天然气地球科学 ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 748–754.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2010.05.748

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖泛泥岩对补偿成藏的控制作用——以绥靖地区长4+5湖泛泥岩为例

李树同, 陶辉飞, 王多云, 陈丹丹, 南北杰, 王改娥, 李儒春, 高月红   

  1. 1.中国科学院油气资源研究重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2.中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049;
    3.北京师范大学资源学院,北京 100875;
    4.长庆油田第四采油厂, 陕西 靖边 718500
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-07 修回日期:2010-05-06 出版日期:2010-10-10 发布日期:2010-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 李树同lishutong1979@163.com. E-mail:lishutong1979@163.com.
  • 作者简介:李树同(1979-),男,甘肃会宁人,助理研究员,博士,主要从事层序地层学和储层沉积学研究.
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院“西部之光”人才培养计划项目;甘肃省科技计划项目(编号:1007RJYA013)联合资助.

Flooding Shale Controls on Compensatory Reservoir Forming: A Case from Chang4+5 Formation Flooding Shale, Suijing Area

LI Shu-Tong, TAO Hui-Fei, WANG Duo-Yun, CHEN Dan-Dan, NA Bei-Jie, WANG Gai-E, LI Ru-Chun, GAO Yue-Hong   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy
    of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2.Graduate school, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,
    China;3.College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 4.The Fourth Oil Production Plant of Changqing Oilfield Company, Jingbian 718500,China。
  • Received:2010-04-07 Revised:2010-05-06 Online:2010-10-10 Published:2010-10-10

摘要:

利用岩性、电性等资料识别出了绥靖地区长4+5湖泛泥岩,建立了其识别标志,并研究了其平面展布特征。在此基础上,运用测井技术研究了长4+5湖泛泥岩的厚度、含砂量和总孔隙度3个地层参数,对每个参数赋予权值,综合评价了长4+5湖泛泥岩封盖性级别,将其划分为11个权级数和4个盖层级别,同时,评价了研究区内6个泥岩区带的长4+5湖泛泥岩的盖层级别。最后,分析了长4+5湖泛泥岩对长6油藏和长2油藏补偿成藏的控制作用:①长4+5湖泛泥岩封盖性权级数在10~5之间时,为优—良盖层,其作为长6盖层封堵油气,形成长6岩性油藏;②长4+5湖泛泥岩封盖性权级数在4~-1之间时,为差—非盖层,在较大排驱压力的作用下,油气穿透长4+5湖泛泥岩层,运移至长2圈闭内形成构造—岩性油藏。

关键词: 湖泛泥岩, 补偿成藏, 总孔隙度, 地层参数, 绥靖地区

Abstract:

Here we identified the flooding shale of Chang4+5 Formation in Suijing area by using lithologic and logging data, established some identifiers of the flooding shale, and illustrated the planar distribution of shales. Using logging technology, we studied three formation parameters (thickness, sand content, and total porosity) of the flooding shale from Chang4+5 Formation, assigned weights to each parameter, and comprehensive evaluated levels of block and permeate of Chang4+5 Formation flooding shale, which was divided into eleven weights and four cap\|rock levels. Meanwhile we evaluated cap-rock levels of six Chang4+5 flooding shale zones in Suijing area. At last, we analyzed the compensatory reservoir forming controls of Chang4+5 flooding shale to Chang6 and Chang2 reservoirs: ① when the block and permeate weight of Chang4+5 Formation flooding shale was 10 to 5, the cap-rocks was excellent-good to Chang6 Formation, and formed Chang6 lithologic reservoir; ②when the block and permeate weight of Chang4+5 Formation flooding shale was 4 to -1, the cap-rocks was bad to non cap-rocks. Oil and gas penetrated the Chang4+5 Formation flooding shale under a great propel pressure, migrated to Chang2 traps and formed structural lithologic reservoir.

Key words: Flooding shale, Compensatory reservoir-forming, Total porosity, Formation parameters, Suijing area.

中图分类号: 

  • TE122

[1]Yang Hua,Zhang Wenzheng.Leading effect of the seventh member high-quality source rock of Yanchang Formation in Ordos basin during the enrichment of low-penetrating oil-gas accumulation: Geology and geochemistry[J].Geochimica,2005,34(2):147-154.[杨华,张文正.论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用:地质地球化学特征[J].地球化学,2005,34(2):147-154.]
[2]Wu Fuli,Li Wenhou,Xi Shengli,et al.Delta sediments and evolution of the Yanchang Formation of  upper Triassic in Ordos basin [J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2004,6(3):307-314. [武富礼,李文厚,席胜利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组三角洲沉积及演化[J].古地理学报,2004,6(3):307-314.]
[3]Li Shutong,Wang Duoyun,Tao Huifei,et al.The lake distribution and evolution law of the Ordos basin,in Triassic Yanchang period[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(1):41-47.[李树同,王多云,陶辉飞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠纪延长期湖水分布特征及演化规律[J].沉积学报,2009,27(1):41-47.]
[4]Zhang Runhe,Zhen Xingping,Xu Xiangao,et al. Evaluation of hydrocarbon-generating potential of the fourth and fifth member mudstone of Yanchang Formation of upper Triassic series in Ordos basin[J].Journal of Xi′an Petroleum Institute:Natural Science Edition,2003,18(2):10-13.[张润合,郑兴平,徐献高,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组四、五段泥岩生烃潜力评价[J].西安石油学院学报:自然科学版,2003,18(2):10-13.]
 [5]Li Guoping,Shi Qiang,Wang Shuyin.A study of reservoir-cap rock log interpretation method[J].Well Log Technology,1997,21(2):98-104.[李国平,石强,王树寅.储盖组合测井解释方法研究[J].测井技术,1997,21(2):98-104.]
[6]Fan Xiangyu.Researches and Application of Cap Rock Logging Evaluation Method [D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum Institute,2003:55-66 .[范翔宇.盖层测井评价方法研究及应用[D].成都:西南石油学院,2003:55-56.]
[7]Lv Xixue,Xu Fengming,Zhang Bin.Evaluation on mudstone cap-rock of upper Paleozoic group and its effect on oil accumulation in Chegu 20 buried hill[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2003,27(3):1-3.[吕希学,许凤鸣,张斌.车古20潜山地区上古生界泥岩盖层的评价及其对成藏控制[J].大庆石油学院学报 2003,27(3):1-3.]
[8]Fu Guang,Kang Dejiang.Seal characteristics of  K1d1  mudstone caprock and researchsignificance  in Wuerxun depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(3):269-273.[付广,康德江.乌尔逊凹陷大一段泥岩盖层封闭能力及其研究意义[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(3):269-273.] 
[9]Zhang Lei.Reevaluation of caprock physical sealing mechanic[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,21(1):112-116.[张蕾.盖层物性封闭力学机制新认识[J].天然气地球科学,2009,21(1):112-116.]
[10]Fu Guang,Zhao Rong,Jiang Zhenxue.Sealing property of mudstone caprocks in Daqing placanticline and its westerns[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1998,19(3):232-237.[付广,赵荣,姜振学.大庆长垣及西部地区泥岩盖层的封闭性能[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(3):232-237.
[11]Kang Dejiang,Fu Guang,Lv Yanfang.Evaluation on mudstone caprock in Nantun Formation and its effect on oil accumulation in Beier rift subsidence basin[J].Oil & Gas Recovery Technology,2006,13(5):44-46.[康德江,付广,吕延防.贝尔断陷布达特群泥岩盖层综合评价[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(5):44-46.]
[12]Si Yuhu.Research on oil reservoir geologic characteristics of Chang 6 oil layer formation of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Huaziping[J].Express Information of Mining Industry,2008,24(1):50-52.[思玉琥.化子坪上三叠统延长组长6油层组油藏特征研究[J].矿业快报,2008,24(1):50-52.] 
[13]Li Jianxiong,Wang Long.Chang 2 Formation′s reservoir characteristics of Sai 39 well area in  Suijing oilfield[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology:Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,2006,28(6):54-56 .[李建雄,王龙.绥靖油田塞39井区长2油层储层特征[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报,2006,28(6):54-56.] 
[14]Wu Fuli,Zhao Jingzhou,Yan Shike,et al.Compensatory petroleum accumulation rules in the Mesozoic of Shanbei area [J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,20(3):23-26.[武富礼,赵靖舟,闫世可,等.陕北地区中生界石油补偿成藏规律研究[J].石油学报, 2007,20(3):23-26.]
[15]Li Jian,Jin Wenqi,Yang Xiaoqi.Probe into compensatory reservoir-forming phenomena in Ansai oilfield[J].Di Shentou Youqitian,2007,(1):97-101.[李健,靳文奇,杨晓奇.安塞油田补偿成藏现象探讨[J].低渗透油气田,2007,(1):97-101.]

[1] 李国欣, 易士威, 林世国, 高阳, 李明鹏, 李德江, 王昌勇. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部地区下侏罗统储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1506-1517.
[2] 李梦茹,唐友军,刘岩,胡辉,贺其川. 江陵凹陷不同地区原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1240-1251.
[3] 包建平, 朱翠山, 申旭. 金刚烷类化合物与库车坳陷克拉2构造凝析油的形成机理研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1217-1230.
[4] 王强, 张大勇, 王杰, 陶成, 腾格尔, 刘文汇. 烃类与非烃综合判识干酪根与原油裂解气[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1231-1239.
[5] 彭威龙,胡国艺,刘全有,贾楠,房忱琛,龚德瑜,于聪,吕玥,王鹏威,冯子齐. 热模拟实验研究现状及值得关注的几个问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1252-1263.
[6] 张荣虎,王珂,王俊鹏,孙雄伟,李君,杨学君,周露. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深构造带克深8区块裂缝性低孔砂岩储层地质模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1264-1273.
[7] 曾旭, 李剑, 田继先, 王波, 国建英, 沙威.  柴达木盆地腹部晚期构造带成藏模拟实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1301-1309.
[8] 王清龙,林畅松,李浩,韩剑发,孙彦达,何海全. 塔里木盆地西北缘中下奥陶统碳酸盐岩沉积微相特征及演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1274-1288.
[9] 孙可欣,李贤庆,魏强,梁万乐,李剑,张光武. 利用流体历史分析技术研究库车坳陷大北气田油气充注史[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1289-1300.
[10] 周立宏,蒲秀刚,肖敦清,李洪香,官全胜,林伶,曲宁. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油形成条件及富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1323-1332.
[11] 蒋裕强,谷一凡,徐昌海,张洁伟,程晓艳,陈辉. 开江—梁平海槽东侧飞仙关组岩相分区及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1067-1077.
[12] 刘琴琴,陈桂华,陈晓智,祝彦贺,杨小峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地L地区上古生界上石盒子组物源特征及其对储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1094-1101.
[13] 朱立文,王震亮,张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[14] 张世铭,王建功,张小军,张婷静,曹志强,杨麟科. 酒西盆地间泉子段储层流体赋存及渗流特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1111-1119.
[15] 吕正祥,王先东,吴家洋,卿元华. 渤海海域中部古近系湖相碳酸盐岩储层成岩演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 921-931.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!