基于误差分析的ΔLogR技术在长岭龙凤山烃源岩评价中的应用

doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.10.1869

天然气地球科学

基于误差分析的ΔLogR技术在长岭龙凤山烃源岩评价中的应用

许娟娟¹，蒋有录¹，朱建峰²

1.中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院，山东青岛 266580；
2.中国石化东北油气分公司勘探开发研究院，吉林长春 130062

收稿日期:2016-02-03 修回日期:2016-04-13 出版日期:2016-10-10 发布日期:2016-10-10
作者简介:许娟娟(1989-)，女，山东滨州人，硕士研究生，主要从事油气成藏研究. E-mail:〖WTBZ〗xujuanjuan0418@163.com.
基金资助:
中国石化东北油气分公司项目(编号：34500000-14-ZC0607-0035)资助.

The application of ΔLogR technology based on the error analysis for source rock evaluation in Longfengshan Sag,Changling Faulted Depression

Xu Juan-juan¹，Jiang You-lu¹，Zhu Jian-feng²

1.School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum,Qingdao 266580,China;
2.Exploration and Development Research Institute,Northeast Oil and Gas Branch,SINOPEC,Changchun 130062,China

Received:2016-02-03 Revised:2016-04-13 Online:2016-10-10 Published:2016-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长岭断陷龙凤山次凹下白垩统烃源岩埋藏深，取心井分析资料少，利用常规的烃源岩有机地球化学分析难以表征烃源岩段有机碳的分布特征。以现有取心井样品分析化验资料为基础，利用ΔLogR技术可以对烃源岩有机碳含量进行精细刻画。传统ΔLogR模型在基线值、叠合系数确定等方面存在主观性大、具有区域适用性等问题，因此利用改进的ΔLogR模型及最优K值分析ΔLogR与实测有机碳含量之间的关系，减小计算误差。但是在两者的趋势之外仍存在许多异常点，这些异常点所产生的误差大大降低了计算有机碳含量的准确性。通过综合研究发现，烃源岩层段异常点存在的原因主要包括扩径、薄夹层及数据分析3个方面。异常点的剔除，能有效改善ΔLogR模型计算有机碳含量的精度，使计算结果与实测值相关系数R²达80%以上，能够客观反映烃源岩层有机碳含量。应用结果显示，龙凤山次凹下白垩统沙河子组为主力烃源岩层系，有机碳含量主要集中在1.0%~3.0%之间，营城组下部为次要烃源岩层系，有机碳含量较低，主要集中在0.6%~1.0%之间。

关键词: 龙凤山次凹, 烃源岩, ΔLogR, 有机碳, 异常点

Abstract: It is difficult to characterize organic carbon distribution of source rock by conventional organic geochemical methods for faulted strata in Longfengshan Sag,Changling Faulted Depression,since the burial depth of source rocks is deep and cored wells analysis data is few.Based on cored wells analysis data,organic carbon content of source rock can be described using ΔLogR technology.There are many problems,such as subjectivity and regional applicability of baseline value,the composite coefficient.As a result,the relationship between ΔLogR and the organic carbon content can be analyzed using improved ΔLogR model and optimal K and it can reduce the calculation error.However,there are many outliers in logging evaluation model of source rocks and the reason for outliers include diameter extension,thin interbed and data analysis.By removing outliers,empirical formula for quantitative calculation of organic carbon can be obtained.The coincidence rate between calculated and measured values is up to 80% and the result can objectively reflect the organic carbon content of source rock.Results show Shahezi Formation is the main source rock,with organic carbon content ranged from 1.0%-3.0%,and lower part of Yingcheng Formation is the secondary source rock,with organic carbon content ranged from 0.6%-1.0%.

Key words: Longfengshan Sag, Source rocks, ΔLogR, Organic carbon, Outlier

中图分类号:

TE132

许娟娟, 蒋有录, 朱建峰. 基于误差分析的ΔLogR技术在长岭龙凤山烃源岩评价中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(10): 1869–1877.

Xu Juan-juan, Jiang You-lu, Zhu Jian-feng. The application of ΔLogR technology based on the error analysis for source rock evaluation in Longfengshan Sag,Changling Faulted Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(10): 1869–1877.

参考文献

[1]Yang Taotao,Fan Guozhang,Lü Fuliang,et al.The logging features and identification mathods of source rock[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):414-422.[杨涛涛,范国章,吕福亮,等.烃源岩测井响应特征及识别评价方法[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):414-422.]
[2]Schmoker J W,Hester T C.Organic carbon in Bakken Formation,United States portion of Williston Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1983,67(12):2165-2174.
[3]Meyer B L,Nederlof M H.Identification of source rocks on wireline logs by density/resistivity and sonic transit time/resistivity crossplots[J].AAPG Bulletin,1984,68(2):121-129.
[4]Wang Guiwen,Zhu Zhenyu.Logging identification and evaluation of source rocks[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2002,29(4):50-52.[王贵文,朱振宇.烃源岩测井识别[HJ2mm]与评价方法研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(4):50-52.]
[5]Hu Huiting,Lu Shuangfang,Liu Chao,et al.Models for calculating organic carbon content from logging information:Camparison and analysis[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2011,29(6):1199-1203.[胡慧婷,卢双舫,刘超,等.测井资料计算源岩有机碳含量模型对比及分析[J].沉积学报，2011,29(6):1199-1203.]
[6]Liu Chao,Lu Shuangfang,Xue Haitao.Variable-coefficient ΔLogR models and its application in shale organic evalution[J].Progress in Geophysics,2014,29(1):312-317.[刘超,卢双舫,薛海涛.变系数ΔlogR方法及其在泥页岩有机质评价中的应用[J].地球物理学进展，2014,29(1):312-317.]
[7]Jin Tao,Gao Risheng,Gao Caixia,et al.Suggestion of exploration prospect in Raoyang Sag of Jizhong Depression from the logging evaluation results of source rock [J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(3):406-412.[金涛,高日胜,高彩霞,等.从烃源岩测井评价结果看冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷勘探前景[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(3):406-412.]
[8]Wang Zongli,Li Jun,Luo Qiang,et al.Fine evaluation of source rock with logging data in Langgu Sag of Jizhong Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(3):430-437.[王宗礼,李君,罗强,等.利用测井资料精细评价冀中坳陷廊固凹陷烃源岩[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(3):430-437.]
[9]Zan Ling,Zhang Zhihuan,Huang Junping,et al.Geochemical characteristics of natural gas and its originin Changling Fault Depression of Songliao Basin,northeastern China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(2):331-337.[昝灵,张枝焕,黄军平,等.松辽盆地长岭断陷天然气地球化学特征及气源分析[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(2):331-337.]
[10]Li Yilong,Jia Ailin,He Dongbo,et al.Early Cretaceous sedimentary systems and depositional process during the period of transition from faulted depression to sag,Changling Faulted Depression,Songliao Basin [J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(5):709-720.[李易隆,贾爱林,何东博,等.松辽盆地长岭断陷早白垩世断坳转换期沉积体系特征与演化过程[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(5):709-720.]
[11]Zhang Zhiwei,Zhang Longhai.Amethod of source rock evaluation by well-logging and its application result[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2000,27(3):84-87.[张志伟,张龙海.测井评价烃源岩的方法及其应用效果[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(3):84-87.]
[12]Guo Zeqing,Sun Ping,Liu Weihong.The carbon calculation by ΔlogR technology in Sanhu area of Qaidam Basin[J].Progress in Geophys,2012,27(2):626-633.[郭泽清,孙平,刘卫红.利用ΔlogR技术计算柴达木盆地三湖地区第四系有机碳[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(2):626-633.]
[13]Chen Ketong,Lu Xuesong,Liu Hua,et al.TOC calculation and the screening of favorable layers in the marine mud shale in the Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(5):942-950.[陈柯童,鲁雪松,刘华,等.塔里木盆地海相泥页岩TOC计算及有利层段筛选[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(5):942-950.]
[14]Passey Q R,Creaney S,Kulla J B,et al.Apracticial model for originic richness from porosity and resistivity logs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(12):1777-1794.
[15]Yang Shaochun,Wang Na,Li Mingrui,et al.The logging evalution of source rocks of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Chongxin area,Ordoa Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):470-476.[杨少春，王娜，李明瑞，等.鄂尔多斯盆地崇信地区三叠系延长组烃源岩测井评价[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):470-476.]
[16]Liao Maohui.The application of multiple regression method to the calibration of the influence of holeenlargement on density and acoustic logs[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2014,38(1):174-179,184.[廖茂辉.多元回归方法校正扩径对密度曲线声波曲线的影响[J].物探与化探,2014,38(1):174-179,184.]
[17]Liu Haojie,Wang Yanguang,Wang Hui.Acoustic log moveout correction based on variation of borehole diameter[J].Geophysical prospecting for petroleum,2007,45(6):638-641.[刘浩杰,王延光,王慧.基于井径变化的声波测井时差校正[J].石油物探,2007,45(6):638-641.]
[18]Luo Donghong,Liang Wei,Feng Jin,et al.Combination correction of log data and development practice in thin reservoirs,XJ Oilfield[J].China Offshaore Oil and Gas,2012,24(5):24-28.[罗东红,梁卫,冯进,等.XJ油田薄层测井资料组合校正及开发实践[J].中国海上油气,2012,24(5):24-28.]
[19]Liu Diren,Yan Linhui,Xia Pei,et al.Response of dual lateral logging on interbeded sand-shale in horizontal well[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science& Technology Edition,2012,34(3):78-82.[刘迪仁,闫林辉,夏培,等.水平井中砂泥岩互层的双侧向测井响应研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版， 2012,34(3):78-82.]

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于误差分析的ΔLogR技术在长岭龙凤山烃源岩评价中的应用

The application of ΔLogR technology based on the error analysis for source rock evaluation in Longfengshan Sag,Changling Faulted Depression

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	崔景伟, 朱如凯, 李森, 齐亚林, 时晓章, 毛治国, . 坳陷湖盆烃源岩发育样式及其对石油聚集的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 982-996.
[2]	杨帆, 宋永, 陈洪, 龚德瑜, 卞保力, 刘海磊. 准噶尔盆地阜东地区石炭系松喀尔苏组烃源岩评价及气源对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1018-1026.
[3]	吴海, 严少怀, 赵孟军, 卓勤功, 王龙, 白东来, 张月, 沙威. 库车前陆盆地东西部油气成藏过程差异性分析——以吐北1和迪那2构造为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1027-1036.
[4]	吴小奇, 倪春华, 陈迎宾, 朱建辉, 李贶, 曾华盛. 鄂尔多斯盆地定北地区上古生界天然气来源[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 819-827.
[5]	唐友军, 杨易卓, 孟宪新, 王霆, 何大祥, 李梦茹, 季长军, 孙鹏, 蔡意兰. 火山活动对南羌塘盆地曲色组烃源岩地球化学特征影响探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 721-728.
[6]	王伟锋, 张仲达. 准噶尔盆地五彩湾地区石炭系烃源岩演化及油气成藏过程[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 447-455.
[7]	唐友军, 郑磊, 李永飞, 郜晓勇, 宗文明, 孙求实, 何大祥. 凌源—宁城盆地牛营子坳陷侏罗系海房沟组烃源岩芳烃地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 433-446.
[8]	刘树根, 孙玮, 宋金民, 雍自权, 王浩, 赵聪. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组天然气勘探的关键地质问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 151-167.
[9]	张帆, 冉清昌, 吴玉明, 任志高. 松辽盆地北部古中央隆起带天然气地球化学特征及成藏条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 126-132.
[10]	于聪, 胡国艺, 陈瑞银. 不同煤系烃源岩热解气地球化学差异及其在苏里格气田的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 133-142.
[11]	傅宁, 刘建升. 北部湾盆地流二段3类烃源岩的生烃成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 932-941.
[12]	贾智彬, 侯读杰, 孙德强, 姜玉涵, 张自鸣, 洪梅. 贵州地区牛蹄塘组底部烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1031-1041.
[13]	程志强，王飞宇，师玉雷，冯伟平，谢佩宇，任利兵，吴子强,江涛，赵志刚. 二连盆地乌里雅斯太凹陷南洼烃源岩有机相与生烃特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 696-707.
[14]	申宝剑，秦建中，腾格尔，潘安阳，仰云峰，边立曾. 中国南方海相烃源岩中细菌状化石识别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 510-517.
[15]	邢舟,曹高社，毕景豪，周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.