天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

中上扬子地区埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层分布特征及地质意义

王玉满,李新景,陈波,韩京,张家铭,袁飞,马杰,代兵,王浩,蒋珊   

  1. 1.中国石油集团科学技术研究院, 北京 100083;2.长江大学,湖北 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-21 修回日期:2017-11-10 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-01-10
  • 作者简介:王玉满(1968-),男,湖北荆门人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事沉积储层与非常规油气地质研究.E-mail:wangyuman@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院A类战略性先导科技专项(编号:XDA14010101);国家科技重大专项(编号:2017ZX05035001);中国石油勘探与生产分公司页岩气资源评价与战略选区课题(编号:101016kt1012001b24)联合资助.

#br# Distribution characteristics and geological significance of the thickest Aeronian bentonite bed in Middle-Upper Yangtze Region

Wang Yu-man,Li Xin-jing,Chen Bo,Han Jing,Zhang Jia-ming,Yuan Fei,Ma Jie,Dai Bing,Wang Hao,Jiang Shan
 
  

  1. 1.CNPC Research Institute of Science and Technology,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.Yangtze University,Wuhan 430100,China
  • Received:2017-07-21 Revised:2017-11-10 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-01-10

摘要:

以野外露头和重点探井资料为基础,对中上扬子地区埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层的分布特征及其在页岩气地质评价和“甜点层”预测中的独特作用进行了研究,初步获得3点认识:①埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层在中上扬子地区大面积稳定分布,厚度为5~40cm,在大部分探区电性特征明显且易于识别,自然伽马值一般为188~235cps(或API),在川南、渝东等页岩气主要探区呈尖峰响应特征,在川中、川东北和中扬子等地区富有机质页岩段尖峰特征不明显或显低谷特征。②此斑脱岩层可以成为龙马溪组重点层段划分与区域对比的关键标志层。在野外和现场研究工作中,以此脱岩层为界向下搜寻半耙笔石的首现位置或其下方的首个伽马曲线低谷处,是确定鲁丹阶顶界的有效方法。③埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层的出现,是扬子台盆区主体进入前陆挠曲强烈活动期和沉积速率显著加快期的重要标志,也是龙马溪组由富有机质、富硅质的岩相组合全面转向富黏土质岩相组合和富钙质岩相组合的沉积转折期,对五峰组—龙马溪组优质页岩的形成和分布具有重要控制作用。因此认为,该斑脱岩层出现以前是富有机质、富硅质页岩的主要形成期;在预测五峰组—龙马溪组“甜点层”空间展布时,必须考虑此斑脱岩层的控制作用;在中上扬子大部分地区, 优质储层顶界的确定以不超过埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层为宜。

关键词: 扬子地区, 埃隆阶, 斑脱岩, 沉积响应, 沉积速率, 优质页岩

Abstract:

Based on the data from the outcrops and key exploratory wells,a basic analysis is provided to the distribution characteristics of the thickest bentonite layer of the Aeronian stage in Middle-Upper Yangtze Region and its unique role in the geological evaluation of shale gas and the prediction of “sweet spot” layer.Three preliminary conclusions have been reached:①The thickest bentonite layer of the Aeronian stage is widely and steadily distributed in the Middle-Upper Yangtze Region with a thickness of 5-40cm,whose electric characteristics can be easily identified in most of the exploration areas.Gamma values of the bentonite layer are generally 188-235cps (or API).The gamma value peaks occur in southern Sichuan,eastern Sichuan and other primary shale gas exploration areas.On the contrary,in middle Sichuan,northeastern Sichuan and the north of Middle Yangtze Region,there is no gamma value peak or even the trough appears.②The bentonite layer can be considered as the key marker layer of the mainly segmental partition and the regional comparison of Longmaxi Formation.In the field,it is an effective way to determine the upper boundary of Rhuddanian,which can be found at the first appearance of the demirastrites and the first gamma curve trough.③The emergence of the thickest bentonite layer in the Aeronian stage has a profound influence on the formation and distribution of the high-quality shale of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation.Its appearance is an important symbol for foreland basin folding and sedimentary rate increasing.Meanwhile,it also represents a transition in Longmaxi Formation from organic-rich and silica-rich shale to clay-rich and calcium-rich shale.Therefore,the organic-rich and silica-rich shales were mainly formed before the occurrence of the bentonite layer,and this control effect must be taken into account when predicting the spatial distribution of “sweet spot” layer in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations.In most parts of the Middle-Upper Yangtze Region,the thickest bentonite layer in the Aeronian stage can be considered as the upper boundary of the high quality reservoir.
 

Key words: Yangtze Region, Aeronian, Bentonite, Sedimentary response, Deposition rate, High quality shale

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2

[1]Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Yuman,et al.Shale gas in China:Characteristics,challenges and prospects (Ⅰ)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):689-701.邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.中国页岩气进展、挑战及前景(一)[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):689-701.
[2]Wang Yuman,Huang Jinliang,Wang Shufang,et al.Dissection of two calibrated areas of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation,Changning and Jiaoshiba,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(3):423-432.王玉满,黄金亮,王淑芳,等.四川盆地长宁、焦石坝志留系龙马溪组页岩气刻度区精细解剖[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):423-432.
[3]Wang Yuman,Li Xinjing,Dong Dazhong,et al.Main factors controlling the sedimentation of high-quality shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Upper Yangtze region[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(4):9-20.王玉满,李新景,董大忠,等.上扬子地区五峰组—龙马溪组优质页岩沉积主控因素[J].天然气工业,2017,37(4):9-20.
[4]Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,Li Xinjing,et al.Stratigraphic sequence and sedimentary characteristics of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its peripheral areas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(3):12-21.王玉满,董大忠,李新景,等.四川盆地及其周缘下志留统龙马溪组层序与沉积特征[J].天然气工业,2015,35(3):12-21.
[5]Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,Huang Jinliang,et al.Guanyinqiao member lithofacies of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation around the Sichuan Basin and the significance to shale gas plays,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(1):42-50.王玉满,董大忠,黄金亮,等.四川盆地及周边上奥陶统五峰组观音桥段岩相特征及对页岩气选区意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):42-50.
[6]Su Wenbo,Li Zhiming,Ettensohn F R,et al.Distribution of black shale in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations (Ordovician-Silurian),South China:Major controlling factors and implications[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2007,32(6):819-827.苏文博,李志明,Frank R.Ettensohn,等.华南五峰组—龙马溪组黑色岩系时空展布的主控因素及其启示[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2007,32(6):819-827.
[7]Su Wenbo,Li Zhiming,Shi Xiaoying,et al.K-bentonites and black shales from the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations (Early Paleozoic,South China)and Xiamaling Formation (Early Neoproterozoic,North China)-Implications for tectonic processes during two important transitions[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2006,13(6):82-95.苏文博,李志明,史晓颖,等.华南五峰组—龙马溪组与华北下马岭组的钾质斑脱岩及黑色岩系—两个地史转折期板块构造运动的沉积响应[J].地学前缘,2006,13(6):82-95.
[8]Su Wenbo,He Longqing,Wang Yongbiao,et al.K-bentonite beds and high-resolution integrated stratigraphy of the Uppermost Ordovician Wufeng and the Lowest Silurian Longmaxi Formations in South China[J].Science in China:Series D,2003,46(11):1121-1133.苏文博,何龙清,王永标,等.华南奥陶一志留系五峰组及龙马溪组底部斑脱岩与高分辨综合地层[J].中国科学:D辑,2002,32(3):207-219.
[9]Zhang Chenchen,Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,et al.Evaluation of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale brittleness and prediction of “sweet spot layers” in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(9):51-60.[JP3]张晨晨,王玉满,董大忠,等.四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩脆性评价与“甜点层”预测[J].天然气工业,2016,36(9):51-60.
[10]Zhang Chenchen,Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,et al.Brittleness characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in Changning region,Southern Sichuan,China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(9):1629-1639.张晨晨,王玉满,董大忠,等.川南长宁地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩脆性特征[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(9):1629-1639.
[11]Fan Junxuan,Melchin J M,Chen Xu,et al.Biostratigraphy and geography of the Ordovician-Silurian Lungmachi black shales in South China[J].Scientia Sinica Terrae,2012,42(1):130-139.樊隽轩,Michael J M,陈旭,等.华南奥陶一志留系龙马溪组黑色笔石页岩的生物地层学[J].中国科学:地球科学,2012,42(1):130-139.
[12]Chen Xu,Rong Jiayu,Fan Junxuan,et al.A final report on the global stratotype section and point (GSSP)for the Hirnantian stage (Upper Ordovician)[J].Journal of Stratigraphy,2006,30(4):289-305.陈旭,戎嘉余,樊隽轩,等.奥陶系上统赫南特阶全球层型剖面和点位的建立[J].地层学杂志,2006,30(4):289-305.
[13]Chen Xu,Rong Jiayu,Li Yue,et al.Facies patterns and geography of the Yangtze region,South China,through the Ordovician and Silurian transition[J].Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,2004,204(3/4):353-372.
[14]Wang Yuman,Wang Shufang,Dong Dazhong,et al.Lithofacies characterization of Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian,Southern Sichuan[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):119-133.王玉满,王淑芳,董大忠,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩岩相表征[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):119-133.
[15]Rong Jiayu,Chen Xu,Wang Yi,et al.Expansion of the Cathaysian oldland through the Ordovician-Silurian transition:Emerging evidence and possible dynamics[J].Scientia Sinica Terrae,2011,41(10):1407-1415.[JP3]戎嘉余,陈旭,王怿,等.奥陶—志留纪之交黔中古陆的变迁:证据与启示[J].中国科学:地球科学,2011,41(10):1407-1415.
[16]Wang Shufang,Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,et al.Biogenic silica of organic-rich shale in Sichuan Basin and its significance for shale gas[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2014,50(3):476-486.王淑芳,邹才能,董大忠,等.四川盆地富有机质页岩硅质生物成因及对页岩气开发的意义[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2014,50(3):476-486.
[17]Liang Feng,Bai Wenhua,Zou Caineng,et al.Shale gas enrichment pattern and exploration significance of Well WuXi-2 in northeast Chongqing,NE Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(3):350-358.梁峰,拜文华,邹才能,等.渝东北地区巫溪 2 井页岩气富集模式及勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(3):350-358.
[18]Guo Tonglou.Key geological issues and main controls on accumulation and enrichment of chinese shale gas[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(3):1-10.郭彤楼.中国式页岩气关键地质问题与成藏富集主控因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(3):1-10.
[19]Guo Xusheng,Hu Dongfeng,Wei Zhihong,et al.Discovery and exploration of Fuling shale gas field[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2016,21(3):24-37.郭旭升,胡东风,魏志红,等.涪陵页岩气田的发现与勘探认识[J].中国石油勘探,2016,21(3):24-37.

[1] 王涛利,郝爱胜,陈清,李,王庆涛,卢鸿,刘大永. 中扬子宜昌地区五峰组和龙马溪组页岩发育主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 616-631.
[2] 贾成业,贾爱林,韩品龙,王建君,袁贺,乔辉. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组优质页岩储层特征与开发评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1406-1415.
[3] 刘忠宝,冯动军,高波,李洪文,聂海宽. 上扬子地区下寒武统高演化页岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1096-1107.
[4] 曹涛涛,宋之光,罗厚勇,周圆圆,王思波. 下扬子地区二叠系海陆过渡相页岩孔隙体系特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1332-1345.
[5] 熊小峰,徐新德,郭潇潇,梁刚,罗威. 沉积过程对莺歌海盆地烃源岩生气的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2169-2175.
[6] 陈尚斌,秦勇,王阳,张寒,左兆喜. 中上扬子区海相页岩气储层孔隙结构非均质性特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(8): 1455-1463.
[7] 丁修建,柳广弟,查明,黄志龙,高长海,曲江秀,卢学军,陈哲龙,郭继刚. 沉积速率与烃源岩有机质丰度关系——以二连盆地为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(6): 1076-1085.
[8] 罗进雄,何幼斌. 中上扬子地区二叠系烃源岩特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(9): 1416-1425.
[9] 李劭杰,何生,朱伟林,王晓龙,吴景富,程甜. 基于珠一坳陷旋回地层分析的烃源岩沉积速率研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(9): 1328-1340.
[10] 丁修建,柳广弟,卢学军,黄志龙,孙明亮,陈哲龙,柳庄小雪. 二连盆地氧化—还原程度和沉积速率对有机质保存的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(6): 810-817.
[11] 邱小松,杨波,胡明毅. 中扬子地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气储层及含气性特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6): 1274-1283.
[12] 张鹏飞, 陈世悦,杨怀宇,马士坤. 中上扬子地区碎屑岩—碳酸盐岩混积相发育特征及组合模式研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(2): 365-371.
[13] 王峰, 田景春, 范立勇, 陈蓉, 邱军利. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组沉积充填演化及其对印支构造运动的响应[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(6): 882-889.
[14] 曾萍. 下扬子区下组合烃源岩热演化及有效性研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(1): 54-61.
[15] 唐友军;文志刚;别旭伟;. 依据海相碳酸盐岩成烃特征探讨中扬子地区油气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 590-592.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!