天然气地球科学

• 天然气地球化学 • 上一篇    

四川盆地上二叠统龙潭组烃源岩的地球化学特征及对有机质来源和沉积环境的指示意义

魏志福,王永莉,吴陈君,吴保祥,孙则鹏,李生喜,魏威   

  1. 1.甘肃省油气资源研究重点实验室/中国科学院油气资源研究重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2.甘肃省地矿局第二地勘院,甘肃 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-28 修回日期:2015-06-03 出版日期:2015-08-10 发布日期:2015-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 王永莉(1969-),女,甘肃兰州人,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事有机地球化学和环境科学研究. E-mail:wyll6800@lzb.ac.cn.
  • 作者简介:魏志福(1985-),男,甘肃会宁人,助理研究员,博士,主要从事油气/有机地球化学研究. E-mail:williamwei2011@hotmail.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划("973”)项目(编号:2012CB214701);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(编号:XDB10030404);中国科学院“西部之光”人才培养计划项目和中国科学院“西部之光”联合学者项目联合资助.

Geochemical Characteristics of Source Rock from Upper Permian Longtan Formation in Sichuan Basin

WEI Zhi-fu,WANG Yong-li,WU Chen-jun,WU Bao-xiang,SUN Ze-peng,LI Sheng-xi,WEI Wei   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources,Gansu Province/Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research,
    Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China;
    2.The 2nd Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration,Lanzhou 730020,China
  • Received:2015-04-28 Revised:2015-06-03 Online:2015-08-10 Published:2015-08-10

摘要:

通过对四川盆地上二叠统龙潭组烃源岩典型剖面样品的地球化学分析,从TOC含量、TOS含量、生物标志化合物特征等方面讨论四川盆地上二叠统龙潭组烃源岩地球化学特征及意义。 实验数据显示:四川盆地上二叠统龙潭组烃源岩TOC含量、TOS含量在剖面上变化幅度较大,表现出明显的非均质性;上二叠统龙潭组煤和炭质泥岩中正构烷烃主要呈现单峰型,高碳数正构烷烃相对丰度较高,姥鲛烷优势明显;而页岩样品以双峰型为主,低碳数峰群主碳集中在nC17,而高碳数峰群以nC25nC27为主碳峰,具明显植烷优势。这些实验结果表明龙潭组页岩母质来源主要为低等水生生物和陆源高等植物,而龙潭组煤和炭质泥岩以陆源有机质输入为主,在母质来源特征上与龙潭组页岩具有很大的差别。

关键词: 页岩, 地球化学特征, 上二叠统龙潭组, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Through geochemical analysis of core and outcrop source rocks from the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in Sichuan Basin,organic matter type and redox depositional conditions were discussed through organic carbon and biomarker characteristics.The results show that the content of TOC and TOS has fluctuation in the profile,showing obvious heterogeneity.The n-alkanes in coal and carbonaceous mudstone of Upper Permian Longtan Formation are mainly unimodally distributed with relatively high abundance of high carbon number n-alkanes.However,the n-alkanes in shale of Upper Permian Longtan Formation are mainly bimodally distributed with phytanic advantage,and the main peak of the front mode was at nC17,in contrast,the main peak of the back mode was at nC25 or nC27.These results indicate that the organic matter in Longtan shale is mainly of aquatic and continental organic matter input,whereas the organic matter in Longtan coal and mudstone are terrestrial organic matter input.

Key words: Shale, Geochemical characteristics, Upper Permian Longtan Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1

[1]Zhang Xiaolong,Li Yanfang,Lü Haigang,et al.Relationship between organic matter characteristics and depositional environment in the Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):851-856.[张小龙,李艳芳,吕海刚,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组有机质特征与沉积环境的关系[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(5):851-856.]
[2]Dong Dazhong,Gao Shikui,Huang Jinliang,et al.A discussion on the shale gas exploration & development prospect[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(12):1-15.[董大忠,高世葵,黄金亮,等.论四川盆地页岩气资源勘探开发前景[J].天然气工业,2014,34(12):1-15.]
[3]Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[4]Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Yang Hua,et al.Conditions of shale gas accumulation and exploration practices in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):26-39.[邹才能,董大忠,杨桦,等.中国页岩气形成条件及勘探实践[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):26-39.]
[5]Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.[贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.]
[6]Li Xianqing,Zhao Pei,Sun Jie,et al.Study on the accumulation conditions of shale gas from the Lower Paleozoic in the south region of Sichuan Basin[J].International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2013,38(5):865-867.[李贤庆,赵佩,孙杰,等.川南地区下古生界页岩气成藏条件研究[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(5):865-867.]
[7]Wei Guoqi,Yang Wei,Xie Wuren,et al.Formation conditions,accumulation models and exploration direction of large gas fields in Sinian-Cambrian,Sichuan Basin[J].Natrural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(5):785-795.[魏国齐,杨威,谢武仁,等.四川盆地震旦系—寒武系大气田形成条件、成藏模式与勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(5):785-795.]
[8]Deng Kangling.Formation and evolution of Sichuan Basin and domains for oil and gas exploration[J].Natural Gas Industry,1992,12(5):7-12.[邓康龄.四川盆地形成演化与油气勘探领域[J].天然气工业,1992,12(5):7-12.]
[9]Liu Quanyou,Jin Zhijun,Gao Bo,et al.Characterization of gas pyrolysates from different types of permian source rocks in Sichuan Basin[J].Natrural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(5):700-704.[刘全有,金之钧,高波,等.四川盆地二叠系不同类型烃源岩生烃热模拟实验[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(5):700-704.]
[10]Zhang Jizhen,Li Xianqing,Liu Yang,et al.Longtan Formation shale gas reservoiring conditions and favorable region analysis in southern Sichuan area[J].Coal Geology of China,2014,26(2):1-6.[张吉振,李贤庆,刘洋,等.川南地区龙潭组页岩气成藏条件及有利区分析[J].中国煤炭地质,2014,26(12):1-6.]
[11]Peters K E,Walters C C,Moldowan J M.The Biomarker Guide:Ⅱ.Biomarkers and Isotopes in Petroleum Systems and Earth History[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005:1-704.
[12]Fu Jiamo,Sheng Guoying,Xu Jiayou,et al.Application of biomarker compounds in assessment of paleo-environments of Chinese terrestrial sediments[J].Geochimica,1991,20(1):1-12.[傅家谟,盛国英,许家友,等.应用生物标志化合物参数判识古沉积环境[J].地球化学,1991,20(1):1-12.]
[13]Powell T,Mckirdy D M.Relationship between ratio of pristane to phytane,crude oil composition and geological environments in Australia[J].Nature,1973,243(12):37-39.
[14]Peters K E,Fraser T H,Amris W,et al.Geochemistry of crude oils from eastern Indonesia[J].AAPG Bulletin,1999,83(12):1927-1942.
[15]Hanson A D,Zhang S C,Moldowan J M,et al.Molecular organic geochemistry of the Tarim Basin,Northwest China[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000,84(8):1109-1128.

[1] 周立宏,蒲秀刚,肖敦清,李洪香,官全胜,林伶,曲宁. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油形成条件及富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1323-1332.
[2] 赵文韬,荆铁亚,吴斌,周游,熊鑫. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制——以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344.
[3] 夏鹏,王甘露,曾凡桂,牟雨亮,张昊天,刘杰刚. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组高—过成熟页岩气富氮特征及机理探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1345-1355.
[4] 康毅力,豆联栋,游利军,陈强,程秋洋. 富有机质页岩增产改造氧化液浸泡离子溶出行为[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 990-996.
[5] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[6] 朱维耀,马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852.
[7] 余川,曾春林,周洵,聂海宽,余忠樯. 大巴山冲断带下寒武统页岩气构造保存单元划分及分区评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 853-865.
[8] 陈斐然,张义杰,朱光有,张宝收,卢玉红,张志遥. 塔里木盆地台盆区深层天然气地球化学特征及成藏演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 880-891.
[9] 邓焱,胡国艺,赵长毅. 四川盆地龙岗气田长兴组—飞仙关组天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 892-907.
[10] 王香增,张丽霞,姜呈馥,尹锦涛,高潮,孙建博,尹娜,薛莲花. 鄂尔多斯盆地差异抬升对长7页岩孔隙的影响——以东南部甘泉地区和南部渭北隆起地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 597-605.
[11] 邱 振,邹才能,李熙喆,王红岩,董大忠,卢斌,周尚文,施振生,冯子齐,张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[12] 汪道兵,葛洪魁,宇波,文东升,周珺,韩东旭,刘露. 页岩弹性模量非均质性对地应力及其损伤的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 632-643.
[13] 龙胜祥,冯动军,李凤霞,杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[14] 贺领兄,宋维刚,安生婷,徐永锋,沈娟,路超,王军. 青海东昆仑地区八宝山盆地烃源岩有机地球化学特征与页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 538-549.
[15] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!