天然气地球科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 561–569.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2012.03.561

• 天然气地球化学 • 上一篇    下一篇

烃源岩评价参数与油页岩品质指标内在关系探讨

 柳少鹏, 周世新, 王保忠, 李靖, 张海坤, 巩书华   

  1. 1.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所油气资源研究重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2.中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-02 修回日期:2012-05-17 出版日期:2012-06-10 发布日期:2012-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 柳少鹏liushaopeng862@163.com. E-mail:liushaopeng862@163.com.
  • 作者简介:柳少鹏(1986-),女,山东德州人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气地球化学研究.E-mail:liushaopeng862@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院重要方向项目(编号:KZCX2-EW-104-02);国家重大专项项目(编号:2008ZX05018-001)联合资助.

Relationship between Industrial Indexes and Source Rock Evaluation Parameters of Oil Shale

 LIU  Shao-Peng, ZHOU  Shi-Xin, WANG  Bao-Zhong, LI  Jing, ZHANG  Hai-Kun, GONG  Shu-Hua   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,
    Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
  • Received:2011-03-02 Revised:2012-05-17 Online:2012-06-10 Published:2012-06-10

摘要:

如何用烃源岩评价参数定量评价油页岩品质级别,是目前含油气盆地油页岩评价面临的一个重要问题。通过对我国中西部鄂尔多斯、准噶尔和民和3个含油气盆地中油页岩进行系统采集,开展了含油率和发热量等油页岩品质方面的研究,同时也进行了有机质丰度、有机质类型和成熟度等烃源岩评价方面的研究,重点探讨油页岩品质参数与烃源岩丰度参数的内在关系。研究表明这3个盆地油页岩含油率(ω)、发热量与生烃潜量(S1+S2)相关性最好,与有机碳(TOC)的关系次之,其中含油率与生烃潜量相关系数高达0.89,两者的线性关系式为ω=0.066(S1+S2)+2.413,可以根据生烃潜量等指标对油页岩品质特征进行评价,当生烃潜量界限值为16.4mg/g、39.0mg/g、114.4mg/g,有机碳含量为3.3%、10.0%、32.3%,氯仿沥青“A”含量为0.03%、0.2%、0.85%时,油页岩的品质分别达到低级、中级、高级。

关键词: 油页岩, 烃源岩, 含油率, 生烃潜量, 有机碳, 中西部盆地

Abstract:

It is an important problem how to evaluate level of oil shale quality by using source rock evaluation parameters. In this paper,we collected oil shale samplesb distributed in Ordos basin,Junggar basin and Minhe basin and studied their industrial indexes with respect to oil yield and calorific value,as well as source rock evaluation parameters such as hydrocarbon generating potential and total organic carbon. Based on industrial indexes and source rock evaluation parameters of oil shale,we find out that oil yield and calorific value have the best correlations with hydrocarbon generating potential,respectively. The correlation coefficient between oil yield and hydrocarbon generating potential is up to 0.89,with the regression equation being ω = 0.066(S1+S2)+2.413. This result suggests that hydrocarbon generating potential is an ideal parameter to estimate oil yield,and can be used to deduce the qualities of oil shale. According to relationships between oil yield and source rock evaluation parameters,the low,middle and high level of oil shale is classified according to boundary values of 16.4,39.0 and 114.4mg/g for hydrocarbon generating potential,3.3%,10.0% and 32.3% for organic carbon and 0.03%,0.2% and 0.85% for chloroform bitumen "A",respectively.

Key words: Oil shale, Source rock, Oil yield, Hydrocarbon generating potential, Organic carbon, Midwest basins.

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+13

[1]Bai Yunlai,Ma Long,Wu Wujun.Geological characteristics and resources/reserves of oil shale in northwestern China and its
exploitation and utilization conditions[J].Geology in China,2007,34(6):1109-1114.[白云来,马龙,吴武军.西北地区油页岩地质特征、资源现状及其开发利用条件分析[J
].中国地质,2007,34(6):1109-1114.]
[2]〖ZK(3#〗Wang Hongyan,Li Jingming,Zhao Qun,et al.Resources and development of new energy in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(3):469
-474.[王红岩,李景明,赵群,等.中国新能源资源基础及发展前景展望[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):469-474.]
[3]Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum Formation and Occurrence[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1984:254-266.
[4]Liu Zhaojun,Liu Rong.Oil shale resource state and evaluating system[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2005,12(3):315-323.[刘招君,柳蓉.中国油页岩特征
及开发利用前景分析[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):315-323.]
[5]Meng Qingtao,Liu Zhaojun,Liu Rong,et al.Controlling factors on the oil yield of the upper Cretaceous oil shale in the Nongan area,Songliao
basin[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2006,36(6):963-968.[孟庆涛,刘招君,柳蓉,等.松辽盆地农安地区上白垩统油页岩含油率影响因素[J].吉林大
学学报:地球科学版,2006,36(6):963-968.]
[6]Liu Zhaojun,Meng Qingtao,Liu Rong.Characteristics and genetic types of continental oil shale in China[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2009,11
(1):105-114.[刘招君,孟庆涛,柳蓉.中国陆相油页岩特征及成因类型[J].古地理学报,2009,11(1):105-114.]
[7]Lu Jincai,Li Yuhong,Wei Xianyang,et al.Research on the depositional environment and resources potential of the oil shale in the Chang 7
Member,Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos basin[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2006,36(6):928-932.[卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,等.鄂尔多
斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2006,36(6):928-932.]
[8]Liu Zhaojun,Yang Hulin,Dong Qingshui,et al.Oil Shale in China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009.[刘招君,杨虎林,董清水,等.中国油页岩
[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009.]
[9]Li Yuhong,Li Jinchao,Jiang Ting,et al.Characteristics of the Triassic oil shale in the Hejiafang area,Ordos basin[J].Journal of Jilin
University:Earth Science Edition,2009,39(1):65-71.[李玉宏,李金超,姜亭,等.鄂尔多斯盆地何家坊地区三叠系油页岩特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2009,39(1):65-71.]
[10]Bai Yunlai,Ma Long,Wu Wujun,et al.Geological characteristics and resource potential of oil shale in Ordos basin[J].Geology in China,2009,36
(5):1123-1127.[白云来,马龙,吴武军,等.鄂尔多斯盆地油页岩的主要地质特征及资源潜力[J].中国地质,2009,36(5):1123-1127.]
[11]Yang Suizheng,Jin Wenhua,Li Zhenhong.Multicycle superimposed basin form and evolution of Ordos basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(4):495-498.[杨
遂正,金文化,李振宏.鄂尔多斯多旋回叠合盆地形成与演化[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(4):495-498.] 
[12]Zhang Xiaoli,Duan Yi,He Jinxian,et al.Geochemical characteristics of crude oil in lower part of Yanchang Formation and correlation of oil source in
Huaqing area of Ordos basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(5):866-873.[张晓丽,段毅,何金先,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区延长组下油层组原油地球化学特征及油源对比
[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(5):866-873.]
[13]Wang Zhikun,Wang Duoyun,Zheng Ximin,et al.Depositional characteristics and physical behaviop analysis of the Chang 6-8 reservoir of Triassic
Yanchang Formation in Longdong area,Shanganning[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2003,14(5):380-385.[王志坤,王多云,郑希民,等.陕甘宁盆地陇东地区三叠系延长统长6—长8
储层沉积特征及物性分析[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(5):380-385.]
[14]Li Chengbo,Guo Wei,Song Yuqin,et al.The genetic type of the oil shale at the northern foot of Bogeda mountain,Xinjiang and prediction for favorable
areas[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2006,36(6):949-953.[李成博,郭巍,宋玉勤,等.新疆博格达山北麓油页岩成因类型及有利区预测[J].吉林大学
学报:地球科学版,2006,36(6):949-953.]
[15]Wang Dongying,Tang Dazhen,Gou Mingfu,et al.Oil-shale geology of Lucaogou Formation in Fukang area on southern margin of Junggar basin[J].Petroleum
Geology,2007,18(6):18-22.[王东营,汤达祯,苟明福,等.准噶尔南缘阜康地区芦草沟组油页岩地质特征[J].石油地质,2007,18(6):18-22.]
[16]Wang Dongying,Xu Hao,Li Jingjing,et al.Analysis on the oil shale geochemical characteristics and sedimentary environments of Lucaogou Formation in
Dahuangshan area[J].Inner Mongolia Petroleum Chemical Industry,2008,(3):62-65.[王东营,许浩,李婧婧,等.博格达山北麓大黄山地区芦草沟组油页岩地球化学特征与沉积环
境分析[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,(3):62-65.]
[17]Da Jiang,Song Yan,Hong Feng,et al.Division of hydrocarbon accumulation system in the southern Junggar foreland basin[J].Natural Gas
Geoscience,2006,17(4):452-455.[达江,宋岩,洪峰,等.准噶尔盆地南缘前陆盆地油气成藏系统划分研究[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(4):452-455.]
[18]Liu Shaobo,Song Yan,Hong Feng,et al.Characteristics and resource potential of source rocks in the foreland basins in central and western China
[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(3):59-65.[柳少波,宋岩,洪峰,等.中国中西部前陆盆地烃源岩特征与油气资源潜力分析[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(3):59-65.]
[19]Bai Yunlai,Wu Wujun,Fang Naizhen,et al.The resource characteristics of oil shale and analysis of condition of prospecting and using in
Minhe-Xining basin,west of China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(5):627-633.[白云来,吴武军,房乃珍,等.民和—西宁盆地油页岩资源特征及勘查开发利用条件分析[J
].天然气地球科学,2006,17(5):627-633.]
[20]Liu Huaqing,Li Xiangbo,Bai Yunlai,et al.Present situation of exploitation & production and resources potential for oil-gas in Gansu province,China[
J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(5):612-615.[刘化清,李相博,白云来,等.甘肃省油气勘探开发现状及资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(5):612-615.]
[21]Song Yuqin,Guo Wei,Liu Zhaojun,et al.Sedimentary environmental analysis and exploration perspective forecasting of oil shale in Yaojie coal
field,Minhe basin[J].Global Geology,2006,25(1):43-48.[宋玉勤,郭巍,刘招君,等.民和盆地窑街煤田油页岩沉积环境分析及开发前景预测[J].世界地质,2006,25(1):43-48.]
[22]Guo Wei,Liu Zhaojun,Song Yuqin,et al.Genetic type and features of oil shale in the Minhe basin,Qinghai-Gansu provinces,China[J].Geological
Bulletin of China,2009,28(6):780-786.[郭巍,刘招君,宋玉勤,等.青海—甘肃民和盆地油页岩的成因类型及特征[J].地质通报,2009,28(6):780-786.]
[23]Chen Jianping,Zhao Changyi,He Zhonghua.Criteria for evaluation the hydrocarbon generating potential of organic matter in coal measures
[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1997,24(1):1-5.[陈建平,赵长毅,何忠华.煤系有机质生烃潜力评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1997,24(1):1-5.]
[24]Dong Qingshui,Wang Lixian,Yu Wenbin,et al.The key parameters of oil shale resource appraisement and its evaluating methods[J].Journal of Jilin
University:Earth Science Edition,2006,36(6):899-903.[董清水,王立贤,于文斌,等.油页岩资源评价关键参数及其求取方法[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2006,36(6):899
-903.]

 

[1] 傅宁,刘建升. 北部湾盆地流二段3类烃源岩的生烃成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 932-941.
[2] 贾智彬,侯读杰,孙德强,姜玉涵,张自鸣,洪梅. 贵州地区牛蹄塘组底部烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1031-1041.
[3] 程志强,王飞宇,师玉雷,冯伟平,谢佩宇,任利兵,吴子强,江涛,赵志刚. 二连盆地乌里雅斯太凹陷南洼烃源岩有机相与生烃特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 696-707.
[4] 申宝剑,秦建中,腾格尔,潘安阳,仰云峰,边立曾. 中国南方海相烃源岩中细菌状化石识别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 510-517.
[5] 贺领兄,宋维刚,安生婷,徐永锋,沈娟,路超,王军. 青海东昆仑地区八宝山盆地烃源岩有机地球化学特征与页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 538-549.
[6] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[7] 杨飞,蒲秀刚,姜文亚,韩文中,张伟,时战楠,林常梅. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段细粒相区有机地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 550-558.
[8] 王清辉,冯进. 烃源岩TOC测井评价方法及应用——以珠江口盆地文昌组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 251-258.
[9] 白雪峰, 梁江平, 张文婧, 付丽, 彭建亮, 薛涛, 杨立伟, 刘继莹. 松辽盆地北部深层天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1443-1454.
[10] 秦胜飞,罗平,王铜山,王蓝军,马奎. 华北南缘东部新元古界冰碛砾岩层系中优质烃源岩的发现及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 55-61.
[11] 李玉婷,黄志龙,安成龙,马强,王瑞,辛铭. 三塘湖盆地石炭系哈尔加乌组上、下段烃源岩特征及差异[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 73-86.
[12] 陈晓艳,田福清,邹华耀,郭柳汐,芦晓伟,殷杰,王道军. 湖相烃源岩热演化生烃研究——基于冀中坳陷烃源岩加水热模拟实验[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 103-113.
[13] 汪宗欣,吕修祥,钱文文. 寒武系海相碳酸盐岩元素地球化学特征及其油气地质意义——以塔里木盆地柯坪地区肖尔布拉克组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1085-1095.
[14] 杨亚南,周世新,李靖,李成成,李源遽,马瑜,陈克非. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘延长组烃源岩地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 550-565.
[15] 刘超. 松辽盆地徐家围子地区沙河子组气源岩与致密砂砾岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 429-438.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!