天然气地球科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1334–1342.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.05.012

• 天然气开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

煤层气井组生产特征及产能差异控制因素

郭广山(),邢力仁,李娜,陈峥嵘   

  1. 中海油研究总院新能源研究中心,北京 100028
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-22 修回日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2020-09-10 发布日期:2020-09-04
  • 作者简介:郭广山(1982-),男,河北沧州人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事非常规油气地质研究.E-mail:guogsh2@cnooc.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    中海油科技攻关项目“柿庄北东部缓坡带排采制度优化与增产措施研究”(YXKY-2019-ZY-02)

Study on production characteristics and controlling factors of capacity differences of coalbed methane well group

Guang-shan GUO(),Li-ren XING,Na LI,Zheng-rong CHEN   

  1. New Energy Research Center,CNOOC Research Institute,Beijing 100028, China
  • Received:2020-04-22 Revised:2020-05-12 Online:2020-09-10 Published:2020-09-04

摘要:

为揭示影响相邻煤层气井组以及同一井组间产能差异控制因素,基于SZB煤层气一体化区典型相邻煤层气井组生产动态变化特征,探讨了产能类型、平均产气量和平均产水量等参数的差异性,并从地质控制因素、工程工艺控制因素和排采管理因素出发,详实剖析了资源条件、有利煤储层发育程度、井身质量、固井质量、压裂工艺和不同阶段排采制度对煤层气产量控制作用。结果显示:在煤层气资源条件相近情况下,煤储层非均质性和有利煤储层发育程度是影响相邻井组产量差异的内在主控地质因素;在保障井身结构合理、固井质量合格基础上,压裂改造效果是相邻煤层气井组产量差异的主控工程因素;不同生产阶段排采管理的科学性是主要管理因素。该观点不仅对煤层气井产量控制因素分析提供了理论依据,对煤层气田快速提产增效也有参考价值。

关键词: 生产特征, 产能, 控制因素, 井组, SZB区块.

Abstract:

In order to reveal the controlling factors of productivity difference between adjacent coalbed methane well groups and the same well group, based on the production dynamic characteristics of typical adjacent coalbed methane groups in SZB block, the differences of productivity types, average gas production and average water production are discussed, and the detailed analysis is made from geological controlling factors, engineering process controlling factors and drainage management factors. The resource conditions and development degree of high quality coal reservoir, well bore quality, well cementation quality, fracturing technology and different stages of drainage system control the coalbed methane productivity. The results show that under the condition of similar coalbed methane resources, the heterogeneity of coal reservoir and the development degree of favorable reservoir are the internal main geological factors that affect the production difference of adjacent well groups; on the basis of ensuring reasonable well bore structure and qualified cementing quality, the fracturing effect is the main engineering factor of the production difference of adjacent coalbed methane groups; the difference of production management in different production stages is the main management factor. This view not only provides a theoretical basis for the analysis of the controlling factors of coalbed methane productivity, but also has a reference value for the rapid production increase of coalbed methane.

Key words: Production characteristics, Capacity, Control factor, Well group, SZB blockFoundation item: The CNOOC Science and Technology Research Project(Grant No. YXKY-2019-ZY-02).

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.2

图1

井组位置分布"

表1

不同井组煤层气井排采分析结果"

井组井名产气量 /(m3/d)产水量/(m3/d)见气前排采时间/d产能类型
平均值最大值平均值最大值
E-222E-2221 056.001 147.001.7813.30100.00高产气井
E-222X265.0080.002.807.85131.00低产气井
E-222X31 076.001 214.003.338.4088.00高产气井
E-222X41 305.001 516.001.063.6087.00高产气井
F-224F-22460.00100.000.443.4041.00低产气井
F-224X1//////
F-224X2417.00981.000.776.1794.00中产气井
F-224X360.14109.000.624.307.00低产气井

图2

不同井组资源参数分布"

图3

不同井组煤层气储层分布"

表2

不同井组煤层气井压裂分析结果"

井名前置液量/m3混砂液量/m3顶替液量/m3总液量/m3总加砂量/m3单位厚度加砂量/m3平均砂比/%
E-222184.90463.8011.20659.9036.377.207.89
E-222X2221.20397.2011.90630.3050.206.6913.23
E-222X3212.40382.3012.10606.8045.286.6612.38
E-222X4244.60654.5011.80912.9045.137.526.93
F-224192.60279.1010.80482.5035.296.1413.00
F-224X1///////
F-224X2249.80384.2011.10645.1032.095.448.56
F-224X3199.20248.5011.80459.5030.265.2612.37

表3

不同井组煤层气井压后效果分析结果"

井号破裂压力 /MPa总摩阻 /MPa裂缝净压力 /MPa压降速率 /(MPa/min)
E-222277.205.190.51
E-222X215.84.600.190.09
E-222X319.55.5011.720.36
E-222X425.94.3015.380.35
F-22422.85.005.040.33
F-224X1////
F-224X232.96.515.80.11
F-224X335.26.6016.190.30

图4

不同井组煤层气排采因素分布"

1 刘云亮,张培河.柳林地区煤层气开采动态及单井产量主控因素分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2016,44(2):34-38.
LIU Y L,ZHANG P H. Analysis on production dynamic and main controlling factors of single coalbed methane (CBM) well in Liulin area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2016,44(2):34-38.
2 韩贤军,杨焦生.沁水盆地南部煤层气产能特征及影响因素分析[J].科学技术与工程, 2013,13(33): 9940-9946.
HAN X J,YANG J S. Coalbed methane deliverability characteristic and its controlling factors in southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(33):9940-9946.
3 吴双,汤达祯,许浩,等.深部煤层气井排采特征及产能控制因素分析[J].东北石油大学学报, 2015,39(2): 69-76.
WU S,TANG D Z,XU H,et al. Analysis of the charcateristics of deep coalbed methane wells drainage and control factors of productivity[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2015,39(2): 69-76.
4 陶树,汤达祯,许浩,等.沁南煤层气井产能影响因素分析及开发建议[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(2): 194-199.
TAO S,TANG D Z,XU H,et al. Analysis on influence factors of coalbed methane wells productivity and development proposals in southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011,36(2): 194-199.
5 邵先杰,王彩凤,汤达祯,等.煤层气井产能模式及控制因素——以韩城地区为例[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(2): 271-277.
SHAO X J,WANG C F,TANG D Z, et al. Productivity mode and control factors of coalbed methane wells:A case from Hancheng region[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(2): 271-277.
6 郭盛强.成庄区块煤层气井产气特征及控制因素研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2013,41(12): 100-104.
GUO S Q.Study on coalbed methane well production charcateristics and control factors in Chengzhuang block[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2013,41(12): 100-104.
7 张培河.煤层气井产能分级方案研究[J].中国煤层气, 2007,4 (1): 28-30.
ZHANG P H.Study on CBM well capacity grading scheme[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 2007,4 (1): 28-30.
8 张培河,刘钰辉,王正喜,等.基于生产数据分析的沁水盆地南部煤层气井产能控制地质因素研究[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(5):909-914.
ZHANG P H,LIU Y H,WANG Z X, et al. Geological factors of production control of CBM well in south Qinshui Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011,22(5):909-914.
9 刘世奇,桑树勋,李梦溪,等.樊庄区块煤层气井产能差异的关键地质影响因素及控制机理[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(2):277-283.
LIU S Q,SANG S X,LI M X, et al. Key geologic factors and control mechanisms of water production and gas production divergences between CBM wells in Fanzhuang block[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2013,38(2):277-283.
10 王丹,赵峰华,姚晓莉,等.临汾区块煤层气产能地质影响因素分析[J].特种油气藏,2016,23(2):1-5.
WANG D,ZHAO F H,YAO X L, et al. Analysis of geological factors on CBM productivity in block Linfen[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoir, 2016,23(2):1-5.
11 王向浩,王延斌,袁钧,等.煤层气资源赋存条件与垂直井产能关系研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2013,38(2): 104-107.
WANG X H,WANG Y B,YUAN J, et al. Study on relationship between coal bed methane resources deposit condition and vertical gas well production capacity[J].Coal Science and Te-chnology, 2013,38(2): 104-107.
12 潘建旭,王延斌,倪小明,等.资源条件与煤层气垂直井产能关系——以沁水盆地南部樊庄与潘庄区块为例[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2011,39(4): 24-28.
PAN J X,WANG Y B,NI X M, et al. The relationship between resource conditions and CBM productivity of vertical wells:Case of Fanzhuang and Panzhuang blocks in southern Qinshui Basin[J].Coal Geology and Exploration, 2011,39(4): 24-28.
13 董震,葛祥,何传亮.测井综合评价指标在煤层气井产能评价中的应用[J].测井技术, 2016,40(2): 214-220.
DONG Z,GE X,HE C L. Application of composite evaluation Iidicator from logs to productivity evaluation of coalbed gas well[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2016,40(2): 214-220.
14 余杰,秦瑞宝,梁建设,等.煤层气“甜点”测井判别与产量预测——以沁水盆地柿庄南区块为例[J].新疆石油地质, 2017,38(4):482-488.
YU J,QIN R B,LIANG J S,et al.Sweet spot identification with well-logging data and production prediction for coalbed methane:A case study from southern Shizhuang block in Qinshui Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2017,38(4):482-488.
15 刘人和,刘飞,周文,等.沁水盆地煤岩储层单井产能影响因素[J].天然气工业, 2008,28 (7): 30-33.
LIU R H,LIU F,ZHOU W, et al.An analysis of factors affecting single well deliverability of coalbed methane in the Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008,28 (7): 30-33.
16 胡秋嘉,李梦溪,乔茂坡,等. 沁水盆地南部高阶煤煤层气井压裂效果关键地质因素分析[J].煤炭学报,2017,42(6):1506-1516.
HU Q J,LI M X,QIAO M P, et al. Analysis of key geologic factors of fracturing effect of CBM wells for high-rank coal in southern Qinshui Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2017,42(6):1506-1516.
17 杨国桥,唐书恒,李忠城,等.柿庄南区块煤层气高产井排采制度分析[J].煤炭科学技术,2016,44(8):176-181.
YANG G Q,TANG S H,LI Z C, et al. Analysis on drainage system of coalbed methane high production well in south block of Shizhuang[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2016,44(8):176-181.
18 姜杉钰,康永尚,张守仁,等. 沁水盆地柿庄区块煤层气井排采动态影响因素分析及开发对策究[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(26):1134-1142.
JIANG S Y,KANG Y S,ZHANG S R, et al. Analysis on influencing factors of drainage dynamic of wells and CBM development strategy in Shizhuang block[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(6):1134-1142.
[1] 史超群, 张慧芳, 周思宇, 王佐涛, 蒋俊, 章学岐, 左小军, 娄洪, 王振鸿, 陈常超. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带—秋里塔格构造带白垩系巴什基奇克组深层、高产储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(8): 1126-1138.
[2] 闫海军, 邓惠, 万玉金, 俞霁晨, 夏钦禹, 徐伟, 罗瑞兰, 程敏华, 鄢友军, 张林, 邵艳伟. 四川盆地磨溪区块灯影组四段强非均质性碳酸盐岩气藏气井产能分布特征及其对开发的指导意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(8): 1152-1160.
[3] 郭明强, 周龙刚, 张兵, 潘新志, 王应斌. 致密砂岩气水分布特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地东部临兴地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(6): 855-864.
[4] 陈爱章, 刘文锋, 谢天寿, 王怀武, 齐洪岩, 周隶华, 陈轩, 孙德强, 朱丹萍. 火山岩孔缝型油气藏产能特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(6): 877-889.
[5] 张宸赫, 韩军铮, 纪友亮, 周勇, 苏芮, 王世超, 尹俊霞, 张素华, 唐林, 刘尽贤. 陆相湖盆扇三角洲—滩坝体系砂体展布特征与叠置模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(4): 518-531.
[6] 鲍园, 安超, 琚宜文, 尹中山, 熊建龙, 王文愽. 川南煤田古叙矿区DC⁃5井上二叠统龙潭组煤层甲烷吸附性及其主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(1): 93-99.
[7] 李祖兵, 李剑, 崔俊峰, 邢立平, 吴雪松. 渤海湾盆地北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及发育主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(1): 13-25.
[8] 吕文雅, 曾联波, 周思宾, 吉园园, 梁丰, 惠晨, 尉加盛. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部致密砂岩储层微观裂缝特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(1): 37-46.
[9] 罗超, 郭建林, 李易隆, 冀光, 窦丽玮, 尹楠鑫, 陈岑. 砂质辫状河隔夹层成因及分布控制因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(9): 1272-1285.
[10] 付爽, 庞雷, 许学龙, 曹元婷, 刘振宇, 张顺存, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下乌尔禾组储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 468-477.
[11] 姜瑞忠, 张福蕾, 郜益华, 崔永正, 沈泽阳, 原建伟. 三重介质压裂气藏椭圆流非稳态产能模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 370-378.
[12] 张辉, 尹国庆, 王海应. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷天然裂缝地质力学响应对气井产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 379-388.
[13] 张磊, 徐兵祥, 辛翠平, 乔向阳, 穆景福, 许阳, 韩长春. 考虑主裂缝的页岩气产能预测模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 247-256.
[14] 谢维扬, 刘旭宁, 吴建发, , 张鉴, 吴天鹏, 陈满. 页岩气水平井组产量递减特征及动态监测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 257-265.
[15] 张芨强,雷霄,张乔良,薛国庆,汤明光. 低渗透气藏产水压裂水平井产能评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(12): 1701-1708.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王先彬;妥进才;周世新;李振西;张铭杰;闫宏;. 论天然气形成机制与相关地球科学问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 7 -13 .
[2] 杨蕾;同登科;. 变形介质煤层气双渗流动压力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(3): 429 -433 .
[3] 张斌;肖中尧;吴英;卢玉红;李明和;刘永福;. 塔里木盆地东南地区若参1井天然气成因初探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 586 -589 .
[4] 王生维;陈钟惠;段连秀;杨梅珍;. 我国中新生代聚煤盆地煤层气地质特征与勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(4): 337 -340 .
[5] 周新源,王清华,杨文静,肖中尧 . 塔里木盆地天然气资源及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 7 -11 .
[6] 王杰;陈践发;. 关于碳酸盐岩烃源岩有机质丰度恢复的探讨――以华北中、上元古界碳酸盐岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(3): 306 -310 .
[7] 张春明,李思田,杨甲明,杨少坤,汪建蓉. 1,X-二甲基咔唑的一种形成机理[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(2): 174 -177 .
[8] 胡海燕. 超压的成因及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(1): 99 -102 .
[9] 杨军杰, 蒲春生. 集气管线天然气水合物生成理论模型及堵塞预测研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(6): 660 -663 .
[10] 陈启林,杨占龙. 岩性油气藏勘探方法与技术[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(5): 622 -626 .