天然气地球科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 1127–1141.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2021.02.004

• 天然气地球化学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地西部致密砂岩气来源及运移地球化学示踪

刘海亮1,2(),刘四兵1,2(),周栋1,2,刘文1,3,金思丁1,2   

  1. 1.油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,成都理工大学,四川 成都 610059
    2.成都理工大学能源学院,四川 成都 610059
    3.成都理工大学地球科学学院,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-11 修回日期:2021-02-02 出版日期:2021-08-10 发布日期:2021-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 刘四兵 E-mail:171592257@qq.com;lsbcdut@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘海亮(1994-),男,陕西铜川人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气储层地球化学研究. E-mail:171592257@qq.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(41972158)

Geochemical indicators for tracing the source and migration of the tight sandstone gas in western Sichuan Basin

Hailiang LIU1,2(),Sibing LIU1,2(),Dong ZHOU1,2,Wen LIU1,3,Siding JIN1,2   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China
    2.College of Energy,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China
    3.College of Geosciences,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China
  • Received:2020-12-11 Revised:2021-02-02 Online:2021-08-10 Published:2021-08-25
  • Contact: Sibing LIU E-mail:171592257@qq.com;lsbcdut@163.com
  • Supported by:
    The National Natural Science Foundation of China(41972158)

摘要:

通过典型钻井天然气组分、轻烃、碳同位素以及烃源岩抽提轻烃的系统测试,研究了四川盆地西部致密砂岩气的成因类型和来源。研究表明,研究区致密砂岩气以煤型气为主,须二段(T3x2)存在部分混合气。天然气来源具有下生上储的特征,其中须二段(T3x2)天然气主要来源于须二段(T3x2)自身的烃源岩以及下伏小塘子-马鞍塘组(T3m+t)烃源岩,须四段(T3x4)天然气主要来源于须三段(T3x3)烃源岩,天然气运移距离短;而侏罗系天然气则主要来源于下伏须五段(T3x5)烃源岩以及须家河组早期气藏的贡献,天然气运移距离长。在此基础上,优选了3组9类天然气运移地球化学指标,分别为:①天然气运移方向和距离指标为甲烷含量[W(CH4)]、乙烷含量[W(C2H6)]、非烃含量[W(CO2)],[W(N2)]、甲烷碳同位素(δ13C1);②天然气运移相态指标为苯/正己烷、苯/环己烷;③天然气运移通道指标为iC4/nC4iC5/nC5。对研究区陆相天然气的运移进行了示踪,明确了研究区致密砂岩气的运移方向、运移相态以及运移通道。结果表明:研究区上侏罗统天然气主要由下部须家河组天然气沿高速优势通道窜层渗流运移而来,断裂是其最重要的运移通道;中侏罗统部分天然气由须家河组气源沿高速运移通道运移而来,而部分天然气为下部气源以水溶相的方式运移聚集成藏;须四段(T3x4)天然气成藏时,储层相对致密,运移通道发育不佳,天然气以扩散相短距离运移为主;须二段(T3x2)天然气主要通过断裂及其伴生裂缝以游离相和水溶相短距离运移为主。

关键词: 四川盆地, 致密砂岩气, 地球化学, 天然气成因, 天然气运移示踪

Abstract:

The genetic tight sandstone gas types and sources in the western Sichuan Basin has been analyzed by systematic testing of the components of typical drilling natural gas, light hydrocarbon, carbon isotopes and the light hydrocarbon extracted from the source rock. The tight sandstone gas is mainly composed of coal-derived gas, and mixed gas only exists in the 2nd Member of the Xujiahe Formation(T3x2). The natural gas source is characterized by lower generation and upper storage. Among them, the natural gas in T3x2 is mainly derived from the self-generated source rock in T3x2 and Xiaotangzi Formation (T3t). The 4th Member of the Xujiahe Formation (T3x4) natural gas is mainly derived from 3rd Member of the Xujiahe Formation (T3x3) source rock, and the migration distance of natural gas is relatively short. However, Jurassic natural gas is mainly derived from 5th Member of the Xujiahe Formation (T3x5) in the Upper Triassic, and resulting from the contribution of the early gas reservoirs in the Xujiahe Formation with a relatively long migration distance. In this paper, three groups of nine natural gas migration geochemical indicators were selected to trace the natural gas migration and the migration direction, phase and channel of tight sandstone gas in the study area have been determined. The geochemical indicator groups including: (1) Migration direction and distance indicators: methane content (WCH4), ethane content (WC2H6), non-hydrocarbon content (WCO2 and WN2) and methane carbon isotope (δ13C1). (2) Migration phase state indicators: benzene/n-hexane, benzene/cyclohexane. (3) Migration channel indicators: iC4/nC4 and iC5/nC5. The results show that the Upper Jurassic natural gas was mainly migrated through the channel with a high velocity from the Xujiahe Formation (underlying strata), and the fault is the most important migration channel. Part of the Middle Jurassic natural gas was migrated from the Xujiahe Formation along the faults, while part of the lower natural gas was accumulated in the form of water-soluble phase. The reservoir was relatively tightness and the migration channel was not well developed in T3x4, and the natural gas was mainly migrated with diffusion phase in short distance. The natural gas was migrated through faults and associated fractures with the free phase and the water-soluble phase in short distance.

Key words: Sichuan Basin, Tight sandstone gas, Geochemistry, Genesis of natural gas, Nature gas migration tracing

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.1+13

图1

川西坳陷单元划分及气田分布(据叶素娟等[11]修改)"

图2

四川盆地西部地区地层概况(据叶素娟等[11])"

表1

川西地区侏罗系天然气组分与碳同位素特征"

井号层位井深/m主要烃类组分含量/%异丁烷/正丁烷异戊烷/正戊烷苯/正己烷苯/环己烷
甲烷乙烷丙烷
川合358井J31 05194.1533.0970.0121.0321.9930.4010.304
川泰361井J367994.3941.2910.0201.1802.4110.3770.297
川鸭609井J31 789.590.2584.2190.0220.9431.6920.5440.461
都蓬30井J31 149.3589.1005.2910.0241.0331.7290.2050.195
金遂2井J31 649.0588.9835.8970.0280.7441.726//
龙67井J31 274.588.3235.8750.0250.8191.9530.1410.121
马蓬13井J31 92389.4866.0770.0240.8581.6430.0560.059
新34井J3739.897.6011.5890.0061.0482.192//
新浅100井J3957.291.0915.1050.0210.8642.0170.0560.077
新浅31井J31 05289.3645.0000.0300.8411.8290.1140.091
新浅56井J31 387.591.9464.3740.0160.8951.6750.7040.442
J3平均值1 241.10091.3364.3470.0210.9321.8960.2890.227
川孝105井J21 90588.2998.0660.0160.9661.7771.2350.835
川孝163井J22 72685.4349.6010.0200.7351.5101.6601.235
川孝168井J22 03688.8577.6950.0200.9171.6780.2880.455
川孝380井J22 38486.0539.4810.0230.7961.5902.3552.071
川孝454井J22 37986.7407.5370.0250.8131.5923.4732.256
川孝455井J22 52085.2496.4570.0360.9281.5701.7371.385
川鸭609井J22 021.590.3004.1910.0220.7811.7030.5570.460
江沙7井J22 420.0784.6958.3930.0300.7971.6561.4371.398
J2平均值2 298.95086.9537.6780.0240.8421.6341.5931.262

表2

川西地区须家河组天然气组分与碳同位素特征"

井号层位井深/m烃类组分含量/%异丁烷/正丁烷异戊烷/正戊烷苯/正己烷苯/环己烷
甲烷乙烷丙烷
川丰131井T3x43 72890.4867.8120.0311.0741.9310.8090.544
川丰563井T3x43 73895.0982.5650.0121.3842.8141.2981.170
川丰563井T3x43 742.591.7945.5680.0111.3872.7930.8411.269
川孝560井T3x43 90196.1442.9010.0061.5032.7712.3261.362
川孝93T3x43 413.590.4315.3591.9870.9001.9240.8890.683
丰谷1井T3x43 36088.2818.1500.0471.1521.9920.5520.406
新882井T3x43 39192.9343.5460.0141.0791.8420.7180.494
新884井T3x43 376.297.6532.0470.0021.1492.5981.6100.282
T3x4平均值3 581.28091.6024.7430.2641.2042.3331.1300.776
川高561井T3x24 95898.7150.9330.0021.0372.873//
川合127井T3x24 588.598.5491.0720.0021.1694.0851.9661.598
川合137井T3x24 612.93597.5841.7130.0031.1482.996//
川江566井T3x24 362.596.9032.0460.0051.4193.6012.3621.575
川江566井T3x24 75096.9482.0060.0051.4093.5452.1221.412
联150T3x24 825.398.6781.0090.0021.0823.0452.0701.863
新2井T3x24 818.2498.6381.0220.0021.2182.9112.8071.296
新853井T3x25 04998.6570.9890.0021.2043.1952.9231.520
新856井T3x24 59298.6151.0330.0021.2143.5622.8091.501
新856井T3x24 838.298.6660.9810.0021.2103.2643.0601.457
T3x2平均值4 739.47098.1951.2800.0031.2113.3082.5151.528

图3

川西坳陷陆相天然气碳同位素系列分布特征"

图4

川西坳陷天然气δ13C1与δ13C2值的关系"

表3

天然气及烃源岩抽提轻烃特征"

井号层位样品类型iC6/nC6MCH/NC7MH/NC7异庚烷值2-甲基戊烷/3-甲基戊烷
洛深1井T3m+t烃源岩2.548.191.382.801.82
龙深1T3m+t烃源岩2.828.251.072.461.22
新856-1T3x2烃源岩2.389.250.662.671.13
川高561T3x2天然气2.9410.011.312.761.64
川江566T3x2天然气2.9910.321.242.651.56
新11T3x3烃源岩1.5321.612.281.731.33
川合100T3x3烃源岩1.5227.442.051.531.25
新11T3x4烃源岩1.5427.912.581.960.96
川孝568T3x4烃源岩1.6425.042.381.711.18
川孝560T3x4天然气1.9026.552.601.721.75
新882T3x4天然气1.9224.342.101.611.72
新856-3T3x5烃源岩2.113.681.282.031.63
新884-1T3x5烃源岩1.873.061.062.211.83
川合358J3天然气1.983.951.042.491.64
新浅31J3天然气2.053.671.092.161.60
川孝105J2天然气1.854.141.012.801.61
川孝455J2天然气1.803.371.102.341.76

图5

川西坳陷天然气轻烃参数对比"

图6

川西地区天然气CH4、C2H6乙烷与深度关系"

图7

川西地区天然气CO2、N2与深度关系"

图8

川西地区天然气iC4/nC4、iC5/nC5与深度关系"

图9

川西坳陷中段天然气C6H6/CH3(CH2)4CH2、C6H6/C6H12与深度关系"

图10

四川盆地西部致密砂岩气运移机制及模式"

1 王屿涛, 吕纯刚, 姚爱国, 等.准噶尔盆地致密砂岩气资源潜力及勘探前景[J].天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(5): 855-860.
WANG Y T, LV C G, YAO A G, et al. Tight sandstone gas resource potential and exploration prospect in the Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015,26(5): 855-860.
2 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(3): 257-264.
DAI J X,NI Y Y,WU X Q.Tight gas in China and its significance and exploaitation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(3):257-264.
3 魏国齐,张福东,李君,等.中国致密砂岩气成藏理论进展[J].天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(2): 199-210.
WEI G Q, ZHNAG F D, LI J, et al. New progress of tight sand gas accumulation theory and favorable exploration zones in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(2): 199-210.
4 郭迎春,庞雄奇,陈冬霞,等.致密砂岩气成藏研究进展及值得关注的几个问题[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(6):717-724.
GUO Y C,PANG X Q,CHEN D X, et al. Progress of research on hydrocarbon accumulation of tight sand gas and several issues for concerns[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2013, 34(6): 717-724.
5 PRINZHOFR A, MELLO M R, TAKAKI T. Geochemical characterization of natural gas: A physical multivariable approach and its applications in maturity and migration estimates[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2000,84(8):1152-1172.
6 戴金星.天然气碳氢同位素特征和各类天然气鉴别[J].天然气地球科学,1993,4(2):1-40.
DAI J X, Hydrocarbon isotopic characteristics and identification of natural gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 1993, 4(2): 1-40.
7 刘文汇, 陈孟晋, 关平, 等. 天然气成藏过程的三元地球化学示踪体系[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学,2007, 37(7): 908-915.
LIU W H, CHEN M J, GUAN P, et al. Ternary geochemical-tracing system in natural gas accumulation[J]. Science China: Earth Science, 2007, 37(7): 908-915.
8 沈忠民, 王鹏, 刘四兵, 等. 川西坳陷中段须家河组天然气碳同位素特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(5): 834-839.
SHEN Z M, WANG P, LIU S B, et al. Carbon isotopes of Xujiahe Formation nature gas in nature gas in middle part of western of Sichuan Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011, 22(5): 834-839.
9 PRINZHOFER A, SANTOS N E V, BATTAN A. Coupled use of carbon isotopes and noble gas isotopes in the Potiguar Basin(Brazil): Fluids migration and mantle influence[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2010,27(6):1273-1284.
10 PRINZHOFR A, MELLO M R, SILVA L C, et al. New geochemical characterization of natural gas and its use in oil and gas evaluation (in petroleum systems of South Atlantic margins)[J]. AAPG Memoir, 2000, 73(1-2): 107-119.
11 叶素娟, 朱宏权, 李嵘, 等. 天然气运移有机—无机地球化学示踪指标——以四川盆地川西坳陷侏罗系气藏为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4): 549-560.
YE S J, ZHU H Q, LI R, et al. Tracing natural gas migration by integrating organic and inorganic geochemical data: A case study of the Jurassic gas fields in western Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4): 549-560.
12 苗忠英, 陈践发, 张晨, 等. 塔里木盆地轮南低凸起天然气分布规律与成藏期次[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(3): 404-410.
MIAO Z Y, CHEN J F, ZHANG C, et al. Regularity of distribution and accumulation stages of natural gases in the Lunnan Lower Uplift of the Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(3): 404-410.
13 戴金星, 邹才能, 张水昌, 等. 无机成因和有机成因烷烃气的鉴别[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2008, 38(11): 1329-1341.
DAI J X, ZOU C N, ZHANG S C, et al. Identification of inorganic and orgnic alkane gas[J]. Science China: Earth Science, 2008, 38(11): 1329-1341.
14 苑坤,杨飞,刘彬,等,新场气田上三叠统须家河组五段天然气成藏主控因素分析[J].石油天然气学报,2016,38(3):23-29.
YUAN K, YANG F, LIU B, et al. Main controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation for 5th section Xujiahe Formation Upper Triassic Series in Xinchang Gas Field[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2016,38(3):23-29.
15 李国辉, 李楠, 谢继容, 等.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组前陆大气区基本特征及勘探有利区[J].天然气工业, 2012, 32(3): 15-21.
LI G H, LI N, XIE J R, et al. Basic features of large gas play fairways in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation of the Sichuan Foreland Basin and evaluation of favorable exploration zones[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(3): 15-21.
16 魏国齐, 杨威, 刘满仓, 等.四川盆地大气田分布、主控因素与勘探方向[J].天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 1-12.
WEI G Q, YANG W, LIU M C, et al. Distribution rules, main controlling factors and exploration directions of giant gas fields in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 1-12.
17 刘忠群, 徐士林, 刘君龙,等. 四川盆地川西坳陷深层致密砂岩气藏富集规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2020,40(2):31-40.
LIU Z Q, XU S L, LIU J L, et al. Enrichment laws of deep tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(2): 31-40.
18 黎华继, 严焕榕, 詹泽东,等. 川西坳陷侏罗系致密砂岩气藏储层精细评价[J]. 天然气工业,2019,39(S1): 129-135.
LI H J, YAN H R, ZHAN Z D, et al. Fine evaluation of Jurassic tight sandstone gas reservoir in Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(S1):129-135.
19 赵政璋, 杜金虎. 非常规油气资源现实的勘探开发领域:致密油气[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2012.
ZHAO Z Z, DU J H. Real Exploration and Development Field of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources: Tight Oil and Gas[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2012.
20 段永明, 张岩, 刘成川, 等. 川西致密砂岩气藏开发实践与认识[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1352-1360.
DUAN Y M, ZHANG Y, LIU C C, et al. Development practice and under standing of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in western Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(7): 1352-1360.
21 王伟东, 彭军, 段冠一, 等. 致密砂岩气藏储层研究的进展及趋势[J]. 油气地球物理, 2012, 10(4): 33-38.
WANG W D, PENG J, DUAN G Y,et al. The research progress and trend of tight sandstone gas reservoir[J]. Oil and Gas Geophysics, 2012, 10(4): 33-38.
22 邹才能, 陶士振, 侯连华. 非常规油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2013.
ZOU C N, TAO S Z, HOU L H. Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2013.
23 樊然学. 川西坳陷中段气藏天然气形成、运移的碳同位素地球化学证据[J]. 自然科学进展, 1999, 9(12):1126-1132.
FAN R X. Carbon isotope geochemical evidence of nature gases formation and migration in the middle of West Sichuan Depression[J]. Progress in Natural Science, 1999, 9(12): 1126-1132.
24 王玲辉, 沈忠民, 赵虎. 川西坳陷中段天然气碳同位素特征及其成因类型[J]. 物探与化探技术, 2008, 30(4): 326-330.
WANG L H, SHEN Z M, ZHAO H. Carbon isotope features and genetic type of natural gas in the middle section of Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2008, 30(4): 326-330.
25 唐艳, 叶军. 轻烃指纹参数在川西坳陷天然气成藏研究中的应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2001, 8(4): 17-21.
TANG Y, YE J. Application of light ends finger print coefficient to natural gas reservoir forming research of depression in the west of Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2001, 8(4): 17-21.
26 鲍典, 沈忠民, 罗小平, 等. 川西坳陷天然气C4—C7烃类指纹特征及在成藏研究中的意义[J]. 物探与化探技术, 2008, 30(2): 113-116.
BAO D, SHEN Z M, LUO X P, et al. The characteristics of natural gas C4-C7fingerprint in the Western Sichuan Depression and its implications for gas reservoir formation[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2008, 30(2): 113-116.
27 沈忠民, 王鹏, 刘四兵, 等. 川西拗陷中段天然气轻烃地球化学特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2011,38(5): 500-506.
SHEN Z M, WANG P, LIU S B, et al. Geochemical characteristics of light hydrocarbon in coal-derived gas: A case study of Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2011,38(5):500-506.
28 顾战宇.制约川西致密砂岩气藏高效开发主要因素探讨——以新场气田浅、中储层特征为例[J].石油天然气学报, 2005,27(4): 112-114.
GU Z Y. Discussion on the main factors restricting the efficient development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in west Sichuan[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2005,27(4):112-114.
29 郭迎春, 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 等. 川西坳陷中段陆相地层压力演化及其成藏意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(4): 426-433.
GUO Y C, PANG X Q, CHEN D X, et al. Evolution of continental formation pressure in the middle part of the Western Sichuan Depression and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4): 426-433.
30 沈忠民, 刘涛, 吕正祥, 等. 川西坳陷侏罗系天然气气源对比研究[J].高校地质学报, 2008, 14(4): 577-582.
SHEN Z M, LIU T, LV Z X, et al. A comparison study on the gas source of Jurassic natural gas in the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2008, 14(4): 577-582.
31 蒋启贵,张志荣,宋晓莹,等.轻烃指纹分析及其应用[J].地质科技情报, 2005,24(1):61-64.
JIANG Q G, ZHANG Z R, SONG X Y, et al. Analysis of light hydrocarbon fingerprints and its application[J]. Gelogical Science and Technology Information, 2005,24(1):61-64.
32 蒋启贵, 李志明, 张彩明, 等.东营凹陷烃源岩轻烃特征[J].地质科技情报, 2008,27(5):87-91.
JIANG Q G, LI Z M, ZHNAG C M, et al. Characteristics of light hydrocarbons of source rocks in Dongying Depression[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2008,27(5):87-91.
33 戴金星. 各类烷烃气的鉴别[J]. 中国科学,B辑, 1992,22(2): 185-193.
DAI J X. Identification of various types of alkanes[J]. Science China Press: Series B,1992, 22(2): 185-193.
34 杨见, 张敏, 陈晓娜. 川西坳陷上三叠统须一段烃源岩地球化学特征分析[J]. 长江大学学报:自然科学版,2012,9(12):41-43.
YANG J,ZHANG M,CHEN X N. Identification of Xu1 Member as main source rock in Upper Triassic from West Sichuan Depression[J]. Journal of Yangtze University: Natural Science Edition, 2012,9(12):41-43.
35 沈忠民, 潘中亮, 吕正祥, 等. 川西坳陷中段须家河组天然气地球化学特征与气源追踪[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2009,36(3):225-230
SHEN Z M, PAN Z L, LV Z X, et al. The geochemical characteristics of natural gas and the gas-sources tracing of Xujiahe Formation in the middle member of West Sichuan Depression[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2009, 36(3):225-230.
36 何心贵, 杨先利. 川西坳陷中段陆相天然气源岩追踪[J]. 天然气工业, 2002,8(3): 14-17.
HE X G, YANG X L. Trailing research on the continental gas source rock in the section of West Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002,8(3): 14-17.
37 黄志龙,柳广弟,郝石生. 东方1-1气田天然气运移地球化学特征[J]. 沉积学报,1997,15(2):66-69.
HUANG Z L, LIU G D, HAO S S. Geochemical characteristics of the natural gas migration in the Dongfang1-1 Gas Field, South China Sea[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997,15(2):66-69.
38 李广之, 吴向华. 异构比φiC4nC4和φiC5nC5的石油地质意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2002,26(2): 135-139.
LI G Z, WU X H. The petroleum geological significance of somerization rates φiC4nC4和φiC5nC5[J]. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration, 2002, 26(2): 135-139.
39 陈安定, 李剑锋. 天然气运移的地球化学指标研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1994,5(4): 38-67.
CHEN A D, LI J F. Study on geochemical index during natural gas migration[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 1994, 5(4): 38-67.
40 杨威, 魏国齐, 李跃纲, 等. 川西地区须家河组二段储层发育的主控因素和致密化时间探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(6): 796-800.
YANG W, WEI G Q,LI Y G, et al. Main controlling factorsand densification periods of the reservoir development of Xuji-ahe Formation second member, western Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2008, 19(6): 796-800.
41 王金琪. 早聚晚藏——川西坳陷天然气基本特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2001,21(1): 5-12.
WANG J Q. Early accumulation and late seal:The basic character of gas reservoirs in West Sichuan Depression[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2001,21(1): 5-12.
42 刘树根, 李国蓉, 李巨初, 等. 川西前陆盆地流体的跨层流动和天然气爆发式成藏[J]. 地质学报, 2005, 79(5): 690-699.
LIU S G, LI G R, LI J C, et al. Fluid cross formation flow and gas explosion accumulation in western Sichuan Foreland Basin,China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2005,79(5):690-699.
43 刘文汇, 王晓锋, 腾格尔, 等. 中国近十年天然气示踪地球化学研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2013, 32(3): 279-289.
LIU W H, WANG X F, TENG G E, et al. Progress of natural gas tracing geochemistry in China in recent ten years[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2013,32(3):279-289.
[1] 李剑, 王晓波, 侯连华, 陈昌, 国建英, 杨春龙, 王义凤, 李志生, 崔会英, 郝爱胜, 张璐. 四川盆地页岩气地球化学特征及资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1093-1106.
[2] 吴小奇, 陈迎宾, 王彦青, 曾华盛, 蒋小琼, 胡烨. 四川盆地川西坳陷成都大气田致密砂岩气地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1107-1116.
[3] 杨春龙, 谢增业, 李剑, 国建英, 张璐, 金惠, 郝翠果, 王晓波, 李志生, 李谨, 齐雪宁. 四川盆地中侏罗统沙溪庙组天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1117-1126.
[4] 李谨,李剑,王超,李德江,韩中喜,张海祖,周慧,卢玉红,刘满仓. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷致密砂岩气地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1151-1162.
[5] 谢增业,杨春龙,李剑,张璐,国建英,金惠,郝翠果. 四川盆地致密砂岩天然气成藏特征及规模富集机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1201-1211.
[6] 郝爱胜,李剑,国建英,吴浩,冉启贵,李志生,齐雪宁,张璐,王晓波. 吐哈盆地下侏罗统致密砂岩气藏特征与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1212-1222.
[7] 蔡灵慧,余烨,郭建华,黄俨然,郭原草. 湘中南地区中奥陶统烟溪组页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1247-1260.
[8] 卢晓林, 李美俊, 王小娟, 唐友军, 韦腾强, 何大祥, 洪海涛, 吴长江, 冉子超. 川中地区侏罗系天然气与原油轻烃地球化学特征对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(7): 1073-1083.
[9] 杨威, 刘满仓, 魏国齐, 金惠, 谢武仁, 武赛军, 苏楠, 朱秋影, 郝翠果, 王小丹. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组岩相古地理与规模储集体特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6): 781-793.
[10] 蔡珺君, 彭先, 李骞, 占天慧, 朱占美, 李文, 甘笑非, 邓庄, 王家树. 强非均质性碳酸盐岩气藏储集层再划分及不同生产阶段技术对策——以四川盆地磨溪—高石梯地区震旦系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6): 851-860.
[11] 张光荣, 聂海宽, 唐玄, 李东晖, 孙川翔, 张培先. 基于有机孔和生物成因硅优选页岩气富集高产层段的方法及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6): 888-898.
[12] 龚训, 李洪辉, 张君龙, 王延斌, 徐兆辉, 赵石虎, 秦连彬. 塔东地区下寒武统泥页岩特征与页岩气有利区优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6): 899-913.
[13] 冉清昌, 陈树民, 周翔. 松辽盆地杏山凹陷深层天然气地球化学特征及富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(5): 727-737.
[14] 倪云燕, 姚立邈, 廖凤蓉, 高金亮, 陈建平, 隋建立, 张蒂嘉. 四川盆地威远返排液元素地球化学特征及排放处理建议[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(4): 492-509.
[15] 韩中喜, 垢艳侠, 李谨, 葛守国, 田闻年, 黄恒. 四川盆地天然气汞含量分布特征及成因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(3): 356-362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蒋有录;. 气藏与油藏形成和保存条件差异问题讨论[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1998, 9(2): 1 -6 .
[2] 胡忠贵,胡明毅,廖 军,刘冬玺,蔡全升,王 丹. 鄂西建南地区长兴组沉积相及生物礁沉积演化模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(7): 980 -990 .
[3] 白云来, 马玉虎, 黄勇, 刘晓光. 鄂尔多斯古陆南部大陆边缘寒武纪奥拉谷存在的沉积学证据及其油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(11): 1706 -1717 .
[4] 张广权,胡向阳,孙兵,贾跃玮. 松辽盆地龙凤山凝析气藏营四砂组沉积特征及控制因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 502 -513 .
[5] 钱凯, 孙晓惠, 许小琼, 韩荣花, 范云, 魏星, 昌新玲, 任珠琳, 崔亚亚. 下印度河盆地石油地质、油气分布及油气富集区特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1797 -1809 .
[6] 邓焱, 胡国艺, 赵长毅. 四川盆地龙岗气田长兴组—飞仙关组天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 892 -907 .
[7] 张春林, 李剑, 陈鑫, 吴庆超. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系盐下古地貌恢复及其对滩体的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(9): 1263 -1271 .
[8] 于洲, 周进高, 丁振纯, 魏柳斌, 魏源, 吴兴宁, 吴东旭, 王少依, 李维岭. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部奥陶系马五41a储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(5): 686 -697 .
[9] 付玲,李建忠,徐旺林,郭玮,李宁熙,张月巧,宋微,孙远实. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部奥陶系盐下深层储层特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(11): 1548 -1561 .
[10] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 董大忠, 秦胜飞, 朱光有, 黄士鹏, 于聪, 龚德瑜, 洪峰, 张延玲, 严增民, 刘全有, 吴小奇, 冯子齐. “十四五”是中国天然气工业大发展期——对中国“十四五”天然气勘探开发的一些建议[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(1): 1 -16 .