天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

珠江口盆地恩平凹陷海相泥岩盖层有效性评价及应用

刘培,于水明,王福国,陶文芳,张庆,许新明,胡坤   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司研究院,广东 深圳 518054
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-28 修回日期:2017-02-08 出版日期:2017-03-10 发布日期:2017-03-10
  • 作者简介:刘培(1986-),男,四川内江人,工程师,硕士,主要从事珠江口盆地(东部)地区油气勘探综合研究. E-mail:liupei4@cnooc.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    “十三五”国家科技重大专项课题“南海东部海域勘探新领域及关键技术” (编号:2016ZX05024-004)资助.

Cap rock effectiveness evaluation and application of marine mudstonein Enping Sag of Pearl River Mouth Basin

Liu Pei,Yu Shui-ming,Wang Fu-guo,Tao Wen-fang,Zhang Qing,Xu Xin-ming,Hu Kun   

  1. Research Institute of CNOOC Shenzhen Branch,Shenzhen 518054,China
  • Received:2016-10-28 Revised:2017-02-08 Online:2017-03-10 Published:2017-03-10

摘要:

珠江口盆地恩平凹陷中浅层海相泥岩分布广泛,对油气封盖保存具有重要意义。通过对研究区宏观沉积背景的分析,认为盖层有效性体现于平面连续性和垂向封闭性,分别受控于泥岩厚度和突破压力,并影响油气的聚集规模。基于已知油气藏和盖层质量之间的关系,找出盖层保存油气的封堵下限,结合下限值将盖层分为一般盖层、有效盖层和高效盖层3类,并建立评价模型。应用模型评价北部古隆起带盖层质量表明,该带下珠江组及珠海组高效盖层数量较为接近,盖层质量基本相当;下韩江组及上珠江组盖层条件差异较大,该带东段高效泥岩盖层明显多于西段,且与南带油田群相当,其盖层条件优越;从油气保存的角度来看,该带东段分布的各类型目标具有一定勘探潜力。

关键词: 珠江口盆地, 恩平凹陷, 盖层条件, 海相泥岩, 突破压力, 泥岩厚度

Abstract:

Middle-shallow marine facies mudstone are widely distributed in Enping Sag of Pearl River Mouth Basin.It is of great significance for oil and gas block preservation.According to the analysis of macro sedimentary background in the study area,cap rock effectiveness is embodied in plane continuity and vertical sealing ability,which is controlled by thickness of mudstone and breakthrough pressure,and affects the scale of oil and gas accumulation.Based on the relationship between known oil and cap rock quality,the lower limit of cap rock is determined.Cap rock can be divided into three categories by the lower limit,i.e.,generally cap rock,effective cap rock and high effective cap rock,and the evaluation model is established.Evaluation model used in the northern palaeouplift shows that the cap rock quality in lower Zhujiang Formation is basically the same as that in the Zhuhai Formation with similar number of efficient cap rock.There are large differences about cap rock in lower Hanjiang Formation and upper Zhujiang Formation.The eastern efficient mudstone cap rock is clearly more than the western,and similar to south belt oilfield group.Its cap rock condition is superior.From the point of view of oil and gas preservation,various types of targets have certain exploration potential in eastern belt.

Key words: Pearl River Mouth Basin, Enping Sag, Cap rock condition, Marine mudstone, Breakthrough pressure, Thickness of mudstone

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+21

[1]
Jiang Youlu,Zha Ming.Oil and Gas Geologic and Exploration[M].Beijing:Petroleum  Industry Press.2006.[蒋有录,查明.石油天然气地质与勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006.]
[2][KG*6/7]Li Huiyong,Xu Changgui,Liu Tinghai,et al.The formation mechanism and characteristics of thin-layer mudstone caprock and its relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation in the terrestrial basin:An example of thin-layer mudstone caprock in the south-central Liaodong Bay[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2010,32(1):19-23.[李慧勇,徐长贵,刘廷海,等.陆相盆地薄层泥岩盖层形成机制、特征与油气成藏关系__以辽东湾地区中南部为例[J].石油实验地质,2010,32(1):19-23.]
[3]Fu Guang,Wang Biao,Shi Jijian.Comprehensive quantitative evaluation method of sealing oil-gas ability of caprock and its application[J].Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science,2014,48(1):174-179.[付广,王彪,史集建.盖层封盖油气能力综合定量评价方法及应用[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2014,48(1):174-179.]
[4]Lv Yanfang,Fu Guang,Yu Dan.Comprehensive evaluation of sealing ability of cap rock in China’s large and medium gas fields and their contribution to gas accumulation[J].Oil and Gas Geology,2005,26(6):742-745.[吕延防,付广,于丹.中国大中型气田盖层封盖能力综合评价及其对成藏的贡献[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(6):742-745.]
[5]Jiang Youlu.A discussion on the relation between cap rock thickness of oil & gas reservoir and its hydrocarbon column height[J].Natural Gas Industry,1998:18(2):20-23.[蒋有录.油气藏盖层厚度与所封盖烃柱高度关系问题探讨[J].天然气工业,1998:18(2):20-23.]
[6]Lu Xuesong,Jiang Youlu,Song Yan.Influence of mechanical properties and stress state of caprock on its sealing performance:taking Kela-2 Gasfield as an example[J].Natural Gas Industry,2007,27(8):48-51.[鲁雪松,蒋有录,宋岩.盖层力学性质及其应力状态对盖层封闭性能的影响——以克拉2 气田为例[J].天然气工业,2007,27(8):48-51.]
[7]Chen Jianliang,Shi Hesheng,Shu Yu,et al.The application of seal evaluation method with log data in ZhuⅠDepression,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2007,19(3):157-160.[陈建亮 施和生 舒誉,等.测井盖层评价方法在珠一坳陷的应用[J].中国海上油气,2007,19(3):157-160.]
[8]Pang Xiongqi,Qiu Nansheng,Jiang Zhenxue,et al.Quantitative Modeling of Hydrocarbon Accumulation[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2005.[庞雄奇,邱楠生,姜振学,等.油气成藏定量模拟[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2005.]
[9]Wang Jiahao,Liu Lihua,Chen Shenghong,et al.Tectonic-sedimentary responses to the second episode of the Zhu-Qiong movement in the Enping Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin and its regional tectonic significance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(4):588-595.[王家豪,刘丽华,陈胜红,等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷珠琼运动二幕的构造_沉积响应及区域构造意义[J].石油学报,2011,32(4):588-595.]
[10]Xu Xinming,Chen Shenghong,Wang Fuguo,et al.Structural features and its impacts on hydrcarbon accumulation of Neogene in Enping Sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Geoscience,2014,28(3):543-550.[许新明,陈胜红,王福国,等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷断层特征及其对新近系油气成藏的影响[J].现代地质,2014,28(3):543-550.]
[11]Du Jiayuan,Shi Hesheng,Ding Lin,et al.An analysis of favorable exploration areas for stratigraphic-lithologic hydrocarbon accumulation in the eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2014,26(3):30-36.[杜家元,施和生,丁琳,等.珠江口盆地(东部)地层岩性油气藏勘探有利区域分析[J].中国海上油气,2014,26(3):30-36.]
[12]Chen Changmin,Shi Hesheng,Xu Shice,et al.Hydrocarbon Reservoir Forming Conditions of Tertiary in the Eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin[M].Beijing:Science Press,2003.[陈长民,施和生,许仕策,等.珠江口盆地(东部)第三系油气藏形成条件[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.]
[13]Chen Weitao,Du Jiayuan,Long Gengsheng,et al.Analysis on controlling factors of marine sequence stratigraphy evolution in  Pearl  River Mouth Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(1):73-82.[陈维涛,杜家元,龙更生,等.珠江口盆地海相层序地层发育的控制因素分析[J].沉积学报,2012,30(1):73-82.]
[14]Zeng Jianhui,Zhang Shanwen,Qiu Nansheng,et al.Degree of oil-gas charged in lens-shaped sand body in Jiyang Depression and its main controlling factors[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2002,27(6):729-732.[曾溅辉,张善文,邱楠生,等.济阳坳陷砂岩透镜体油气藏充满度大小及其主控因素[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2002,27(6):729-732.]
[15]Fu Guang,Xu Fengming.Quantitative research oncontrolling of thickness to seal abilities of caprock[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2003,14(3):186-190.[付广,许凤鸣.盖层厚度对封闭能力控制作用分析[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(3):186-190.]
[16]Zhao Lijie,Jiang Youlu,Pang Yumao,et al.Sealing ability of cap rock and its relationship with hydrocarbon distribution of Neogene in Raoyang Sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2012,36(5):25-31.[赵利杰,蒋有录,庞玉茂,等.饶阳凹陷新近系盖层质量及其与油气分布的关系[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(5):25-31.]

[1] 王清辉,冯进. 烃源岩TOC测井评价方法及应用——以珠江口盆地文昌组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 251-258.
[2] 轩义华,代一丁,张振波,但志伟,肖为,朱美娟. 珠江口盆地惠州某区平缆与斜缆地震资料叠前反演综合研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(11): 1755-1760.
[3] 王琪,田兵,马晓峰,牟炜卫,高丽华. 珠江口盆地白云深水区深水水道沉积体系及成因模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(10): 1497-1505.
[4] 牟炜卫,王琪,田兵,郝乐伟,胡子见. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷北坡中深部储层成岩相测井响应特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(10): 1601-1612.
[5] 张迎朝,徐新德,尤丽,袁冰,甘军,李辉,邓广君. 珠江口盆地文昌A凹陷低渗凝析气藏天然气成因及成藏模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(9): 1320-1328,1450.
[6] 杨波,张昌民,李少华,杜家元,张忠涛,朱锐,余烨,袁瑞. 珠江口盆地晚渐新世—早中新世古地震记录及油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(6): 834-847.
[7] 郭玉峰,杜秀琴,傅宁. 珠二坳陷白云凹陷海相烃源岩及其成藏贡献[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(12): 1975-1982.
[8] 于开平,丁放. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷中生界的发现及石油地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(3): 489-492.
[9] 苗顺德, 张功成, 梁建设, 郭刚, 于开平. 珠江口盆地北部坳陷带文昌组地震反射特征及沉积环境分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(5): 844-850.
[10] 崔莎莎, 何家雄, 陈胜红, 邹和平, 崔洁. 珠江口盆地发育演化特征及其油气成藏地质条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(3): 384-391.
[11] 朱俊章 施和生 汪建蓉 龙祖烈. 珠江口盆地陆相原油轻烃环优势及其成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 15-19.
[12] 朱俊章;施和生;何敏;庞雄;杨少坤;李昭伟 . 珠江口盆地白云凹陷深水区LW3-1-1井天然气地球化学特征及成因探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(2): 229-233.
[13] 禚喜准, 王琪, 陈国俊, 李小燕, 吕成福. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷碎屑岩储层孔隙度纵向演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(5): 643-647.
[14] 朱俊章,施和生,邓宏文,吴建耀,舒誉,丁琳. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷古近系烃源岩层序地层学和地球化学研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(5): 709-714.
[15] 朱俊章;施和生;舒誉;杜家元;罗俊莲;. 珠江口盆地珠-坳陷典型烃源岩热压模拟实验――生排烃模式及TOC恢复系数探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 573-578.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!