天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

库车坳陷北部单斜带油气充注史及成藏潜力分析

吴海，赵孟军，卓勤功，鲁雪松   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院，北京 100083；2.提高石油采收率国家重点实验室，北京 100083；
    3.中国石油天然气集团公司盆地构造与油气成藏重点实验室，北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-12 修回日期:2015-03-29 出版日期:2015-12-10 发布日期:2015-12-10
  • 作者简介:吴海(1989-)，男，湖北黄冈人，硕士，主要从事油气成藏综合研究. E-mail:wuhai2012@hotmail.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家油气重大专项(编号:2011ZX05003)；中国石油科技开发项目(编号:2014B-04)联合资助.

Hydrocarbon Accumulation Prospect and Charge History of the Northern Monocline Belt in Kuqa Depression of Tarim Basin,Western China

WU Hai，ZHAO Meng-jun，ZHUO Qin-gong，LU Xue-song   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery,Beijing 100083,China;
    3.Key Laboratory of Basin Structure and Hydrocarbon Accumulation,CNPC,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2015-02-12 Revised:2015-03-29 Online:2015-12-10 Published:2015-12-10

PDF (PC)

380

摘要：

北部单斜带是库车坳陷油气成藏研究程度最低的构造带。基于流体包裹体、定量颗粒荧光和激光拉曼等分析技术对北部单斜带的油气充注史进行详细的研究，并结合生储盖和圈闭条件对其成藏潜力进行了评价。根据其常规孔隙型储层和裂缝储层的岩心样品对比分析表明，孔隙型储层中流体包裹体主要为单相黄色荧光油包裹体，储层QGF指数都大于6,QGF-E强度都大于20pc,油气充注显示出明显的继承性特点;裂缝型储层中包裹体主要为蓝白色荧光固液气三相包裹体和气液两相包裹体，储层QGF指数、QGF-E强度和R1都显示出异常值，与孔隙型储层原油物性具有较大差异，认为储层早期(65Ma左右)经历一期油充注，晚期喜马拉雅造山运动使地层强烈褶皱产生大量裂缝，沟通了其他储层或源岩，使得晚期(10Ma左右)生成的轻质油沿裂缝网络发生一期充注，之后又经历一期(3Ma左右)气洗。研究区生储盖条件匹配良好。烃源岩演化达到主要生油阶段，部分地区的三叠系甚至达到生气阶段。储层物性致密，裂缝控制“甜点”发育，致密油气的勘探具有广阔的潜力。

关键词: 北部单斜带, 库车坳陷, 颗粒荧光, 包裹体, 充注史, 油气成藏

Abstract:

The lowest exploration level tectonic belt of Kuqa Depression is the Northern Monocline Belt.A detailed study was done to unravel the charge history of northern Monocline Belt in Kuqa Depression based on the techniques of fluid inclusion,quantitative grain fluorescence and laser Raman.By combining the characteristic of the source rock,reservoir,seal and trap we can make an evaluation of the petroleum exploration prospective play.According to the porous sand reservoir and fractured reservoir core sample analysis,the fluid inclusions in porous sand reservoir samples are single phase(liquid oil)with yellow fluorescence,the QGF index in the reservoir is generally greater than 6,QGF-E intensity is greater than 20pc,showing obvious inherited characteristic of the hydrocarbon charging,while two-phase(vapor and liquid oil)and three-phase(solid bitumen,liquid oil and vapor)fluid inclusions with blue-white fluorescence are dominant in the fractured reservoir samples and the QGF index,QGF-E intensity and R1 show outliers in them.It is concluded that the northern Monocline Belt had experienced hydrocarbon charge in three different stages.In the first stage(about 65Ma),the porous sand reservoir is charged by the immature oil,after that the study area experienced Himalayan orogeny which made the stratum fold strongly and formed a large numbers of fractures which connected other reservoirs or source rock,leading to the charge of light oil in the second stage(about 10Ma).In the third stage(about 3Ma),the fractured reservoir was flushed by the gas.The source rock,reservoir and seal in the study area match well in the vertical.Source rock has entered the stage of generating light oil,some zones even entered the stage of generating condensate or dry gas nowadays.The development of “sweet point” was controlled by fractures in the tight reservoirs in the tight reservoirs which is promising for the petroleum exploration in the northern Monocline Belt.

Key words: Northern Monocline belt, Kuqa Foreland Basin, Quantitative grain fluorescence, Fluid inclusion, Charge history, Hydrocarbon accumulation

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+2

[1]Zhao Mengjun,Lu Shuangfang.Two periods of reservoir forming and their significance for hydrocarbon distribution in Kuqa Depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(5):16-25.[赵孟军,卢双舫.库车坳陷两期成藏及其对油气分布的影响[J].石油学报,2003,24(5):16-25.]
[2]Zhao Mengjun,Zhang Baomin.Source rocks for a giant gas-accumulation areas in the Kuqa Foreland Depression[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2002,37(supplement):35-44.[赵孟军,张宝民.库车前陆坳陷形成大气区的烃源岩条件[J].地质科学,2002,37(增刊):35-44.]
[3]Zhao Mengjun,Wang Zhaoming,Zhang Shuichang,et al.Accumulation and features of natural gas in Kuqa Foreland Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2005,79(3):414-422.[赵孟军,王招明,张水昌,等.库车前陆盆地天然气成藏过程及聚集特征[J].地质学报,2005,79(3):414-422.]
[4]Zhao Jingzhou,Dai Jinxing.Accumulation timing and history of Kuche petroleum system,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Sedimentological Sinica,2002,20(2):314-318.[赵靖舟,戴金星.库车油气系统油气成藏期与成藏史[J].沉积学报,2002,20(2):314-318.]
[5]Liang Digang,Zhang Shuichang,Zhao Mengjun,et al.Hydrocarbon sources and stages of reservoir formation in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2002,47(supplement):62-70.
[6]Sun Dongsheng,Jin Zhijun,Lv Xiuxiang,et al.Reservoir mechanism and finalization period of Dina 2 Gasfield in Kuqa Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2004,25(5):559-591.[孙冬胜,金之钧,吕修祥,等.库车前陆盆地迪那2气田成藏机理及成藏年代[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):559-591.]
[7]Lu Xuesong,Liu Keyu,Zhuo Qingong,et al.Palaeo-fluid evidence for the multi-stage hydrocarbon charges in Kela-2 Gasfield,Kuqa foreland basin,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(5):537-543.[鲁雪松,刘可禹,卓勤功,等.库车克拉2气田多期油气充注的古流体证据[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(5):537-543.]
[8][KG*6/7]Zhu Guangyou,Yang Haijun,Zhang Bin,et al.The geological feature and origin of Dina 2 large gas field in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28(8):2479-2492.[朱光有,杨海军,张斌,等.塔里木盆地迪那2大型凝析气田的地质特征及其成藏机制[J].岩石学报,2012,28(8):2479-2492.]
[9]Wang Zhaoming.Formation mechanism and enrichment regularities of Kelasu subsalt deep large gas field in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):153-166.[王招明.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏盐下深层大气田形成机制与富集规律[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):153-166.]
[10]Zhuo Qingong,Li Yong,Song Yan,et al.Evolution of paleogene saline deposits and effectiveness of traps in Kelasu tectonic zone,Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(1):42-47.[卓勤功,李勇,宋岩,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带古近系膏盐岩盖层演化与圈闭有效性[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(1):42-47.]
[11]Liu K,Eadington P.A new method for identifying secondary oil migration pathways[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2003,78(1):389-394.
[12]Liu K,Eadington P.Quantitative fluorescence techniques for detecting residual oils and reconstructing hydrocarbon charge history[J].Organic Geochemistry,2005,36(7):1023-1036.
[13]Liu K,Eadington P,Middleton H,et al.Applying quantitative fluorescence techniques to investigate petroleum charge history of sedimentary basins in Australia and Papuan New Guinea[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2007,57(1):139-151.
[14][KG*6/7]Liu K,Fenton S,Bastow T,et al.Geochemical evidence of multiple hydrocarbon charges and long distance oil migration in the Vulcan Sub-basin,Timor Sea[J].APPEA Journal,2005,45(1):1-17.
[15]Liu K,George S C,Lu X,et al.Innovative fluorescence spectroscopic techniques for rapidly characterising oil inclusions[J].Organic Geochemistry,2014,72:34-45.
[16]Coble P G,Green S A,Blough N V,et al.Characterisation of dissolved organic matter in the Black Sea by fluorescence spectroscopy[J].Nature,1990,348(6300):432-434.
[17]Chen L,Zhu G,Zhang B,et al.Control factors and diversities of phase state of oil and gas pools in the Kuqa petroleum system[J].Acta Geologica Sinica:English Edition,2012,86(2):484-496.
[18]Zhou Xingxi.The distribution and control factors of phase state of oil and gas pools in Kuqa petroleum system[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2004,15(3):205-213.[周兴熙.库车油气系统油气藏相态分布及其控制因素[J].天然气地球科学,2004,15(3):205-213]
[19]Liu Chun,Zhang Huiliang,Han Bo,et al.Reservoir characteristics and control factors of deep-burial clastic rocks in Dabei zone of Kuche Sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(4):504-512.[刘春,张惠良,韩波,等.库车坳陷大北地区深部碎屑岩储层特征及控制因素[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(4):504-512.]
[20]Guo Jigang,Pang Xiongqi,Liu Dandan,et al.Hydrocarbon expulsion for Middle-Lower Jurassic coal measures and evaluation of potential resources in Kuqa Depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(2):327-334.[郭继刚,庞雄奇,刘丹丹,等.库车坳陷中、下侏罗统煤系烃源岩排烃特征及资源潜力评价[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(2):327-334.]
[21]Chen S,Tang L,Jin Z,et al.Thrust and fold tectonics and the role of evaporites in deformation in the western Kuqa Foreland of Tarim Basin,northwest China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2004,21(8):1027-1042.
[22]Warren J K.Evaporites:Sediments,Resources and Hydrocarbons[M].Berlin Heidelberg：Springer Science and Business Media,2006:711-712.
[1] 包建平, 朱翠山, 申旭. 金刚烷类化合物与库车坳陷克拉2构造凝析油的形成机理研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1217-1230.
[2] 张荣虎，王珂，王俊鹏，孙雄伟，李君，杨学君，周露. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深构造带克深8区块裂缝性低孔砂岩储层地质模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1264-1273.
[3] 孙可欣，李贤庆，魏强，梁万乐，李剑，张光武. 利用流体历史分析技术研究库车坳陷大北气田油气充注史[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1289-1300.
[4] 杨海军，张荣虎，杨宪彰，王珂，王俊鹏，唐雁刚，周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[5] 杨超，贺永红，马芳侠，雷裕红，陈义国. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组有机流体活动期次划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 655-664.
[6] 赵力彬，张同辉，杨学君，郭小波，饶华文. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深区块深层致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征与成因机理[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 500-509.
[7] 高文杰，李贤庆，张光武，魏强，张吉振，祁帅，陈金明. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带深层致密砂岩气藏储层致密化与成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 226-235.
[8] 李国欣, 易士威, 林世国, 高阳, 李明鹏, 李德江, 王昌勇. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部地区下侏罗统储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1506-1517.
[9] 肖敦清, 姜文亚, 蒲秀刚, 王娜, 岳云福, 孙超囡, 代昆, 滑双君. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷中深层天然气成藏条件与资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1409-1421.
[10] 李威，文志刚，窦立荣，谢勰，王泽，李馨. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南地区油气富集与储层演化史[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 920-929.
[11] 纪红，黄光辉，成定树，许姗姗. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷大宛齐—大北地区原油轻烃特征及地球化学意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 965-974.
[12] 陈兰朴，李国蓉，吴章志，朱亚林，符浩，高鱼伟，王雨辰，王冬娅，何赛，胡静. 塔里木盆地塔河油田东南斜坡海西晚期奥陶系热液作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 410-419.
[13] 赵力彬，杨学君，昌伦杰，张同辉，孙雄伟，冯建伟. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深地区白垩系低孔砂岩储层“三重介质特征”[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 209-218.
[14] 韩宝，王昌伟，盛世锋，庞燕青. 准噶尔盆地中拐—五区二叠系不整合面对油气成藏控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1821-1828.
[15] 王琳，赵孟军，孟庆洋，王鹏，王科，袁海莉,申磊军，雷刚. 柴达木盆地英西地区中深层油气成藏过程分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1846-1854.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!