天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

沉积环境对富有机质页岩分布的控制作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例

耳闯,赵靖舟,王芮,魏之焜   

  1. 1.西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710065;
    2.陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室,陕西 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-30 修回日期:2015-01-07 出版日期:2015-05-10 发布日期:2015-05-10
  • 作者简介:耳闯(1982-),男,河北保定人,讲师,博士,主要从事沉积与储层、非常规油气地质等研究.E-mail:erchuang@xsyu.edu.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    陕西省自然科学基金项目“鄂尔多斯盆地延长组陆相富有机质页岩孔隙特征及其控制因素”(编号:2013JQ5003)|国家科技重大专项“鄂尔多斯盆地及周边页岩气资源评价”(编号:2011ZX05018001-004)|西安石油大学博士科研启动基金“准连续型油气藏储层形成机理与油气成藏——以鄂尔多斯盆地为例”(编号:YS29031219)联合资助.

Controlling Role of Sedimentary Environment on the Distribution of Organic-rich Shale:A Case Study of the Chang7 Member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin

ER Chuang,ZHAO Jing-zhou,WANG Rui,WEI Zhi-kun   

  1. 1.School of Earth Science and Engineering,Xi′an Shiyou University,Xi′an 710065,China;
    2.Shaanxi Key Lab of Petroleum Accumulation Geology,Xi′an Shiyou University,Xi′an 710065,China
  • Received:2014-10-30 Revised:2015-01-07 Online:2015-05-10 Published:2015-05-10

摘要:

富有机质页岩厚度和分布范围是页岩油气形成条件评价的重要内容,而页岩的分布受沉积环境的控制。利用露头和岩心揭示了延长组长7油层组暗色页岩的沉积环境,通过露头和钻井资料确定了暗色页岩纵向结构特征,结合岩心和薄片资料阐述了暗色页岩的沉积构造和显微层理特征;综合实测数据和测井解释资料分析了不同沉积环境下暗色页岩的有机碳含量和有机质类型差异。长7油层组暗色页岩主要发育在三角洲前缘水下分流间湾和半深湖—深湖环境下:三角洲前缘环境下的页岩连续厚度小,呈页岩、砂岩等厚互层或薄页岩和厚砂岩互层;半深湖—深湖环境下,页岩连续厚度大,砂岩厚度小,暗色页岩多发育页理、水平纹层或砂质纹层。三角洲前缘环境下,多以暗色泥岩、粉砂质泥岩为主,页理不发育,暗色页岩有机质类型以Ⅱ2型和Ⅲ型居多;半深湖—深湖环境下,有机碳含量明显高于三角洲前缘环境,有机质类型以Ⅰ型和Ⅱ1型居多。根据页岩纵向和平面分布、页岩沉积构造类型、有机质类型和有机碳含量综合评价认为,半深湖—深湖环境下形成的暗色页岩是延长组页岩油气最有利的勘探对象。

关键词: 富有机质页岩, 页岩油气, 沉积环境, 页岩分布, 延长组

Abstract:

The thickness and distribution of organic-rich shale are important parts of forming conditions appraising about shale gas and shale oil.The distribution of shale is controlled by sedimentary environments.This study determined the sedimentary environment of dark shale of the Chang 7 Member by field profile and cores.Vertical overlaying features of dark shale were confirmed by field profile and wells.Sedimentary structures and micro-bedding structures were delineated by cores and sections.Differences of total organic content and organic types between dark shale in different sedimentary environments were revealed by testing data and logging interpretation.Dark shale of the Chang 7 member distributes in the subaqueous distributary bay of delta front and semi-deep to deep lacustrine.In semi-deep to deep lacustrine,dark shale has great continuous thickness and sandstones have thin thickness.However,in delta front,dark shale has thin continuous thickness,shale and sandstone interbeddings have similar thickness or thin shale layer and thick sandstone layer.In semi-deep to deep lacustrine,dark shale always has lamellation,horizontal lamination and sandy lamination,whereas lamellation does not develop very well in delta front shales.Organic types of delta front are mainly type Ⅱ2 and Ⅲ,and type I and type Ⅱ1 to semi-deep to deep lacustrine shales,respectively.TOCof semi-deep to deep lacustrine shale are higher than that of delta front shale.Based on these comparisons,we concluded that shales which distribute in semi-deep to deep lacustrine are the more favorable prospecting target for shale gas/oil in the Yanchang Formation.

Key words: Organic-rich shale, Shale gas/oil, Sedimentary facies, Distribution of shale, Yanchang Formation

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3

[1]Ministry of Land and Resources of the People′s Republic of China.Regulation of Shale Gas Resources/Reserves Estimation(DZ/T 0254-2014)[S].Beijing:China Standards Press,2014:1-4.[中华人民共和国国土资源部.页岩气资源/储量计算与评价技术规范(DZ/T 0254-2014)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014:1-4.]
[2]Yang Hua,Fu Qiang,Fu Jinhua.Sequence and Petroleum Formation of Late Triassic,Ordos Basin[M].Beijing:Geologied Publishing House,2007:21-43.[JP3][杨华,傅强,付金华.鄂尔多斯晚三叠世盆地沉积层序与油气成藏[M].北京:地质出版社,2007:21-43.]
[3]Yang Hua,Zhang Wenzheng.Leading effect of the seventh Member high-quality source rock of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin during the enrichment of low-penetrating oil-gas accumulation:Geology and geochemistry[J].Geochimica,2005,34(2):147-154.[杨华,张文正.论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用:地质地球化学特征[J].地球化学,2005,34(2):147-154.]
[4]Lv Qiang,Zhao Junxing,Chen Hongde,et al.Analysis of the provenance and basin bottom shape of Yanchang Epoch of Mesozoic in Ordos Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2008,35(6):610-616.[吕强,赵俊兴,陈洪德,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界延长组物源与盆地底形分析[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2008,35(6):610-616.]
[5]Deng Xiuqin,Fu Jinhua,Yao Jingli,et al.Sedimentary facies of the Middle-Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and breakthrough in petroleum exploration[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2011,13(4):443-455.[邓秀芹,付金华,姚泾利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中及上三叠统延长组沉积相与油气勘探的突破[J].古地理学报,2011,13(4):443-455.]
[6]Deng Xiuqin,Lin Fangxiao,Liu Xianyang,et al.Discussion on relationship between sedimentary evolution of the Triassic Yanchang Formation and the Early Indosinian Movement in Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2008,10(2):159-166.[邓秀芹,蔺昉晓,刘显阳,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组沉积演化及其与早印支运动关系的探讨[J].古地理学报,2008,10(2):159-166.]
[7]Yang Hua,Dou Weitan,Liu Xianyang,et al.Analysis on sedimentary facies of member 7 in Yanchang Formation of Triassic in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(2):254-263.[杨华,窦伟坦,刘显阳,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7沉积相分析[J].沉积学报,2010,28(2):254-263.]
[8]Yang Hua,Deng Xiuqin.Deposition of Yanchang Formation deep-water sandstone under the control of tectonic events,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(5):513-520.[杨华,邓秀芹.构造事件对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水砂岩沉积的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(5):513-520.]
[9]Fu Jinhua,Deng Xiuqin,Zhang Xiaolei,et al.Relationship between deepwater sandstone and tight oil of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,13(5):624-634.[付金华,邓秀芹,张晓磊,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组深水砂岩与致密油的关系[J].古地理学报,2013,13(5):624-634.]
[10]Fu Jinhua,Deng Xiuqin,Chu Meijuan,et al.Features of deepwater lithofacies,Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and its petroleum significance[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2013,31(5):928-938.[付金华,邓秀芹,楚美娟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水岩相发育特征及其石油地质意义[J].沉积学报,2013,31(5):928-938.]
[11]Jiang Yuqiang,Dong Dazhong,Qi Lin,et al.Basic features and evaluation of shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(10):7-12.[蒋裕强,董大忠,漆麟,等.页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J].天然气工业,2010,30(10):7-12.]
[12]Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.[邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.]
[13]Chen Xinjun,Bao Shujing,Hou Dujie,et al.Methods and key parameters of shale gas resources evaluation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(5):566-571.[陈新军,包书景,侯读杰,等.页岩气资源评价方法与关键参数探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(5):566-571.]
[14]Wang Shiqian.Shale gas exploration and appraisal in China:Problems and discussion[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(12):13-29.[王世谦.中国页岩气勘探评价若干问题评述[J].天然气工业,2013,33(12):13-29.]
[15]Wang Shiqian,Wang Shuyan,Man Ling,et al.Appraisal method and key parameters for screening shale gas play[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(6):609-620.[王世谦,王书彦,满玲,等.页岩气选区评价方法与关键参数[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(6):609-620.]
[16]Luo Peng,Ji Liming.Reservoircharacteristics and potential evaluation of continental shale gas[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(5):1060-1068.[罗鹏,吉利明.陆相页岩气储层特征与潜力评价[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(5):1060-1068.]
[17]Er Chuang,Zhao Jingzhou,Bai Yubin,et al.Initial discussion on characteristics of organic-rich shale of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Oil and Gas Geology,2013,34(5):708-715.[耳闯,赵靖舟,白玉彬,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组富有机质泥页岩储层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(5):708-715.]
[18]Ingram R L.Fissility of mudrocks[J].Bulletin of the Geological Society of America,1953,64(4):869-878.
[19]Lu Shuangfang,Zhang Min.Petroleum Geochemistry[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008:51-59.[卢双舫,张敏.油气地球化学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:51-59.]
[20]Ding Xiujian,Liu Guangdi,Lu Xuejun,et al.The impact on organic matter preservation by the degree of Oxidation and reduction and sedimentation rates of Erlian Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,24(5):810-817.[丁修建,柳广弟,卢学军,等.二连盆地氧化—还原程度和沉积速率对有机质保存的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2014,24(5):810-817.]

[1] 王涛利,郝爱胜,陈清,李,王庆涛,卢鸿,刘大永. 中扬子宜昌地区五峰组和龙马溪组页岩发育主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 616-631.
[2] 郭睿良,陈小东,马晓峰,马静,[王琪],陈霖. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长7段致密储层水平向可动流体特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 665-674.
[3] 杨超,贺永红,马芳侠,雷裕红,陈义国. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组有机流体活动期次划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 655-664.
[4] 申宝剑,秦建中,腾格尔,潘安阳,仰云峰,边立曾. 中国南方海相烃源岩中细菌状化石识别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 510-517.
[5] 曹涛涛,邓模,宋之光,刘光祥,黄俨然,Andrew Stefan Hursthouse. 黄铁矿对页岩油气富集成藏影响研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 404-414.
[6] 王钊,周新平,李树同,李士祥,邱军利,张文选,王琪. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区长9段和长10段原油地球化学特征对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1385-1395.
[7] 刘英杰,黄传炎,岳家恒,郭来源. 陆相湖盆层序地层格架内有机质发育及控制因素分析——以中上扬子建南地区侏罗系东岳庙段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 930-938.
[8] 李威,文志刚,窦立荣,谢勰,王泽,李馨. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南地区油气富集与储层演化史[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 920-929.
[9] 郭佳佳,孙国强,龙国徽,管斌,康健,夏维民,陈波,史基安. 柴达木盆地北缘冷湖五号构造下侏罗统沉积—成岩环境分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1839-1845.
[10] 王静彬,高志前,康志宏,杨有星,卫端,秦念通. 塔里木盆地塔西南坳陷和田凹陷普司格组烃源岩沉积环境及有机地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(11): 1723-1734.
[11] 张晨晨,王玉满,董大忠,管全中. 川南长宁地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩脆性特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1629-1639.
[12] 袁伟,柳广弟,罗文斌,李超正,徐黎明,牛小兵,艾嘉怡. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段富有机质页岩中磷灰石类型及其成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(8): 1399-1408.
[13] 耳闯,赵靖舟,王芮,张杰,袁野,沈武显. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组富有机质页岩孔隙特征及发育机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1202-1214.
[14] 李超正,柳广弟,曹喆,牛子铖,牛小兵,王朋,张梦媛,张凯迪. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段致密砂岩微孔隙特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1235-1247.
[15] 孟昊,任影,钟大康,高崇龙,高宙,王点,姜杨锦丰,李谨杰. 四川盆地东部寒武系龙王庙组地球化学特征及其古环境意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1299-1311.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!