天然气地球科学

• 天然气勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种利用测井曲线齿化率刻画河道的新方法

张广权,李浩,胡向阳,陈舒薇,高阳   

  1. 中国石化勘探开发研究院,北京100083
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-07 修回日期:2018-10-25 出版日期:2018-12-10
  • 作者简介:张广权(1979-),男,河北沧州人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事石油与天然气开发研究.E-mail:zhanggq.syky@sinopec.com.
  • 基金资助:
    中石化科技攻关项目“东胜气田复杂含水气藏描述与开发技术政策”(编号:P16064)资助.

Study of the method of portrayed the river by calculating the tooth rate of logging curve

Zhang Guang-quan,Li Hao,Hu Xiang-yang,Chen Shu-wei,Gao Yang   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration&Production,SINOPEC,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2018-09-07 Revised:2018-10-25 Online:2018-12-10

摘要: 为了精细描述以河道微相为主的油气田储层展布,对河道微相刻画的精度要求日益增高。针对目前沉积微相刻画存在的问题和难点,提出一种利用测井曲线计算齿化率,以此来确定河道位置、高精度刻画河道的方法。齿化率采用测井三参数来表征,即齿的幅度、齿的分布密度和齿的分布频率。总体思路是首先计算测井三参数,然后赋予每个参数一定的权重系数,得出该测井曲线段的齿化率。根据齿化率的大小,分析该段测井位于河道的具体位置,最后精细刻画河道。该方法相对于传统的沉积相研究,在相边界的刻画精度方面有了明显的提高,达到了半定量—定量的精度。将该方法应用于鄂尔多斯盆地某气田的沉积微相研究的实践表明,齿化率技术能清晰刻画河道特征,为有利区优选及井位部署提供准确依据,其研究成果可直接应用于生产中。

关键词: 沉积微相, 测井曲线参数, 齿化率, 有利区优选

Abstract: In order to accurately describe the reservoir distribution of the oil and gas field,the precision of the portrayal of the channel microfacies is getting higher and higher.Aiming at the existing problems and difficulties in sedimentary microfacies,a method of determining the location of river channels and describing the river channels with high accuracy is proposed by calculating the tooth rate of logging curves.The tooth rate is characterized by the amplitude of the tooth,the density of the tooth and the frequency of the tooth distribution.The general idea is to calculate the three parameters of logging first,and then give eachparameter a certain weight coefficient,and get the tooth rate of the curve section of the log.According to the size of the tooth rate,the specific location of the log in the channel is analyzed,and the channel is finely depicted. Compared with traditional method of sedimentary facies research,the method has improved the accuracy of the boundary characterization and achieved semi-quantitative or quantitative accuracy.In the application of sedimentary research of X Gasfield in Ordos Basin,the position of the river is determined by the tooth rate,and the accuracy of the boundary is obviously improved.The research results can be applied directly to the production and guide the optimization of the favorable area and the deployment of the well position.

Key words: Sedimentary microfacies, Logging curve parameters, Tooth rate, Favorable area optimization<

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1+4
[1]Wang Weifeng,Jin Qiang,Xu Huaimin,et al.Study of sedimentary facies in reservoir description[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1995,13(1):94-101.
王伟锋,金强,徐怀民,等.油藏描述中的沉积相研究[J].沉积学报,1995,13(1):94-101.
[2]Zhu Ran,Yang Bin,Li Xing,et al.Application of logging facies in the analysis of sedimentary microfacies:A case study of CⅢ reservoir in Tazhong 402 well block[J].Shandong Chemical Industry,2016,45(16):138-141.
朱冉,杨斌,李星,等.测井相在沉积微相分析中的应用——以塔中402井区CⅢ油藏为例[J].山东化工,2016,45(16):138-141.
[3]He Yuhang,Yu Kaichun.Recognition and its effect analysis of single river channel in composite sand body with distributary plain facies[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2005,24(2):17-19.
何宇航,于开春.分流平原相复合砂体单一河道识别及效果分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(2):17-19.
[4]Chen Qinghua,Zeng Ming,Zhang Fengqi,et al.Identification of single river channel in fluvial facies reservoir and its significance for oil field development[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2004,11(3):13-15.
陈清华,曾明,章凤奇,等.河流相储层单一河道的识别及其对油田开发的意义[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(3):13-15.
[5]Shu Zhihua,Zhang Liyou,Liu Gang.Identification of single channel in compound sand body[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2006,25(4):18-20.
舒志华,张立有,刘刚.复合砂体中单一河道的识别方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(4):18-20.
[6]Wu Cancan,Li Zhuangfu.Logging facies analysis and sedimentary facies identification based on BP neural network[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2012,40(1):68-71.
吴灿灿,李壮福.基于BP神经网络的测井相分析及沉积相识别[J].煤田地质与勘探,2012,40(1):68-71.
[7]Shen Yulin,Guo Yinghai,Li Zhuangfu.Sedimentary facies of the Shanxi Formation and member 8 of Xiashihezi Formation of Permian in Suligemiao area in Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(1):53-62.
沈玉林,郭英海,李壮福.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格庙地区二叠系山西组及下石盒子组盒八段沉积相[J].古地理学报,2006,8(1):53-62.
[8]Fu Suotang.Study on Sedimentary System and Sandbody Distribution of Upper Paleozoic in Northern Ordos Basin[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2004.
付锁堂.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界沉积体系及砂体展布规律研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2004.
[9]Li Jie,Zhao Junxing,Kong Xiangchao,et al.Sedimentary facies evolution and controlling factors of Lower Shihezi Formation in Hangjinqi area,north Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology:Natural Science,2013,32(2):34-42.
李婕,赵俊兴,孔祥超,等.鄂北杭锦旗地区下石盒子组沉积相演化及控制因素[J].山东科技大学学报:自然科学版,2013,32(2):34-42.
[10]Liao Baofang,Ge Yunlong,Lu Jingtie,et al.Modern sedimentary study and facies model of braided river:Analysis of Yongding river in China[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1998,16(1):34-39.
廖保方,葛云龙,逯径铁,等,辫状河现代沉积研究与相模式——中国永定河剖析[J].沉积学报,1998,16(1):34-39.
[11]Liao Baofang,Ge Yunlong,Lu Jingtie,et al.The braided river reservoir geological model “pan connected”[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1998,25(5):77-79.
廖保方,葛云龙,逯径铁,等,辫状河相储集层地质模型——“泛连通体”[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(5):77-79.
[12]Li Haiming,Wang Zhizhang,Qiao Hui,et al.Quantitative relation of sedimentary system of modern braided river[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(29):21-26.
李海明,王志章,乔辉,等.现代辫状河沉积体系的定量关系[J].科学技术与工程,2014,14(29):21-26.
[13]He Zixin.Evolution and Hydrocarbon of Ordos Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003:25-60.
何自新.鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:25-60.
[14]Wang Zhenliang,Wang Feiyan.Migration characteristics of Upper Paleozoic natural gas in central Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1998,25(6):1-5.
王震亮,王飞燕.鄂尔多斯盆地中部上古生界天然气运移特征分析[J].石油勘探与开发.1998,25(6):1-5.
[15]Zhu Zongliang,Li Wenhou,Li Keyong,et al.The characteristic of sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary systems of Taiyuan-Xiashihezi Formation in Hangjinqi area[J].Journal of Northwest University:Natural Science Edition,2010,40(6):1050-1054.
朱宗良,李文厚,李克永,等.杭锦旗地区上古生界层序及沉积体系发育特征[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2010,40(6):1050-1054.
[16]Li Qingsong.Logging evaluation of low resistivity oil and gas reservoirs in Devonian of Pashto oil and gas field[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2015,29(3):42-48.
李清松.巴什托油气田泥盆系低阻油气层测井评价[J].石油地质与工程,2015,29(3):42-48.
[17]Xu Binggao.Logging identification of low resistivity gas reservoirs in Shifang well area,western Sichuan[J].Journal of Petroleum and Natural Gas:Jianghan Petroleum Institute,2014,36(9):69-73.
徐炳高.川西什邡一马井地区低阻气层测井识别[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报,2014,36(9):69-73.
[18]Sun  Jianmeng,Chen Ganghua,Yang Yuzheng,et al.Evaluation method of low resistivity oil and gas reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1998,19(3):83-88.
孙建孟,陈钢花,杨玉征,等.低阻油气层评价方法[J].石油学报,1998,19(3):83-88.
[1] 廖计华,王华,甘华军,孙鸣,王颖,蔡露露,郭帅,郭佳. 莺歌海盆地东方区中新统黄流组一段高精度层序地层特征与隐蔽油气藏预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 241-253.
[2] 鲁新川,安永福,夏维民,胡子见,张顺存,史基安. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系三工河组沉积微相特征及对储层的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1810-1820.
[3] 赵圣贤,杨跃明,张鉴,王兰生,王兴志,罗超,田冲. 四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩小层划分与储层精细对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 470-487.
[4] 韩剑发,胡有福,胡晓勇,于金星,刘炜博,张丽微,齐凤林,何睿. 塔里木盆地塔中隆起良里塔格组礁滩体储集特征及油气富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(S2): 106-114.
[5] 张旭,刘成林,朱炎铭,王阳,付常青. 滇东北龙马溪组页岩气地质条件及有利区优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(6): 1190-1199.
[6] 张荣虎,王俊鹏,马玉杰,陈戈,曾庆鲁,周晨光. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷深层沉积微相古地貌及其对天然气富集的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(4): 667-678.
[7] 黄云峰,韩小峰,魏立花,黄小鹏,张丽萍. 用于沉积分析的地震沉积学技术研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(4): 706-710.
[8] 任凭,林畅松,韩剑发,李浩,刘景彦,王清龙. 塔中北斜坡鹰山组碳酸盐岩沉积微相特征与演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(2): 241-251.
[9] 陈更新,赵凡,曹正林,郑红军,王爱萍,胡云鹏. 地震反演、地质协同约束储层精细建模研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(11): 1839-1846.
[10] 涂乙,谢传礼. 沉积微相约束下的储层物性参数建模研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(4): 821-826.
[11] 李能武,李江海,姜义权,保吉成,严嘉年. 花土沟油田N22储层沉积微相及含油性研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(5): 916-922.
[12] 何金先,段毅,张晓丽,吴保祥,徐丽,夏嘉. 鄂尔多斯盆地林镇地区延安组延9油层组地层对比与沉积微相展布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2): 291-298.
[13] 吴志雄, 杨兆臣, 丁超, 史基安, 张顺存, 张杰. 准噶尔盆地西北缘三叠系克拉玛依组扇三角洲沉积微相特征——以W16井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(4): 602-609.
[14] 李新虎, 王婷茹, 郭媛. HSS油田H1储层测井沉积微相研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(2): 254-259.
[15] 孙秀建, 刘应如, 乐幸福, 倪祥龙, 李艳丽. 柴达木盆地红柳泉地区岩性油藏主控因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(5): 801-808.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 韩中喜,李剑,严启团,垢艳侠,王淑英,葛守国,王春怡. 天然气汞含量作为煤型气和油型气判识指标的探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 0, (): 129 -133 .
[2] 张睿,宁正福,杨峰,赵华伟,杜立红,廖新维. 微观孔隙结构对页岩应力敏感影响的实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(8): 1284 -1289 .
[3] 戴金星,倪云燕,黄士鹏,龚德瑜,刘丹,冯子齐,彭威龙,韩文学. 次生型负碳同位素系列成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 1 -7 .
[4] 王鹏,刘四兵,沈忠民,黄飞,罗自力,陈飞. 四川盆地上三叠统气藏成藏年代及差异[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 50 -59 .
[5] 惠潇,楚美娟. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部延长组长9油层组2种砂体类型特征及成因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 81 -91 .
[6] 张睿,宁正福,张海山,谢佥. 裂缝性致密储层应力敏感机理新认识[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(5): 918 -923 .
[7] 姚泾利,王程程,陈娟萍,高岗,王飞雁,李晓凤,李佳烨,刘岩. 鄂尔多斯盆地马家沟组盐下碳酸盐岩烃源岩分布特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2115 -2126 .
[8] 魏国齐,王志宏,李剑,杨威,谢增业. 四川盆地震旦系、寒武系烃源岩特征、资源潜力与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 1 -13 .
[9] 杨振恒,魏志红,何文斌,范明,俞凌杰,徐二社,钱门辉. 川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩现场解吸气特征及其意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 156 -163 .
[10] 杨晓东,张苗,魏巍,李娟,傅雪海. 沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层孔隙特征对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 356 -365 .