天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

柴达木盆地涩北二号生物气田微构造对气藏气水分布动态变化的控制

奎明清1，胡望水2，李瑜3，沈润凯2，曹继华3   

  1. 1.西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院，四川 成都 610500；2.长江大学，湖北 武汉 430100；
    3.中国石油青海油田天然气开发公司，青海 格尔木 816000
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-07 修回日期:2017-03-16 出版日期:2017-05-10 发布日期:2017-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 胡望水(1963-)，男，湖北孝感人，教授，博士生导师，主要从事油气勘探与开发教学、科研工作. E-mail：huwangshui@126.com.
  • 作者简介:奎明清(1977-)，男，青海湟中人，高级工程师，博士在读，主要从事天然气开发地质研究工作. E-mail：kuimq@126.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重大专项“低渗、特低渗透油气田经济开发关键技术”(编号：2011ZX05013)资助.

The effect of mini-structure on the dynamic variation of gas and water distribution in Sebei Ⅱ Gasfield,Qaidam Basin,China

Kui Ming-qing1，Hu Wang-shui2，Li Yu3，Shen Run-kai2，Cao Ji-hua3   

  1. 1.Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China;
    2.Yangtze University,Wuhan 430100,China;
    3.Natuaral Gas Exploitation Company,Qinghai Oilfield,PetroChina,Golmud 816000,China
  • Received:2017-01-07 Revised:2017-03-16 Online:2017-05-10 Published:2017-05-10

PDF (PC)

513

摘要：

针对涩北二号气田开发后期边水水侵方向预测、井网调整等问题，综合考虑背斜构造边水气藏特征，提出以微构造研究为基础，结合实际生产数据，分析微构造对气藏气水分布动态变化的控制作用。结果表明：微构造图所界定气水边界更符合实际生产，负向微构造所在位置可动水饱和度明显偏高，水侵面积与可动水饱和度具有较高的相关性，位于负向微构造开发井平均单井日产水量为10.26m3，位于正向微构造开发井平均单井日产水量为1.52m3。研究认为：①气水边界线分布趋势与气藏微构造等值线分布趋势有较好的相关性，表明气藏气水分布特征明显受微构造分布特征控制；②气藏内水侵常常首先发生在气藏边缘小低点、小沟槽等负向微构造内；③负向微构造带内边水水体量较大，边水驱动力强，边水推进速度较快；④涩北二号气田气藏下步实现高效开发，降低水淹速度，其有效方法是有效地控制沟槽带内开发井的产气速度，并在微构造高点增加新井以完善井网。

关键词:
微构造, 气水边界, 气藏开发, 气水分布动态变化, 涩北二号气田

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to critically investigatethe problem of prediction of the direction of edge water invasion and the adjustment of well pattern in the late stage of the development of Sebei Ⅱ Gasfield,by considering the characteristics of anticline gas reservoir with edge water.This research is based on the feature of mini-structure and the actual production data to analyze the controlling effect of mini-structure on the dynamic change of gas and water distribution in gas reservoir.Results showed that a gas-water boundary defined by the micro structure mapis more consistent with the actual production,whereby movable water saturation was significantly higher in the negative mini-structure.There is a high positive correlation between water invasion area and mobile water saturation.The average daily water production ofsingle well is 10.26 cubic meters in the negative mini-structure,and is 1.52 cubic meters in the positive mini-structure.It could be concluded that:(1)There is a good correlation between the distribution of the gas-water boundary and the distribution of the mini-structure of the gas reservoir,which indicates that the distribution of gas and water in the gas reservoir is obviously controlled by the distribution of the mini-structure.(2)The water invasion within the gas reservoir firstly occurs in the negative mini-structures such as small low and small grooves in the anticline.(3)In the negative mini-structure,the volume of edge-water is larger,the edge-water driving force is stronger,and edge-water carriesforward at a faster rate.(4)The method of effective development and reducing flooding velocity of gas reservoirs in the Sebei-2 Gasfield is to effectively control the gas production rate of the development wells on the negative mini-structures,and add new wells on the positive mini-structures to improve the well network.

Key words: Mini-structure, Gas-water boundary, Gas reservoir development, Gas-water distribution dynamic change, SebeiⅡ Gasfield

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1

[1]Huang Diefang.Cenozoic Sedimentation and Structure of Tainan 9 Well area in Sanhu Depression,Qaidam Basin[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2010:29-30.[黄蝶芳.柴达木三湖坳陷台南9井区新生代沉积和构造特征[D].青岛：中国石油大学(华东),2010:29-30.][ZK)]
[2]Wang Xiaolei.Study on Gas Log Interpretation and Gas Water Distribution Charac-Teristics in Sebei Ⅱ Gasfield[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2013:57-58.[王晓磊.涩北二号气田气层测井解释及气水分布特征研究[D].青岛：中国石油大学(华东),2013:57-58.]
[3]Lin Xiaoxing.Research to Quaternary Sequence Stratigraphy of North Slope Sanhu Depression in Qaidam Basin[D].BeiJing:China University of Geosciences,2006:55-60.[林晓星. 柴达木盆地三湖凹陷北斜坡第四系层序地层学研究[D].北京：中国地质大学（北京），2006:55-60.]
[4]Ma Lining,Wang Xiaolu,Zhu Yujie,et al.Introduction of technology improve on natural gas development in the Qaidam Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2007,27(2):77-80.[马力宁,王小鲁,朱玉洁,等.柴达木盆地天然气开发技术进展[J].天然气工业,2007,27(2):77-80.]
[5]Guo Zeqing,Li Benliang,Zhang Lin,et al.Discussion on minimum closure for low-amplitude structueal nature gas pool:A case studay from Sanhu area in the Qaidam Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Geology:Scientia Geologica Sinica,2008,43(1):34-49.[郭泽清,李本亮,张林,等.低幅度构造天然气成藏的闭合[HJ2mm]度下限探讨—以柴达木盆地三湖地区为例[J].地质科学,2008,43(1):34-49.]
[6]Hua Ruixiang,Jia Yinglan,Li Qing,et al.An analysis of gas-water distribution and its movement law in the Sebei Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(7):68-71.[华锐湘,贾英兰,李清,等.涩北气田气水分布及气水运动规律分析[J].天然气工业,2009,29(7):68-71.]
[7]Deng Chenggang.The application of the all gas wells shut-in pressure analysis to predict the edge water advancing direction of Sebei-2 Gasfield[J].Qiughai Shiyou,2010(4):42-44.[邓成刚.涩北二号气田全气藏关井压力分析在预测边水推进方向中的应用研究[J].青海石油,2010(4):42-44.]
[8]Gao Qinfeng,Wu Shengli,Ren Yulin,et al.Dynamic monitoring technology in the development of multi-layer edge water gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(2):56-60.[高勤峰,吴胜利,任玉林,等．多层边水气藏的动态监测技术及效果[J].天然气工业,2014,34(2):56-60.]
[9]Yi Zhenli,Hou Songyi,Li Yanhua,et al.Loose sandstone water invasion characteristics analysis in Sebei Ⅱ Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Technology and Economy.2013(2)：25-29.[易珍丽,侯淞译,李延华,等.涩北二号疏松砂岩气田水侵特征分析[J].天然气技术与经济,2013(2)：25-29.]
[10]Tang Mingming.Fracture Modeling Based on Fracture Mechanics and Its Effect on the Reservoir Modeling[D].Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2010:12-15.[唐明明.湖盆裂缝动力学模拟及其储层精细建模方法研究[D].青岛：中国海洋大学,2010:12-15.]
[11]Xie Congjiao,Liu Mingsheng,Yang Junhong,et al.Preliminary study on the relation between ministructure and oil and gas[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field.2001,8(4)：4-7.[谢丛娇,刘明生,杨俊红,等.微构造与油气聚集关系初探[J].断块油气田.2001,8(4)：4-7.]
[12]Kui Mingqing,Hu Xuetao,Li Liu,et al.The study on water-producing features of Sebei-2 Gasfield[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2012,34(5):137-145.[奎明清,胡雪涛,李留,等.涩北二号疏松砂岩气田出水规律研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,34(5):137-145.]
[13]Zhu Huayin,Hu Yong,Li Jiangtao,et al.Physical simulation of commingled production for multilayer gas reservoir in Sebei Gasfield,Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica.2013,34(supplement 1):136-142.[朱华银,胡勇,李江涛,等.柴达木盆地涩北多层气藏合采物理模拟[J].石油学报,2013,34(增刊1):136-142.]
[14]Li Honglian.The Water Invasion Dynamic Research on Gas Reservior of Mufti-Layer Loose Sand and Edge Water:Sebei No.2 Gasfield as an Example[D].Xi’an:Xi’an Shiyou University,2014:69-73.[李泓涟.多层疏松砂岩边水气藏水侵动态研究__以涩北二号气田为例[D].西安:西安石油大学,2014:69-73.]
[15]Mu Shuguang,Zou Yu.New development of gas trap evaluation technology[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,1996,18(4):110-115.[穆曙光,邹宇.天然气圈闭评价技术新进展[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,1996,18(4):110-115.]
[1] 李梦茹,唐友军,刘岩,胡辉,贺其川. 江陵凹陷不同地区原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1240-1251.
[2] 包建平, 朱翠山, 申旭. 金刚烷类化合物与库车坳陷克拉2构造凝析油的形成机理研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1217-1230.
[3] 彭威龙，胡国艺，刘全有，贾楠，房忱琛，龚德瑜，于聪，吕玥，王鹏威，冯子齐. 热模拟实验研究现状及值得关注的几个问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1252-1263.
[4] 曾旭, 李剑, 田继先, 王波, 国建英, 沙威.  柴达木盆地腹部晚期构造带成藏模拟实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1301-1309.
[5] 王强, 张大勇, 王杰, 陶成, 腾格尔, 刘文汇. 烃类与非烃综合判识干酪根与原油裂解气[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1231-1239.
[6] 刘琴琴，陈桂华，陈晓智，祝彦贺，杨小峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地L地区上古生界上石盒子组物源特征及其对储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1094-1101.
[7] 傅宁,刘建升. 北部湾盆地流二段3类烃源岩的生烃成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 932-941.
[8] 杨海军，张荣虎，杨宪彰，王珂，王俊鹏，唐雁刚，周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[9] 裴立新，刚文哲，朱传真，刘亚洲，何文军，向宝力，董岩. 准噶尔盆地烷烃气碳同位素组成及来源[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1020-1030.
[10] 刘小兵，温志新，王兆明，贺正军，宋成鹏. 中东扎格罗斯盆地构造演化与油气分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 973-981.
[11] 马安来，朱翠山，顾忆，李慧莉. 塔中地区中深1C井寒武系原油低聚硫代金刚烷含量分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1009-1019.
[12] 贾智彬,侯读杰,孙德强,姜玉涵,张自鸣,洪梅. 贵州地区牛蹄塘组底部烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1031-1041.
[13] 杨智峰,曾溅辉,韩菲. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组7段致密油充注影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 961-972.
[14] 陈斐然，张义杰，朱光有，张宝收，卢玉红，张志遥. 塔里木盆地台盆区深层天然气地球化学特征及成藏演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 880-891.
[15] 王珊，曹颖辉，杜德道，王石，李洪辉，董洪奎，严威，白莹. 塔里木盆地柯坪—巴楚地区肖尔布拉克组储层特征与主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 784-795.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!