天然气地球科学

• 非常规天然气 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地膏盐岩层对页岩气保存及勘探前景的影响

朱臻,尹宏伟,贾东,陈竹新,魏东涛   

  1. 1. 南京大学地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210093; 
    2.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    3.中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院,甘肃 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-28 修回日期:2015-06-22 出版日期:2015-08-10 发布日期:2015-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 尹宏伟(1971-),男,江西玉山人,教授,博导,主要从事构造变形特征、变形机制以及构造物理和数值模拟研究与教学工作. E-mail:hwyin@nju.edu.cn.
  • 作者简介:朱臻(1990-),男,上海人,硕士研究生,主要从事构造解释及构造变形分析研究. E-mail:xiaobulixiang@sina.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划("973”)项目(编号:2012CB214703);国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41272227);江苏省科技支撑计划项目(编号:BE2013115)联合资助.

Impact of Gypsolith on the Preservation and Exploration Prospect of Shale Gas in Sichuan Basin

ZHU Zhen,YIN Hong-wei,JIA Dong,CHEN Zhu-xin,WEI Dong-tao   

  1. 1.School of Earth Science and Engineering,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China;
    2.PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Beijing 100083,China;
    3.Northwest Branch of PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Lanzhou 730020,China
  • Received:2015-04-28 Revised:2015-06-22 Online:2015-08-10 Published:2015-08-10

摘要:

通过调研分析前人研究结果与收集统计大量钻井及地球物理资料,探讨四川盆地膏盐岩层对页岩气保存的影响以及龙马溪组页岩气勘探潜力。结果表明:四川盆地下寒武统与三叠系膏盐岩滑脱层在构造变形中起重要的控制作用,是形成盆地内不同构造形态的主要因素,对四川盆地龙马溪组页岩气的保存有着重要作用。膏盐岩层有利于其下部地层异常压力的形成,对页岩气的成藏和保存有重要影响。膏盐岩层是影响四川盆地龙马溪组页岩气勘探前景的重要控住因素之一。综合考虑膏盐岩层分布,页岩埋藏深度,地层厚度与地球化学条件等因素,认为四川盆地龙马溪组页岩气勘探优选区域为自贡—宜宾区域、重庆—永川区域、涪陵区域。

关键词: 页岩气, 龙马溪组, 膏盐岩层, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of previous researches and drilling data,this paper interpreted the impact of gypsolith on the preservation and exploration prospect of shale gas in Sichuan Basin.Results show that the halite layer of Lower Cambrian and Triassic plays an important controlling role in tectonic deformation,resulting in different structural styles in Sichuan Basin.The formation under gypsolith tends to be overpressure because of the halite layer.Gypsolith in Sichuan Basin is one of the most important factors which controls the shale gas exploration of Longmaxi Formantion.Based on the distribution of salt layers,depth and thickness of shale,and organic geochemical characteristics,we suggest that Zigong-Yibin,Chongqing-Yongchuan,and Fuling are the favorite shale gas exploration regions in Sichuan Basin.

Key words: Shale gas, Longmaxi Formation, Gypsolith, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2

[1]Wang Dongxu,Zeng Jianhui,Gong Xiumei.Impact of gypsolith on the Formation of oil and gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(3):329-333.[王东旭,曾溅辉,宫秀梅.膏盐岩层对油气成藏的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(3):329-333.]
[2]Zhao Zhenyu,Zhou Yaoqi,Ma Xiaoming,et al.The impact of saline deposit upon the hydrocarbon accumulation in petroliferous basin[J].Oil and Gas Geology,2007,28(2):299-308.[赵振宇,周瑶琪,马晓鸣,等.含油气盆地中膏盐岩层对油气成藏的重要影响[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):299-308.]
[3]Montgomery S L,Jarvie D M,Bowker K A,et al.Mississippian Barnett Shale,Fort Worth Basin,north-central Texas:Gas shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential[J].AAPG Bulletin,2005,89(2):155-175.
[4]Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Shale gas potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale member,northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2007,55(1):51-75.
[5]Lash G G,Engelder T.Thickness trends and sequence stratigraphy of the middle devonian marcellus formation,Appalachian Basin:Implications for acadian foreland basin evolution[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(1):61-103.
[6]Strapoc D,Mastalerz M,Schimmelmann A,et al.Geochemical constraints on the origin and volume of gas in the New Albany Shale(Devonian-Mississippian),eastern Illinois Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2010,94(11):1713-1740.
[7][JP2]Zhu Yanming,Chen Shangbin,Fang Junhua,et al.The geologic background of the Siluric shale gas reservoiring in Szechwan,China[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(7):1160-1164.[朱炎铭,陈尚斌,方俊华,等.四川地区志留系页岩气成藏的地质背景[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(7):1160-1164.]
[8]Zhang Tao,Yin Hongwei,Jia Dong,et al.Structural deformation characteristics and shale gas preservation of Lower Yangtze region[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):883-889.[张涛,尹宏伟,贾东,等.下扬子区构造变形特征与页岩气保存条件[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(5):883-889.]
[9]Zhang Yueqiao,Dong Shuwen,Li Jianhua,et al.Mesozoic multi-directional compressional tectonics and formation-reformation of Sichuan Basin[J].Geology in China,2011,32(2):233-250.[张岳桥,董树文,李建华,等.中生代多向挤压构造作用与四川盆地的形成和改造[J].中国地质,2011,32(2):233-250.]
[10][KG*6/7]Zhai Guangming,Zhang Jiming,Tang Zeyao,et al.PetroleumGeology of China(Vol.10)[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1987.[翟光明,张继铭,唐泽尧,等.中国石油地质志(卷十)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987.]
[11]Li Y,Jia D,Shaw J H,et al.Structural interpretation of the coseismic faults of the Wenchuan earthquake:Three-dimensional modeling of the Longmen Shan fold-and-thrust belt,[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,2010,115(B4):B04317.
[12]Yan Danping,Zhang Bing,Zhou Meifu,et al.Constraints on the depth,geometry and kinematics of blind detachment faults provided by fault-propagation folds:An example from the Mesozoic fold belt of South China[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2009,31(2):150-162.
[13]Xie Huiwen,Wang Chunyang,Wang Zhibin,et al.the effect of spatialdistribution of basement detachment on deformation in a fold and thrust belt:An analogue modeling approach an example of west Kunlun fold-and-thrust belt[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2012,18(4):701-710.[谢会文,王春阳,王智斌,等.基底滑脱层分布对褶皱冲断带变形影响的物理模拟研究:以塔西南西昆仑山前褶皱冲断带为例[J].高校地质学报,2012,18(4):701-710.]
[14]Xie Guoai,Jia Dong,Zhang Qinglong,et al.physical modeling of the Jura-Type folds in eastern Sichuan[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2013,87(6):774-788.[解国爱,贾东,张庆龙,等.川东侏罗山式褶皱构造带的物理模拟研究[J].地质学报,2013,87(6):774-788.]
[15]Liu Chongqing,Zhou Jianxun,Lang Jian.Study on restrictive factor of fold-thrust belt formation with multiple decollements:Taking eastern Sichuan-Xuefeng tectonic belt as an example[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2013,35(2):45-55.[刘重庆,周建勋,郎建.多层滑脱条件下褶皱—冲断带形成制约因素研究:以川东—雪峰构造带为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2013,35(2):45-55.]
[16]Liu Yuping,Zhang Jie,Yin Hongwei,et al.The regional detachment of Dachigan thrust belt,eastern Sichuan:Results from geological section restoration based on area-depth technique[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2008,32(4):410-417.[刘玉萍,张洁,尹宏伟,等.用面积平衡法预测川东大池干推覆带区域滑脱面[J].大地构造与成矿学,2008,32(4):410-417.]
[17][JP2]Bowker K A.Barnett Shale gas production,fort worth Basin:Issues and discussion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):523-533.[JP]
[18]Zhang Jingping,Tang Shuheng,Guo Dongxin.Shale gas favorable area prediction of the Qiongzhusi Formation and Longmaxi Formation of Lower Palaeozoic in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):357-363.[张静平,唐书恒,郭东鑫.四川盆地下古生界筇竹寺组与龙马溪组页岩气勘探优选区预测[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):357-363.]
[19]Zeng Xiangliang,Liu Shugeng,Huang Wenming,et al.Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in China and Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):372-384.[曾祥亮,刘树根,黄文明,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国FortWorth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):372-384.]
[20]Li Yanjun,Liu Huan,Zhang Liehui,et al.Lower limits of evaluation parameters for the Lower Paleozoic Longmaxi shale gas in southern Sichuan Province[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,2013,43(7):1088-1095.[李延钧,刘欢,张烈辉,等.四川盆地南部下古生界龙马溪组页岩气评价指标下限[J].中国科学:地球科学,2013,43(7):1088-1095.]
[21]Liu Chenglin,Ge Yan,Fan Baijiang,et al.Study on shale gas accumulation mode[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2010,17(5):1-5.[刘成林,葛岩,范柏江,等.页岩气成藏模式研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2010,17(5):1-5.]
[22]Cheng Peng,Xiao Xianming.Gas content of organic-rich shales with very high maturities[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):737-741.[程鹏,肖贤明.很高成熟度富有机质页岩的含气性问题[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(5):737-741.]
[23]Wang Qingbo,Liu Ruobing,Li Chunyan,et al.Geologiccondition of the Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technoloty:Natural Sciences Edition,2012,14(5):17-21.[王庆波,刘若冰,李春燕,等.四川盆地及周缘五峰—龙马溪组页岩气地质条件研究[J].重庆科技学院院报:自然科学版,2012,14(5):17-21.]
[24]Wang Zecheng,Zhao Wenzhi,Zhang Lin.Classification of Tectonic Sequence and Natural Gas Exploration in Sichuan Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2002.[汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.]

[1] 赵文韬,荆铁亚,吴斌,周游,熊鑫. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制——以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344.
[2] 夏鹏,王甘露,曾凡桂,牟雨亮,张昊天,刘杰刚. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组高—过成熟页岩气富氮特征及机理探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1345-1355.
[3] 王朋飞,姜振学,吕鹏,金璨,李鑫,黄璞. 重庆周缘下志留统龙马溪组和下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩有机质孔隙发育及演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 997-1008.
[4] 康毅力,豆联栋,游利军,陈强,程秋洋. 富有机质页岩增产改造氧化液浸泡离子溶出行为[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 990-996.
[5] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[6] 朱维耀,马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852.
[7] 余川,曾春林,周洵,聂海宽,余忠樯. 大巴山冲断带下寒武统页岩气构造保存单元划分及分区评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 853-865.
[8] 邱 振,邹才能,李熙喆,王红岩,董大忠,卢斌,周尚文,施振生,冯子齐,张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[9] 王涛利,郝爱胜,陈清,李,王庆涛,卢鸿,刘大永. 中扬子宜昌地区五峰组和龙马溪组页岩发育主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 616-631.
[10] 汪道兵,葛洪魁,宇波,文东升,周珺,韩东旭,刘露. 页岩弹性模量非均质性对地应力及其损伤的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 632-643.
[11] 龙胜祥,冯动军,李凤霞,杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[12] 贺领兄,宋维刚,安生婷,徐永锋,沈娟,路超,王军. 青海东昆仑地区八宝山盆地烃源岩有机地球化学特征与页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 538-549.
[13] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[14] 王宏坤,吕修祥,王玉满,慕瑄,张琰,钱文文,陈佩佩. 鄂西下志留统龙马溪组页岩储集特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 415-423.
[15] 卢文涛,李继庆,郑爱维,梁榜,张谦,杨文新. 涪陵页岩气田定产生产分段压裂水平井井底流压预测方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 437-442.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!