天然气地球科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1551–1559.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.07.019

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组物源特征及对储集砂体的控制作用

刘学珍1(),王雪艳1,钟安宁2,杨迎春1,张世祥2,周翔2   

  1. 1. 东方物探有限责任公司大庆物探一公司,黑龙江 大庆 163000
    2. 大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-15 修回日期:2019-07-24 出版日期:2019-11-10 发布日期:2019-12-03
  • 作者简介:刘学珍(1967-),女,河南光山人,高级工程师,主要从事层序地层学与沉积学研究. E-mail:liuxuezhendq@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05047-001);中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项(2016E-02)

Characteristic of provenance and their control over sand bodies in Shahezi Formation of Xujiaweizi fault depression, Songliao Basin

Xue-zhen Liu1(),Xue-yan Wang1,An-ning Zhong2,Ying-chun Yang1,Shi-xiang Zhang2,Xiang Zhou2   

  1. 1. The 1st Geophysical Exploration Company in Daqing, Bureau of Geophysical Prospecting, Daqing 163000, China
    2. Exploration and Production Research Institute, Daqing Oilfield Company, Daqing 163712, China
  • Received:2019-04-15 Revised:2019-07-24 Online:2019-11-10 Published:2019-12-03

摘要:

综合砂岩轻、重矿物组成和砾岩砾石成分分析,在明确松辽盆地徐家围子断陷不同构造单元母岩性质的基础上,结合地震特殊反射特征建立各构造单元物源方向,明确物源对储集砂体展布、物性形成的控制。结果表明:①安达地区母岩为西北部安达凸起的酸性火山岩,物源方向为南西向;徐西凹陷母岩为西部中央古隆起的酸性、中基性火山岩,物源方向以东西向为主;宋站地区和徐东凹陷母岩为徐东斜坡的中基性火山岩和变质岩,物源方向以北东向、东西向为主。②西部、西北部物源规模较小,在断陷西侧陡坡带形成一系列沿断裂呈孤立点状分布的扇三角洲沉积体,砂体厚度大但延伸距离短;东部物源规模较大,在断陷东侧缓坡带形成连片叠置的辫状河三角洲沉积,砂体较薄但平面分布广。③西部陡坡带砂体粒度粗,抗压实能力强,在深埋条件下仍保留部分原生孔隙;东侧缓坡带砂体碎屑颗粒细、岩屑等塑性组分含量高,压实减孔严重,但紧邻煤层和湖相泥岩环境有利于有机酸进入造成岩屑、长石广泛溶蚀,极大地改善了储层物性。

关键词: 物源分析, 重矿物, 沉积体系, 沙河子组, 徐家围子断陷

Abstract:

The characteristic of parent rock in different tectonic unit was investigated according to the composition of clastic rock, heavy mineral and conglomerate. The main direction of different tectonic units was established based on special reflection analysis, and their impacts on the distribute and quality of sand bodies were clarified. The result is that, the parent rock in Anda area is mainly acid volcanic rock which comes from Anda Sag, and the parent rock in Xuxi Depression is mainly acid and intermediate-basic volcanic rock which comes from the central uplift. The parent rock in Songzhan area and Xudong Depression is intermediate-basic volcanic and metamorphic rocks that comes from Xudong slop. The scale of provenance in sleep slop such as Anda area and Xuxi Depression is less than that in gentle slope belt such as Songzhan area and Xudong Depression, therefore, the sedimentary facies in Anda area and Xuxi Depression are small fan delta which was developed along with Xuxi fault, and isolated from the other. While the sedimentary facies in Songzhan area and Xudong Depression is braided river delta in large scale, with a small thickness and wide area. The size of sandstone in sleep slop are greater than that in gentle slope belt, which makes the sandstone have a stronger ability to resist the compaction, and lots of primary pores can be reserved at a higher burial depth, while for the sandstone in gentle slope belt with a greater content of rock debris and smaller size, in that case, a great deal of porosity have been lost because of serious compact and primary pore can hardly be found in gentle slope belt. But organic acids get into reservoir and corrode rock debris, generate masses of dissolution pores which is the key factor why quality of sandstone in gentle slope belt is higher than that in sleep slope.

Key words: Provenance analysis, Heavy mineral, Sedimentary system, Shahezi Formation, Xujiaweizi fault depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1

图1

徐家围子断陷构造单元划分"

图2

徐家围子断陷不同构造单元砂岩岩石类型"

表1

徐家围子断陷不同构造单元砂岩碎屑矿物组成和砾岩砾石成分组合"

构造单元碎屑矿物组合/%变质岩/个岩浆岩/个沉积岩/个
石英长石岩屑流纹岩英安岩安山岩玄武岩

安达

地区

12~3624.30(31)10~4328.39(31)18~5547.31(31)2~239(15)1~134.4(15)0~71.4(15)0~82.4(15)0~229(15)0~112.4(15)

宋站

地区

10~6024.20(40)7~3322.95(40)26~6652.84(40)0~146.25(21)1~136.75(21)0~134.75(21)0~269.25(21)0~41.75(21)0~62.5(21)

徐西

凹陷

3~2821.34(35)12~3632.51(35)17~5846.14(35)0~193.22(31)1~2347.31(31)0~339.56(31)5~4817.22(31)0~41.22(31)

徐东

凹陷

5~4427.78(65)12~4921.11(65)25~6251.11(65)0~319.2(17)0~4914.2(17)0~9224.2(17)0~14137.6(17)0~20.8(17)0~92.4(17)

图3

徐家围子断陷不同构造单元沙河子组重矿物组合特征"

图4

徐家围子断陷典型物源响应地震反射结构剖面和下切谷特征[(a)—(d)剖面位置对应图5中T4a—T4d]"

图5

徐家围子断陷沙河子组SQ2层序下切谷分布及沉积相"

图6

徐家围子断陷沙河子组ZTR等值线"

图7

徐家围子断陷达深401井—宋3井沙河子组沉积剖面图(剖面位置见图5中T7)"

图8

徐家围子断陷达深4井(a)和宋深4井(b)单井沉积相"

图9

徐家围子断陷不同构造单元砂岩胶结物与粒间体积关系"

图10

徐家围子断陷不同构造单元储层孔隙度随深度变化曲线"

1 WangMin,SunYefeng,WangWenguang,et al.Gas generation characteristics and resource potential of the deep source rock in Xujiaweizi fault depression,northern Songliao Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(7):1011-1018.
王民,孙业峰,王文广,等.松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷深层烃源岩生气特征及天然气资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1011-1018.
2 CaiQuansheng,HuMingyi,HuZhonggui,et al.Sedimentary filling evolution of small-scale lake basins during intensive faulting: An example from the Shahezi Formation of Songzhan region in Xujiaweizi fault depression,Songliao Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(2):975-984.
蔡全升,胡明毅,胡忠贵,等.强烈断陷期小型湖盆沉积充填演化特征——以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷宋站地区沙河子组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(2):975-984.
3 SuChaoguang,ZhongWeiping.An analysis on the provenance of the Neogene Shawan Formation in the Chepaizi Uplift of the Junggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2010,31(5):648-655.
苏朝光,仲维萍.准噶尔盆地车排子凸起新近系沙湾组物源分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(5):648-655.
4 ZhaoHongge,LiuChiyang. Approaches and prospects of provenance analysis[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003,21(3):409-415.
赵红格,刘池洋.物源分析方法及研究进展[J].沉积学报,2003,21(3):409-415.
5 BaiXuefeng,LiangJiangping,ZhangWenjing,et al.Geologic conditions, resource potential and exploratory direction of deep gas in the northern Songliao Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018,29(1):1443-1454.
白雪峰,梁江平,张文婧,等.松辽盆地北部深层天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2018,29(1):1443-1454.
6 YangHua,LiuZiliang,ZhuXiaomin,et al.Provenance and depositional systems of the Upper Trassic Yanchang Formation in the southweastern Ordos Basin,China[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2013,20(2):10-18.
杨华,刘自亮,朱筱敏,等.鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘上三叠统延长组物源与沉积体系特征[J].地学前缘,2013,20(2):10-18.
7 ShanXiang,ZouZhiwen,MengXiangchao,et al.Provence analysis of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in the area around Mahu Depression,Junggar Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016,34(5):930-939.
单祥,邹志文,孟祥超,等.准噶尔盆地环玛湖地区三叠系百口泉组物源分析[J].沉积学报,2016,34(5):930-939.
8 MortonA C,WhithamA G,FanningC M. Provenance of Late Cretaceous to Paleocene submarine fan sendstones in the norwegian Sea: Integration of heavy mineral,mineral chemical and zircon age data[J].Sedimentary Geology,2005,182(1-4):3-28.
9 LiSitian,PanYuanlin,LuYongchao,et al.Key techonlogy of prospecting and exploration of subtle traps in lacustrine fault basin:Sequence stratigraphic researches on the basin of high resolution seismic survey[J].Earth Science, 2002,27(5):592-598.
李思田,潘元林,陆永潮,等.断陷湖盆隐蔽油藏预测及探勘的关键技术—高精度地震探测基础上的层序地层学研究[J].地球科学,2002,27(5):592-598.
10 YuanXiaoqiang,YaoGuangqing,JiangPing,et al.Provenance analysis for Liushagang Formation of Wushi Depression,Beibuwan Basin,the South China Sea[J].Earth Science, 2017,42(11):2040-2054.
袁晓蔷,姚光庆,姜平,等.北部湾盆地乌石凹陷东部流沙港组物源分析[J].地球科学,2017,42(11):2040-2054.
11 GaoChonglong,JiYouliang,JinJun,et al.Development model of sedimentary system and reservoir under valley-monadnock paleotopography during buried stage of paleouplift: Case study of 1st member of K1q in Shinan area, hinterland of Junggar Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018,29(8):1120-1137.
高崇龙,纪友亮,靳军,等.古隆起埋藏期沟谷残丘地貌下沉积体系及油气藏发育模式——以准噶尔盆地腹部石南地区清水河组一段为例[J].天然气地球科学,2018,29(8):1120-1137.
12 MortonA C,HallsworthC R.Identifying provenance specific features of detrital heavy mineral assemblages in sandstones[J].Sedimentray Geology,1994,90(3):241-256.
13 ZhouXiang,HeSheng,ChenZhaoyou,et al.Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of low porosity and permeability sandstone in member 8 of Yanchang Formation in Daijiaping area,Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2016,37(2):155-164.
周翔,何生,陈召佑,等.鄂尔多斯盆地代家坪地球延长组长8段低孔渗砂岩成岩作用及成岩相[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(2):155-164.
[1] 刘永福, 夏辉, 孙琦, 林畅松, 赵海涛, 李浩, 黄腊梅, 张知源. 塔里木盆地塔北隆起西部巴什基奇克组层序地层及沉积演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 62-73.
[2] 高崇龙, 纪友亮, 靳军, 王剑, 任影, 曾力, 王道伟, 张昊, 李谨杰. 古隆起埋藏期沟谷残丘地貌下沉积体系及油气藏发育模式——以准噶尔盆地腹部石南地区清水河组一段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1120-1137.
[3] 杨占龙,黄云峰,沙雪梅,吴青鹏,黄小鹏,郝彬. 吐哈盆地鄯善弧形带东翼中—下侏罗统沉积体系发育模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 349-357.
[4] 张大智. 利用氮气吸附实验分析致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征——以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 898-908.
[5] 张广权,胡向阳,孙兵,贾跃玮. 松辽盆地龙凤山凝析气藏营四砂组沉积特征及控制因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 502-513.
[6] 黄玉龙,刘春生,张晶晶,高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系火山岩气藏有效储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 420-428.
[7] 刘超. 松辽盆地徐家围子地区沙河子组气源岩与致密砂砾岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 429-438.
[8] 赵春晨,刘护创,任来义,陈治军,李科社,白晓寅,王小多. 银额盆地YHC1井白垩系气藏形成的地质环境及其远景意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 439-451.
[9] 王琪,田兵,马晓峰,牟炜卫,高丽华. 珠江口盆地白云深水区深水水道沉积体系及成因模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(10): 1497-1505.
[10] 郭帅,陈莹,曾清波,杨海长,韩银学,纪沫,沈怀磊,郭佳,赵钊. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷北坡恩平组上段三角洲物源演化及储集意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(10): 1527-1536.
[11] 韩银学,王龙颖,杨东升,曾清波,白海强,郭帅,杨香华. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷珠海组南部物源及其油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(10): 1537-1545.
[12] 陈彬滔,潘树新,方乐华,张庆石,李成刚,梁苏娟. 松辽盆地齐家—古龙凹陷青山口组泥页岩层段储层特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(2): 298-308.
[13] 胡慧婷,苏瑞,刘超,孟令威. 广义ΔLgR技术预测陆相深层烃源岩有机碳含量方法及其应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 149-155.
[14] 龙礼文,李相博,刘广林,廖建波,赵园园,李智勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水砂岩储层岩石学特征及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(4): 634-640.
[15] 肖传桃,肖胜,叶飞,梁文君. 柴达木盆地昆北—阿拉尔地区坡折带及其对岩性油气藏的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(11): 2085-2092.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷理雄,郭建华,王英明,冯永宏,李广才 . 柴窝堡凹陷达坂城次凹油气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 20 -24 .
[2] 邵荣;叶加仁;陈章玉;. 流体包裹体在断陷盆地含油气系统研究中的应用概述[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(6): 11 -14 .
[3] 何家雄;李明兴;陈伟煌;. 莺歌海盆地热流体上侵活动与天然气运聚富集关系探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(6): 29 -43 .
[4] Al-Arouri K;Mckirdy D;Boreham C(澳大利亚);孙庆峰(译). 用油源对比方法识别澳大利亚南塔鲁姆凹陷的石油系统[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(4-5): 57 -67 .
[5] 马立祥;. 断层封闭性研究在烃类聚集系统分析中的意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(3): 1 -8 .
[6] 廖成君. VSP技术在锦612复杂断块油藏开发部署研究中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 117 -122 .
[7] 马立祥. 岩石物理流动单元的概念及其研究现状[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 30 -36 .
[8] 杜乐天;. 地球的5个气圈与中地壳天然气开发[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 25 -30 .
[9] 周世新;邹红亮;解启来;贾星亮;. 沉积盆地油气形成过程中有机-无机相互作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 42 -47 .
[10] 曹华;龚晶晶;汪贵锋;. 超压的成因及其与油气成藏的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(3): 422 -425 .