天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地震旦系、寒武系烃源岩特征、资源潜力与勘探方向

魏国齐1,2,王志宏1,2,李剑1,2,杨威1,2,谢增业1,2   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院,河北 廊坊 065007;
    2.中国石油天然气集团公司天然气成藏与开发重点实验室,河北 廊坊 065007
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-11 修回日期:2016-10-25 出版日期:2017-01-10 发布日期:2017-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 王志宏(1976-),男,河北鹿泉人,高级工程师,主要从事天然气地质综合研究. E-mail:wangzhihong69@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 作者简介:魏国齐(1964-),男,河北乐亭人,教授级高级工程师,博士,主要从事天然气地质研究. E-mail:weigq@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(编号:2016ZX05007);中国石油天然气股份公司重点科技项目(编号:2016B-0600)联合资助.

Characteristics of source rocks,resource potential and exploration direction of Sinian and Cambrian in Sichuan Basin

Wei Guo-qi1,2,Wang Zhi-hong1,2,Li Jian1,2,Yang Wei1,2,Xie Zeng-ye1,2   

  1. 1.Langfang Branch,Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Langfang 065007,China;
    2.CNPC Key Laboratory of Gas Reservoir Formation and Development,Langfang 065007,China
  • Received:2016-01-11 Revised:2016-10-25 Online:2017-01-10 Published:2017-01-10

摘要:

2013年四川盆地川中地区震旦系_寒武系发现了安岳特大型气田,储量规模达万亿立方米,在全球古老地层天然气勘探中尚属首次。气源研究认为,震旦系天然气来源于震旦系和寒武系烃源岩,开展震旦系及寒武系古老烃源岩系统研究,对全球古老地层油气地质领域具有重要的科学和实践意义。通过对四川盆地震旦系、寒武系钻井资料和野外剖面观察,利用28 000km地震资料解释结果和新钻井资料,结合2 315样次烃源岩地球化学分析,系统研究了下寒武统优质烃源岩中心,主要沿绵竹_长宁克拉通内裂陷分布,累计厚度可达200~450m,其他地区烃源岩厚度为50~100m,裂陷范围内烃源岩对震旦系_寒武系天然气资源贡献约占全盆地的56%~63%;系统评价了震旦系灯影组灯三段泥质烃源岩及其分布,TOC含量介于0.04%~4.73%之间,平均为0.65%,川中地区厚度在10~30m之间;首次系统研究了能够形成大气田的中国最古老震旦系烃源岩,大川中地区震旦系烃源岩总生气强度为(15~28)×108m3/km2,具备形成大气田的气源条件。采用成因法、类比法重新评价全盆地震旦系、寒武系天然气资源量为(4.65~5.58)×1012m3,天然气资源潜力巨大。川中区块天然气资源量约占全盆地总资源量的66%,是当前勘探的首选。

关键词: 烃源岩, 资源潜力, 震旦系, 寒武系, 四川盆地

Abstract:

The Anyue giant gasfield was discovered in the Sinian-Cambrian Central Sichuan region of the Sichuan Basin in 2013,with geological reserves up to 1×1012m3,which is the first time for the exploration of natural gas paleo-reservoirs in the world.The gas source studies suggest that the Sinian natural gas is originated from the Sinian and Cambrian hydrocarbon source rocks,and the systematical study on the Sinian and Cambrian ancient source rocks has important scientific and practical significance for the global oil and gas geologic domain of the ancient stratum.Based on the drilling data and field profile observation of Sinian and Cambrian in Sichuan Basin,with adoption of the interpretation data of 28 000 km-seismic and new drilling data,combined with geochemical analysis of source rocks of 2 315 samples,this paper systematically studied the high quality hydrocarbon source rock center,where the source rocks are mainly distributed along the Mianzhu-Changning craton inner rift,with a accumulative thickness reaching 200-450m,and 50-100m for the thickness of source rocks in other areas.The hydrocarbon source rocks of the Sinian-Cambrian contributed about 56%-63% of natural gas resources of the whole basin.Systematical evaluations have been conducted to the mudstone source rocks and their distribution in the Ⅲ-section of Sinian Dengying Formation,where TOC value is ranging from 0.04% to 4.73%,with an average of 0.65%.The thickness of the source rocks in central Sichuan region is ranging from 10 to 30 m.The oldest Sinian source rocks that can form large gasfields in China were systematically studied for the first time,and the total gas production intensity of the Sinian source rocks in the great central Sichuan region is (15-28)×108m3/km2,where the gas source conditions for the formation of large gasfields are available.By using the genetic method and analogy method,the amount of natural gas resources of the Sinian-Cambrian in the basin are re-evaluated as (4.65-5.58)×1012m3,and the resources potential of natural gas is huge.The amount of natural gas resources in the central Sichuan block accounts for about 66% of the total basin resources,which is the preferred selection for current exploration.

Key words: Source rocks, Resource potential, Sinian, Cambrian, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.2

[1]Xu Yongchang,Shen Ping,Li Yucheng.The oldest gas pool of China-Weiyuan Sinian gas pool,Sichuan Province[J].Acta Sedmentolohica Sinica,1989,7(4):3-12.[徐永昌,沈平,李玉成.中国最古老的气藏_四川威远震旦纪气藏[J].沉积学报,1989,7(4):3-12.]
[2]Chen Wenzheng.Discussing again on the source of Sinian gas pool in Weiyuan Gasfield in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,1992,12(6):28-32.[陈文正.再论四川盆地威远震旦系气藏的气源[J].天然气工业,1992,12(6):28-32.]
[3]Huang Jizhong,Chen Shengji.Hydrocarbon source analysis of Sinian gas reservoir forming conditions of Sichuan Basin:A case history of Weiyuan Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,1993,4(4):16-20.[黄籍中,陈盛吉.四川盆地震旦系气藏形成的烃源地化条件分析:以威远气田为例[J].天然气地球科学,1993,4(4):16-20.]
[4]Dai Jinxing.Pool-forming periods and gas sources of Weiyuan Gasfield[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2003,25(5):473-479.[戴金星.威远气田成藏期及气源[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(5):473-479.]
[5]Yao Jianjun,Chen Mengjin,Hua Aigang,et al.Formation of the gas reservoirs of the Leshan-Longnvsi Sinian palaeo-uplift in central Sichuan[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(4):7-9.[姚建军,陈孟晋,华爱刚,等.川中乐山_龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏条件分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(4):7-9.]
[6]Wei Guoqi,Shen Ping,Yang Wei,et al.Formation conditions and exploration prospects of Sinian large gasfields,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(2):129-138.[魏国齐,沈平,杨威,等.四川盆地震旦系大气田形成条件与勘探远景区[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):129-138.]
[7]Du Jinhu,Zou Caineng,Xu Chunchun,et al.Theoretical and technical innovations in strategic discovery of a giant gas field in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of central Sichuan paleo-uplift,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):268-277.[杜金虎,邹才能,徐春春,等.川中古隆起龙王庙组特大型气田战略发现与理论技术创新[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):268-277.]
[8]Zou Caineng,Du Jinhu,Xu Chunchun,et al.Formation,distribution,resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):278-293.[邹才能,杜金虎,徐春春,等.四川盆地震旦系_寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力与勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):278-293.]
[9]Wei Guoqi,Xie Zengye,Bai Guilin,et al.Organic geochemical characteristics and origin of natural gas in the Sinian-Lower Paleozoic reservoirs,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):44-49.[魏国齐,谢增业,白贵林,等.四川盆地震旦系_下古生界天然气地球化学特征及成因判识[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):44-49.]
[10]Wei Guoqi,Xie Zengye,Song Jiarong,et al.Features and origin of natural gas in the Sinian-Cambrian of central Sichuan paleo-uplift,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):702-711.[魏国齐,谢增业,宋家荣,等.四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系—寒武系天然气特征及成因[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):702-711.]
[11]Wei Guoqi,Yang Wei,Xie Wuren,et al.Formation conditions,accumulation models and exploration direction of large gas fields in Sinian-Cambrian,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(5):785-795.[魏国齐,杨威,谢武仁,等.四川盆地震旦系_寒武系大气田形成条件、成藏模式与勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(5):785-795.]
[12]Xu Chunchun,Shen Ping,Yang Yueming,et al.Accumulation conditions and enrichment patterns of natural gas in the Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao formation reservoirs of the Leshan-Longnvsi Paleohigh,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):1-7.[徐春春,沈平,杨跃明,等.乐山_龙女寺古隆起震旦系_下寒武统龙王庙组天然气成藏条件与富集规律[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):1-7.]
[13]Yang Yueming,Wen Long,Luo Bing,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation of Sinian natural gas reservoirs,Leshan-Longnüsi paleohigh,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):179-188.[杨跃明,文龙,罗冰,等.四川盆地乐山—龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):179-188.]
[14]Wei Guoqi,Yang Wei,Du Jinhu,et al.Geological characteristics of the Sinian-Early Cambrian intracratonic rift,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(1):24-35.[魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等.四川盆地震旦纪-早寒武世克拉通内裂陷地质特征[J].天然气工业,2015,35(1):24-35.]
[15]Wei Guoqi,Yang Wei,Du Jinhu,et al.Tectonic features of Gaoshiti-Moxi paleo-uplift and its controls on the formation of a giant gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):257-265.[魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等.四川盆地高石梯—磨溪古隆起构造特征及对特大型气田形成的控制作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):257-265.]
[16]Li Ling,Wang Tongshan,Wang Zecheng,et al.The characteristics and implications of late gas accumulation in the Sinian Dengying Formation of Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(9):1378-1386.[李玲,王铜山,汪泽成,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组天然气晚期成藏特征及意义[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(9):1378-1386.]
[17]Tian Xingwang,Hu Guoyi,Li Wei,et al.Geochemical Characteristics and significance of Sinian reservoir bitumen in Leshan-Longnvsi paleo-uplift area,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(5):982-990.[田兴旺,胡国艺,李伟,等.四川盆地乐山_龙女寺古隆起地区震旦系储层沥青地球化学特征及意义[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(5):982-990.]
[18]Feng Guoxiu,Chen Shengji.Relationship between the reflectance of bitumen and vitrinite in rock[J].Natural Gas Industry,1988,8(8):20-25.[丰国秀,陈盛吉.岩石中沥青反射率与镜质体反射率之间的关系[J].天然气工业,1988,8(8):20-25.]
[19]Yin Jicheng,Ding Lianfang,He Tinggui,et al.On the Sinian-Cambrian boundary in Emei county,Sichuan[J].Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,1980,2(1):59-74.[殷继成,丁莲芳,何廷贵,等.四川峨眉高桥震旦系—寒武系界线[J].中国地质科学院院报,1980,2(1):59-74.]
[20]Chen Menge.The new knowledge of the fossil assemblages form maidiping section,Emei county,Sichuan with reference to the Sinian-Cambrian boundary[J].Chinese Journal of Geology:Sciential Geologica Sinica,1982(3):253-261.[陈孟莪.四川峨眉麦地坪剖面震旦系_寒武系界线的新认识及有关化石群的记述[J].地质科学,1982(3):253-261.]
[21]Liu Shugen,Sun Wei,Luo Zhili,et al.Xingkai taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian strata in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(5):511-521.[刘树根,孙玮,罗志立,等.兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(5):511-521.]
[22]Wang Zecheng,Jiang Hua,Wang Tongshan,et al.Paleo-geomorphology formed during Tongwan tectonization in Sichuan Basin and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):305-312.[汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):305-312.]
[23]Jiang Hua,Wang Zecheng,Du Hongyu,et al.Tectonic evolution of the Leshan-Longnvsi paleo-uplift and reservoir formation of Neoproterozoic Sinian gas[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):192-200.[姜华,汪泽成,杜宏宇,等.乐山_龙女寺古隆起构造演化与新元古界震旦系天然气成藏[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):192-200.]
[24]Li Jian,Liu Chenglin,Xie Zengye,et al.Natural Gas Resource Evaluation[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:41-63.[李剑,刘成林,谢增业,等.天然气资源评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:41-63.]
[25]He Lijuan,Xu Hehua,Wang Jiyang,et al.Thermal evolution and dynamic mechanism of the Sichuan Basin during the Early Permian-Middle Triassic[J].Science China Earth Science,2011,41(12):1884-1891.[何丽娟,许鹤华,汪集旸.早二叠世_中三叠世四川盆地热演化及其动力学机制[J].中国科学:地球科学版,2011,41(12):1884-1891.]
[26]Rao Song,Zhu Chuanqing,Wang Qiang,et al.Thermal evolution patterns of the Sinian-Lower Paleozoic source rocks in the Sichuan Basin,southwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2013,56(5):1549-1559.[饶松,朱传庆,王强,等.四川盆地震旦系_下古生界烃源岩热演化模式及主控因素[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(5):1549-1559.]
[27]Richardson N J,Densmore A L,Seward D,et al.Extraordinary denudation in the Sichuan Basin:Insights from low-temperature thermochronology adjacent to the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2008,113(B044094):1-23.
[28]Zhang B,Zhao Z,Zhang S C,et al.Discussion on marine source rocks thermal evolvement patterns in the Tarim basin and Sichuan basin,west China[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2007,52(S1):141-149.
[29]Li Jian,Hu Guoyi,Xie Zengye,et al.Physical and Chemical Simulation of Gas Accumulation in Large and Medium Gas Fields in China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2001:154-157.[李剑,胡国艺,谢增业,等.中国大中型气田天然气成藏物理化学模拟研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:154-157.]

[1] 傅宁,刘建升. 北部湾盆地流二段3类烃源岩的生烃成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 932-941.
[2] 马安来,朱翠山,顾忆,李慧莉. 塔中地区中深1C井寒武系原油低聚硫代金刚烷含量分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1009-1019.
[3] 贾智彬,侯读杰,孙德强,姜玉涵,张自鸣,洪梅. 贵州地区牛蹄塘组底部烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1031-1041.
[4] 朱光有,曹颖辉,闫磊,杨海军,孙崇浩,张志遥,李婷婷,陈永权. 塔里木盆地8 000m以深超深层海相油气勘探潜力与方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 755-772.
[5] 曹颖辉,李洪辉,闫磊,王洪江,张君龙,杨敏,赵一民. 塔里木盆地满西地区寒武系台缘带分段演化特征及其对生储盖组合的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 796-806.
[6] 闫磊,李洪辉,曹颖辉,杨敏,赵一民. 塔里木盆地满西地区寒武系台缘带演化及其分段特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 807-816.
[7] 邱 振,邹才能,李熙喆,王红岩,董大忠,卢斌,周尚文,施振生,冯子齐,张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[8] 程志强,王飞宇,师玉雷,冯伟平,谢佩宇,任利兵,吴子强,江涛,赵志刚. 二连盆地乌里雅斯太凹陷南洼烃源岩有机相与生烃特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 696-707.
[9] 龙胜祥,冯动军,李凤霞,杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[10] 申宝剑,秦建中,腾格尔,潘安阳,仰云峰,边立曾. 中国南方海相烃源岩中细菌状化石识别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 510-517.
[11] 贺领兄,宋维刚,安生婷,徐永锋,沈娟,路超,王军. 青海东昆仑地区八宝山盆地烃源岩有机地球化学特征与页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 538-549.
[12] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[13] 杨飞,蒲秀刚,姜文亚,韩文中,张伟,时战楠,林常梅. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段细粒相区有机地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 550-558.
[14] 马达德, 袁莉, 陈琰, 周飞, 吴志雄, 雷涛, 朱军. 柴达木盆地北缘天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1486-1496.
[15] 朱华, 杨光, 苑保国, 应丹琳, 戴鑫, 周红飞, 徐世琦, 谈健康. 四川盆地常规天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1475-1485.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚泾利,王程程,陈娟萍,高岗,王飞雁,李晓凤,李佳烨,刘岩. 鄂尔多斯盆地马家沟组盐下碳酸盐岩烃源岩分布特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2115 -2126 .
[2] 杨振恒,魏志红,何文斌,范明,俞凌杰,徐二社,钱门辉. 川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩现场解吸气特征及其意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 156 -163 .
[3] 杨晓东,张苗,魏巍,李娟,傅雪海. 沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层孔隙特征对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 356 -365 .
[4] 邹才能, 赵群, 董大忠, 杨智, 邱振, 梁峰, 王南, 黄勇, 端安详, 张琴, 胡志明. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1781 -1796 .
[5] 钱凯,孙晓惠,许小琼,韩荣花,范云,魏星,昌新玲,任珠琳,崔亚亚. 下印度河盆地石油地质、油气分布及油气富集区特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1797 -1809 .
[6] 鲁新川,安永福,夏维民,胡子见,张顺存,史基安. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系三工河组沉积微相特征及对储层的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1810 -1820 .
[7] 杨志冬. 准噶尔盆地红山嘴油田红153井区二叠系夏子街组砂砾岩储层特征及影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1829 -1838 .
[8] 郭佳佳,孙国强,龙国徽,管斌,康健,夏维民,陈波,史基安. 柴达木盆地北缘冷湖五号构造下侏罗统沉积—成岩环境分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1839 -1845 .
[9] 罗情勇,郝婧玥,李可文,戴娜,栾进华,程礼军,张志平,胡科,钟宁宁. 重庆地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩笔石光学特征及其在成熟度评价中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1855 -1863 .
[10] 郭潇潇,徐新德,熊小峰,侯静娴,刘海钰. 莺歌海盆地中深层天然气成藏特征与有利勘探领域[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1864 -1872 .