天然气地球科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 1451–1464.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.07.016

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“四古”特征论四川盆地川中古隆起北斜坡龙王庙组天然气勘探潜力

马奎1(),沈平2,汪泽成3,田兴旺1,彭翰霖1,汪华1,张玺华1,孙奕婷1,罗冰1,王云龙1,杨岱林1   

  1. 1. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院, 四川 成都 610041
    2. 中国石油西南油气田公司,四川 成都 610051
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-12 修回日期:2019-07-05 出版日期:2019-10-10 发布日期:2019-11-06
  • 作者简介:马奎(1988?),男,湖北黄冈人,博士后,主要从事四川盆地油气地质勘探研究.E?mail:mak@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油西南油气田公司博士后项目“川中地区磨溪北斜坡震旦系—寒武系天然气成藏过程研究”(20180301-16);“十三五”国家科技重大专项“四川盆地及邻区下古生界—前寒武系成藏条件研究与区带目标评价”(2016ZX05004-005)

Natural gas exploration potential of Longwangmiao Formation on the north slope of Chuanzhong paleo⁃uplift from the characteristics of “Four Paleo”

Kui Ma1(),Ping Shen2,Ze-cheng Wang3,Xing-wang Tian1,Han-lin Peng1,Hua Wang1,Xi-hua Zhang1,Yi-ting Sun1,Bing Luo1,Yun-long Wang1,Dai-lin Yang1   

  1. 1. Exploration and Development Research Institute of Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, PetroChina, Chengdu 610041, China
    2. Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, PetroChina, Chengdu 610051, China
    3. Research Institution of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2019-06-12 Revised:2019-07-05 Online:2019-10-10 Published:2019-11-06

摘要:

近年来,四川盆地川中古隆起轴部发现了安岳特大型气田,主要目的层为震旦系灯影组、寒武系龙王庙组。但对古隆起斜坡区的成藏问题探讨较少,直接制约了油气勘探突破和发现。基于野外、钻井岩心和地球物理资料分析,重点论述川中古隆起北斜坡龙王庙组“四古”(古颗粒滩体、古老烃源岩、古圈闭和古构造)对成藏控制作用,并对勘探潜力进行评价。研究表明:①北斜坡龙王庙组沉积期颗粒滩体叠置发育,为准同生期岩溶作用形成粒间孔、粒内孔等类型储集空间形成提供物质基础;②北斜坡紧邻德阳—安岳裂陷,下寒武统筇竹寺组优质烃源岩为天然气聚集提供了充足的气源;③斜坡构造背景下发育的岩性—地层和岩性—构造复合类古圈闭为油气聚集提供有效聚集空间;④古构造多期活动和调整控制油气成藏演化;⑤川中古隆起北斜坡龙王庙组油气成藏条件优越,勘探取得突破的关键在于寻找活动强度较弱的断层附近的岩性—地层和岩性—构造圈闭。不同类型天然气藏发育有利分布区总面积达3 652km2,资源量大,勘探前景广阔。

关键词: 川中古隆起北斜坡, 龙王庙组, 四古, 成藏演化, 勘探潜力

Abstract:

In recent years, the Anyue giant gas field has been discovered in the axis of the Chuanzhong paleo-uplift in the Sichuan Basin. The main target layers are the Sinian Dengying Formation and the Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation. Reservoir formation in the slope area of paleo-uplift is seldom discussed, which directly restricts the breakthrough and discovery of oil and gas exploration. Based on field, drilling core and geophysical data, This paper, focuses on the controlling effects of paleo-granitic shoal, paleo-source rocks, paleo-traps and paleo-tectonic on the natural gas accumulation of the Longwangmiao Formation in the northern slope of the Chuanzhong paleo-uplift, and the exploration potential. The results show that: (1) The granitic shoal was superimposed during the deposition period of the Longwangmiao Formation in the north slope, providing a material basis for the formation of intergranular pores and intragranular pores in the quasi-syngenetic karstification; (2) North slope adjacent to the Deyang-Anyue rift, the high-quality source rocks of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation provide sufficient gas source for natural gas accumulation; (3) Lithological-stratigraphic and lithology-structure complex paleotraps developed in the slope tectonic setting provide effective accumulation space for hydrocarbon accumulation; (4) Paleotectonic multi-stage activities and adjustment control hydrocarbon accumulation and evolution; (5) The oil and gas accumulation conditions of Longwangmiao Formation on the northern slope of Middle Sichuan paleo-uplift are superior. The key to breakthrough in exploration lies in finding lithologic-stratigraphic and lithology-structure traps near faults with weak activity intensity. The favorable distribution area for different types of trap gas reservoirs is 3 652km2, with large natural gas resources and broad prospects for exploration.

Key words: Northern slope of the Chuanzhong paleo-uplift, Longwangmiao Formation, Four Paleo, Hydrocarbon accumulation and evolution, Exploration potential

中图分类号: 

  • TE122

图1

川中古隆起龙王庙组顶界北斜坡现今构造"

图2

川中古隆起磨溪北斜坡典型地震剖面(见图1中AB测线)"

图3

川中古隆起北斜坡构造演化"

图4

川中—川西北地区龙王庙组沉积相分布"

图5

川中古隆起磨溪至北斜坡沉积相连井剖面特征"

图6

川中古隆起北斜坡下寒武统龙王庙组颗粒滩储层岩性及储集空间特征 (a)MX26井,4 931.04m,龙王庙组,鲕粒白云岩,粒间孔发育,蓝色铸体薄片,单偏光;(b)NC1井,5 659.34~5 659.57m,龙王庙组,褐灰色细晶云岩,顺层溶蚀孔发育;(c)MX56井,4 959.43~4 959.61m,龙王庙组,褐灰色细晶云岩,顺层溶蚀孔发育;(d)MX26井,4 814.81m,龙王庙组,砂屑白云岩,粒内溶孔发育,沥青半充填,蓝色铸体薄片,单偏光;(e)MX56井,4 964.35m,龙王庙组,细晶云岩,白云石以半自形—自行镶嵌,晶间溶孔发育,蓝色铸体薄片,单偏光;(f)MX56井,4 951.98m,龙王庙组,细晶云岩,晶间溶孔,沥青和白云石矿物充填,蓝色铸体薄片,单偏光;(g)MX56井,4 966.29~4 966.50m,龙王庙组,砂屑白云岩,孤立溶洞发育,直径3cm,沥青充填;(h)MX22井,4 943.88m,龙王庙组,细晶云岩,溶洞发育,大小3mm,沥青充填,蓝色铸体薄片,单偏光;(i)MX22井,4 943.88~4 945.71m,龙王庙组,泥晶白云岩,溶蚀孔沿裂缝发育,蓝色铸体薄片,单偏光"

图7

川中古隆起北斜坡下寒武统龙王庙组颗粒滩储集层物性特征"

图8

川中—川西北地区下寒武统筇竹寺组烃源岩厚度"

图9

MX52—MX111—MX22—MX108—MX103—MX27—MX8连井地层格架"

图10

下寒武统寒武系龙王庙组地震剖面解释"

图11

磨溪北斜坡龙王庙组圈闭类型分布"

图12

川中古隆起北斜坡筇竹寺组烃源岩热演化与油气充注史"

图13

川中古隆起磨溪北斜坡龙王庙组油气成藏演化模式(见图1中CD测线)"

1 Zou Caineng , Du Jinhu , Xu Chunchun , et al . Formation, distribution, resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 278-293.
邹才能,杜金虎,徐春春,等 . 四川盆地震旦系—寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014, 41(3):278-293.
2 Du Jinhu . Geological Theory and the Exploration Practice of the Old Large Carbonate Gas Field[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2015.
杜金虎 .古老碳酸盐岩大气田地质理论与勘探实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2015.
3 Zou Caineng , Yang Zhi , Dai Jinxing , et al . The characteristics and significance of conventional and unconventional Sinian-Silurian gas systems in the Sichuan Basin, central China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 64:386-402.
4 Zhu Guangyou , Yang Haijun , Zhu Yongfeng , et al . Study on petroleum geological characteristics and accumulation of carbonate reservoirs in Hanilcatam area, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(3): 827-844.
朱光有,杨海军,朱永峰,等 . 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区碳酸盐岩油气地质特征与富集成藏研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(3):827-844.
5 Jiao Fangzheng . Significance and prospect of ultra-deep carbonate fault-karst reservoirs in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2018,39(2): 207-216.
焦方正 .塔里木盆地顺北特深碳酸盐岩断溶体油气藏发现意义与前景[J].石油与天然气地质,2018,39(2): 207-216.
6 Fu Jinhua , Wei Xinshan , Ren Junfeng , et al . Gas exploration and developing prospect in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(6):1-4.
付金华,魏新善,任军峰,等 . 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探形势与发展前景[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(6):1-4.
7 Liu Quanyou , Jin Zhijun , Wang Yi , et al . Gas filling pattern in Paleozoic marine carbonate reservoir of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(3): 847-858.
刘全有,金之钧,王毅,等 . 鄂尔多斯盆地海相碳酸盐岩层系天然气成藏研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(3) : 847-858.
8 Wu Guanghui , Yang Haijun , Qu Tailai , et al . The fault system characteristics and its controlling roles on marine carbonate hydrocarbon in the central uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(3): 793-805.
邬光辉,杨海军,屈泰来,等 . 塔里木盆地塔中隆起断裂系统特征及其对海相碳酸盐岩油气的控制作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(3):793-805.
9 Ma Debo , Wang Zecheng , Duan Shufu , et al . Strike-slip faults and their significance for hydrocarbon accumulation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 795-805.
马德波,汪泽成,段书府,等 . 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区走滑断层构造特征与天然气成藏意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 795-805.
10 Mei Qinghua , He Dengfa , Wen Zhu , et al . Geologic structure and tectonic evolution of Leshan-Longnvsi paleo-uplift in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1):11-25.
梅庆华,何登发,文竹,等 . 四川盆地乐山—龙女寺古隆起地质结构及构造演化[J]. 石油学报,2014, 35(1):11-25
11 Li Wei , Yi Haiyong , Hu Wangshui , et al . Tectonic evolution of Caledonian paleohigh in the Sichuan Basin and its relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Natural Gas Industry,
2014, 34(3): 1-8. 李伟,易海永,胡望水,等 . 四川盆地加里东古隆起构造演化与油气聚集的关系[J]. 天然气工业,2014, 34(3): 1-8.
12 Wei Guoqi , Yang Wei , Du Jinhu , et al . Tectonic features of Gaoshiti-Moxi paleo-uplift and its controls on the formation of a giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(3):257-265.
魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等 . 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪古隆起构造特征及对特大型气田形成的控制作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):257-265.
13 Zhu Chuanqing , Xu Ming , Shan Jingnan , et al . Quantifying the denudations of major tectonic events in Sichuan Basin: Constrained by the paleothermal records[J]. Geology in China. 2009, 36(6):1268-1277.
朱传庆,徐明,单竞男,等 . 利用古温标恢复四川盆地主要构造运动时期的剥蚀量[J]. 中国地质,2009, 36(6):1268-1277.
14 Liu Shugeng , Tong Chongguang , Luo Zhili , et al . The formation and evolution of Late Triassic foreland basin in west Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1995, 15(2):11-15.
刘树根,童崇光,罗志立,等 . 川西晚三叠世前陆盆地的形成与演化[J]. 天然气工业,1995, 15(2):11-15.
15 Wang Zecheng , Zhao Wenzhi , Zhang Lin , et al . Tectonic Sequence and the Natural Gas Exploration in the Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2002.
汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等 . 四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002.
16 Jia Dong , Wei Guoqi , Chen Zhuxin , et al . Longmen Shan fold-thrust belt and its relation to the western Sichuan Basin in central China: New insights from hydrocarbon exploration[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(9):1425-1447.
17 Fan Zenghui , Liu Shugen , Fan Cunhui , et al . Analysis of typical seismic profile and balanced cross-section recovery and tectonic evolution in the Longmenshan fold-thrust belt[J]. Geological Review, 2018, 64(2):347-360.
范增辉,刘树根,范存辉,等 . 龙门山褶皱冲断带典型地震剖面平衡剖面恢复及构造演化分析[J]. 地质论评,2018, 64(2):347-360.
18 Du Jinhu , Zhang Baomin , Wang Zecheng , et al . Sedimentary model and reservoir genesis of dual grain banks at the Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation carbonate ramp in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(6):1-10.
杜金虎,张宝民,汪泽成,等 . 四川盆地下寒武统龙王庙组碳酸盐缓坡双颗粒滩沉积模式及储层成因[J]. 天然气工业,2016, 36(6):1-10.
19 Shen Anjiang , Chen Ya'na , Pan Liyin , et al . Facies and porosity origin of reservoirs: Case studies from the Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of Sichuan Basin, China, and their implicationson reservoir prediction[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(8): 1176-1190.
沈安江,陈娅娜,潘立银,等 . 四川盆地下寒武统龙王庙组沉积相与储层分布预测研究[J]. 天然气地球科学,2017, 28(8):1176-1190.
20 Ma Teng , Xiucheng Ta , Li Ling , et al . Sedimentary characteristics and lithofacies palaeogeography during Longwangmiao period of Early Cambrian,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(1): 33-48.
马腾,谭秀成,李凌,等 . 四川盆地早寒武世龙王庙期沉积特征与古地理[J]. 沉积学报,2016, 34(1): 33-48.
21 Shi Chunhua , Cao Jian , Tan Xiucheng , et al . Discovery of oil bitumen co-existing with solid bitumen in the Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao giant gas reservoir, Sichuan Basin, southwestern China: Implications for hydrocarbon accumulation process[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2017, 108:61-81.
22 Liu Shugen , Sun Wei , Luo Zhili , et al . Xingkai taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian strata in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2013, 40(5):511-520.
刘树根,孙玮,罗志立,等 . 兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 40(5):511-520.
23 Wei Guoqi , Wang Zhihong , Li Jian , et al . Characteristics of source rocks, resource potential and exploration direction of Sinian-Cambrian in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geo-science, 2017, 28(1):1-13.
魏国齐,王志宏,李剑,等 . 四川盆地震旦系、寒武系烃源岩特征、资源潜力与勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2017, 28(1):1-13.
24 Liu Zhongbao , Gao Bo , Zhang Yuying , et al . Types and distribution of the shale sedimentary facies of the Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze area,South China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 21-31.
刘忠宝,高波,张钰莹,等 . 上扬子地区下寒武统页岩沉积相类型及分布特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1):21-31.
25 Xu Shenglin , Chen Hongde , Chen Anqing , et al . Source rock characteristics of marine strata, Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2011, 41(2):343-358.
徐胜林,陈洪德,陈安清,等 . 四川盆地海相地层烃源岩特征[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2011, 41(2):343-358.
26 Zheng Ping , Shi Yuhua , Zou Chunyan , et al . Natural gas source in the Denying and Longwangmiao Formations in the Gaoshiti-Maoxi area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(3): 50-54.
郑平,施雨华,邹春艳,等 . 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组、龙王庙组天然气气源分析[J]. 天然气工业,2014, 34(3):50-54.
27 Liu Shugeng , Liu Shu , Sun Wei , et al . Tectonic and sedimentary features of the northern Mianyang-Changning intracratonic sag, Sichuan, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2018, 45(1):1-13.
刘树根,刘殊,孙玮,等 . 绵阳—长宁拉张槽北段构造-沉积特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 45(1):1-13.
28 Li Hui , Zhu Xiang , Li Bisong , et al . Sinian natural gas exploration potential analysis in the northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reserviors, 2018, 25(1): 52-57.
李辉,朱祥,李毕松,等 . 四川盆地北部震旦系天然气勘探潜力分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(1): 52-57.
29 Du Jinhu , Wang Zecheng , Zou Caineng , et al . Discovery of intra-cratonic rift in the Upper Yangtze and its control effect on the formation of Anyue giant gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(1): 1-16.
杜金虎,汪泽成,邹才能,等 . 上扬子克拉通内裂陷的发现及对安岳特大型气田形成的控制作用[J]. 石油学报,2016, 37(6):1-10.
30 Yuan Yusong , Sun Dongsheng , Li Shuangjian , et al . Caledonian erosion thickness reconstruction in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2013, 48(3): 581-591.
袁玉松,孙冬胜,李双建,等 . 四川盆地加里东期剥蚀量恢复[J]. 地质科学,2013,48(3): 581-591.
31 Li Zongyin , Jiang Hua , Wang Zecheng , et al . Control of tectonic movement on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Sinian strata, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(3):23-30.
李宗银,姜华,汪泽成,等 . 构造运动对四川盆地震旦系油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 天然气工业,2014, 34(3):23-30.
[1] 方向, 杨智, 郭旭光, 吴颜雄, 刘俊田. 中国重点盆地致密油资源分级评价标准及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1094-1105.
[2] 赵长毅, 李永新, 王居峰, 刘海涛, 邓焱, 赵博雅. 渤海湾盆地天然气成因类型与勘探潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 783-789.
[3] 李剑, 郝爱胜, 齐雪宁, 陈旋, 国建英, 冉启贵, 李志生, 谢增业, 曾旭, 李谨, 王瑀, 刘如红, . 中国西北地区侏罗系煤成气地球化学特征与勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 866-879.
[4] 陈斐然, 张义杰, 朱光有, 张宝收, 卢玉红, 张志遥. 塔里木盆地台盆区深层天然气地球化学特征及成藏演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 880-891.
[5] 于京都, 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 郭秋麟. 我国深层天然气资源潜力、勘探前景与有利方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1398-1408.
[6] 王彬, 张强, 吕福亮, 杨涛涛, 杨志力, 孙国忠, 吴敬武, . 南海海域新生界沉积盆地天然气成藏条件及资源前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1542-1552.
[7] 沈安江,陈娅娜,潘立银,王龙,佘敏. 四川盆地下寒武统龙王庙组沉积相与储层分布预测研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1176-1190.
[8] 陶士振,袁选俊,侯连华,张国生,杨帆,陶小晚,卫延召,李欣,张成龙,王岚,孙国欣,王颖,高长海. 大型岩性地层油气田(区)形成与分布规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(11): 1613-1624.
[9] 孟昊, 任影, 钟大康, 高崇龙, 高宙, 王点, 姜杨锦丰, 李谨杰. 四川盆地东部寒武系龙王庙组地球化学特征及其古环境意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1299-1311.
[10] 郝松立, 孙六一, 包洪平, 刘刚, 章贵松. 鄂尔多斯盆地中—新元古界勘探方向及潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2127-2135.
[11] 周国晓, 秦胜飞, 侯矅华, 吕芳. 四川盆地安岳气田龙王庙组气藏天然气有水溶气贡献的迹象[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2193-2199.
[12] 周俊峰,张虎权,余建平,朱永峰,姚清洲,袁玉春. 塔北西部玉东地区奥陶系油气成藏条件与勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(S1): 121-129.
[13] 黄军平,杨占龙,马国福,李涛,邸俊,朱俊杰,李智勇,黄成刚. 中国小型断陷湖盆致密油地质特征及勘探潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(9): 1763-1772.
[14] 罗冰,罗文军,王文之,王志宏,山述娇. 四川盆地乐山—龙女寺古隆起震旦系气藏形成机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(3): 444-455.
[15] 张建勇,罗文军,周进高,王勇,唐松,罗冰,潘立银,倪超,谷明峰,李文正. 四川盆地安岳特大型气田下寒武统龙王庙组优质储层形成的主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(11): 2063-2074.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 付广;王剑秦. 地壳抬升对油气藏保存条件的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 18 -23 .
[2] 黄安敏;裴建翔;陈志宏;李绪深;李林;. 油气储层预测技术在琼东南盆地BD13区的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 518 -522 .
[3] 胡守志,付晓文,王廷栋,李延均 . 储层中的沥青沉淀带及其对油气勘探的意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(1): 99 -103 .
[4] 曾宪斌;. 封盖层突破时间和周期浅析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1998, 9(1): 43 -46 .
[5] 李士祥;胡明毅;李霞;. 榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(2): 200 -205 .
[6] 刘文汇;黄第藩;熊传武;徐永昌;. 成烃理论的发展及国外未熟―低熟油气的分布与研究现状[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(1-2): 1 -22 .
[7] 胡雄;李延钧;陈新领;江波;马立协;付晓文;王强;梁艳;. 柴北缘马海地区油气全烃地球化学特征与成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 612 -616 .
[8] 吴时国;袁圣强;. 世界深水油气勘探进展与我国南海深水油气前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(6): 693 -699 .
[9] 朱维耀;宋洪庆; 何东博;王明 ;贾爱林;胡永乐 . 含水低渗气藏低速非达西渗流数学模型及产能方程研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(05): 685 -689 .
[10] 成永生 陈松岭. 南堡凹陷外围地区古生界地层油气成藏分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 108 -112 .