天然气地球科学

• 综述与评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

常规与非常规油气资源评价的总体思路、方法体系与关键技术

李建忠,吴晓智,郑民,郭秋麟,王社教,董大忠,陈晓明,谢红兵   

  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-27 修回日期:2016-06-09 出版日期:2016-09-10 发布日期:2016-09-10
  • 作者简介:李建忠(1968-),男,河南辉县人,教授级高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气地质、资源评价与勘探规划部署研究. E-mail:lijizh@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项(编号:2011ZX05043);中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项(编号:2013E-0502)联合资助.

General philosophy,method system and key technology of conventionaland unconventional oil & gas resource assessment

Li Jian-zhong,Wu Xiao-zhi,Zheng Min,Guo Qiu-lin,Wang She-jiao,Dong Da-zhong,Chen Xiao-ming,Xie Hong-bing   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2016-04-27 Revised:2016-06-09 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

摘要: 资源评价是油气勘探开发活动中一项非常重要的基础性研究工作。在回顾历次油气资源评价背景、采用方法和主要做法基础上,分析了新形势下油气资源评价面临需求、评价对象及主要任务,阐述了油气资源评价的内涵、特点与发展方向。重点论述了第四次油气资源评价的总体思路,提出“四步走”评价流程,建立常规、非常规2类资源的评价方法体系。针对新的评价需求和评价对象,发展了烃源岩精细评价技术、刻度区精细评价技术、三维油气运聚模拟技术、缝洞型碳酸盐岩运聚模拟技术、分级资源丰度类比评价技术、小面元容积法评价技术、EUR类比评价技术等关键评价技术,研发形成新一代油气资源评价软件系统(HyRAS2.0),实际应用效果良好。

关键词: 关键技术, 方法体系, 总体思路, 常规与非常规, 资源评价

Abstract: Resource assessment is a very important fundamental research work in petroleum exploration & development.Previous oil & gas resources assessment methods and practices are systematicly reviewed in this paper.Based on the latest progresses in exploration and geological understandings,this paper analyses the production requirements,evaluation objects,technology status and the confront main task of resource assessment under new circumstance,clarifies the connotation,characteristics and future development direction of resources assessment.On this basis,the paper elaborates the general philosophy,“Four Steps” assessment process and method system of the 4th Round Oil & Gas Resources Assessment.According to the new assessment requirements and different types of evaluation objects,8 key evaluation techniques have been developed,which includes fine evaluation technique of  hydrocarbon source rocks,fine evaluation technique of the “Calibrated Units”,3D simulation technique of oil & gas migration and accumulation,simulation technique of fracture-cavity type carbonate,grading resource abundance analogy technique,cell volumetric method rated evaluation technique,EUR analogy evaluation technique,and a new generation of oil & gas resources assessment system(HyRAS2.0).

Key words: Key technology, Method system, General philosophy, Conventional and unconventional resources, Resource assessment

中图分类号: 

  • TE155

[1]Ma Yongsheng,Gu Xusheng,Guo Tonglou,et al.Discovery of the large-scale Puguang Gasfield in Sichuan Basin and its enlightenment for hydrocarbon prospecting[J].Geological Review,2005,51(4):477-480.[马永生,郭旭生,郭彤楼,等.四川盆地普光大型气田的发现与勘探启示[J].地质论评,2005,51(4):477-480.]
[2]Du Jinhu,He Haiqing,Pi Xuejun,et al.CNPC obtained strategic discoveries and successful experience in venture exploration[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2011,16(1):1-8.[杜金虎,何海清,皮学军,等.中国石油风险勘探的战略发现与成功做法[J].中国石油勘探,2011,16(1):1-8.]
[3]Zhao Zhengzhang,Du Jinhu.The Responsibility of Geologists from the Perspective of Exploration and Practice[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2012.[赵政璋,杜金虎.从勘探实践看地质家的责任[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2012.]
[4]Du Jinhu,Hu Suyun,Zhang Yijie,et al.Implications from typical petroleum exploration cases[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(5):809-819.[杜金虎,胡素云,张义杰,等.从典型实例感悟油气勘探[J].石油学报,2013,34(5):809-819.]
[5]Wang Zhaoming,Xie Huiwen,Chen Yongquan,et al.Discovery and exploration of Cambrian subsalt  dolomite original hydrocarbon reservoir at Tazhong-1 well in Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(2):1-13.[王招明,谢会文,陈永权,等.塔里木盆地中深1井寒武系盐下白云岩原生油气藏的发现及勘探意义[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(2):1-13.]
[6]Wang Zhaoming.Formation mechanism and enrichment regularities of Kelasu subsalt deep large gasfield in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):153-166.[王招明.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏盐下深层大气田形成机制与富集规律[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):153-166.]
[7]Zhao Wenzhi,Zou Caineng,Wang Zecheng,et al.The intension and signification of “Sag-wide Oil-Bearing Theory” in the hydrocarbon-rich depression with terrestrial origin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(2):5-13.[赵文智,邹才能,汪泽成,等.富油气凹陷“满凹含油”论——内涵与意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(2):5-13.]
[8]Zhao Xianzheng,Wang Quan,Jin Fengming,et al.Second exploration methods or hydrocarbon-rich depression and their application in the high exploration area[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2012,17(6):1-9.[赵贤正,王权,金凤鸣,等.高勘探程度区富油气凹陷二次勘探方法及应用[J].中国石油勘探,2012,17(6):1-9.]
[9]Xue Yongan,Chai Yongbo,Zhou Yuanyuan.Recent new brea kthroughs in hydrocarbon exploration in Bohai sea[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2015,27(1):1-9.[薛永安,柴永波,周园园.近期渤海海域油气勘探的新突破[J].中国海上油气,2015,27(1):1-9.]
[10]Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Zhu Rukai,et al.Progress in China’s unconventional oil & gas exploration and development and theoretical technologies[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2015,89(6):979-1007.[邹才能,杨智,朱如凯,等.中国非常规油气勘探开发与理论技术进展[J].地质学报,2015,89(6):979-1007.]
[11]Zhao Wenzhi,Wang Zhaoyun,Zhang Shuichang,et al.Successive generation of natural gas from organic materials and its significance in future exploration[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(2):1-7.[赵文智,王兆云,张水昌,等.有机质“接力成气”模式的提出及其在勘探中的意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(2):1-7.]
[12]Zhao Wenzhi.Theoretical development and exploration significance of large area accumulation of lithologic stratigraphic reservoirs with low and medium abundance[C]//Continental Basin System and Lithologic Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Reservoir Exploration International Symposium.Beijing:PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007.[赵文智.中低丰度岩性地层油气藏大面积成藏的理论进展及勘探意义[C]//陆相盆地系统与岩性地层油气藏勘探国际研讨会.北京:中国石油勘探开发研究院,2007.]
[13]Zhao Wenzhi,Hu Suyun,Liu Wei,et al.The multi-staged “golden zones” of hydrocarbon exploration in superimposed petroliferous basins of onshore China and its significance[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):1-12.[赵文智,胡素云,刘伟,等.论叠合含油气盆地多勘探“黄金带”及其意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):1-12.]
[14]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Yuan Xuanjun,et al.The formation conditions and distribution characteristics of continuous petroleum accumulations[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(3):324-331.[邹才能,陶士振,袁选俊,等.连续型油气藏形成条件与分布特征[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):324-331.]
[15]Zhao Wenzhi,Hu Suyun,Li Jianzhong,et al.Changes and enlightenment of onshore oil/gas exploration domain in China:Exploration and perception in the past decade[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2013,18(4):1-10.[赵文智,胡素云,李建忠,等,我国陆上油气勘探领域变化与启示——过去十余年的亲历与感悟[J].中国石油勘探,2013,18(4):1-10.]
[16]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Bai Bin,et al.Differences and relations between unconventional and conventional oil and gas[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2015,20(1):1-16.[邹才能,陶士振,白斌,等.论非常规油气与常规油气的区别和联系[J].中国石油勘探,2015,20(1):1-16.]
[17]Zhao Wenzhi.Advances in Petroleum Geology Theory and Methods[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2006.[赵文智.石油地质理论与方法进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006.]
[18]Zhao Wenzhi,Hu Suyun,Shen Chengxi,et al.Philosophy and methodology of oil and gas resource assessement[J].Acta Petrolei Sinca,2005,26(supplement):12-17.[赵文智,胡素云,沈成喜,等.油气资源评价的总体思路和方法体系[J].石油学报,2005,26(增刊):12-17.]
[19]Liu Chenglin,Che Changbo.Evaluation Method and Application of Conventional and Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2012.[刘成林,车长波.常规与非常规油气资源评价方法与应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2012.]
[20]Chen Xiaoming,Li Jianzhong,Gao Ruili,et al.A Quantitative Study of Hydrocarbon Generation & Expulsion of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shale in the Southern Sichuan Basin[C].Unconventional Resources Technology Conference,25-27 August,Denver,Colorado,USA.SPE-2014-1933998-MS.SPE,2014.
[21]Wang Dongliang,Zhang Ying,Lu Shuangfang,et al.The simulation experiment on gas-generating potential of over mature source rocks[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(6):1172-1179.[王东良,张英,卢双舫,等.烃源岩过成熟阶段生气潜力的实验室模拟[J].沉积学报,2012,30(6):1172-1179.]
[22]Tang Qingyan,Zhang Mingjie,Zhang Tongwei,et al.A review on pyrolysis experimentation on hydrocarbon generation[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2013,35(1):52-62.[汤庆艳,张铭杰,张同伟,等.生烃热模拟实验方法述评[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2013,35(1):52-62.]
[23]Hu Suyun,Tian Keqin,Liu Guangdi,et al.Dissection of calibrated units and key parameters for oil and gas resource assessment[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(supplement) :49-54.[胡素云,田克勤,柳广弟,等.刻度区解剖方法与油气资源评价关键参数研究[J].石油学报,2005,26(增刊):49-54.]
[24]Shi Guangren.Status,problems and proposals of the quantitative modeling techniques for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(1):1-10.[石广仁.油气运聚定量模拟技术现状、问题及设想[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(1):1-10.]
[25]Guo Qiulin,Chen Ningsheng,Xie Hongbing,et al.Three-dimensional hydrocarbon migration and accumulation modeling based on finite volume method[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):817-825.[郭秋麟,陈宁生,谢红兵,等.基于有限体积法的三维油气运聚模拟技术[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):817-825.]
[26]Zhao Zongju.Types,accumulation models and exploration concepts of marine carbonate reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2008,35(6):692-703.[赵宗举.海相碳酸盐岩储集层类型、成藏模式及勘探思路[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(6):692-703.]
[27]Guo Qiulin,Yang Wenjing,Xiao Zhongyao,et al.Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation model of fractured-vuggy reservoir under unconformity surface:A case study of carbonate reservoir in Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2013(5):495-499.[郭秋麟,杨文静,肖中尧,等.不整合面下缝洞岩体油气运聚模型——以塔里木盆地碳酸盐岩油藏为例[J].石油实验地质,2013(5):495-499.]
[28]Guo Qiulin,Chen Ningsheng,Liu Chenglin,et al.Research advance of hydrocarbon resource assessment method and a new assessment software system[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(10):1305-1314.[郭秋麟,陈宁生,刘成林,等.油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统[J].石油学报,2015,36(10):1305-1314.]
[29]Wang Shejiao,Yu Yuanjiang,Guo Qiulin,et al.New advance in resources evaluation of tight oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1095-1105.[王社教,蔚远江,郭秋麟,等.致密油资源评价新进展[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1095-1105.]

[1] 何文军,杨海波,费李莹,王学勇,杨彤远,杨翼波,鲍海娟. 准噶尔盆地新光地区佳木河组致密砂岩气有利区资源潜力综合分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 370-381.
[2] 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 王社教, 郭秋麟, 于京都, 郑曼, 陈宁生, 易庆. 我国常规与非常规天然气资源潜力、重点领域与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1383-1397.
[3] 黄少英, 杨文静, 卢玉红, 张科, 赵青, 凡闪. 塔里木盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1497-1505.
[4] 王彬, 张强, 吕福亮, 杨涛涛, 杨志力, 孙国忠, 吴敬武, . 南海海域新生界沉积盆地天然气成藏条件及资源前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1542-1552.
[5] 吴伟,谢军,石学文,赵圣贤,季春海,胡颖,郭艳波. 川东北巫溪地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件与勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 734-743.
[6] 何文军,王绪龙,杨海波,贾希玉,鲍海娟,蓝文芳,丁靖. 准噶尔盆地典型刻度区选择及其资源量计算方法体系建立[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 62-73.
[7] 郭秋麟,李峰,陈宁生,郑曼,马忠. 致密油资源评价方法、软件及关键技术[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1566-1575.
[8] 王社教,李峰,郭秋麟,汪少勇. 致密油资源评价方法及关键参数研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1576-1582.
[9] 董大忠,王玉满,黄旭楠,张晨晨,管全中,黄金亮,王淑芳,李新景. 中国页岩气地质特征、资源评价方法及关键参数[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1583-1601.
[10] 吴晓智,王社教,郑民,董大忠,李登华,谢红兵,陈晓明,黄旭楠. 常规与非常规油气资源评价技术规范体系建立及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1640-1650.
[11] 李登华,李建忠,汪少勇,张斌. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油刻度区精细解剖与关键参数研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1666-1678.
[12] 邱振,吴晓智,唐勇,郑民,王桂君,郭秋麟,王社教,谢红兵. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油资源评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1688-1698.
[13] 谢红兵,陈晓林,郭秋麟,易庆,马忠,陈宁生,高日丽,孟燕龙. 基于WEB—GIS的油气资源评价数据库构建及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1752-1760.
[14] 杨升宇,张金川,唐玄. 鄂尔多斯盆地张家滩页岩气区三维盆地模拟[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(5): 932-942.
[15] 盛秀杰,金之钧,王义刚,肖晔. 融合不同地质场景假设的油气区带及圈闭资源量计算方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(3): 456-465.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 马立祥;. 断层封闭性研究在烃类聚集系统分析中的意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(3): 1 -8 .
[2] 曹华;龚晶晶;汪贵锋;. 超压的成因及其与油气成藏的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(3): 422 -425 .
[3] 李在光;杨占龙;李琳;郭精义;黄云峰;吴青鹏;李红哲;. 胜北地区油气分布规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 94 -96 .
[4] 孔庆芬,王可仁. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘奥陶系烃源岩热模拟试验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(2): 187 -191 .
[5] 尹太举,张昌民,王寿平,李中超 . 濮53块开发概念模拟[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(2): 201 -205 .
[6] 韩应钧;. 龙门山中南段地区印支运动和天然气勘探目标研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2002, 13(5-6): 66 -73 .
[7] 赵孟军;宋岩;柳少波;秦胜飞;洪峰;傅国友;达江;. 中国中西部前陆盆地成藏特征的初步分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 445 -451 .
[8] 江文荣;李允;蔡东升;. 秦皇岛27/33区块三维地震精细解释及储层预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 502 -509 .
[9] 杨占龙陈启林,. 岩性圈闭与陆相盆地岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(5): 616 -621 .
[10] Khelil Chakib;赵晓英;. 拉丁美洲主要天然气项目的问题和前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1997, 8(5-6): 44 -50 .