天然气地球科学

• 天然气勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地某地区石盒子组低渗透天然气储层产能测井预测

陈雨龙,张冲,石文睿,郭冀宁,秦瑞宝,余杰,周兴波   

  1. 1.长江大学油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430100;
    2.长江大学地球物理与石油资源学院,湖北 武汉 430100;
    3.中国海油研究总院,北京100027;
    4.中国石油塔里木油田分公司天然气事业部,新疆 库尔勒 841000
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-29 修回日期:2016-08-09 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2016-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 张冲(1983-),男,湖北汉川人,副教授,博士,主要从事复杂储层测井解释理论与方法研究. E-mail:yzlogging@163.com.
  • 作者简介:陈雨龙(1990-),男,湖北襄阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事非常规储层测井解释评价研究. E-mail:cyllogging@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(编号:41404084);湖北省自然科学基金(编号:2013CFB396)联合资助.

Productivity log forecasting of low permeability gas reservoir of Shihezi Formation in X area of Ordos Basin

Chen Yu-long,Zhang Chong,Shi Wen-rui,Guo Ji-ning,Qin Rui-bao,Yu Jie,Zhou Xing-bo   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources of Education Ministry of
    Yangtze University,Wuhan 430100,China;2.Geophysics and Oil Resource Institute,Yangtze University,
    Wuhan 430100,China;3.CNOOC Research Institute,Beijing 100027,China;4.Institute of Petroleum
    Exploration and Development,PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company,Korla 841000,China
  • Received:2016-06-29 Revised:2016-08-09 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2016-12-10

摘要:

在油气田勘探与开发中,低渗透储层产能测井预测是一个关键也是一个难点。依据测井、测试和岩心实验资料,首先针对自然生产与压裂生产的不同生产措施,确定物性下限,孔隙度10%、渗透率1×10-3μm2为自然生产储层物性下限,孔隙度6%、渗透率0.1×10-3μm2为储层产能物性下限;然后根据生产情况,将产能分为自然生产、压后产气大于10 000m3/d、压后产气3 000~10 000m3/d和压后无产4个等级,总结常规测井响应特征,采用自然伽马与密度—中子视石灰岩孔隙度差值结合储层孔隙度、渗透率建立产能分级预测模型;其次由渗流力学和毛管理论可知,压后每米无阻产气量与可动流体孔隙度呈现指数关系,利用核磁共振测井确定储层有效流动孔隙度,建立压后每米无阻产气量测井定量预测模型;最后将产能测井预测模型应用于鄂尔多斯盆地某地区石盒子组低渗透天然气储层的产能预测,预测结果与测试结果符合很好,压后定量预测结果与测试结果相对误差均在10%以内。

关键词: 产能预测, 压裂, 低渗透, 天然气, 测井, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract:

The process of oil-gasfield exploration and development,productivity log forecasting of low permeability gas reservoir is a key and difficult point.On the basis of log,testing and core experimental data,firstly,according to the different production measure,the lower limit of reservoir physical property is determined.Reservoirs with porosity and permeability greater than 10% and 1×10-3μm2,respectively,have natural productivity,and reservoirs with porosity and permeability less than 6% and 0.1×10-3μm2,respectively,have no productivity.Secondly,according to the production condition,productivity is divided into natural productivity,post-frac AOF>10 000m3/d,post-frac AOF 3 000-10 000m3/d and post-frac without production.Their log characteristics of different productivity levels are studied,and using GR,φD-N,porosity and permeability,four productivity levels can be forecasted.Then followed by permeation fluid mechanics and capillary theory,the relationship of post-frac AOF per meter and efficient flow pore,calculated by NMR,is index,and the model can be established.Finally,productivity of low permeability gas reservoir of Shihezi Formation in X area of Ordos Basin is calculated and the forecast results accord with test results well,and the relative error is less than 10%.

Key words: Productivity forecasting, Post-frac, Low permeability, Gas reservoir, Log, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2

[1]Zhang Lihua,Pan Baozhi,Zhuang Hua,et al.Productivity log forecasting method for post-frac reservoir with low porosity and low permeability[J].Well Logging Technology,2012,36(1):101-105.[张丽华,潘保芝,庄华,等.低孔隙度低渗透率储层压裂后产能测井预测方法研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(1):101-105.]
[2]Pan Baozhi,Shi Yujiang,Jiang Bici,et al.Research on gasfield and level prediction for post-frac tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2015,45(2): 649-654.[潘保芝,石玉江,蒋必辞,等.致密砂岩气层压裂产能及等级预测方法[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2015,45(2):649-654.]
[3]Guo Zhenhua,Zhao Yanchao.Logging evaluation to tight gas reservoir in He2 member of Daniudi Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(1):87-94.[郭振华,赵彦超.大牛地气田盒2段致密砂岩气层测井评价[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(1):87-94.]
[4]Zhang Lingyun.Study on method evaluating tight clastic reservoir[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2008,43(5):595-599.[张凌云.致密碎屑岩储层评价方法研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2008,43(5):595-599.]
[5]Ju Jianghui,Wang Jiangong,Gao Ruiqin,et al.Productivity forecast of the reservoir with low porosity and low permeability in Erlian Oilfield[J].Well Logging Technology,2005,29(4): 379-381.[鞠江慧,王建功,高瑞琴,等.二连油田低孔隙度低渗透率储层压裂后产能预测[J].测井技术,2005,29(4):379-381.]
[6]Yan Jianwen,Zhang Shongyang,Huang Guoqian.Relationship between reservoir log parameters and AOF in Daniudi Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(2):67-69.[严建文,张松扬,黄国骞.大牛地气田储层测井参数与无阻流量的关系[J].天然气工业,2008,28(2):67-69.]
[7]Li Jing,Yang Yong,Wang Shaofei,et al.Determination of the lower limits of the physical properties of consolidated sandstone reservoirs in eastern Sulige Gasfield[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2011,18(6):52-56.[黎菁,杨勇,王少飞,等.苏里格气田东区致密砂岩储层物性下限值的确定[J].特种油气藏,2011,18(6):52-56.]
[8]Guo Rui.Supplement to determining method of cut-off value of net pay[J].Petroleum Exploration & Development,2004,31(5):140-144.[郭睿.储集层物性下限值确定方法及其补充[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(5):140-144.]
[9]Zhang Chong,Zhang Zhansong,Zhang Chaomo.A permeability interpretation model based on equivalent rock elements theory[J].Well Logging Technology,2014,38(6):690-694.[张冲,张占松,张超谟.基于等效岩石组分理论的渗透率解释模型[J].测井技术,2014,38(6):690-694.]
[10]Song Yanjie,Zhou Yuting,Tang Xiaomin,et al.Method for determination of permeability of shaly sand formation with low porosity and permeability based on efficient flow pore[J].Progress in Geophysics,2016,31(1):327-333.[宋延杰,周玉婷,唐晓敏,等.基于有效流动孔隙的低孔渗泥质砂岩储层渗透率确定方法[J].地球物理学进展,2016,31(1):327-333.]
[11]Amaefule J O,Altunbay M,Tiab D,et al.Enhanced Reservoir Description:Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic(flow) Units and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells[C].SPE 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers,Texas:3-6 October,1993.
[12]Zhu Weiyao,Song Hongqing,He Dongfu,et al.Low-velocity non-darcy gas seepage model and productivity equations of low-permeability water-bearing gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(5):685-689.[朱维耀,宋洪庆,何东博,等.含水低渗气藏低速非达西渗流数学模型及产能方程研究[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(5):685-689.]
[13]Bushlanov V P,Bushlanov I V,Sentyakova E N.Permeability coefficient in Darcy’s filtration law[J].Journal of Applied Mechanics & Technical Physics,2013,54(4):608-611.
[14]Payne L E,Rodrigues J F,Straughan B.Effect of anisotropic permeability on Darcy's law[J].Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences,2001,24(6):427-438.
[15]Li Pengju,Gu Yufeng.Matrix method of transforming NMR T2 spectrum to pseudo capillary pressure curve[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(4):700-705.[李鹏举,谷宇峰.核磁共振T2谱转换伪毛管压力曲线的矩阵方法[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(4):700-705.]
[16]Shi Jianchao,Qu Xuefeng,Lei Qihong,et al.Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of movable fluid in tight oil reservoir:A case study of Chang 7 reservoir in Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(5):827-834,850.[时建超,屈雪峰,雷启鸿,等.致密油储层可动流体分布特征及主控因素分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地长7储层为例[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(5):827-834,850.]
[17]Wang Ruifei,Chen Minqiang.Characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluid in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(4):558-561,566.[王瑞飞,陈明强.特低渗透砂岩储层可动流体赋存特征及影响因素[J].石油学报,2008,29(4):558-561,566.]
[18]Xie R H,Xiao L Z,Wang Z D,et al.The influence factors of NMR logging porosity in complex fluid reservoir[J].Science in China,2008,51(2):212-217.
[19]Xiao Liang,Xiao Zhongxiang.Analysis of methods for determining NMR T2cutoff and its applicability[J].Progress in Geophysics,2008,23(1):167-172.[肖亮,肖忠祥.核磁共振测井T2cutoff确定方法及适用性分析[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(1):167-172.]

[1] 刘琴琴,陈桂华,陈晓智,祝彦贺,杨小峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地L地区上古生界上石盒子组物源特征及其对储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1094-1101.
[2] 朱立文,王震亮,张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[3] 杨智峰,曾溅辉,韩菲. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组7段致密油充注影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 961-972.
[4] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[5] 陈斐然,张义杰,朱光有,张宝收,卢玉红,张志遥. 塔里木盆地台盆区深层天然气地球化学特征及成藏演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 880-891.
[6] 吕志凯,贾爱林,唐海发,刘群明,王泽龙. 大型致密砂岩气藏水平井产能评价与新认识[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 873-879.
[7] 邓焱,胡国艺,赵长毅. 四川盆地龙岗气田长兴组—飞仙关组天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 892-907.
[8] 王香增,张丽霞,姜呈馥,尹锦涛,高潮,孙建博,尹娜,薛莲花. 鄂尔多斯盆地差异抬升对长7页岩孔隙的影响——以东南部甘泉地区和南部渭北隆起地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 597-605.
[9] 汪道兵,葛洪魁,宇波,文东升,周珺,韩东旭,刘露. 页岩弹性模量非均质性对地应力及其损伤的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 632-643.
[10] 杨超,贺永红,马芳侠,雷裕红,陈义国. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组有机流体活动期次划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 655-664.
[11] 苏佳纯,张金川,朱伟林. 非常规天然气经济评价对策思考[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 743-753.
[12] 葛岩,朱光辉,万欢,潘新志,黄志龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘紫金山侵入构造对上古生界致密砂岩气藏形成和分布的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 491-499.
[13] 杨丽杰,侯读杰,陈晓东,刁慧. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中部古近系地层水化学特征及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 559-571,596.
[14] 史文洋,姚约东,程时清,石志良,高敏. 裂缝性低渗透碳酸盐岩储层酸压改造油井动态压力特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 586-596.
[15] 屈雪峰,周晓峰,刘丽丽,丁黎. 鄂尔多斯盆地古峰庄—麻黄山地区长82低渗透砂岩致密化过程分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 337-348.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!