
[3]Ren Leifu.The Clay Minerals and Clay Rock[M].Beijing:Geological Press,1992.[任磊夫.粘土矿物与粘土岩[M].北京:地质出版社,1992.]
[4]Vairogs J.Pressure transient tests in formations having stress-
[JP]sensitive permeability[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1973,25(8):965-970.
[5]Thomas R D,Ward D C.Effect of over-burden pressure and water saturation on gas permeability of the tight sandstone cores[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1972,24(2):120-124.
[6]Kang Yili,Zhang Hao,Chen Yijian,et al.Comprehensive research of tight sandstones gas reservoirs stress sensitivity in Daniudi gas field[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(3):335-338.[康毅力,张浩,陈一健,等.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田致密砂岩气层应力敏感性综合研究[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(3):335-338.]
[7]Wang Yezhong,Kang Yili,Zhang Hao,et al.Responses of carbonatite stress sensitivity to loading time under effective pressure[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2007,30(3):105-108.[王业众,康毅力,张浩,等.碳酸盐岩应力敏感性对有效应力作用时间的响应[J].钻采工艺,2007,30(3):105-108.]
[8]Lan Lin,Kang Yili,Chen Yijian,et al.Discussion on evaluation methods for stress sensitivities of low permeability and tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2005,22(3):1-4.[兰林,康毅力,陈一健,等.储层应力敏感性评价实验方法与评价指标探讨[J].钻井液与完井液,2005,22(3):1-4.]
[9]Li Chuanliang.Low permeabilitty rocks are less sensitive to stress[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2005,27(4):61-63.[李传亮.低渗透储层不存在强应力敏感[J].石油钻采工艺,2005,27(4):61-63.]
[10]Du Xinlong,Kang Yili,You Lijun.Controlling factors of stress sensitivity in low-permeability reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(2):1-5.[杜新龙,康毅力,游利军.低渗透储层应力敏感性控制因素研究[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(2):1-5.]
[11]Wang Daofu.Ordos Basin Development Technology in the Low Permeable Reserviors[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.[王道富.鄂尔多斯盆地低渗透油气田开发技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003.]
[12]Daniel M J.Unconventional Shale Resource Plays:Shale-Gas and Shale Oil Opportunities[C].USA:Fort Worth Business Press,2008.
[13]Daniel M J.Shale Gas:Making Gas and Oil From Shale Resource Systems[R].Dallas:Dallas Geological Society,2010.
[14]Li Yuxi,Qiao Dewu,Jiang Wenli.Gas content of gas-bearing shale and its geological evaluation summary[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):308-317.[李玉喜,乔德武,姜文利.页岩气含气量和页岩气地质评价综述[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):308-317.]
[15]Dai Lei.Geological Study on Chang 4+5 and Chang 6 Reservoirs in Jiyuan Area of Ordos Basin[D].Qingdao:Shandong University of Science and Technology,2006.[代磊.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长4+5、长6储层地质学研究[D].青岛:山东科技大学,2006.]
[16]Guo Yanqin.Research on Reservoir Micro-characteristic of Yanchang Formation in Fuxian Exploration Area of the Ordos Basin[D].Xi′an:Northwest University,2006.[郭艳琴.富县探区延长组储层微观特征研究[D].西安:西北大学,2006.]
[17]Liu Chunyan,Wang Yi,Hu Zongquan.Depositional features and properties analysis of Yanchang Formation in Fuxian area,Ordos basin[J].Global Geology,2009,28(4):491-497.[刘春燕,王毅,胡宗全.鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组沉积特征及物性分析[J].世界地质,2009,28(4):491-497.]
[18]He Jingang,Kang Yili,You Lijun,et al.Influence of the fluid damage on shale reservoir stress sensitivity[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(5):915-920.[何金钢,康毅力,游利军,等.流体损害对页岩储层应力敏感性的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(5):915-920.]

[1] 周立宏,蒲秀刚,肖敦清,李洪香,官全胜,林伶,曲宁. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油形成条件及富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1323-1332.
[2] 赵文韬,荆铁亚,吴斌,周游,熊鑫. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制——以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344.
[3] 夏鹏,王甘露,曾凡桂,牟雨亮,张昊天,刘杰刚. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组高—过成熟页岩气富氮特征及机理探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1345-1355.
[4] 程鸣,傅雪海,张苗,程维平,渠丽珍. 沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层覆压孔渗实验对比研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1163-1171.
[5] 康毅力,豆联栋,游利军,陈强,程秋洋. 富有机质页岩增产改造氧化液浸泡离子溶出行为[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 990-996.
[6] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[7] 朱维耀,马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852.
[8] 余川,曾春林,周洵,聂海宽,余忠樯. 大巴山冲断带下寒武统页岩气构造保存单元划分及分区评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 853-865.
[9] 王香增,张丽霞,姜呈馥,尹锦涛,高潮,孙建博,尹娜,薛莲花. 鄂尔多斯盆地差异抬升对长7页岩孔隙的影响——以东南部甘泉地区和南部渭北隆起地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 597-605.
[10] 邱 振,邹才能,李熙喆,王红岩,董大忠,卢斌,周尚文,施振生,冯子齐,张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[11] 汪道兵,葛洪魁,宇波,文东升,周珺,韩东旭,刘露. 页岩弹性模量非均质性对地应力及其损伤的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 632-643.
[12] 龙胜祥,冯动军,李凤霞,杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[13] 贺领兄,宋维刚,安生婷,徐永锋,沈娟,路超,王军. 青海东昆仑地区八宝山盆地烃源岩有机地球化学特征与页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 538-549.
[14] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[15] 林伯韬,陈渊,陈勉,金衍,蒋峥. 多峰孔径分布拟合模型在页岩孔隙结构分析中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 397-403.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!