天然气地球科学

• 非常规天然气 • 上一篇    下一篇

潞安矿区山西组3#煤储层低压特征及控制因素研究

曹运兴1,2,3,柴学周4,刘同吉4,冯培文4,田林1,3,石玢1,3,曹永恒5,周丹5   

  1. 1.河南理工大学煤层气/瓦斯地质工程研究中心,河南 焦作 454003;
    2.瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理国家重点实验室培育基地,河南 焦作 454003;
    3.中原经济区煤层/页岩气协同创新中心,河南 焦作 454003;
    4.山西潞安矿业(集团)有限责任公司,山西 长治 046200;
    5.河南方舟新能源股份有限公司,河南 焦作 454000
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-13 修回日期:2016-09-26 出版日期:2016-11-10 发布日期:2016-11-10
  • 作者简介:曹运兴(1955-),男,河南鲁山人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事煤层气/瓦斯地质与煤层气开发技术研究. E-mail:yxcao17@126.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:41372159);山西省科技重大专项资助项目(编号:20111101002)联合资助.

A research on low reservoir pressure of coal 3# of Shanxi Formation in Luan mining area,Qinshui Basin

Cao Yun-xing1,2,3,Chai Xue-zhou4,Liu Tong-ji4,Feng Pei-wen4,Tian Lin1,3,Shi Bin1,3,Cao Yong-heng5,Zhou Dan5   

  1. 1.The Engineering Research Center for Coalbed Methane,He’nan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo 454003,China;
    2.State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control,Jiaozuo 454003,China;
    3.Collaborative Innovation Center of Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas for Central Plains Economic Region,Jiaozuo 454003,China;
    4.Shanxi Luan Mining Group Ltd.,Changzhi 046200,China;
    5.He’nan Arks New Energy Co.Ltd.,Jiaozuo 454000,China
  • Received:2016-05-13 Revised:2016-09-26 Online:2016-11-10 Published:2016-11-10

摘要: 煤储层压力是影响煤层气开发地质条件评价和钻完井、增产改造技术工艺设计以及排采制度制定的重要参数,获得可靠的煤储层压力参数并认识其区域分布规律,对于指导煤层气高效开发至关重要。以沁水盆地中南段潞安矿区山西组3#煤层为对象,分析发现前期煤储层压力数值可靠性不足,改进并应用大时长关井注入压降套管试井方法,完成了潞安矿区34口煤层气井的储层参数测试和压力特征的系统研究。结果表明:(1)大时长关井压降套管试井是潞安低渗透低压储层矿区获得可靠储层压力参数的先进技术和方法;(2)山西组3#煤层为低压和超低压储层,在800m埋深以浅,平均储层压力梯度为4.2kPa/m,这远低于本世纪初期关于潞安矿区储层压力(6~7kPa/m)的水平;(3)3#煤层的低压特征与煤层埋深和底板高程线性相关,其区域性分布规律的控制性地质因素是地下水流场和辛安泉域的地面排泄;(4)潞安矿区3#煤层的低压和超低压储层的保护性增产改造技术工艺亟待开发,这包括压裂液体系,压裂泵注程序、压裂后返排,及时排采施工,以及排采制度的设计和实施;(5)潞安矿区山西组3#煤层低压_超低压现象的发现对重新认识沁水盆地煤储层压力规律具有重要启发和借鉴。

关键词: 煤层气, 储层压力, 潞安矿区, 沁水盆地

Abstract: Pressure is one of the most important parameters for characterizing coal reservoirs and for evaluating coalbed methane (CBM)production potential,and for designing the well drilling,well completion,stimulation and production.Reliable pressure data and the distribution of a CBM play are critical for CBM exploitation.Based on the pressure data obtained through injection falloff test (IFOT)in open-hole wells completed in 1990's,it was found that the pressure was over evaluated for coal 3# of Lower Permian Shanxi Formation.In this study,an advanced pressure test methodology was newly developed with cased holes and extending shut-in time.Though application of this new method from 2010 to 2013,34 data wells have been tested in Luan mining area,Qinshui Basin,China.It was found that: (1)The newly developed method is an advanced technology for obtaining reliable reservoir pressure in low permeability and low pressure CBM play.(2)The reservoir pressure gradient of coal 3# in average is 4.2kPa/m in the study area,characterizing a low to ultra low pressure reservoir.Ultra low pressure gradient was found in Changcun (2.6kPa/m),Gaohe (3.3kPa/m)and Yuwu coalmines (3.7kPa/m),and low pressure gradient was obtained in Wuyang (4.7kPa/m),Licun (5.2kPa/m)and Gucheng (5.4kPa/m).These values are significantly lower than those of previously collected data from open holes in the study area Yuwu coal mine.(3)The low reservoir pressure is related to the Xin'an Spring Group,located on the eastern edge of the Qinshui Basin,which discharges reservoir groundwater to the surface hydrological system.(4)For increasing CBM production in such low to ultra low pressure reservoir in Luan mining area,reservoir protect fluid system and optimizing stimulation technologies should be developed in the near future.

Key words: Coalbed methane, Reservoir pressure, Luan mining area, Qinshui Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.2

[1]Halliburton.Coalbed Methane:The Principle and Practices[M].http://www.halliburton.com,2007:357-420.
[2]Jerrald L S,Paul S S,Richard A S.A Guide to Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering[M].Chicago:Gas Research Institute,1996:5.1-5.2.
[3]Sunil Ramaswamy.Selection of Best Drilling,Completion and Stimulation Methods for Coalbed Methane Reservoirs[D].College Station:Texas A & M University,2007:12-66.
[4][KG*5/6]Waffle C R,Tisdale1 D L,MacNeill1 C A.The Horseshoe Canyon Coals of Central Alberta:A Dry CBM Play[C]//Evansville:Eastern Section AAPG Annual Meeting,2009:1-7.
[5]Overview and Economics of Horseshoe Canyon Coalbed Methane Development[R].Calgary:Canadian National Energy Board,2007:4-8.
[6]Peter A B,Olwen Wirth,Wang Li,et al.Assessment and Development of the Dry Horseshoe Canyon CBM Play in Canada[C]//Dallas:SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,2005:9-12.
[7]Bell J.Geology Update:Alberta CBM Plays Gregory[C]//Calgary:4th Annual Coalbed Methane Symposium,2005:6-9.
[8]Shallow Nitrogen Fracturing Dimensions and Groundwater Protection[R].Calgary:Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board,2008:9-17.
[9]Li Guofu,Lei Chongli.The reason of lower coal reservoir pressure in Luan coal mining area[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2002,30(4):30-32.[李国富,雷崇利.潞安矿区煤储层压力低的原因分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2002,30(4):30-32.]
[10]Zhang Peihe.Characters of distribution and influencing factors about the reservoir pressure in Qinshui Coalfield[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2002,30(6):31-32.[张培河.沁水煤田煤储层压力分布特征及影响因素分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2002,30(6):31-32.]
[11]Zhang Yanqing,Tang Shuheng.Research on coal reservoir pressure of some mine areas in north China[J].Acta Geoscientia Sinica,2001,22(2):1-4.[张延庆,唐书恒.华北部分矿区煤储层压力研究[J].地球学报,2001,22(2):1-4.]
[12]Zhong Lingwen.Coalbed methane pressures in China[J].National Gas Industry,2003,23(5):132-134.[钟玲文.中国煤储层压力特征[J].天然气工业,2003,23(5):132-134.]
[13]Cao Yunxing,Chai Xuezhou,Ni Xiaoming,et al.Development and Application of New Stimulation Technology for Reservoir Protection in Luan Coal Mining Area[M].Jiaozuo:Henan Polytechnic University,2012:9-29.[曹运兴,柴学周,倪小明,等.潞安矿区煤层气井储层保护压裂增产开发工艺技术研究[R].焦作:河南理工大学,2012:9-29.]
[14]Cao Yunxing,Chai Xuezhou,et al.Evaluation and Classification of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs in Luan Mining Area[M].Jiaozhou:Henan Polytechnic University,2015:9-29.[曹运兴,柴学周,等.潞安矿区煤层气开发地质条件评价与区块划分[M].焦作:河南理工大学,2015:9-29.]
[15]Tian Lin,Cao Yunxing,Chai Xuezhou,et al.Best practice for the determination of low-pressure/permeability coalbed methane reservoirs,Yuwu Coal Mine,Luan mining area,China[J].Fuel,2015,160:100-107.
[16]China National Coal Association.GB/T 24504-2009 the Method of Injection/Falloff  Test for Coalbed Methane Well[S].Beijing:Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic China,2009:1-5.[中国煤炭工业协会.GB/T 24504-2009煤层气井注入/压降试井方法[S].北京:中国国家标准化管理委员会,2009:1-5.]
[17]Rodvelt G,Oestreich R.Best Practices for Obtaining Quality Permeability Data with CBM Matrix Injection-Falloff Testing[C].Tuscaloosa:International Coalbed and Shale Gas Symposium,2008:1-12.
[18]Jing Xingpeng.Study on pressure distribution law and control factors of coalbed methane reservoir in south part of Qinshui Basin[J].Coal Science and Technology,2012,40(2):116-120.[景兴鹏.沁水盆地南部储层压力分布规律和控制因素研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2012,40(2):116-120.]
[19]Liu Limin,Su Xianbo,Li Jinhai.The characteristics and formation mechanism of coalbed methane reservoir pressure in Henan[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2009,37(5):23-27.[刘丽民,苏现波,李金海.河南省煤层气储层压力特征及其形成机制[J].煤田地质与勘探,2009,37(5):23-27.]
[20]Ye Jianping,Qin Yong,Lin Dayang.Coalbed Methane Resources of China[M].Xuzhou:China University of Mining & Technology Press,1998:113-116.[叶建平,秦勇,林大扬.中国煤层气资源[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1998:13-116.]
[21]Meng Zhaoping,Tian Yongdong.Theory and Method of Coalbed Methane Development Geology[M].Beijing:Science Press,2010:118-123.[孟召平,田永东.煤层气开发地质学理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:118-123.]
[22]Gao Wanxing,Zhang Junsheng.Research on pressure distribution law and affecting factors in No.3 coal reservoir seam of gaohe coal mine[J].Coal,2014,176(23):3-6.[高万兴,张军胜.高河3号煤储层压力分布规律及影响因素研究[J].煤,2014,176(23):3-6.]
[23]Zhang Peihe.Characteristics of main reservoir parameters influencing CBM development in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(6):880-884.[张培河.影响我国煤层气可采性主要储层参数特征[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(6):880-884.]
[24]Liu Shimin,Harpalani S.Permeability prediction of coalbed methane reservoirs during primary depletion[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2012,113:1-10.
[25]Liu Honglin,Wang Bo,Wang Feng,et al.Ground stress characteristics and prediction of high productivity zones in south of Qinshui Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(6):885-890.[刘洪林,王勃,王烽,等.沁水盆地南部地应力特征及高产区带预测[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(6):885-890.]

[1] 陈立超, 王生维, . 煤岩弹性力学性质与煤层破裂压力关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 503-511.
[2] 许耀波, 朱玉双, 张培河. 沁水盆地赵庄井田煤层气产出特征及其影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 119-125.
[3] 吴丛丛, 杨兆彪, 孙晗森, 张争光, 李庚, 彭辉. 云南恩洪向斜西南区垂向流体能量特征及有序开发建议[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1205-1214.
[4] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[5] 毛港涛, 赖枫鹏, 木卡旦斯·阿克木江, 蒋志宇. 沁水盆地赵庄井田煤层气储层水锁伤害影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1647-1655.
[6] 杨晓盈, 李永臣, 朱文涛, 黄纪勇, 单永乐, 张强. 贵州煤层气高产主控因素及甜点区综合评价模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1664-1671.
[7] 单衍胜,毕彩芹,迟焕鹏,王福国,李惠. 六盘水地区杨梅树向斜煤层气地质特征与有利开发层段优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 122-129.
[8] 赵一民,陈强,常锁亮,田忠斌,桂文华. 基于边界要素二分的煤层气封存单元分类与评估[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 130-139.
[9] 张洲,王生维,周敏. 基于构造裂隙填图技术的煤储层裂隙发育特征预测与验证[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1356-1362.
[10] 王玫珠,王勃,孙粉锦,赵洋,丛连铸,杨焦生,于荣泽,罗金洋,周红梅. 沁水盆地煤层气富集高产区定量评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1108-1114.
[11] 郭广山,柳迎红,张苗,吕玉民. 沁水盆地柿庄南区块排采水特征及其对煤层气富集的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1115-1125.
[12] 马东民,李沛,张辉,李卫波,杨甫. 长焰煤中镜煤与暗煤吸附/解吸特征对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 852-862.
[13] 林玉祥,舒永,赵承锦,李夏,张春荣. 沁水盆地含煤地层天然气统筹勘探方法及有利区预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 744-754.
[14] 朱学申,梁建设,柳迎红,王存武,廖夏,郭广山,吕玉民. 煤层气井产水影响因素及类型研究——以沁冰盆地柿庄南区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 755-760.
[15] 倪小明, 李志恒,王延斌,吴建光. 沁水盆地中部断层发育区煤层气开发有利块段优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 602-610.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 付广;王剑秦. 地壳抬升对油气藏保存条件的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 18 -23 .
[2] 周兴熙;. 库车油气系统油气藏相态分布及其控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(3): 205 -213 .
[3] 胡守志,付晓文,王廷栋,李延均 . 储层中的沥青沉淀带及其对油气勘探的意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(1): 99 -103 .
[4] 张顺存,;王凌;石新璞;方琳浩,;董文举,;孔玉华 . 准噶尔盆地腹部陆西地区石炭系火山岩储层的物性特征及其与电性的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(2): 198 -203 .
[5] 吴时国;袁圣强;. 世界深水油气勘探进展与我国南海深水油气前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(6): 693 -699 .
[6] 朱小燕;孙卫;李建霆;刘宏义;李爱琴;刘一仓;田随良;胡建基 . 陇东城壕—南梁地区长6储层特征研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(6): 903 -907 .
[7] 张朝;张廷山;魏祥峰;戴传瑞;王秀林 . 也门X区块下白垩统沉积相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(06): 835 -839 .
[8] 陈凤喜 王勇 张吉 杨勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田盒8气藏开发有利区块优选研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 94 -99 .
[9] 成永生 陈松岭. 南堡凹陷外围地区古生界地层油气成藏分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 108 -112 .
[10] 白斌, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 翟文亮, 刘柳红, 戴朝成, 张健, 杜红权, 毛治国. 利用露头、自然伽玛、岩石地球化学和测井地震一体化综合厘定层序界面——以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(1): 78 -86 .