塔里木盆地库车坳陷深层大气田气水分布与开发对策

doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.05.014

天然气地球科学

塔里木盆地库车坳陷深层大气田气水分布与开发对策

贾爱林,唐海发,韩永新,吕志凯,刘群明,张永忠,孙贺东,黄伟岗,王泽龙

中国石油勘探开发研究院，北京 100083

收稿日期:2019-04-18 修回日期:2019-05-30 出版日期:2019-06-10
作者简介:贾爱林(1966-)，男，内蒙古四王子旗人，教授级高级工程师，博士，主要从事油气田开发综合研究.E-mail：jal@petrochina.com.cn.
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“复杂天然气藏开发关键技术”(编号：2016ZX05015);中国石油科技重大攻关项目“天然气藏开发关键技术”(编号：2016B-15)联合资助.

The distribution of gas and water and development strategy for deep-buried gasfield in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin

Jia Ai-lin,Tang Hai-fa,Han Yong-xin,Lv Zhi-kai,Liu Qun-ming,Zhang Yong-zhong,Sun He-dong,Huang Wei-gang,Wang Ze-long

PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Beijing 100083,China

Received:2019-04-18 Revised:2019-05-30 Online:2019-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 库车坳陷深层碎屑岩气田是近年来塔里木盆地天然气勘探开发的热点，该类气田具有储量规模大、埋藏深、高温高压、区块间裂缝发育差异大、边底水普遍存在等特点。气藏非均匀水侵导致气井产能快速下降，严重制约气田开发效果，是目前气田高效开发面临的普遍难题。从静态气水分布、微观水侵机理和动态水侵评价入手，系统建立了气水分布描述、水侵规律和控水开发技术对策为一体的静动态评价技术。研究认为，库车坳陷深层大气田气水分布受基质物性和缝网发育共同控制，气水分布模式可划分为两类：薄气水过渡带型(含基质物性好型和裂缝特别发育型两个亚类)和厚气水过渡带型。气水分布和裂缝发育的差异性，直接导致了气田水侵部位与水侵动态特征的不同，表现为3种水侵类型：边底水整体抬升侵入型、边底水沿微细裂缝带锥进型和边底水沿大裂缝纵窜型。基于不同气水分布模式及水侵动态，提出了构造高部位布井避水、降速控压控水和边部水淹井强排等开发技术对策，为塔里木盆地库车深层大气田的高效开发和调整提供技术支撑，并为国内同类气田的开发提供借鉴。

关键词: 塔里木盆地, 库车坳陷, 深层气田, 裂缝, 水侵, 开发对策

Abstract: Deep and ultra-deep buried reservoirs in Kuqa Depression are the most prospecting targets for natural gas exploration and development in Tarim Basin.These gas reservoirs are characterized by huge reserves,deep-buried formation (more than 3 500m),high temperature and abnormal high pressure,well-developed natural fracture,and complex gas-water distribution.The development practice shows that water invasion is occurred frequently in some development blocks,and thus result in the sharp decline of gas well production and low gas field productivity.In solving this problem,this paper presents a systematic static and dynamic evaluation technology for deep-buried gas reservoir with active edge water or bottom water.The methodology integrates description of static gas-water distribution,micro-water invasion mechanism and dynamic evaluation of water invasion.Based on above research,the character of gas-water distribution,the law of water invasion and the technical countermeasures of water control and development is established systematically.The results show that the distribution of gas and water in deep-buried reservoirs in Kuqa Depression is controlled by matrix property and the development degree of fracture net together.The gas-water distribution pattern can be divided into two types:Thin gas-water transition zone type (good matrix physical property type and especially developed fracture type) and thick gas-water transition zone type.The difference of gas-water distribution and fracture development directly results in the difference of water invasion location and dynamic characteristics of gas field,which is manifested in three types of water invasion:Integral uplift of edge-bottom water,coning of edge-bottom water along micro-fracture zone and longitudinal channeling of edge-bottom water along large fractures.Based on the above analysis,the technical countermeasures for water control,such as well spacing at high structural position to avoid water,optimizing gas production rate to stabilize water and drainage of old wells at the edge,are put forward systematically,which provide technical supports for efficient development and adjustment of deep-buried gas field in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin,and also provide reference for the development of similar gas fields in China.

Key words: Tarim Basin, Kuqa Depression, Deep-buried gasfield, Natural fracture, Water invasion, Development strategy

中图分类号:

TE121

贾爱林, 唐海发, 韩永新, 吕志凯, 刘群明, 张永忠, 孙贺东, 黄伟岗, 王泽龙. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷深层大气田气水分布与开发对策[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 908–918.

Jia Ai-lin, Tang Hai-fa, Han Yong-xin, Lv Zhi-kai, Liu Qun-ming, Zhang Yong-zhong, Sun He-dong, Huang Wei-gang, Wang Ze-long. The distribution of gas and water and development strategy for deep-buried gasfield in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(6): 908–918.

参考文献

［1］Jia Chengzao,Pang Xiongqi.Research processes and main development directions of deep hydrocarbon geological theories[J].Acta Petrolei Sinaica,2015,36(12)：1457-1569.
贾承造，庞雄奇.深层油气地质理论研究进展与主要发展方向[J].石油学报，2015，36(12)：1457-1569.
[2]Zhang Guangya,Ma Feng,Liang Yingbo,et al.Domain and theory-technology progress of global deep oil & gas exploration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015，36(9)：1156-1166.
张光亚，马锋，梁英波，等.全球深层油气勘探领域及理论技术进展[J].石油学报，2015，36(9)：1156-1166.
[3]Bai Guoping,Cao Binfeng.Characteristics and distribution patterns of deep petroleum accumulations in the world[J].Oil ＆ Gas Geology,2014，35(1)：19-25.
白国平，曹斌风.全球深层油气藏及其分布规律[J].石油与天然气地质，2014，35(1)：19-25.
[4]Feng Jiarui,Gao Zhiyong,Cui Jinggang,et al.The exploration status and research advances of deep and ultra-deep clastic reservoirs[J].Advances in Earth Science,2016,31(7):718-736.
冯佳睿，高志勇，崔京钢，等.深层、超深层碎屑岩储层勘探现状与研究进展[J].地球科学进展，2016，31(7)：718-736.
[5]Sun Longde,Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,et al.Formation,distribution and potential of deep hydrocarbon resources in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013，40(6)：641-649.
孙龙德，邹才能，朱如凯，等.中国深层油气形成、分布与潜力分析[J].石油勘探与开发，2013，40(6)：641-649.
[6]Zou Caineng,Du Jinhu,Xu Chunchun,et al.Formation,distribution,resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3)：278-293.
邹才能，杜金虎，徐春春，等.四川盆地震旦系—寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发，2014，41(3)：278-293.
[7]Li Baozhu,Zhu Zhongqian,Xia Jing,et al.Development patterns and key techniques of coal-formed Kela 2 Gas Field[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(3)：392-397.
李保柱，朱忠谦，夏静，等.克拉2煤成大气田开发模式与开发关键技术[J].石油勘探与开发，2009，36(3)：392-397.
[8]Du Jinhu,Wang Zhaoming,Hu Suyun,et al.Formation and geological characteristics of deep giant gas provinces in the Kuqa foreland thrust belt,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(4)：385-393.
杜金虎，王招明，胡素云，等.库车前陆冲断带深层大气区形成条件与地质特征[J].石油勘探与开发，2012，39(4)：385-393.
[9]Jiang Tongwen,Sun Xiongwei,et al.Development of Keshen ultra-deep and ultra-high pressure gas reservoirs in the Kuqa foreland basin,Tarim Basin:Understanding points and technical countermeasures[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(6)：1-8.
江同文，孙雄伟.库车前陆盆地克深气田超深超高压气藏开发认识与技术对策[J].天然气工业，2018，38(6)：1-8.
[10]Zhang Huiliang,Zhang Ronghu,Yang Haijun,et al.Characterization and evaluation of ultra-deep fracture-pore tight sandstone reservoirs:A case study of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kelasu tectonic zone in Kuqa foreland basin,Tarim,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(2)：158-167.
张惠良，张荣虎，杨海军，等.超深层裂缝—孔隙型致密砂岩储集层表征与评价——以库车前陆盆地克拉苏构造带白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J].石油勘探与开发，2014，41(2)：158-167.
[11]Liu Chun,Zhang Ronghu,Zhang Huiliang,et al.Genesis and reservoir significance of multi-scale natural fractures in Kuqa foreland thrust belt,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017，44(3)：463-472.
刘春，张荣虎，张惠良，等.库车前陆冲断带多尺度裂缝成因及其储集意义[J].石油勘探与开发，2017，44(3)：463-472.
[12]Zhao Libin,Zhang Tonghui,Yang Xuejun,et al.Gas-water distribution characteristics and formation mechanics in deep tight sandstone gas reservoirs of Keshen block,Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2018，29(4)：500-509.
赵力彬，张同辉，杨学君，等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深区块深层致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征与成因机理[J].天然气地球科学，2018，29(4)：500-509.
[13]Fu Xiaofei,Jia Ru,Wang Haixue,et al.Quantitative evaluation of fault-caprock sealing capacity:A case from Dabei-Kelasu structural belt in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3)：300-309.
付晓飞，贾茹，王海学，等.断层—盖层封闭性定量评价——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷大北—克拉苏构造带为例[J].石油勘探与开发，2015，42(3)：300-309.
[14]Chu Guangzhen,Shi Shi,Shao Longyi,et al.Contrastive study on geological characteristics of cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen2 and Kela2 Gas Fields in Kuqa Depression[J].Geoscience,2014，28(3)：604-610.
初广震，石石，邵龙义，等.库车坳陷克深2气藏与克拉2气田白垩系巴什基奇克组储层地质特征对比研究[J].现代地质，2014，28(3)：604-610.
[15]Zhu Guangyou,Zhang Shuichang,Chen Ling,et al.Coupling relationship between natural gas charging and deep sandstone reservoir formation:A case from the Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009，36(3)：347-357.
朱光有，张水昌，陈玲，等.天然气充注成藏与深部砂岩储集层的形成——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷为例[J].石油勘探与开发，2009，36(3)：347-357.
[16]Hand Denglin,Li Zhong,Shou Jianfeng.Reservoir property difference between structural positions in the anticline:A case study from Kela-2 Gas Field in the Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011，38(3)：282-286.
韩登林，李忠，寿建峰.背斜构造不同部位储集层物性差异——以库车坳陷克拉2气田为例[J].石油勘探与开发，2011，38(3)：282-286.
[17]Zhang Ronghu,Yang Haijun,Wang Junpeng,et al.The formation mechanism and exploration significance of ultra-deep,low-porosity and tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrlei Sinica,2014，35(6)：1057-1069.
张荣虎，杨海军，王俊鹏，等.库车坳陷超深层低孔致密砂岩储层形成机制与油气勘探意义[J].石油学报，2014，35(6)：1057-1069.
[18]Lu Xuesong,Zhao Mengjun,Liu Keyu,et al.Forming condition and mechanism of highly effective deep tight sandstone gas reservoir in Kuqa foreland basin[J].Acta Petrlei Sinica,2018，39(4)：365-378.
鲁雪松，赵孟军，刘可禹，等.库车前陆盆地深层高效致密砂岩气藏形成条件与机理[J].石油学报，2018，39(4)：365-378.
[19]Luo Ruilan,Zhang Yongzhong,Liu Min,et al.Analysis of water invasion performance of ultra-deep and natural fractured tight sand gas reservoirs:A case study of Keshen-2 Gas Field[J].Journal of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology,2017,29(5)：322-327.
罗瑞兰，张永忠，刘敏，等.超深层裂缝性致密砂岩气藏水侵动态特征分析——以库车坳陷克深2气田为例[J].浙江科技学院学报，2017，29(5)：322-327.
[20]Li Baozhu,Zhu Yuxin,Song Wenjie,et al.A productivity forecast equation for the Kela-2 Gas Field,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004，31(2)：107-111.
李保柱，朱玉新，宋文杰，等.克拉2气田产能预测方程的建立[J].石油勘探与开发，2004，31(2)：107-111.
[21]Xia Jing,Xie Xingli,Ji Guang,et al.Derivation and application of material balance equation for over-pressured gas reservoir with aquifer[J].Acta Petrlei Sinica,2007，28(3)：96-99.
夏静，谢兴礼，冀光，等.异常高压有水气藏物质平衡方程推导及应用[J].石油学报，2007，28(3)：96-99.
[22]Li Yong,Zhang Jing,Li Baozhu,et al.New method of aquifer influx risk classification for wells in gas reservoir with aquifer support[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016，27(1)：128-133.
李勇，张晶，李保柱，等.水驱气藏气井见水风险评价新方法[J].天然气地球科学,2016，27(1)：128-133.
[23]Li Yong,Li Baozhu,Xia Jing,et al.New method of aquifer influx identification for single well in gas reservoir with quifer support[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015，26(10)：1951-1955.
李勇，李保柱，夏静，等.有水气藏单井水侵阶段划分新方法[J].天然气地球科学,2015，26(10)：1951-1955.
[24]Jiang Tongwen,Zhang Hui,Wang Haiying,et al.Effects of faults geomechanical activity on water invasion in Kela 2 Gas Field,Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017，28(11)：1735-1744.
江同文，张辉，王海应，等.塔里木盆地克拉2气田断裂地质力学活动性对水侵的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2017，28(11)：1735-1744.
[25]Wu Hongzhu,Huang Zhilong,Tong Chuanxin,et al.Discussion on gas-water transition zone and accumulation closure limit:A case of gas reservoir in high temperature and high pressure belts of Yinggehai Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(12)：2304-2314.
吴红烛，黄志龙，童传新，等.气水过渡带和天然气成藏圈闭闭合度下限问题讨论——以莺歌海盆地高温高压带气藏为例[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(12)：2304-2314.
[26]Meng Dewei,Jia Ailin,Ji Guang,et al.Water and gas distribution and its controlling factors of large scale tight sand gas:A case study of western Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(4)：607-635.
孟德伟，贾爱林，冀光，等.大型致密砂岩气田气水分布规律及控制因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西区为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4)：607-635.
[27]Chen Taotao,Jia Ailin,He Dongbo,et al.Gas and water distribution regularity for tight sandstone reserviors of Xujiahe Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2014,33(4):66-71.
陈涛涛，贾爱林，何东博，等.川中地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏气水分布规律[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(4)：66-71.
[28]Wang Guoting,He Dobong,Cheng Lihua,et al.Gas-water distribution characteristics of tight sand reserviors in Badaowan Formation in Baka Gas Field,Tuha Basin[J].Geoscience,2012,26(2):370-376.
王国亭，何东博，程立华，等.吐哈盆地巴喀气田八道湾组致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征[J].现代地质,2012,26(2):370-376.
[29]Fan Huaicai,Zhong Bing,Li Xiaoping,et al.Studies on water invasion mechanism of fractured-watered gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(6):1179-1184.
樊怀才，钟兵，李晓平，等.裂缝型产水气藏水侵机理研究[J].天然气地球科学，2012，23(6)：1179-1184.
[30]Fang Jianlong,Guo Ping,Xiao Xiangjiao,et al.Gas-water relative permeability measurement of high temperature and high pressure tight gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):84-87.
方建龙,郭平,肖香姣,等.高温高压致密砂岩储集层气水相渗曲线测试方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):84-87.
[31]Feng Yiyong,He Shengning.A research on water invasion performance of the gas wells in fractured bottom water reservoir[J].Natural Gas Industry,1998,18(3):40-44.
冯异勇，贺胜宁.裂缝性底水气藏气井水侵动态研究[J].天然气工业，1998,18(3)：40-44.
[32]Hu Yong,Li Xizhe,Wan Yujin,et al.The experimental study of water invasion mechanism in fracture and the influence on the development of gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(5):910-917.
胡勇，李熙喆，万玉金，等.裂缝气藏水侵机理及对开发影响实验研究[J].天然气地球科学，2016,27(5):910-917.
[33]Jia Ailin,Yan Haijun,Guo Jianlin,et al.Characteristics and experiences of the development of various giant gas field all over the world[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(10)：33-46.
贾爱林，闫海军，郭建林，等.全球不同类型大型气藏的开发特征及经验[J].天然气工业，2014,34(10)：33-46.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	熊钰, 刘斯琪, 余翔, 唐建荣, 傅希桐. 四川盆地自流井区块自2井缝洞系统结构与水侵途径和模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 925-936.
[2]	张晗. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层缝网导流能力优化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 955-962.
[3]	王勇飞, 赵向原, 刘成川. 川东北元坝地区长兴组礁滩相储层裂缝特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 973-981.
[4]	戴金星, 洪峰, 倪云燕, 廖凤蓉. 塔里木盆地英吉苏凹陷煤成气前景良好[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 771-782.
[5]	魏强, 李贤庆, 孙可欣, 李瑾, 肖中尧, 梁万乐, 张亚超, . 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深大气田深层天然气成藏地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 897-907.
[6]	陈立超, 王生维, . 煤岩弹性力学性质与煤层破裂压力关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 503-511.
[7]	黄小青, 王建君, 杜悦, 李林, 张卓. 昭通国家级页岩气示范区YS108区块小井距错层开发模式探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 557-565.
[8]	张辉, 尹国庆, 王海应. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷天然裂缝地质力学响应对气井产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 379-388.
[9]	曾凡辉, 彭凡, 郭建春, 钟华, 向建华. 考虑页岩缝宽动态变化的微裂缝气体质量传输模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 237-246.
[10]	张磊, 徐兵祥, 辛翠平, 乔向阳, 穆景福, 许阳, 韩长春. 考虑主裂缝的页岩气产能预测模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 247-256.
[11]	徐加祥, 丁云宏, 杨立峰, 刘哲, 陈挺. 页岩气储层迂曲微裂缝二维重构及多点起裂分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 285-294.
[12]	陈永权, 严威, 韩长伟, 闫磊, 冉启贵, 亢茜, 何皓, 马源. 塔里木盆地寒武纪/前寒武纪构造—沉积转换及其勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 39-50.
[13]	包建平, 朱翠山, 申旭. 金刚烷类化合物与库车坳陷克拉2构造凝析油的形成机理研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1217-1230.
[14]	张荣虎，王珂，王俊鹏，孙雄伟，李君，杨学君，周露. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深构造带克深8区块裂缝性低孔砂岩储层地质模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1264-1273.
[15]	王清龙，林畅松，李浩，韩剑发，孙彦达，何海全. 塔里木盆地西北缘中下奥陶统碳酸盐岩沉积微相特征及演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1274-1288.