天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部青山口组超压特征及油气地质意义

任丽华1,2，代俊杰1，林承焰1,2，曹铮1   

  1. 1.中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院，山东 青岛 266580；
    2.山东省油藏地质重点实验室，山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-25 修回日期:2017-06-24 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2017-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 代俊杰(1990-)，男，河南周口人，硕士研究生，主要从事油气储层地质及油藏描述研究. E-mail：daijj1991@126.com.
  • 作者简介:任丽华(1979-)，女，山东东营人，副教授，博士，主要从事储层地质学及油藏描述、油气地质与勘探研究与教学工作. E-mail：rlh_79@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(编号：2017ZX05009-001)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(编号：15CX06012A)联合资助.

Characteristics of overpressure and its geological significance for hydrocarbon of Qingshankou Formation in southern Fuxin Uplift，Songliao Basin

Ren Li-hua1,2，Dai Jun-jie1，Lin Cheng-yan1,2，Cao Zheng1   

  1. 1.School of Geosciences，China University of Petroleum(East China)，Qingdao 266580，China；
    2.Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Reservoir Geology，Qingdao 266580，China
  • Received:2017-05-25 Revised:2017-06-24 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2017-07-10

PDF (PC)

429

摘要：

扶新隆起带南部青山口组普遍发育超压，超压与源下油气成藏关系密切。根据录井、钻测井及室内分析测试等资料，结合沉积埋藏史及生烃史，对该区青山口组超压成因、分布及控制因素进行了研究。结果表明：青山口组超压主要分布在青一段、青二段，“层控”效应明显，超压层测井响应具高声波时差、低密度、低电阻率的特征；下斜坡区超压为欠压实作用与干酪根生烃作用综合作用的结果，属二元成因型超压，而上斜坡区超压则以欠压实作用为主导，属单一成因型超压；单井压力剖面呈钟形，自上而下，压力系数与剩余压力均呈递增性变化；纵向上，青二段压力系数为1.2～1.65，剩余压力为2.5～9MPa，表现为低—中超压，青一段压力系数为1.5～1.85，剩余压力为4.5～11MPa，表现为中—高超压，超压极值分布在青一段；平面上，自长岭凹陷至扶新隆起带方向，随着埋深变浅，超压强度减弱，下斜坡区超压明显高于上斜坡区，剩余压力高值中心主要集中在R48井、R39井及R26-1井等井区；青山口组超压分布呈现较强的非均质性，这种非均质性主要受沉积埋藏速率、暗色泥岩厚度及品质、超压层埋深和断层启闭性等因素控制。超压特征研究可为扶新隆起带南部扶余油层油气成藏认识、盖层封闭性能评价等提供依据。

关键词: 超压成因, 超压分布, 剩余压力, 控制因素, 青山口组, 扶新隆起带, 松辽盆地

Abstract:

Overpressure is common in Qingshankou Formation of southern Fuxin Uplift and is closely related to hydrocarbon accumulation for underlying reservoirs below Qingshankou source rocks.Based on data from cutting logging，drilling，well logging and laboratory analysis，the causes，spatial distribution and controlling factors of overpressure in Qingshankou in southern Fuxin Uplift have been studied combined with burial history and hydrocarbon generation history.The results show that overpressure is mainly distributed in K2qn1 and K2qn2 of Qingshankou Formation and is obviously controlled by strata.The overpressure layer is characterized by high acoustic transit time，low density and low resistivity.The overpressure is contributed by both disequilibrium compaction and hydrocarbon generation and possesses binary genesis characteristics in lower slope zone，while in upper slope zone，it is dominated by disequilibrium compaction and possesses single genesis characteristics.The pore pressure profile of single well is bell-shaped and both pressure coefficients and excessive pressure increase with depth.Longitudinally，pressure coefficients of K2qn2 range from 1.2 to 1.65 and excessive pressure ranges from 2.5 to 9 MPa，which suggests low- and medium-intensity overpressure.Whereas pressure coefficients of K2qn1 range from 1.5 to 1.85 and excessive pressure ranges from 4.5 to 11 MPa，which is characterized by medium- and high-intensity overpressure.And the extremum of overpressure occurs in the K2qn1 Formation.On the plane，the intensity of overpressure decreases with the decrease of the buried depth from the Changling Sag to the Fuxin Uplift and the intensity of overpressure in the lower slope zone is apparently higher than that in the upper slope zone.And the high-value center of excessive pressure is mainly concentrated in Well R48 fields，Well R39 fields and Well R26-1 fields.The overpressure distribution of Qingshankou Formation displays strong heterogeneity，which is mainly controlled by depositional rate，thickness and quality of dark mudstone，burial depth and opening/closing property of faults.The study of overpressure characteristics can promote the understanding of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Fuyu oil layer and have a great significance on evaluating sealing capability of caprock in southern Fuxin Uplift.

Key words: Overpressure mechanism, Overpressure distribution, Excessive pressure, Controlling factors, Qingshankou Formation, Fuxin Uplift, Songliao Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1

[1]Hunt J M.Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J].AAPG Bulletin，1990，74(1)：1-12.
[2]Liu Jingdong，Jiang Youlu.Relationship between abnormally high pressure and hydrocarbon of the Paleogene reservoirs in the northern part of central uplift，Dongpu Sag，Bohai Bay Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry，2012，32(2)：30-36.[刘景东，蒋有录.东濮凹陷中央隆起带北部古近系异常高压与油气成藏的关系[J].天然气工业，2012，32(12)：30-36.]
[3]Jiang Youlu，Wang Xin，Yu Qianqian，et al.Pressure field characteristics of petroliferous depressions and its relationship with hydrocarbon enrichment in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica，2016，37(11)：1361-1369.[蒋有录，王鑫，于倩倩，等.渤海湾盆地含油气凹陷压力场特征及与油气富集关系[J].石油学报，2016，37(11)：1361-1369.]
[4]Zha Ming，Qu Jiangxiu，Zhang Weihai.The relationship between overpressure and reservoir forming mechanism[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development，2002，29(1)：19-23.[查明，曲江秀，张卫海.异常高压与油气成藏机理[J].石油勘探与开发，2002，29(1)：19-23.]
[5]Fu Guang，Lü Yanfang，Yang Mian.Quantitative study on abnormal pore fluid pressure in undercompacted mudstone[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2002，23(4)：295-298.[付广，吕延防，杨勉.欠压实泥岩异常孔隙流体压力的定量研究[J].新疆石油地质，2002，23(4)：295-298.]
[6]Xiang Caifu，Feng Zhiqiang，Wu Heyong，et al.Three abnormal pressure systems developed in the Songliao Basin，northeast China and their genesis[J].Acta Geological Sinica，2006，80(11)：1752-1759.[向才富，冯志强，吴河勇，等.松辽盆地异常压力系统及其形成原因探讨[J].地质学报，2006，80(11)：1752-1759.]
[7]Fu Guang，Sun Kezhi，Song Guowei.Difference of formation and evolution of overpressure of K1qn1 mudstone east and west of Daqing placanticline[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute，2008，32(5)：1-4.[付广，孙克智，宋国微.大庆长垣东西两侧青一段泥岩超压形成与演化的差异性[J].大庆石油学院学报，2008，32(5)：1-4.]
[8]Lei Zhenyu，Xie Xinong，Huang Wei，et al.Abnormal pressure system characteristics of mid-shallow formation in Qijiagulong-Sanzhao Depression of Songliao Basin，China[J].Journal of Jilin University：Earth Science Edition，2012，42(supplement 1)：96-104.[雷振宇，解习农，黄卫，等.松辽盆地齐家古龙凹陷—三肇凹陷中浅层异常压力系统特征[J].吉林大学学报：地球科学版，2012，42(增刊1)：96-104.]
[9][KG*5/6]Liu Zongbao，Fu Xiaofei，Lv Yanfang，et al.Hydrocarbon reversed accumulation model of big depression syncline area：A case of the Fuyang reservoir in the Sanzhao Depression[J].Geological Review，2009，55(5)：685-692.[刘宗堡，付晓飞，吕延防，等.大型凹陷向斜区油气倒灌式成藏模式——以松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶杨油层为例[J].地质论评，2009，55(5)：685-692.]
[10]Feng Zhiqiang，Zhang Shun，Feng Zihui.Discovery of “Enveloping surface of oil and gas overpressure migration” in the Songliao Basin and its bearings on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation mechanisms[J].Science China:Earth Science，2011，41(12)：1872-1833.[冯志强，张顺，冯子辉.在松辽盆地发现“油气超压运移包络面”的意义及油气运移及成藏机理探讨[J].中国科学：地球科学，2011，41(12)：1872-1833.]
[11]Lei Zhenyu，Xie Xinong，Meng Yuanlin，et al.Effecting of overpressures on diagensis in the Qijiagulong-Sanzhao Depression of Songliao Basin[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences，2012，37(4)：833-842.[雷振宇，解习农，孟元林，等.松辽盆地齐家古龙—三肇凹陷超压对成岩作用的影响[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报，2012，37(4)：833-842.]
[12]Tao Shizhen，Yuan Xuanjun，Hou Lianhua，et al.Play types，geologic characteristics and exploration domains of lithological reservoirs in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development，2016，43(6)：863-872.[陶士振，袁选俊，侯连华，等.中国岩性油气藏区带类型、地质特征与勘探领域[J].石油勘探与开发，2016，43(6)：863-872.]
[13]Li Dan，Dong Chunmei，Lin Chengyan，et al.Characteristic of overpressure and its control on migration and accumulation model for hydrocarbon reservoirs below source rocks in Rangzijing slope zone of southern Songliao Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience，2014，25(3)：326-332.[李丹，董春梅，林承焰，等.松辽盆地南部让字井斜坡带超压特征及其对源下油藏运聚模式的控制[J].天然气地球科学，2014，25(3)：326-332.]
[14]Wang Yongchun，Kang Weili，Mao Chaolin.Theories and Practices of Petroleum Exploration in Jilin Exploration Area[M].Beijing：Petroleum Industry Press，2007：1-51.[王永春，康伟力，毛超林，等.吉林探区油气勘探理论与实践[M].北京：石油工业出版社，2007：1-51.]
[15]Zhang Fengqi，Wang Zhenliang，Zhong Hongli，et al.Recognition model and contribution evaluation of main overpressure formation mechanisms in Sedimentary Basins[J].Natural Gas Geoscience，2013，24(6)：1151-1158.[张凤奇，王震亮，钟红利，等.沉积盆地主要超压成因机制识别模式及贡献[J].天然气地球科学，2013，24(6)：1151-1158.]
[16]Luo Xiaorong.The application of numerical basin modeling in geological studies[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development，2000，27(2)：6-10.[罗晓容.数值盆地模拟方法在地质研究中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发，2000，27(2)：6-10.]
[17]He Sheng，He Zhiliang，Yang Zhi，et al.Characteristics，well-log responses and mechanisms of overpressures within the Jurassic Formation in the central part of Junggar Basin[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences，2009，34(3)：457-470.[何生，何治亮，杨智，等.准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系超压特征和测井响应以及成因[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报，2009，34(3)：457-470.]
[18]Liu Hua，Zhang Fengrong，Jiang Youlu，et al.Characteristics and genetic mechanism of formation pressure in sags of Raoyang Depression[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum：Edition of Natural Science，2016，40(4)：37-46.[刘华，张丰荣，蒋有录，等.饶阳凹陷洼槽区地层压力特征及成因机制[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版，2016，40(4)：37-46.]
[19]Wang Lianjin，Ye Jiaren.A comment on forming mechanism of over pressure in sedimentary basins[J].Oil & Gas Geology，2001，22(1)：17-20.[王连进，叶加仁.沉积盆地超压形成机制述评[J].石油与天然气地质，2001，22(1)：17-20.]
[20]Guo Wei，Yu Wenxiang，Liu Zhaojun，et al.The burial history of the southern Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition，2009，39(3)：353-360.[郭巍，于文祥，刘招君，等.松辽盆地南部埋藏史[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版，2009，39(3)：353-360.]
[21]Lu Shuangfang，Li Jiaona，Liu Shaojun，et al.Oil generation threshold depth of Songliao Basin：Revision and its significance[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development，2009，36(2)：166-173.[卢双舫，李娇娜，刘绍军，等.松辽盆地生油门限重新厘定及其意义[J].石油勘探与开发，2009，36(2)：166-173.]
[22]Tingay M R P，Morley C K，Laird A，et al.Evidence for overpressure generation by kerogen-to-gas maturation in the northern Malay Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin，2013，97(4)：639-672.
[23]Jin Qiuyue，Gan Jun，Lu Mei，et al.Analysis of the causes of formation overpressure in the Chezhen Sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University，2015，39(5)：32-40.[金秋月，甘军，卢梅，等.渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷地层超压成因[J].东北石油大学学报，2015，39(5)：32-40.]
[24]Xu Zhengjian，Liu Luofu，Wu Kangjun，et al.Characteristics of formation overpressure and its relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation in Chepaizi and its surrounding area of Junggar Basin[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology，2015，46(10)：3848-3858.[徐正建，刘洛夫，吴康军，等.准噶尔盆地车排子周缘地层超压特征及其与油气成藏的关系[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版，2015，46(10)：3848-3858.]
[25]Wang Xin，Jiang Youlu，Cao Lanzhu，et al.Characteristics of paleopressure evolution and its influencing factors in sub-sags of hydrocarbon-bearing sag：A case study of Raoyang Sag in Jizhong Depression[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology，2017，46(3)：540-550.[王鑫，蒋有录，曹兰柱，等.富油凹陷洼槽区古压力演化特征及影响因素——以冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷为例[J].中国矿业大学学报，2017，46(3)：540-550.]
[26]Ma Wei，Wang Dongliang，Li Zhisheng，et al.A simulation experiment of pressurization during hydrocarbon generation from lacustrine source rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinca，2013，34(supplement 1)：65-69.[马卫，王东良，李志生，等.湖相烃源岩生烃增压模拟实验[J].石油学报，2013，34(增刊1)：65-69.]
[27]Cai Laixing，Lu Shuangfang，Huang Wenbiao，et al.Controlling function of overlying high-quality source rocks on above-generation and below-storage tight oil reservoir：Taking mudstone in Qn1 Formation at central depression in southern Songliao Basin as an instance[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology，2016，45(2)：280-292.[蔡来星，卢双舫，黄文彪，等.上覆优质源岩对上生下储式致密油成藏的控制作用——以松南中央坳陷区青一段泥岩为例[J].中国矿业大学学报，2016，45(2)：280-292.]
[28]Sun Yu，Chen Chen，Ma Shizhong，et al.Hydrocarbon migration mechanism and accumulation models of the Fuyu oil layer in southern Fuxin Uplift，Songliao Basin[J].Geological Review，2013，59(3)：501-509.[孙雨，陈晨，马世忠，等.松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部扶余油层油气运移机制与成藏模式研究[J].地质论评，2013，59(3)：501-509.]
[1] 王俊,高银山,王洪君,王新星,鲍志东,张红静. 基于正演模拟的水下分流复合河道内单一河道划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1310-1322.
[2] 朱立文，王震亮，张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[3] 王国龙，杜社宽. 准噶尔盆地北三台凸起二叠系梧桐沟组一段碎屑岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 675-681.
[4] 胡向阳，李宏涛，史云清，肖开华，郭艳东，李浩，高君. 川西坳陷斜坡带蓬莱镇组三段沉积特征与储层分布——以什邡地区JP32砂组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 468-480.
[5] 白雪峰, 梁江平, 张文婧, 付丽, 彭建亮, 薛涛, 杨立伟, 刘继莹. 松辽盆地北部深层天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1443-1454.
[6] 王颖, 邓守伟, 范晶, 邹晓品, 杨静. 松辽盆地南部重点断陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1455-1464.
[7] 周翔，舒萍，于士泉，陈曦. 松辽盆地徐深9区块营一段火山岩气藏储层特征及综合评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 62-72.
[8] 熊连桥，姚根顺，倪超，熊绍云，沈安江，周刚，郝毅. 川西北地区中泥盆统观雾山组储集层特征、控制因素与演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1031-1042.
[9] 刘英杰，黄传炎，岳家恒，郭来源. 陆相湖盆层序地层格架内有机质发育及控制因素分析——以中上扬子建南地区侏罗系东岳庙段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 930-938.
[10] 闫海军，贾爱林，冀光，郭建林， 许文壮，孟德伟，夏钦禹，黄航娟. 岩溶风化壳型含水气藏气水分布特征及开发技术对策——以鄂尔多斯盆地高桥区下古气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 801-811.
[11] 曾庆鲁，张荣虎，卢文忠，王波，王春阳. 基于三维激光扫描技术的裂缝发育规律和控制因素研究——以塔里木盆地库车前陆区索罕村露头剖面为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 397-409.
[12] 黄玉龙，刘春生，张晶晶，高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系火山岩气藏有效储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 420-428.
[13] 巩磊，高铭泽，曾联波，付晓飞，高志勇，高昂，祖克威，姚嘉琪. 影响致密砂岩储层裂缝分布的主控因素分析——以库车前陆盆地侏罗系—新近系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 199-208.
[14] 杨贵前，杜社宽，梁爽. 准噶尔盆地中拐凸起侏罗系八道湾组储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(11): 1689-1698.
[15] 刘君龙，纪友亮，杨克明，朱宏权，潘亚男，余加松，王天云. 川西地区中侏罗世前陆盆地河流层序结构及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 14-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!