天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地陕北斜坡东南部长7段致密砂岩油藏成藏物性下限

张凤奇1,2，钟红利3，魏登峰4，张凤博4，柳伟明1，刘伟1   

  1. 1.西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院，陕西 西安 710065；
    2.西安石油大学陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室，陕西 西安 710065；
    3.西安科技大学地质与环境学院，陕西 西安 710054；
    4.延长油田股份有限公司，陕西 延安 716000
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-14 修回日期:2016-10-13 出版日期:2017-02-10 发布日期:2017-02-10
  • 作者简介:张凤奇(1981-)，男，河南周口人，副教授，博士，主要从事非常规油气形成机制与富集规律研究. E-mail:zhangfengqi68@126.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重大项目“中国非常规油气储层特征、分类与典型地质模型建立”(编号:41390451)；国家自然科学青年基金项目“致密砂岩储层微观孔喉非均质性及对石油分布的控制作用”(编号:41502137)；陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目“连续型油藏砂岩输导体系与石油运移时效性探讨”(编号:2013JM5006)联合资助.

Lower limits of porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 member,southeastern Shaanbei Slope,Ordos Basin

Zhang Feng-qi1,2，Zhong Hong-li3，Wei Deng-feng4，Zhang Feng-bo4，Liu Wei-ming1，Liu Wei1   

  1. 1.School of Earth Sciences and Engineering,Xi’an Shiyou University,Xi’an 710065,China;
    2.Shaanxi Key Lab of Petroleum Accumulation Geology,Xi’an Shiyou University,Xi’an 710065,China;
    3.Gollege of Geology & Environment,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an 710054 ,China;
    4. Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Co. Ltd.,Yan’an 716000,China
  • Received:2016-07-14 Revised:2016-10-13 Online:2017-02-10 Published:2017-02-10

PDF (PC)

345

摘要：

成藏物性下限研究可为致密砂岩储层的含油有效性评价提供重要参数，可为资源潜力较大的鄂尔多斯盆地致密油勘探发现提供重要指导。运用录井、测井、试油试采、物性、压汞、流体包裹体、铸体薄片、扫描电镜等资料，综合确认了鄂尔多斯盆地陕北斜坡东南部长7段有效储层物性下限和油气的关键成藏时期，进一步对现今有效储层物性下限进行关键成藏时期以来成岩作用对物性的改变量校正，得到了研究区长7段致密砂岩油气成藏物性下限。结果表明，研究区长7段有效储层孔隙度下限为5.0％，渗透率下限为0.038×10-3μm2；关键成藏时期主要为早白垩世中晚期，关键成藏时期与现今时期储层物性存在较大差异，研究区Ⅳa型、Ⅳb型、Ⅴ型3种储层类型在2个时期的物性差异大小平均值分别为5.15%、3.46%、2.32%；研究区Ⅳb型、Ⅴ型储层的物性大小多分布在现今有效储层物性下限值附近，这2种储层类型的关键成藏与现今时期孔隙度相差平均为2.79%，进而得到研究区长7段致密砂岩油气成藏孔隙度下限约为7.79%、成藏渗透率下限约为0.10×10-3μm2。

关键词: 致密砂岩储层, 物性下限, 致密油, 长7段, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract:

Lower limits of porosity and permeability for oil accumulations can provide major parameters for the oiliness evaluation of tight sandstone reservoir,and important guidance for exploration discovery of tight oil of Ordos Basin which has big exploration potential. Many data including mud logging,log data,well test and production test,physical property,mercury intrusion,fluid inclusion,thin section examination,SEM and so on were applied to determine porosity and permeability cutoffs of effective reservoir in the Chang 7 member,southeastern Shaanbei Slope,Ordos Basin,and critical accumulation period. By adding the loss of porosity after oil accumulation to current lower limit value of effective reservoir,lower limits of porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 member,southeastern Shaanbei Slope,Ordos Basin were determined. The results show that the lower limit values of porosity and permeability of effective reservoir are 5% and 0.038×10-3μm2. The critical accumulation periods are mainly the mid-late stage of Early Cretaceous. The physical properties of Chang 7 member reservoir are different between the critical accumulation period and nowadays,and the average differences of porosity between the two ages in the Ⅳa,Ⅳb and Ⅴ reservoir type are 5.15%,3.46%,2.32%,respectively. The physical property values of Ⅳb and Ⅴ reservoir type are nearly the current lower limit value of effective reservoir,the average differences of porosity of the two reservoir type between the critical accumulation period and nowadays are 2.79%,and then the lower limit value of porosity and permeability of oil accumulations of Chang 7 member in the study area are 7.79% and 0.10×10-3μm2.

Key words: Tight sandstone reservoirs, Lower limits of physical properties, Tight oil, Chang 7 member, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121

[1]Pan Gaofeng,Liu Zhen,Zhao Shu,et al.The study on lower limit of porosity for oil accumulation in Chang 8 member,Zhenjing area,Ordos Basin[J].Geoscience,2011,25(2):271-278.[潘高峰,刘震,赵舒,等.鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区长8段致密砂岩油藏成藏孔隙度下限研究[J].现代地质,2011,25(2):271-278.]
[2]Hu Linnan,Zhao Jingzhou.A discussion on the determination way to effective thickness of tight sandstone gas pools[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):69-77.[胡林楠,赵靖舟.致密砂岩气藏有效厚度确定方法及应用探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(1):69-77.]
[3]Wang Yanzhong,Cao Yingchang,Li Yongxin,et al.Controlling factors on the Paleogene deep effective reservoirs in the Bonan Sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(6):996-1003.[王艳忠,操应长,李永新,等.渤南洼陷古近系深层有效储层控制因素研究[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(6):996-1003.]
[4]Gao Gang,Shen Xia,Han Yonglin.The physical properties’ lowest limit values in sandstone conducting system and their affections to oil accumulation in the setting of low porosity and permeability:Taking Chang(4+5) and Chang 6 sections of Yanchang Formation in Hujianshan  area of Ordos Basin for example[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2010,16(3):351-357.[高岗,沈霞,韩永林.低孔低渗背景下砂体输导物性下限及其对石油运聚的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区延长组长4+5段和长6段为例[J].高校地质学报,2010,16(3):351-357.]
[5]Li Wenhao,Zhang Zhihuan,Zan ling,et al.Lower limits of physical properties and their controlling factors of effective coarse-grained clastic reservoirs in the Shahejie Formation on northern steep slope of Bonan Subsag,the Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(5):766-775.[李文浩,张枝焕,昝灵,等.渤南洼陷北部陡坡带沙河街组砂砾岩有效储层物性下限及其主控因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(5):766-775.]
[6]Fu Jinhua,Luo Anxiang,Zhang Nini,et al.Determine lower limits of physical properties of effective reservoirs in Chang 7 oil Formation in Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(6):82-88.[付金华,罗安湘,张妮妮,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7油层组有效储层物性下限的确定[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(6):82-88.]
[7]Liu Zhen,Huang Yanhui,Pan Gaofeng,et al.Determination of critical properties of low porosity and permeability sandstone reservoir and its significance in petroleum geology[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(11):1815-1825.[刘震,黄艳辉,潘高峰,等.低孔渗砂岩储层临界物性确定及其石油地质意义[J].地质学报,2012,86(11):1815-1825.]
[8]Jin Bo,Han Jun,Jiang Shuyun,et al.Control of critical physical properties of reservoir to the hydrocarbon accumulation in lithological  traps:Taking Jurassic of Baijiahai uplift in the eastern Junggar Basin as an example[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Natural Science  Edition,2012,27(3):1-7.[金博,韩军,姜淑云,等.储层临界物性对岩性圈闭油气成藏的意义——以准噶尔盆地东部白家海凸起侏罗系储层为例[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,27(3):1-7.]
[9]Pang Xiongqi,Li Pilong,Jin Zhijun,et al.Hydrocarbon accululation threshold and its application in Jiyang Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2003,24(3):204-209.[庞雄奇,李丕龙,金之钧,等.油气成藏门限研究及其在济阳坳陷中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(3):204-209.]
[10]Wang Pengwei,Pang Xiongqi,Jiang Zhenxue,et al.Critical phyisical conditions for accumulation of Yinan 2“continuous” tight  sandstone gas reservoir,Kuqa Depression[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2014,39(10):1381-1390.[王鹏威,庞雄奇,姜振学,等.库车坳陷依南2 “连续型”致密砂岩气藏成藏临界物性条件[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2014,39(10):1381-1390.]
[11]Wu Kangjun,Liu Luofu,Xu Zhengjian,et al.Lower limits of pore throat radius,porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 member,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(1):63-69.[吴康军,刘洛夫,徐正建,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密油成藏物性下限研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(1):63-69.]
[12]Cao Qing,Zhao Jingzhou,Liu Xinshe,et al.Determination of physical property limits for the gas accumulation in tight sandstone reservoirs in the eastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1040-1048.[曹青,赵靖舟,刘新社,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部致密砂岩气成藏物性界限的确定[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1040-1048.]
[13][KG*6/7]Wang Weiming,Lu Shuangfang,Tian Weichao,et al.A now method to determine porosity and permeability cutoffs of tight oil reservoirs by using thickness of adsorption water film:A case study from the Damintun Sag,Liaohe Oilfield[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):135-140.[王伟明,卢双舫,田伟超,等.吸附水膜厚度确定致密油储层物性下限新方法——以辽河油田大民屯凹陷为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):135-140.]
[14][KG*6/7]Zhang Fengqi,Wu Fuli,Meng Xiaoling,et al.Porosity and permeability cutoffs for calculating effective thickness of different types of low-permeability reservoirs and causes of their differences:A case study of the Mesozoic in S region of central Shaanbei slope[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(4):555-562.[张凤奇,武富礼,蒙晓灵,等.不同类型低渗透储层有效厚度物性下限及其差异性成因——以陕北斜坡中部S地区中生界为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(4):555-562.]
[15]Shi Baohong,Zhang Yan,Zhang Lei,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation dating by fluid inclusion characteristics in Chang 7 tight sandstone reservoirs of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2012,34(6):599-603.[时保宏,张艳,张雷,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7致密储层流体包裹体特征与成藏期次[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(6):599-603.]
[16]Chen Ruiyin,Luo Xiaorong,Chen Zhankun,et al.Estimation of denudation thickness of Mesozoic stata in the Ordos Basin and its geological significance[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2006,80(5):685-693.[陈瑞银,罗晓容,陈占坤,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生代地层剥蚀量估算及其地质意义[J].地质学报,2006,80(5):685-693.]
[17]Liang Yu,Ren Zhanli,Shi Zheng,et al.Classification of hydrocarbon accumulation phases of the Yanchang Formation in the Fuxian-Zhengning area,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(5):741-748.[梁宇,任战利,史政,等.鄂尔多斯盆地富县—正宁地区延长组油气成藏期次[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):741-748.]
[18][KG*6/7]Yu Qiang,Ren Zhanli,Ni Jun,et al.The thermal evolution history of Mesozoic,Fuxian exploratory area of Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Northwest University:Natural Science Edition,2012,42(5):801-805.[于强,任战利,倪军,等.鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区中生界热演化史探讨[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2012,42(5):801-805.]
[19][KG*6/7]Athy L F.Density,porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,1930,14(1):1-24.
[20]Beard D C,Weyl P K.Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand[J].AAPG Bulletin,1973,7(2):349-369.
[21]Hegarty K A.Subsidence history of Australia’s southern margin:constraints on basin models[J].AAPG Bulletin,1988,72(5):614-633.
[22]Zhang Fengqi,Wang Zhenliang,Wu Fuli,et al.Dynamic analysis on hydrocarbon migration of accumulation periods in low permeability-tight sandstone reservoir[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2012,36(4):32-37.[张凤奇,王震亮,武富礼,等.低渗透致密砂岩储层成藏期油气运移的动力条件[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(4):32-37.]
[1] 刘琴琴，陈桂华，陈晓智，祝彦贺，杨小峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地L地区上古生界上石盒子组物源特征及其对储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1094-1101.
[2] 朱立文，王震亮，张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[3] 杨海军，张荣虎，杨宪彰，王珂，王俊鹏，唐雁刚，周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[4] 杨智峰,曾溅辉,韩菲. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组7段致密油充注影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 961-972.
[5] 王香增，张丽霞，姜呈馥，尹锦涛，高潮，孙建博，尹娜，薛莲花. 鄂尔多斯盆地差异抬升对长7页岩孔隙的影响——以东南部甘泉地区和南部渭北隆起地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 597-605.
[6] 杨超，贺永红，马芳侠，雷裕红，陈义国. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组有机流体活动期次划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 655-664.
[7] 葛岩，朱光辉，万欢，潘新志，黄志龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘紫金山侵入构造对上古生界致密砂岩气藏形成和分布的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 491-499.
[8] 屈雪峰，周晓峰，刘丽丽，丁黎. 鄂尔多斯盆地古峰庄—麻黄山地区长82低渗透砂岩致密化过程分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 337-348.
[9] 魏新善，魏柳斌，任军峰，蔡郑红，周黎霞. 鄂尔多斯盆地下古生界风化壳气藏差异性[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 178-188.
[10] 陈跃，马东民，吴圣，李新虎，方世跃，郭晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘煤系伴生泥页岩孔隙特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 189-198.
[11] 张艳，张春雷，高世臣. 基于SOM和HSV染色技术的致密砂岩储层地震相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 259-267.
[12] 姚泾利, 胡新友, 范立勇, 刘新社, 季海锟, . 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1465-1474.
[13] 张建勇，倪新峰，吴兴宁，李文正，郝毅，陈娅娜，吕学菊，谷明峰，田瀚，朱茂. 中国主要克拉通盆地深层白云岩优质储层发育主控因素及分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1165-1175.
[14] 王晖，张磊，石军太，张丽霞，高潮，张亮，郭超. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部山西组泥页岩生烃热模拟实验[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1078-1084.
[15] 李登华，刘卓亚，张国生，郑志红，贾君，高煖，昝昕. 中美致密油成藏条件、分布特征和开发现状对比与启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1126-1138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!