天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 74–80.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2012.01.74

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地上三叠统生物扰动环境分析及与储集性能的关系

林世国,施振生,李君,王宗礼,高阳,李正文   

  1. 1.中国地质大学(北京)能源学院，北京 100083； 
    2.中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院，河北 廊坊 065007
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-09 修回日期:2012-01-05 出版日期:2012-02-10 发布日期:2012-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 林世国linshiguo69@petrochina.com.cn. E-mail:linshiguo69@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 作者简介:林世国(1980-)，男，满族，辽宁凤城人，工程师，在职博士，主要从事油气成藏综合研究.E-mail:linshiguo69@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(编号:2008ZX05007)；国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”)项目(编号:2007CB209503)；中国石油股份公司项目(编号:030104-1-02)联合资助

Environmental Interpretation of Upper Triassic Bioturbation Structures and Correlation with Petrophysical Properties of Reservoirs in Sichuan Basin  

Lin Shi-guo,Shi Zhen-sheng,Li Jun,Wang Zong-li,Gao Yang,Li Wen-zheng   

  1. 1.School of Energy Resources,China University of Geosciences,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.Langfang Branch of Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina,Langfang 065007,China
  • Received:2011-11-09 Revised:2012-01-05 Online:2012-02-10 Published:2012-02-10

PDF (PC)

785

摘要：

近些年来的勘探实践表明，四川盆地须家河组存在“厚砂薄储”的问题，优质储层的形成主控因素复杂。前人研究认为优质储层主要受沉积相、岩石相和成岩相控制，然而，对其他因素考虑较少。通过系统的岩心、露头、岩石薄片等资料研究认为，生物扰动构造对储层物性的影响也较大，生物扰动强度与储层物性成正比。研究认为，四川盆地上三叠统可以划分出4种岩性—生物扰动组合:①厚泥层扰动，主要形成于厚层黑色泥岩中，反映滨湖沼泽或浅湖沉积环境；②砂泥边界扰动，发育于厚层深灰色泥岩夹薄层浅灰色粉—细砂岩中，扰动指数为2~3，反映远端砂坝下部环境；③砂泥薄互层扰动，主要发育在砂泥薄互层中，砂层单层厚度为2~8cm，纵向上砂泥薄互层，扰动指数为4~5，反映三角洲前缘远端砂坝上部环境；④厚砂层扰动，主要发育于厚层砂岩中，扰动指数为1~2，表明其形成于水体能量相对较强的水下分支河道环境。生物扰动构造与储层物性呈正相关，即生物扰动越强，储层物性越好；而弱扰动或未扰动部位原生孔隙胶结致密，孔渗性都非常差。这主要是因为生物扰动可以提高岩石的均质性和岩石颗粒的分选性。

关键词: 生物扰动, 沉积环境, 储集性能, 上三叠统, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Recent exploration of Sichuan basin manifests that there exists thick sand bodies but thin reservoirs in Xujiahe Formation and controlling factors of favorable reservoirs are complex.Most researchers considered the sedimentary facies,lithofacies and diagenetic facies to be key factors of favorable reservoir,but paid little attention to other factors.Based on observation and measurement of outcrops,cores and rock slices,we consider that bioturbation give certain contribution to improve the reservoir properties and is also an important factor.Based on the bioturbation distribution in the cores of upper Triassic Sichuan basin,four types of lithology\|bioturbation assemblage can be subdivided as follows: ① Bioturbation produced by single trace fossils,developing mainly in thick bedded mudstone,and presents shallow lake and shore lake swamp sedimentary environments;② Bioturbation near boundary between sandstone and mudstone,which occurs mainly in sediments of thick-bedded mudstone interbed with thin-layered siltstone,with bioturbation index between 2 and 3 reflecting the upper distal sand bar sediments；③ Bioturbation interbedded mudstones and sandstones,which exists in thin-bedded sandstone and mudstone,with sandstone thickness of 2-8cm and bioturbation index between 4 and 5,representing the middle shallow lake depositional environment；④ Bioturbation produced by single trace fossils,which develops predominantly in thick-bedded sandstone,with bioturbation index between 1 and 2,indicating shore lake sedimentary environments with high wave energy.Based on bioturbation,sandstone diagenesis and porosity structures,there suggests that the more strong the bioturbation is,the better the reservoir petrophysical property is,namely a positive correlation between the bioturbation structures and the reservoir petrophysical properties.The primary porosity in the place of strong bioturbation,is preserved greatly to form the high porosity and high permeability reservoirs,since the bioturbation increases the homogeneity and grain gradation of rocks.

 

Key words: Bioturbation, Depositional environment, Reservoir property, Upper Triassic, Sichuan basin.

中图分类号: 

  • TE121

［1］Guo Zhengwu,Deng Kangling,Han Yonghui.Formation and Evolution
[JP]of Sichuan Basin［M］.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1996:70-116.［郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉.四川盆地形成与演化［M］.北京:地质出版社,1996:70-116.］
［2］Hou Fanghao,Jiang Yuqiang,Fang Shaoxian,et al.Sedimentary model of sandstone in second and fourth members of Xiangxi Formation in the upper Triassic of Sichuan basin［J］.Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(2):30-37.［侯方浩,蒋裕强,方少仙,等.四川盆地上三叠统香溪组二段和四段砂岩沉积模式［J］.石油学报,2005,26(2):30-37.］
［3］Shi Zhensheng,Jin Hui,Guo Changmin,et al.Log facies of member 2 of Xujiahe Formation of upper Triassic in Sichuan basin［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(3):339-346.［施振生,金惠,郭长敏,等.四川盆地上三叠统须二段测井沉积相研究［J］.天然气地球科学,2008,19(3):339-346.］
［4］Shi Zhensheng,Yang Wei,Guo Changmin.Ichnocoenosis of shore-shallow lacustrine upper Triassic in central and south Sichuan province［J］.Acta Palaeontologica Sinica,2007,46(4):453-463.［施振生,杨威,郭长敏.川中—川南地区上三叠统滨浅湖沉积中的遗迹化石［J］.古生物学报,2007,46(4):453-463.］
［5］Chen Gang,Wei Guoqi,Yang Wei,et al.Distribution and origin of secondary pores in Xujiahe Formation sandstone reservoirs in mid-south Sichuan basin［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(2):192-198.［陈刚,魏国齐,杨威,等.川中—川南过渡带须家河组砂岩储层次生孔隙成因与分布特征［J］.天然气地球科学,2009,20(2):192-198.］
［6］Qi Yong′an.Relations between bioturbation structures and petrophysical properties of Donghe sandstone reservoirs in central Tarim［J］.Oil and Gas Geology,1998,19(4):318-320.［齐永安.生物扰动构造与塔中东河砂岩储集性能的关系［J］.石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4):318-320.］
［7］Ji Youliang,Zhao Chenglin,Liu Menghui.The effect of bioturbate structure on the petrophysical properties of sandstone reservoir［J］.Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,1990,14(6):1-7.［纪友亮,赵澄林,刘孟慧.生物扰动构造对碎屑岩储层储集性能的影响［J］.石油大学学报:自然科学版,1990,14(6):1-7.］
［8］Pemberton S G,Murray K.Classification and characterizations of biogenically enhanced permeability［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2005,89(11),1493-1517.
［9］Yin Yanyi,Wang Guojuan,Fang Shaoxian.The influence of the bioturbation on the quality of the reservoir and oil-bearing capability of the sandstone reservoirs［J］.Petroleum Exploration and Development,1996,23(5):29-32.［尹燕义,王国娟,方少仙.生物扰动对砂岩储集性和含油性的影响［J］.石油勘探与开发,1996,23(5):29-32.］
［10］Chen Zhibin,Chen Mei,Wang Longzhang.Diagenesis of carbonate reservoir in the lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation of the NE Sichuan basin,China［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(5):742-747.［陈志斌,陈梅,王龙樟.川东北地区下三叠统飞仙关组碳酸盐岩储层成岩作用［J］.天然气地球科学,2010,21(5):742-747.］
［11］Wu Xiantao,Hu Bin,Wang Guanzhong,et al.Storm deposits in upper Carboniferous shallow marine carbonates of Jiaozuo,Henan［J］.Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1987,5(4):1-13.［吴贤涛,胡斌,王冠忠,等.豫西焦作地区上石炭统浅海碳酸盐岩中的风暴沉积［J］.沉积学报,1987,5(4):1-13.］
［12］Taylor A M.Trace Fossil Fabric Analysis in the Subsurface Exploration of Jurassic Sequences from the North Sea Basin［D］.Manchester:University of Manchester,1991:1-167.
［13］Reineck H E.Layered Sediments of Tidal Flats,Beaches and Shelf Bottoms of the North Sea［M］//Lauff G H et al.Estuaries.American Association for the Advancement of Science Special Publication,1976,83:191-206.
［14］Reineck H E.Sedimentgefüge in Bereich Der Südilichen Nordsee［M］.Germany:Abhandlungen Der Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft,1963:1-138.
［15］Li Yingxian,Lu Zongsheng,Wang Dan,et al.Continental Trace Fossils and Sedimentary Environments in Liaohe Basin［M］.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:1-102.［李应暹,卢宗盛,王丹,等.辽河盆地陆相遗迹化石与沉积环境研究［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,1997:1-102.］
[1] 肖传桃，肖云鹏，宋振宇，黄云飞，董曼. 湖北松滋地区下奥陶统生物扰动型凝块石的发现及其成因探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1078-1084.
[2] 邱 振，邹才能，李熙喆，王红岩，董大忠，卢斌，周尚文，施振生，冯子齐，张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[3] 王涛利，郝爱胜，陈清，李，王庆涛，卢鸿，刘大永. 中扬子宜昌地区五峰组和龙马溪组页岩发育主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 616-631.
[4] 龙胜祥，冯动军，李凤霞，杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[5] 申宝剑，秦建中，腾格尔，潘安阳，仰云峰，边立曾. 中国南方海相烃源岩中细菌状化石识别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 510-517.
[6] 曹涛涛，邓模，宋之光，刘光祥，黄俨然，Andrew Stefan Hursthouse. 黄铁矿对页岩油气富集成藏影响研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 404-414.
[7] 朱华, 杨光, 苑保国, 应丹琳, 戴鑫, 周红飞, 徐世琦, 谈健康. 四川盆地常规天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1475-1485.
[8] 陈双，黄海平,张博原，谢增业. 原油及源内残余沥青裂解成气差异及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1375-1384.
[9] 王钊，周新平，李树同，李士祥,邱军利，张文选,王琪. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区长9段和长10段原油地球化学特征对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1385-1395.
[10] 贾成业,贾爱林,韩品龙,王建君,袁贺,乔辉. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组优质页岩储层特征与开发评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1406-1415.
[11] 张建勇，倪新峰，吴兴宁，李文正，郝毅，陈娅娜，吕学菊，谷明峰，田瀚，朱茂. 中国主要克拉通盆地深层白云岩优质储层发育主控因素及分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1165-1175.
[12] 沈安江，陈娅娜，潘立银，王龙，佘敏. 四川盆地下寒武统龙王庙组沉积相与储层分布预测研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1176-1190.
[13] 张林，万玉金，杨洪志，苏云河，张满郎. 四川盆地高石梯构造灯影组四段溶蚀孔洞型储层类型及组合模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1191-1198.
[14] 翟秀芬，汪泽成，罗平，王铜山，石书缘，张洪. 四川盆地高石梯东部地区震旦系灯影组微生物白云岩储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1199-1210.
[15] 张光荣，张旋，喻颐，张红英，廖奇，张福宏，赵艾琳，梁瀚. 四川盆地深层海相碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层预测关键技术——以SN地区茅口组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1235-1242.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!