天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地球化学 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖相烃源岩热演化生烃研究——基于冀中坳陷烃源岩加水热模拟实验

陈晓艳，田福清,邹华耀，郭柳汐,芦晓伟，殷杰，王道军   

  1. 1.中国石油大学地球科学学院，北京 102249；
    2.中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室，北京 102249；
    3.中国石油华北油田分公司勘探开发研究院，河北 任丘 062552
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-20 修回日期:2017-09-30 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 邹华耀（1963-），男，江西上高人，教授，博士，主要从事油气成藏机理教学与科研工作. E-mail:huayaozou@cup.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈晓艳（1989-），女，陕西山阳人，博士研究生，主要从事油气藏形成与分布、油气地球化学研究. E-mail：chenxiaoyan180401@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（编号：U1663210）;国家“十三五”科技重大专项（编号：2016ZX05024-003-008）联合资助.
     

Study on hydrocarbon-generation of lacustrine source rocks based on hydrous pyrolysis experiments of source rocks from Jizhong Depression，Bohai Bay Basin

Chen Xiao-yan，Tian Fu-qing，Zou Hua-yao，Guo Liu-xi，Lu Xiao-wei，Yin Jie，Wang Dao-jun   

  1. 1.School of Geosciences，China University of Petroleum，Beijing 102249，China;
    2.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting，China University of Petroleum，Beijing 102249，China;
    3.Exploration and Development Research Institute，PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company，Renqiu 062552，China
  • Received:2017-08-20 Revised:2017-09-30 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-01-10

PDF (PC)

611

摘要：

基于烃源岩热演化生烃原理，利用实验室加水热模拟生烃实验，结合GC分析，通过对来自渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷的8个不同有机质类型的未熟烃源岩样品的生烃热演化定量分析，得到湖相烃源岩的热演化生烃定量模型。湖相Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型与Ⅱ2型有机质生油窗对应RO值介于0.6%~1.3%之间，并且RO值均在0.9%左右达到生油最大值，分别为580mg/gTOC、350mg/gTOC和260mg/gTOC左右，但是3类有机质生油耗尽时对应RO值依次减小；以RO=1.3%为界，分为初次裂解气与二次裂解气2个阶段，其中Ⅰ型有机质初次裂解气量显著高于Ⅱ型和Ⅱ2型，超过100mL/gTOC，而Ⅱ型和Ⅱ2型有机质初次裂解气量相近，约为70~80mL/gTOC，二次裂解生气量受控于烃源岩的排油效率；湖相Ⅰ型有机质生油与生气潜力均远高于Ⅱ型与Ⅱ2型，在具备良好的成藏保存条件下，分别以3类有机质为主的湖相烃源岩初次裂解生气量均具有形成工业性气藏的能力。

关键词: 热模拟实验, 热演化生烃, 湖相烃源岩, 冀中坳陷

Abstract:

Based on hydrocarbon generation from source rocks with increasing thermal maturity，quantitative models for hydrocarbon generation of lacustrine source rocks are concluded by hydrous gold-tube pyrolysis experiments and GC analysis of eight immature samples from different types of organic matters in Jizhong Depression，Bohai Bay Basin.The types of organic matters (OM) from lacustrine source rocks mainly contain TypeⅠ，Type Ⅱ1 and Type Ⅱ2.Their oil window is basically coincident and %RO is correspondingly at 0.6%-1.3%，while %RO  at 0.9%，oil yields reaching the peak value，about 580，350 and 260mg/gTOC respectively for TypeⅠ，Type Ⅱ1 and Type Ⅱ2.But the corresponding %RO value of Type Ⅰ，Type Ⅱ1 and Type Ⅱ2 decreases when oil-generating potential is exhausted.There is two stages of gas-generating，gas from kerogen cracking at %RO  below 1.3% and oil cracking at %RO  exceeding 1.3% respectively.The gas yield from kerogen cracking of Type Ⅰ is exceeding 100mL/gTOC，higher than the similar yields of Type Ⅱ1 and Type Ⅱ2，about 70-80mL/gTOC.However，it is difficult to quantitatively research the yield of gas from oil cracking，which is controlled by oil expulsion efficiency.The yields of three OM types from lacustrine source rocks are enough to form industrial gas fields when the conditions of accumulation and preservation are allowed.

Key words: Pyrolysis experiment, Thermogenic hydrocarbon-generating, Lacustrine source rocks, Jizhong Depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+13

［1］Waples D W.Time and temperature in petroleum formation：Application of lopatin’s method to petroleum exploration[J].AAPG Bulletin，1980，64(6):228-235.
[HJ2.1mm]
[2]Tang Qinyan，Zhang Minjie，Zhang Tongwei，et al．A Review on pyrolysis experimentation on hydrocarbon generation[J]．Journal of Southwest Petroleum University：Science & Technology Edition，2013，35(1):52-62．汤庆艳,张铭杰,张同伟,等.生烃热模拟实验方法述评[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版，2013，35(1):52-62.
[3]Monthioux M，Landais P，Durand B.Comparison between extracts from natural and artificial maturation series of  Mahakam delta coals[J]．Organic Geochemistry，1986，10(1-3):299-311.
[4]Horsfield B，Schenk H J，Mills N，et al.An investigation of the in-reservoir conversion of oil to gas：Compositional and kinetic findings from closed-system programmed-temperature pyrolysis[J]．Organic Geochemistry，1992，19(1-3):191-204.
[5]Lewan M D.Experiments on the role of water in petroleum formation[J]．Geochimica et Cosmochimica  Acta，1997，61(17):3691-3723.
[6]Ruble T E，Lewan  M D，Philp R P.New Insights on the Green River petroleum system in the Uinta Basin from hydrous pyrolysis experiments[J]．American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin，2001，85(8):1333-1371.
[7]Bayon R L，Brey G P，Ernst  W G，et al.Experimental kinetic study of organic matter maturation：Time and pressure effects on vitrinite reflectance at 400℃[J]．Organic Geochemistry，2011，42(4):340-355.
[8]Tian H，Xiao X M，Wilkins R W T，et al.An experimental comparison of gas generation from three oil fractions：Implications for the chemical and stable carbon isotopic signatures of oil cracking gas[J].Organic Geochemistry，2012，46(191):96-112.
[9]Behar F，Vandenbroucke M，Tang Y，et al.Thermal cracking of kerogen in open and closed systems：Determination of kinetic parameters and stoichiometric coefficients for oil and gas generation[J]．Organic Geochemistry，1997，26(5/6):321-339.
[10]Ruble T E，Lewan M D，Philp R P.New insights on the Green River petroleum system in the Uinta basin from hydrous-pyrolysis experiments：Reply[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin，2003，87(9):1535-1541.
[11]Liu Quanyou，Liu Wenhui，Qin  Shengfei，et al.Geochemical study of thermal simulation of coal and coal adding different mediums rate of gaseous and organic liquid products and the evolution characteristics[J].Acta Sedimentological Sinica，2001，19(3)：465-468.刘全有,刘文汇,秦胜飞,等.煤岩及煤岩加不同介质的热模拟地球化学实验——气态和液态产物的产率以及演化特征[J].沉积学报，2001，19(3)：465-468.
[12]Pan C C，Zhang M，Peng D H，et al.Confined pyrolysis of Tertiary lacustrine source rocks in the Western Qaidam Basin，northwest China：Implications for generative potential and oil maturity evaluation[J]．Applied Geochemistry，2010，25(2):276-287.
[13]Diao Fan，Zou Huayao，Hao Fang，et al.Characteristics and depositional models of source rocks in Langgu Sag，Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil ＆ Gas Geology，2014，35(3)：326-335.刁帆,邹华耀,郝芳,等.渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷烃源岩特征及其发育模式[J].石油与天然气地质，2014，35(3)：326-335.
[14]Li Xin，Zheng Shuhong，Peng Ning，et al.Analysis of deep-seated hydrocarbon resource potential of Palaeogene in the Baxian Sag，Central Hebei Province[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment，2008，30(6):600-605.李欣,郑署泓,彭宁,等.冀中霸县凹陷古近系深层油气资源潜力研究[J].石油实验地质，2008，30(6):600-605.
[15]Wang Jian，Ma Shunping，Luo Qiang，et al.Recognition and resource potential of source rocks in Raoyang Sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica，2009，30(1):51-55.王建,马顺平,罗强,等.渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷烃源岩再认识与资源潜力分析[J].石油学报,2009,30(1):51-55.
[16]Wu Liyan，Gu Xinzhang.The application of pyrolysis technique in source rock research[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica，1986，7(2):13-19.邬立言,顾信章.热解技术在我国生油岩研究中的应用[J].石油学报，1986，7(2):13-19.
[17]Dieckmann V，Schenk H J，Horsfield B.Assessing the overlap of primary and secondary reactions by closed-versus open-system pyrolysis of marine kerogens[J]．Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis，2000，56(1):33-46.
[18]Sweeney J J，Burnham A K.Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics[J]．American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin，1990，74(10):1559-1570.
[19]Hill R J，Zhang E，Katz B J.et al.Modeling of gas generation from the Barnett Shale，Fort Worth Basin，Texas[J]．American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin，2007，91(4):501-521 .
[20]Zheng G D，Duan Y，Takano B，et al.Pyrolysis studies on the conversion of vitrinite reflectance and the primary productivity of various non-marine source rocks in China[J]．Journal of Asian Earth Sciences，2003，22(4)：353-361.
[21]Wang Q,Zou H Y，Hao F，et al.Modeling hydrocarbon generation from the Paleogene source rocks in Liaodong Bay，Bohai Sea：A study on gas potential of oil-prone source rocks[J]．Org.Geochem,2014，76:204-219.
[22]Espitalie J.Use of Tmax as a maturation index for different types of organic matter comparison with vitrinite reflectance[C]//Thermal modeling in sedimentary basins:1st IFP Exploration Research Conference，Carcans:France，June 3-7,1985:475-496.
[23]Li Jian.The Characteristics of Gas Source and the Resource Abundance in Typical Basins in China[M].Xuzhou：China Mineral Industry Press，2000.李剑.中国重点含气盆地气源特征与资源丰度[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社，2000.
[24]Wang Yuanjie，Yang Dexiang，Li Qing，et al.Analysis of natural gas accumulation model for middle and shallow layers of Langgu depression and main controlling factors[J].China Petroleum Exploration，2012，17(6):48-52.
王元杰,杨德相,李清,等.廊固凹陷中浅层天然气成藏模式及主控因素分析[J].中国石油勘探,2012,17(6):48-52.
[25]Sun Tongtong，Zhu Jian.Gas distribution and reservoir-forming characteristics in Langgu Depression[J].Natural Gas Technology，2009,3(2):18-20.
孙彤彤,朱健.廊固凹陷天然气分布及成藏特征分析[J].天然气技术,2009,3(2):18-20.
[1] 彭威龙，胡国艺，刘全有，贾楠，房忱琛，龚德瑜，于聪，吕玥，王鹏威，冯子齐. 热模拟实验研究现状及值得关注的几个问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1252-1263.
[2] 程志强，王飞宇，师玉雷，冯伟平，谢佩宇，任利兵，吴子强,江涛，赵志刚. 二连盆地乌里雅斯太凹陷南洼烃源岩有机相与生烃特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 696-707.
[3] 钟雪梅, 王建, 李向阳, 王权, 董雄英, 马学峰, 张国伟. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1433-1442.
[4] 高长海，查明，陈力，赵贤正，金凤鸣. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷大柳泉构造不整合输导油气能力的定量表征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 619-627.
[5] 赵贤正，金凤鸣，邹娟，侯凤香，戴俊生，孙治华. 赵贤正，金凤鸣，邹娟，侯凤香，戴俊生，孙治华[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(12): 1888-1895.
[6] 姚泾利，邱军利，王琪，夏燕青. 硫酸盐热还原反应蚀变天然气组分热模拟实验对比及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6): 1165-1170.
[7] 陈瑞银，朱光有，周文宝，李伟，胡国艺. 川北地区大隆组烃源岩地球化学特征与生气潜力初探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1): 99-107.
[8] 王杰, 刘文汇, 腾格尔, 秦建中, 郑伦举. 南方海相层系不同类型烃源（岩）生烃模拟实验及其产物同位素演化规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(4): 684-691.
[9] 马素萍, 孙东, 张晓宝, 夏燕青. 酒西盆地青西凹陷下白垩统湖相烃源岩生烃动力学研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(2): 219-223.
[10] 邱军利, 夏燕青, 雷天柱. 两种热模拟体系下热解产物的相关性研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(1): 144-148.
[11] 刘全有, 金之钧, 高波, 张殿伟, 陶冶. 四川盆地二叠系不同类型烃源岩生烃热模拟实验[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(5): 700-704.
[12] 杨桂茹,崔周旗,崔俊峰,田福清. 冀中坳陷油气储量分布特征及未来储量区带分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(6): 923-929.
[13] 高生军 陈义才 李延钧 王波 尹长河 李文涛 杨显成. 东营凹陷沙四段原油裂解热模拟实验及产物特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 32-35.
[14] 王娟 金强 马国政 王力 王秀红. 高成熟阶段膏岩等盐类物质在烃源岩热解生烃过程中的催化作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 26-31.
[15] 朱俊章 施和生 汪建蓉 龙祖烈. 珠江口盆地陆相原油轻烃环优势及其成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 15-19.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!