天然气地球科学

• 天然气开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

页岩凝析气井生产数据分析新方法

徐兵祥   

  1. 中海油研究总院新能源研究中心,北京 100028
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-09 修回日期:2015-08-04 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2016-05-10
  • 作者简介:徐兵祥(1985-),男,安徽望江人,工程师,博士,主要从事页岩气、煤层气等非常规油气开发研究. E-mail:xubingxiang8526@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    中海石油(中国)有限公司科技项目(编号:YXKY-2016-ZY-03);能源行业页岩气标准化技术委员会2015年标准研究项目(编号:页研-2015020007)资助.

New production data analysis technique for gas condensate well in shale reservoirs

Xu Bing-xiang   

  1. New Energy Research Center,CNOOC Research Institute,Beijing 100028,China
  • Received:2015-06-09 Revised:2015-08-04 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2016-05-10

摘要: 生产数据分析方法在页岩气动态分析中应用广泛,常作为储层及裂缝参数反演、产量预测的重要技术手段。目前该方法多用于分析页岩干气情况,仅适用于单相流,对于凝析气来说,地层会出现油气两相流导致方法不适用。基于此,从油气两相渗流方程出发,兼顾页岩气和凝析气特点,建立页岩凝析气井两相拟压力、拟时间解析模型,给出该类井特征曲线分析方法和流程,该方法经数值模型验证可提高裂缝长度计算精度,减小误差22%。提出的方法同样适用于页岩挥发油井,此时分析对象变成产油量,模型参数做略微调整即可。

关键词: 页岩, 凝析气井, 生产数据分析, 线性流, 拟压力, 拟时间

Abstract: Production data analysis technique (PDA) is commonly used in shale gas reservoir as an effective tool to estimate the reservoir parameters and predict production.Presently this technique is usually applied in dry gas shale reservoir since it is only applicable to single-phase flow cases.For shale gas condensate reservoir,two-phase flow occurs and exists in formation when the pressure is below the dew point pressure,making the present PDA technique not applicable in these cases.Based on this,an analytical model with two-phase pseudo-pressure and pseudo-time for shale gas condensate wells was derived from the fundamental oil-gas two-phase flow equations,accounting for the characteristics of both shale gas and gas condensate.The new analysis approach and procedure of specialized plot were presented and validated by numerical simulation.It is more accurate than the previous method and can reduce the error by 22% in current case.This technique is also useful forshale volatile oil wells by changing several parameters in analytical model.And the analysis object becomes oil rate rather than gas rate.

Key words: Shale, Gas condensate well, Production data analysis, Linear flow, Pseudo-pressure, Pseudo-time

中图分类号: 

  • TE33

[1]Li Jianzhong,Dong Dazhong,Chen Gengsheng,et al.Prospects and strategic position of shale gas resources in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):11-16.[李建忠,董大忠,陈更生,等.中国页岩气资源前景与战略地位[J].天然气工业,2009,29(5):11-16.]
[2]Li Changwei,Tao Shizhen,Dong Dazhong,et al.Comparison of the formation condition of shale gas between domestic and abroad and favorable areas evaluation[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(5):986-1000.[李昌伟,陶士振,董大忠,等.国内外页岩气形成条件对比与有利区优选[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(5):986-1000.]
[3]Qiu Xiaosong,Yang Bo,Hu Mingyi.Characteristics of shale reservoirs and gas content of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the middle Yangtze region[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(6):1274-1283.[邱小松,杨波,胡明毅.中扬子地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气储层及含气性特征[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(6):1274-1283.]
[4]Wattenbarger R A,El banbi A H,Villegas M E,et al.Production analysis of linear flow into fractured tight gas wells[C].SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/ Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition,Denver:Colorado,5-8 April,1998.
[5]Ibrahi M M,Wattenbarger R A.Rate dependence of transient linear flow in tight gas wells[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2006,45(10):18-20.
[6]Baihly J,Altman R,Malpani R,et al.Shale gas production decline trend comparison over time and basins[C].SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Italy:Florence,19-22 September,2010.
[7]Bello R O,Wattenbarger R A.Modelling and analysis of shale gas production with a skin effect[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2010,49(12):37-48.
[8]Nobakht M,Clarkson C R.Analysis of production data in shale gas reservoirs:Rigorous corrections for fluid and flow properties[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2012,8(8):85-98.
[9][KG*5/6]Brohi I,Pooladi-Darvish M,Aguilera R.Modeling fractured horizontal wells as dual porosity composite reservoirs-application to tight gas,shale gas and tight oil cases[C].SPE Western North American Regional Meeting,Alaska:Anchorage,7-11 May,2011.
[10]Xu Bingxiang,Haghighi M,Li Xiangfang,et al.Development of new type curves for production analysis in naturally fractured shale gas/tight gas reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2013,105(1):107-115.
[11]Xu Bingxiang,Li Xiangfang,Haghighi M,et al.Production analysis and productivity forecasting of shale gas reservoir[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2013,37(3):119-121.[徐兵祥,李相方,Haghighi M等.页岩气产量数据分析方法及产能预测[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(3):119-121.]
[12]Ai Shuang,Cheng Linsong,Huang Shijun,et al.Transient production forecasting model of multiply fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(10):1661-1667.[艾爽,程林松,黄世军,等.页岩气体积压裂水平井非稳态产能评价模型[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(10):1661-1667.]
[13]Cipolla C L,Lolon E P,Erdle J C,et al.Modeling well performance in shale-gas reservoirs[C].SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and simulation Conference,Abu Dhabi:UAE,19-21 October,2009.
[14]Lang Zhaoxin.Fluid Flow in Porous Medias[M].Dongying:Petroleum University Press,2001:53-55.[郎兆新.油气地下渗流力学[M].东营:石油大学出版社,2001:53-55.]
[15]Hagoort J.Fundamentals of gas reservoir engineering[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier Science,1988:97-100.
[16]Li Shilun.Natural Gas Reservoir Engineering[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008:153-156.[李士伦.天然气工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:153-156.]

[1] 王岚, 曾雯婷, 夏晓敏, 周海燕, 毕赫, 商斐, 周学先. 松辽盆地齐家—古龙凹陷青山口组黑色页岩岩相类型与沉积环境[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1125-1133.
[2] 郭旭光, 何文军, 杨森, 王江涛, 冯右伦, 贾希玉, 邹阳, 王霞田, 黄立良. 准噶尔盆地页岩油“甜点区”评价与关键技术应用——以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179.
[3] 陈旋, 刘小琦, 王雪纯, 马强, 刘俊田, 龚鑫, 杨小东, 石江峰, 白国娟. 三塘湖盆地芦草沟组页岩油储层形成机理及分布特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1180-1189.
[4] 刘海涛, 胡素云, 李建忠, 王居峰, 王群一 , 姜文亚, 江涛, 赵长毅 , 张春明, 吴丰成. 渤海湾断陷湖盆页岩油富集控制因素及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1190-1198.
[5] 黄东, 杨光, 杨智, 杨天泉, 白蓉, 李育聪, 戴鸿鸣. 四川盆地致密油勘探开发新认识与发展潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1212-1221.
[6] 王科, 李海涛, 李留杰, 张庆, 补成中, 王志强. 3种常用页岩气井经验递减方法——以四川盆地威远区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 946-954.
[7] 张晗. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层缝网导流能力优化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 955-962.
[8] 杨振恒, 韩志艳, 腾格尔, 熊亮, 申宝剑, 张庆珍, 史洪亮, 魏力民, 李艳芳, . 四川盆地南部五峰组—龙马溪组页岩地质甜点层特征——以威远—荣昌区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1037-1044.
[9] 苟启洋, 徐尚, 郝芳, 舒志国, 杨峰, 陆扬博, 张爱华, 王雨轩, 程璇, 青加伟, 高梦天. 基于灰色关联的页岩储层含气性综合评价因子及应用——以四川盆地焦石坝区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1045-1052.
[10] 杨娟, 王作栋, 薄海波, 张婷, 吉生军, 王静莹. 下马岭组油页岩热模拟实验抽提物中三芴系列化合物演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1063-1071.
[11] 郭芪恒, 金振奎, 耿一凯, 赵建华, 常睿, 崔学敏, 王金艺. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩中碳酸盐矿物特征及对储集性能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 616-625.
[12] 崔春兰, 董振国, 吴德山. 湖南保靖区块龙马溪组岩石力学特征及可压性评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 626-634.
[13] 王秀平, 牟传龙, 肖朝晖 , 郑斌嵩 , 陈尧 , 王启宇. 鄂西南地区五峰组—龙马溪组连续沉积特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 635-651.
[14] 谢卫东, 王猛, 代旭光, 王彦迪. 山西河东煤田中—南部煤系页岩气储层微观特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 512-525.
[15] 黄小青, 王建君, 杜悦, 李林, 张卓. 昭通国家级页岩气示范区YS108区块小井距错层开发模式探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 557-565.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李桂菊, 庄新国. 多年冻土区沉积物中甲烷的生成[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(5): 516 -518 .
[2] 黄安敏;裴建翔;陈志宏;李绪深;李林;. 油气储层预测技术在琼东南盆地BD13区的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(4): 518 -522 .
[3] 胡守志,付晓文,王廷栋,李延均 . 储层中的沥青沉淀带及其对油气勘探的意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(1): 99 -103 .
[4] 刘春慧;金振奎;朱桂芳;王庆东;张建良. . 准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系梧桐沟组储层物性特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(3): 375 -379 .
[5] 张顺存,;王凌;石新璞;方琳浩,;董文举,;孔玉华 . 准噶尔盆地腹部陆西地区石炭系火山岩储层的物性特征及其与电性的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(2): 198 -203 .
[6] 刘文汇;黄第藩;熊传武;徐永昌;. 成烃理论的发展及国外未熟―低熟油气的分布与研究现状[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(1-2): 1 -22 .
[7] 胡雄;李延钧;陈新领;江波;马立协;付晓文;王强;梁艳;. 柴北缘马海地区油气全烃地球化学特征与成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 612 -616 .
[8] 吴时国;袁圣强;. 世界深水油气勘探进展与我国南海深水油气前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(6): 693 -699 .
[9] 朱小燕;孙卫;李建霆;刘宏义;李爱琴;刘一仓;田随良;胡建基 . 陇东城壕—南梁地区长6储层特征研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(6): 903 -907 .
[10] 张朝;张廷山;魏祥峰;戴传瑞;王秀林 . 也门X区块下白垩统沉积相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(06): 835 -839 .