Geological characteristics and enrichment controlling factors of interlayer shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin

  • Yong LI , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • Pu YANG 3 ,
  • Yuting HOU 4 ,
  • Tao ZHANG 5 ,
  • Jian YU 4 ,
  • Haifeng ZHANG 5 ,
  • Long WANG 5 ,
  • Aiping HU 5 ,
  • Ruize SHI 3 ,
  • Xin HE 3 ,
  • Shijia CHEN 1, 2, 3 ,
  • Jungang LU 1, 2, 3
Expand
  • 1. National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China
  • 2. Sichuan Natural Gas Geology Key Laboratories,Chengdu 610500,China
  • 3. School of Geoscience and Technology,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China
  • 4. Changqing Oilfield Company,PetroChina,Xi’an 710018,China
  • 5. Exploration Department of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company,Xi’an 710018,China

Received date: 2025-05-30

  Revised date: 2025-09-04

  Online published: 2025-09-15

Supported by

the Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project of PetroChina(2022D002-0105)

Abstract

The Chang 7 interlayered shale oil in the Ordos Basin possesses significant exploration potential, yet the enrichment degree varies greatly across different zones, and the understanding of regionalized reservoir controlling factors remains unclear. Through comparative analysis of reservoir-forming elements such as source rocks, reservoirs, and lithological combinations in the Chang 7 interlayered shale oil in Longdong, Northern Shaanxi, and Jiyuan areas, the controlling factors for differential accumulation of interlayered shale oil have been identified, and a differential enrichment and reservoir formation model has been established. The research results indicate that the thin mud and thick sand development in the delta front of Northern Shaanxi, coupled with limited distribution of source rocks, is the key factor contributing to the poorer enrichment of interlayered shale oil compared to Longdong. In Jiyuan, despite the maximum thickness of source rocks in the Chang 7 Member, the small scale of sandstone reservoirs and poor lateral continuity, coupled with low hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency due to the thick mud and thin sand lithological combination, result in the smallest enrichment scale of interlayered shale oil, making it a favorable area for shale-type shale oil exploration. In the Huachi-Qingcheng area of Longdong, the development of thick mud and thick sand lithological combinations, coupled with high-quality reservoirs, determines the large-scale enrichment of interlayered shale oil. The fracture development in the Heshui area provides good transport conditions for the vertical migration of shale oil, and the better physical properties of the Chang 71 sub-member reservoirs result in a better enrichment scale of interlayered shale oil compared to the Chang 72 sub-member. A “four-element” joint control differential enrichment and accumulation model has been established, which includes high-quality source rock, high-quality reservoir enrichment, lithological combination accumulation, and fracture control. It points out that the delta front ends of Longdong and Northern Shaanxi are the main target areas for interlayered shale oil exploration, and the Chang 73 sub-member in Jiyuan is an important area for shale-type shale oil exploration, providing theoretical support for the optimization of sweet spots and development deployment of continental shale oil.

Cite this article

Yong LI , Pu YANG , Yuting HOU , Tao ZHANG , Jian YU , Haifeng ZHANG , Long WANG , Aiping HU , Ruize SHI , Xin HE , Shijia CHEN , Jungang LU . Geological characteristics and enrichment controlling factors of interlayer shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2026 , 37(3) : 414 -427 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2025.08.006

0 引言

随着我国常规油气资源勘探难度日益增大及原油对外依存度长期超能源安全警戒线,发展非常规油气接替资源已成为保障国家能源安全的战略选择1-4。国际勘探实践表明,美国借助页岩油的成功勘探开发一跃成为油气净出口国,而我国页岩油资源潜力巨大,技术可采资源量达145×108 t,页岩油的勘探开发将对我国原油自给供应的长期安全形成重大支撑5-6。近年来通过理论技术创新,我国在渤海湾盆地沙河街组、鄂尔多斯盆地延长组、松辽盆地青山口组、四川盆地侏罗系等层系相继实现了页岩油勘探开发突破,标志着我国陆相页岩油已进入大规模勘探开发建产阶段7-11。我国陆相页岩主要发育于淡水、咸水、碱湖环境,岩石类型和矿物组成复杂,非均质性强,形成了夹层型、混积型和页岩型多类型甜点,其中夹层型页岩油因其砂泥互层结构和较好可动性成为当前勘探开发的重点目标12-15
鄂尔多斯盆地作为我国陆相页岩油富集区,长7段沉积期最大湖侵阶段形成的黑色页岩层系厚度逾百米16-17。受沉积水体变化,长7段纵向上不同亚段沉积微相和岩性组合存在较大差异,长73亚段主要发育页岩型甜点,而长72和长71亚段则形成三角洲前缘—重力流夹层型页岩油甜点18-20。以半深湖—深湖的重力流砂体为勘探对象,在湖盆中部发现了储量规模超10×108 t的庆城油田,在甘肃陇东建成了百万吨页岩油生产基地21。为进一步深化砂体展布规律研究,将含油富集区进一步向陕北三角洲夹层型页岩油扩展,陕北新区带落实含油面积1 200 km2,储量规模为(3~5)×108 t,展示了鄂尔多斯盆地夹层型页岩油巨大的勘探潜力22-23
鄂尔多斯盆地长7段夹层型页岩油勘探虽然取得了较大突破,但随着勘探开发的逐步深入,不同区带夹层型页岩油富集程度和勘探开发效果却存在明显差异。例如,姬塬地区和陕北地区夹层型页岩油勘探效果明显差于陇东地区,纵向上陇东庆城地区长71和长72亚段勘探效果均较好,而合水地区长71亚段夹层型页岩油富集程度却明显好于长72亚段。现有研究多聚焦长7段页岩油单一区块成藏解剖,对区域化页岩油差异富集规律和控制因素认识不清,影响了下一步有利勘探区带预测24-27。基于此,本文从烃源岩、沉积储层、岩性组合以及裂缝发育等地质特征入手,对比分析陇东、姬塬和陕北地区夹层型页岩油差异富集控制因素,建立不同区带夹层型页岩油成藏模式,以期为强非均质性陆相页岩油甜点优选和开发部署提供理论支撑。

1 区域地质背景

鄂尔多斯盆地是我国第二大沉积盆地,是发育在华北克拉通之上的复合型盆地。鄂尔多斯盆地位于华北板块西部,横跨内蒙古、陕西、山西、甘肃和宁夏5个省(区)。加里东运动时期,华北板块在中、晚奥陶世抬升,盆地结束了陆表海沉积体系,且海水逐渐由北向东退去28,在晚石炭世形成了海陆交汇的过渡沉积体系。在早二叠世时,南北两侧的洋壳向华北板块俯冲,盆地形成了南北两侧隆起、中部坳陷的构造格局(图1),可划分为6个一级构造单元,分别为伊盟隆起、西缘逆冲带、渭北隆起、天环坳陷、伊陕斜坡和晋西挠褶带29-30
图1 区域地理位置(a)与长7段综合柱状图(b)34

Fig.1 Regional geographic location(a) and Chang 7 Member comprehensive histogram(b)34

研究区在晚三叠时期为一沉降作用为主的大型坳陷湖盆,长7段则发育于湖盆鼎盛时期,沉积了一套富含有机质的湖相黑色生油岩系,包含长71、长72和长73共3个亚段,总厚度为100~120 m。长73亚段沉积期以深湖相沉积为主,页岩发育,在湖泊周缘发育三角洲砂体,在深湖区发育小规模砂质碎屑流砂体,水体深度可达150 m,发育灰黑色泥岩、深灰色灰质泥岩、含炭屑粉砂质泥岩和黑色页岩等生油岩1831-33。长72亚段沉积期湖泊开始萎缩,深湖相沉积范围减小,西南部大型三角洲发育并向湖延伸,导致深湖区发育大规模砂质碎屑流沉积,水体深度变浅。长71亚段沉积期湖泊继续萎缩,大型三角洲持续发育,深湖区砂质碎屑流沉积范围进一步扩大,水体深度进一步变浅。长71和长72亚段发育粉砂岩、细砂岩和泥岩的交替层34-35

2 夹层型页岩油地质特征

2.1 烃源岩地球化学特征

有机质丰度、类型和成熟度是烃源岩生烃潜力评价常用的指标参数36。实验结果表明,纵向上长73亚段烃源岩有机质丰度最高、生烃潜力大,平面上陇东和姬塬地区的烃源岩质量明显好于陕北地区[图2(a)]。陇东地区,长71亚段TOC平均值为1.56%,S 1+S 2平均值为5.02 mg/g,长72亚段TOC平均值为6.31%,S 1+S 2平均值为14.87 mg/g,长73亚段TOC平均值为10.86%,S1+S2 平均值为34.08 mg/g。姬塬地区,长71亚段TOC平均值为3.86%,S 1+S 2平均值为8.28 mg/g,长72亚段TOC平均值为4.31%,S 1+S 2平均值为11.58 mg/g,长73亚段TOC平均值为8.96%,S 1+S 2平均值为26.98 mg/g。陕北地区,长71亚段TOC平均值为1.98%,S 1+S 2平均值为8.15 mg/g,长72亚段TOC平均值为3.69%,S 1+S 2平均值为10.58 mg/g,长73亚段TOC平均值为6.25%,S 1+S 2平均值为17.55 mg/g。
图2 长7段不同区带和不同亚段烃源岩地球化学特征评价

(a)不同地区和不同亚段有机质丰度评价;(b)不同地区和不同亚段有机质类型划分;(c)不同地区和不同亚段干酪根显微组分含量;(d)不同地区成熟度频率分布直方图;(e)不同亚段成熟度频率分布直方图

Fig.2 Evaluation of geochemical characteristics of source rocks in different zones and different sub-members of Chang 7 Member

从元素组成和显微组分对比来看,长7段烃源岩主要以Ⅰ型和Ⅱ1型有机质为主,纵向上长73亚段有机质类型最好,平面上姬塬和陇东地区以Ⅰ型有机质为主,而陕北地区以Ⅱ1型有机质为主[图2(b),图2(c)]。从成熟度指标参数镜质体反射率R O值来看,鄂尔多斯盆地长7段烃源岩都已达到了成熟阶段,R O值主体分布在0.7%~1.1%之间,平均值为0.88%,正处于生油高峰期[图2(d)]。纵向上,随着埋深的增加,长7段烃源岩的成熟度也在增加,长71亚段泥页岩R O平均值为0.81%,长72亚段R O平均值为0.87%,长73亚段R O平均值为0.93%[图2(e)]。区域上,陕北地区烃源岩R O平均值为0.85%,姬塬地区R O平均值为0.91%,陇东地区R O平均值为0.89%,陇东和姬塬地区烃源岩成熟度略高于陕北地区,但整体差异较小。

2.2 砂岩储层特征

为了进一步明确夹层型甜点储层特征,系统开展了陇东、陕北和姬塬地区长71亚段和长72亚段砂岩储层岩石学、物性和孔隙结构对比分析(表1)。碎屑物组成上,陇东和姬塬地区整体以岩屑长石砂岩为主,而陕北地区则以长石砂岩为主。填隙物组成上,不同区带差异不明显,整体上以云母、水云母和铁方解石为主。孔隙类型主要以粒间孔和长石溶孔为主,相比较而言,陕北地区长石溶孔比姬塬和陇东地区更为发育(图3)。从储层物性分析结果来看,长71亚段砂岩储层平均孔隙度为8.03%,平均渗透率为0.18×10-3 μm2;长72亚段砂岩储层平均孔隙度为8.33%,平均渗透率为0.19×10-3 μm2;但不同区块却存在明显差异,陕北和陇东地区砂岩物性好于姬塬地区。陇东地区,长71亚段砂岩孔隙度分布在1.19%~16.70%之间,平均为8.47%,渗透率分布在(0.001~14.280)×10-3 μm2之间,平均值为0.194×10-3 μm2;长72亚段砂岩孔隙度分布在0.90%~14.40%之间,平均为8.27%,渗透率分布在(0.001~1.680)×10-3 μm2之间,平均值为0.183×10-3 μm2。姬塬地区,长71亚段砂岩孔隙度分布在1.60%~17.20%之间,平均值为7.15%,渗透率分布在(0.055~2.860)×10-3 μm2之间,平均值为0.117×10-3 μm2;长72亚段砂岩孔隙度分布在2.12%~15.90%之间,平均值为6.64%,渗透率分布在(0.001~1.980)×10-3 μm2之间,平均值为0.103×10-3 μm2。陕北地区,长71亚段砂岩孔隙度分布在1.33%~14.89%之间,平均值为8.14%,渗透率分布在(0.055~7.440)×10-3 μm2之间,平均值为0.201×10-3 μm2;长72亚段砂岩孔隙度分布在3.02%~15.30%之间,平均值为8.86%,渗透率分布在(0.006~5.510)×10-3 μm2之间,平均值为0.215×10-3 μm2表1)。从高压压汞实验数据分析来看,陕北和陇东地区砂岩排驱压力明显小于姬塬地区,也表明陕北和陇东地区砂岩孔隙结构明显好于姬塬地区。值得注意的是,陇东和姬塬2个地区的长71和长72亚段砂岩的成分和含量接近,但是孔隙度、渗透率和排替压力相差较大,尤其是渗透率和排替压力相差接近一倍,这主要是由于不同地区砂体沉积体系不一样导致的,陕北地区长7段整体为三角洲沉积体系砂体,分选好,泥质含量低37;而陇东和姬塬主要发育重力流砂体,分选差,杂基含量高38,尤其是姬塬地区,黏土矿物胶结作用和碳酸盐胶结作用强烈,极大降低了储层品质39-41
表1 鄂尔多斯盆地长71亚段和长72亚段不同区带砂岩储层特征实验数据

Table 1 Experimental data table of sandstone reservoir characteristics in different zones of Chang 71 and Chang 72 sub-members in Ordos Basin

参数 陇东 姬塬 陕北
长71亚段(633) 长72亚段(531) 长71亚段(383) 长72亚段(205) 长71亚段(537) 长72亚段(701)
石英/% 39.56 38.68 39.21 37.89 24.97 25.6
长石/% 20.55 19.3 15.55 20.25 38.82 40.3
岩屑/% 17.29 18.07 19.55 20.33 10.89 10.45
杂基/% 7.44 8.31 12.7 11.6 6.21 6.42
胶结物/% 6.55 6.22 7.31 7.55 6.97 6.32
孔隙度/%

1.19~16.70

8.47(633)

0.90~14.40

8.27(531)

1.60~17.20

7.15(383)

2.12~15.9

6.64(205)

1.33~14.89

8.14(537)

3.02~15.30

8.86(701)

渗透率/(10-3 μm2

0.001~14.280

0.194(633)

0.001~1.68

0.183(531)

0.055~2.86

0.117(383)

0.001~1.98

0.103(205)

0.001~7.44

0.201(537)

0.006~5.51

0.215(701)

排驱压力/MPa

0.047 5~7.631 5

2.88(133)

0.571 3~7.893 6

2.92(97)

1~13.111 7

3.62(15)

0.823~19.280 1

4.57(11)

0.193 9~9.662 8

2.86(10)

0.455 3~8.683 4

2.74(28)

注: 1.19 ~ 16.70 8.47 ( 633 ) = 最小 最大 平均 ( 样本 总数 )

图3 研究区砂体储层显微照片

(a)陇东地区B144井,长71亚段,1 927.46 m,溶孔和粒间孔;(b)陇东地区L189井,长72亚段,2 189.2 m,溶孔和粒间孔;(c)陇东地区N112井,长71亚段,1 443.93 m,颗粒溶蚀现象及溶蚀孔;(d)陇东地区X259井,长71亚段,1 895.5 m,粒间杂基溶蚀产生溶孔;(e)姬塬地区H59井,长72亚段,2 405.32 m,溶孔和粒间孔;(f)姬塬地区H304井,长71亚段,2 581.0 m,溶孔和粒间孔;(g)姬塬地区L88井,长71亚段,2 247.03 m,长石颗粒溶蚀孔隙;(h)姬塬地区L38井,长71亚段,1 927.46 m,长石粒类溶蚀孔隙;(i)陕北地区A92井,长72亚段,2 297.67 m,溶孔和粒间孔;(j)陕北地区Y149井,长72亚段,2 173.85 m,绿泥石膜和长石溶孔;(k)陕北地区B144井,长71亚段,1 927.46 m,绿泥石填充参与孔喉;(l)陕北地区X42井,长72亚段,2 388.71 m,高岭石填充粒间孔

Fig.3 Micrograph of sand body reservoir in the study area

2.3 岩性组合特征

鄂尔多斯盆地长7段页岩油主要发育夹层型和页岩型2大类,前人42-44结合不同地区沉积相、岩性组合、源储配置等差异性,进一步将其划分为重力流型、三角洲前缘型、纹层型和页理型4小类。本文针对长71和长72亚段夹层型页岩油,根据源储配置组合的关系,可以将夹层型页岩油的岩性组合划分为厚泥薄砂、厚泥厚砂以及薄泥厚砂3类(图4)。厚泥薄砂主要发育在姬塬地区,长73、长72和长71亚段烃源岩均发育,砂岩厚度呈薄互层分布,砂地比普遍小于20%,如Y56井;厚泥厚砂主要发育在陇东地区,烃源岩以长73亚段厚层泥页岩为主,长71和长72亚段主要发育厚层砂岩,砂地比主要分布在30%~50%之间,如Z233井;薄泥厚砂主要分布在陕北一带,位于三角洲前缘,烃源岩厚度和连续性明显差于姬塬和陇东地区,整体上以砂岩为主,砂地比普遍大于50%,如H261井。
图4 不同岩性组合类型发育特征

Fig.4 Development characteristics of different lithology combination types

3 夹层型页岩油富集控制因素

3.1 充足的供烃能力为页岩油富集提供了物质基础

烃源岩质量是控制页岩油富集程度的物质基础,长73亚段沉积期广泛发育的厚层泥页岩是长7段页岩油的主力供烃层系45。受沉积相带分异影响,长73亚段烃源岩空间展布具有显著非均质性:姬塬与陇东地区处于半深湖—深湖,烃源岩厚度大,普遍大于30 m,且横向连续性好;而陕北地区位于湖盆边缘浅水环境,烃源岩厚度较薄,多小于8 m,且横向断续分布(图5)。此外,从前文烃源岩地球化学参数对比显示,姬塬和陇东地区烃源岩具有更高的有机质丰度和生烃潜量,同时镜质体反射率亦略高于陕北地区。这种差异导致陕北地区长7段烃源岩供烃能力差于姬塬和陇东地区,进而造成陕北地区夹层型页岩油富集程度显著低于陇东地区。
图5 不同地区烃源岩发育特征

(a)长73亚段烃源岩厚度分布图;(b)陕北—陇东烃源岩连井剖面图;(c)姬塬—陇东地区烃源岩连井剖面图

Fig.5 Development characteristics of source rocks in different areas

3.2 优质的储集能力决定了页岩油富集规模

砂体分布和储集能力决定了夹层型页岩油甜点的富集规模。受湖盆水体变化,由长73亚段到长71亚段沉积过程中,盆地西南部逐渐抬升,使湖盆沉积中心逐渐向东迁移,湖盆深水区面积逐渐减少,砂体发育规模逐渐增加。从不同区域上来看,姬塬地区砂体发育规模远不如陇东和陕北地区[图6(a),图6(b)]。受浊流和碎屑流沉积影响,陇东地区长71亚段和长72亚段浊积砂体发育,砂体厚度大,累计厚度可以超过40 m,为夹层型页岩油大规模发育提供了良好的储集空间。陕北发育三角洲砂体,前缘主体砂体连续性好,厚度大,长71亚段、长72亚段砂体均发育,三角洲前缘末端砂体多为薄层,单层厚度小,岩性变化频繁。姬塬地区水体相对较深,长73亚段到长71亚段均发育泥页岩,砂体发育规模小,砂体厚度薄,横向连续性差。此外,从恒速压汞分析结果来看,陕北和陇东地区储层孔隙结构也明显优于姬塬地区,陇东地区砂岩平均喉道半径为0.359 μm,平均孔隙半径为161.41 μm[图6(c)],陕北地区砂岩平均喉道半径为0.398 μm,平均孔隙半径为178.71 μm[图6(d)],而姬塬地区砂岩平均喉道半径为0.28 μm,平均孔隙半径为151.03 μm[图6(e)]。因此,砂岩的发育规模和储集能力导致陇东和陕北地区夹层型页岩油勘探效果明显好于姬塬地区。
图6 不同区带砂岩厚度平面展布及其孔径大小分布

(a)长71亚段砂体厚度平面展布;(b)长72亚段砂体厚度平面展布;(c)陇东地区长7段砂岩孔径分布;(d)陕北地区长7段砂岩孔径分布;(e)姬塬地区长7段砂岩孔径分布

Fig.6 Planar distribution of sandstone thickness and pore size distribution in different zones

3.3 有利的岩性组合控制了页岩油差异聚集

岩性组合发育特征的差异性控制了不同地区夹层型页岩油差异聚集。姬塬地区,长7段沉积时期水体深,主要发育泥岩,砂岩发育规模小,主要以厚泥夹薄砂型岩性组合为主,砂地比普遍小于20%,虽然烃源岩厚度大,但夹层型砂体储集甜点不发育,导致姬塬地区夹层型页岩油勘探效果较差。陇东地区长73亚段泥页岩发育且横向分布稳定,长71亚段和长72亚段物性好的重力流砂体与下伏泥页岩直接接触,发育厚泥厚砂岩性组合,形成了陇东地区夹层型页岩油大面积规模聚集。而陕北地区,位于湖盆边缘,三角洲前缘砂体连续性好,厚度大,但烃源岩厚度相对薄于姬塬和陇东地区,主要发育薄泥厚砂型岩性组合,供烃能力不足,导致陕北地区夹层型页岩油富集规模差于陇东地区(图7)。
图7 不同区带岩性组合模式与页岩油富集规模

(a)研究区井位分布平面图;(b)姬塬地区H15—G92—G184—L23—L254—L314连井剖面;(c)陇东地区C96—C98—L360—L387—L47—L152连井剖面;(d)陕北地区H68—A83—A72—H306—Y256—Y189—X259—X281—X541—S18—G28—D199—Q23连井剖面

Fig.7 Lithology combination mode and shale oil enrichment scale in different zones

3.4 裂缝发育控制了页岩油运移

位于陇东地区的东南部合水,沉积相带与华池—庆城一带相似,夹层型页岩油甜点主要为浊积砂体,但从纵向对比上来看,长71亚段原油富集程度却比靠近优质烃源岩的长72亚段更高。一方面,合水地区长71亚段砂岩储层物性优于长72亚段,长71亚段储层平均孔隙度为9.42%,平均渗透率为0.25×10-3 μm2,而长72亚段储层平均孔隙度为7.27%,平均渗透率为0.075×10-3 μm2,好的储层物性有利于原油的充注与聚集;另一方面,更重要的是合水地区裂缝的发育为长7段页岩油运移至长71亚段优质储层提供了良好的输导体系。除此之外,合水地区长7段普遍发育各种裂缝,宏观裂缝包括张性裂缝、剪切裂缝,平均线密度为0.31条/m,微裂缝包括穿粒裂缝等,平均面密度为0.25~0.50 μm/μm2,有效增加了地层连通性和孔隙连通性46-47。而通过实际的岩心观察也证实了这一情况,合水地区岩心普遍发育裂缝(图8)。显微镜下观察裂缝中存在发黄色荧光的原油,进一步证实了裂缝是该地区原油运移的有效通道。大量发育的裂缝为原油向上运移提供了运移通道,且长72亚段砂体储层物性较差制约了原油的侧向运移,原油沿裂缝大规模优先运移至长71亚段优质储层中,在裂缝和砂体控藏背景下,形成了如今页岩油在长71亚段大规模富集的局面。
图8 合水地区长7段裂缝发育岩心照片和荧光薄片

(a)N33井,长72 亚段,1 691.4 m发育裂缝;(b)Z40井,长73 亚段,1 463.45 m微裂缝含油;(c)Z40井,长73 亚段,1 463.45 m微裂缝含油;(d)Z40井,长73亚段,1 463.45 m发育裂缝;(e)ZH147井,长72亚段,1 827.50 m微裂缝含油;(f)ZH147井,长72亚段,1 827.95 m微裂缝含油

Fig.8 Core photos and fluorescent thin sections of Chang 7 Member fracture development in Heshui area

3.5 成藏模式

通过陇东、姬塬和陕北3个地区长7段夹层型页岩油生烃条件、储集层物性、岩性组合和裂缝发育程度等成藏条件对比分析,建立了鄂尔多斯盆地长7段夹层型页岩油“优质烃源岩供烃、优质储层控富、岩性组合控聚、裂缝发育控运”的四元联控差异富集成藏模式。姬塬地区,长73亚段、长72亚段和长71亚段烃源岩均发育,夹层型砂岩储层发育规模小、砂体横向连续性差,夹层型页岩油富集规模差,发育厚砂薄泥岩性组合,纵向上多套厚层烃源岩相互排烃制约,有利于长73亚段源内页岩型页岩油滞留聚集成藏;陕北地区,位于湖盆边缘,三角洲前缘砂体横向连续性好,但烃源岩供烃能力差,发育薄泥厚砂岩性组合,导致夹层型页岩油富集规模差于陇东地区;陇东地区的华池—庆城一带,重力流砂体规模大、物性好,稳定分布的长73亚段厚层泥页岩供烃,发育厚泥厚砂岩性组合,靠近优质烃源岩的长72亚段夹层型页岩油富集规模最大;陇东地区东南部合水一带,裂缝发育为页岩油垂向运移提供了良好输导条件,再加上长71亚段砂体物性更好,长71亚段夹层型页岩油富集规模好于长72亚段。综合以上分析,陇东地区厚泥厚砂直接接触的源储组合,长73亚段泥页岩生成的原油高效运移至长71亚段和长72亚段砂岩聚集成藏,是长7段夹层型页岩油勘探的主要目标。陕北地区砂体厚度大,储集层物性好,在三角洲前缘末端烃源岩质量相对较好,是长7段夹层型页岩油勘探的新领域。对于姬塬地区而言,长73亚段到长71亚段烃源岩均发育,厚泥薄砂,长71亚段和长72亚段的烃源岩可以作为长73亚段的封挡层,长73亚段排烃效率低,是长7段页岩型页岩油勘探的重要目标(图9)。
图9 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段夹层型页岩油差异富集成藏模式

Fig.9 Differential enrichment accumulation model of interlayer shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Ordos Basin

4 结论

(1)鄂尔多斯盆地不同地区页岩油地质特征存在差异。姬塬地区长73亚段到长71亚段烃源岩均较为发育,砂体发育规模小,主要为厚泥薄砂岩性组合;陇东地区长73亚段烃源岩稳定发育,长71和长72亚段发育优质的重力流砂体,累计厚度大,主要为厚泥厚砂岩性组合;陕北地区位于三角洲沉积体系,烃源岩厚度薄且不连续,主要为薄泥厚砂岩性组合。
(2)充足的供烃能力为页岩油富集提供了物质基础,陕北地区烃源岩质量差是该区块夹层型页岩油规模差于陇东地区的关键因素。优质的储集能力决定了页岩油富集规模,姬塬地区砂体发育规模最差是该区块夹层型页岩油富集规模最小的主要原因。有利的岩性组合控制了页岩油差异聚集,陇东地区厚泥厚砂源储直接接触,有利于夹层型页岩油聚集成藏。微裂缝发育控制了页岩油运移,合水地区裂缝发育,页岩油可沿裂缝运移至长71亚段富集成藏。
(3)建立了鄂尔多斯盆地长7段夹层型页岩油“优质源岩供烃、优质储层控富、岩性组合控聚、裂缝发育控运”的四元联控差异富集成藏模式,并指出了陇东和陕北地区三角洲前缘末端是夹层型页岩油勘探的主要目标区域,姬塬地区长73亚段是页岩型页岩油勘探的重要区域,为鄂尔多斯盆地长7段页岩油下一步勘探开发部署提供了理论依据。
[1]
QIU Z,ZOU C N,BENJAMIN J. W,et al. A nutrient control on expanded anoxia and global cooling during the Late Ordovician mass extinction[J].Communications Earth & Environment,2022,3(1): 1-9.

[2]
邱振,邹才能. 非常规油气沉积学:内涵与展望[J]. 沉积学报,2020,38(1): 1-29.

QIU Z,ZOU C N. Unconventional oil and gas sedimentology: Connotation and prospect[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2020,38(1): 1-29.

[3]
邹才能,杨智,张国生,等. 非常规油气地质学理论技术及实践[J]. 地球科学,2023,48(6): 2376-2397.

ZOU C N,YANG Z,ZHANG G S,et al. Theory,technology and practice of unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Earth Science,2023,48(6): 2376-2397.

[4]
杨魏,李勇,邱玉超,等. 四川盆地简阳地区须四段致密砂岩气富集高产控制因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2024,51(6): 897-912.

YANG W,LI Y,QIU Y C,et al. Controlling factors of tight sandstone gas enrichment an high yield in the fourth member of the Xujiahe Formation in Jianyang area,Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2024,51 (6): 897-912.

[5]
杨雷,金之钧.全球页岩油发展及展望[J]. 中国石油勘探,2019,24(5): 553-559.

YANG L,JIN Z J. Global shale oil development and prospects[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5): 553-559.

[6]
郭秋麟,米石云,张倩,等. 中国页岩油资源评价方法与资源潜力探讨[J]. 石油实验地质,2023,45(3): 402-412.

GUO Q L,MI S Y,ZHANG Q,et al. Assessment methods and potential of shale oil resources in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2023,45(3): 402-412.

[7]
蒋奇君,李勇,肖正录,等. 川中地区大安寨段页岩热演化史及油气地质意义[J]. 新疆石油地质,2024,45(3): 262-270.

JIANG Q J,LI Y,XIAO Z L,et al. Thermal evolution history of shale in Da'anzhai Member and its petroleum geological significance in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2024,45(3): 262-270.

[8]
赵文智,卞从胜,李永新,等. 陆相中高成熟页岩油“组分流动”条件及其在提高页岩油产量中的作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2024,51(4): 720-730.

ZHAO W Z,DIAN C S,LI Y X,et al. “Component flow” conditions and its effects on enhancing production of continental medium-to-high maturity shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2024,51(4): 720-730.

[9]
胡英杰,李晓光,单俊峰,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘宁县—正宁地区延长组地层结构重建及页岩油富集模式探讨[J]. 中国石油勘探,2024,29(5): 91-106.

HU Y J,LI X G,DAN J F,et al. Re-construction of stratigraphic structure and shale oil enrichment pattern in Yanchang Formation in Ningxian-Zhengning area,southern margin of Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2024,29(5): 91-106.

[10]
孙焕泉,王海涛,杨勇,等.陆相断陷湖盆页岩油开发技术迭代与发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2024,51(4): 865-877.

SUN H Q,WANG H T,YANG Y,et al. Iteration and evaluation of shale oil development technology for continental rift lake basins[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2024,51(4): 865-877.

[11]
党永潮,梁晓伟,罗锦昌,等. 国家示范工程陆相湖盆夹层型页岩油高效开发技术[J].石油钻采工艺,2024,46(2):208-219.

DANG Y C,LIANG X W,LUO J C,et al. High-efficiency development technology for interbedded shale oil in terrestrial lake basin of national demonstration project[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2024,46(2): 208-219.

[12]
金之钧,张谦,朱如凯,等. 中国陆相页岩油分类及其意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(4): 801-819.

JIN Z J,ZHANG Q,ZHU R K,et al. Classification of lacustrine shale oil reservoirs in China and its significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(4): 801-819.

[13]
赵文智,朱如凯,张婧雅,等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、勘探开发现状与发展趋势 [J]. 中国石油勘探,2023,28(4): 1-13.

ZHAO W Z,ZHU R K,ZHANG Q Y,et al. Classification,exploration and development status and development trend of continental shale oil in China[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(4): 1-13.

[14]
郭芪恒,李士祥,金振奎,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长73亚段页岩油特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2023,50(4): 767-781.

GUO Q H,LI S X,JIN Z K,et al. Characteristics and exploration targets of Chang 7 shale oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and De-velopment,2023,50(4): 767-781.

[15]
李家程,王永宏,冯胜斌,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长7段夹层型页岩油储层物性特征与原油赋存状态分析[J]. 天然气地球科学,2024,35(2): 217-229.

LI J C,WANG Y H,FENG S B,et al. Analysis of physical characteristics and crude oil occurrence status of interlayered shale oil reservoir in Chang 7 Member in Southwest Ordos Basin[J]. Natuaral Gas Geoscience,2024,35(2): 217-229.

[16]
刘翰林,邹才能,邱振,等. 陆相黑色页岩沉积环境及有机质富集机制——以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 沉积学报,2023,41(6): 1810-1829.

LIU H L,ZOU C N,QIU Z,et al. Sedimentary Depositional environment and organic matter enrichment mechanism of Lacustrine black shales:A case study of the Chang 7 Member in the Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2023,41(6):1810-1829.

[17]
刘全有,李鹏,金之钧,等. 湖相泥页岩层系富有机质形成与烃类富集——以长7为例[J]. 中国科学(地球科学),2022,52(2): 270-290.

LIU Q Y,LI P,JIN Z J,et al. Formation of organic rich shale formations and enrichment of hydrocarbons in lacustrine mudstone layers: A case study of Chang 7[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae),2022,52(2): 270-290.

[18]
侯雨庭,杨兆钰,张忠义,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长73页岩油地质认识与勘探前景[J]. 中国石油勘探,2024,29(6): 16-28.

HOU Y T,YANG Z Y,ZHANG Z Y,et al. Geological understanding and exploration potential of shale oil in the third submember of the seventh member of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2024,29(6): 16-28.

[19]
王建,郭秋麟,赵晨蕾,等. 中国主要盆地页岩油气资源潜力及发展前景[J].石油学报,2023,44(12): 2033-2044.

WANG J,GUO Q L,ZHAO C L,et al. Potentials and prospects of shale oil-gas resources in major basins of China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(12): 2033-2044.

[20]
伍岳,刘传喜,夏东领,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地泾河油田长73亚段页岩油地质评价[J]. 天然气地球科学,2024,35(7): 1214-1222.

WU Y,LIU C X,XIA D L,et al. Geological evaluation of Chang 73 shale oil in Jinghe Oilfield,Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(7): 1214-1222.

[21]
孙龙德,刘合,朱如凯,等. 中国页岩油革命值得关注的十个问题[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(12): 2007-2019.

SUN L D,LIU H,ZHU R K,et al. Ten noteworthy issues on shale oil revolution in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(12): 2007-2019.

[22]
付金华,王龙,陈修,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油勘探开发新进展及前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探,2023,28(5): 1-14.

FU J H,WANG L,CHEN X,et al. Progress and prospects of shale oil exploration and development in the seventh member of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Ex-ploration,2023,28(5): 1-14.

[23]
马艳丽,辛红刚,马文忠,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区长7段页岩油富集主控因素及甜点区预测[J]. 天然气地球科学,2021,32(12): 1822-1829.

MA Y L,XING H G,MA W Z,et al. The main controlling factors on the enrichment and sweet-spot area prediction of Chang 7 Member shale oil in northern Shaanxi area,Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2021,32(12): 1822-1829.

[24]
郭旭升,马晓潇,黎茂稳,等. 陆相页岩油富集机理探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(6): 1333-1349.

GUO X S,MA X X,LI M W,et al. Mechanisms for lacustrine shale oil enrichment in Chinese sedimentary basins[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(6): 1333-1349.

[25]
何右安,曹东升,郭雯,等. 板内走滑断裂发育特征及其对页岩油的控制作用:以鄂尔多斯盆地庆城油田长7段为例[J]. 地质科学,2025,60(1): 19-32.

HE Y A,CAO D S,GUO W,et al. Development characteristics of intraplate strike-slip faults and their control on shale oil: A case study of the Chang 7 Member in the Qingcheng Oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Geology(Scientia Geologica Sinica) ,2025,60(1): 19-32.

[26]
曹江骏,王茜,王刘伟,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2024,36(3): 158-171.

CAO J J,WANG X,WANG L W,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of interbedded shale oil reservoirs of Triassic Chang 7 Member in Heshui area,Ordos Basin[J].Li-thologic Reservoirs,2024,36(3): 158-171.

[27]
潘松圻,郭秋雷,邹才能,等. 页岩型与粉砂岩型“页岩油系统”甜点段判识——以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 中国科学(地球科学),2023,53(7): 1663-1678.

PAN S Y,GUO Q L,ZOU C N,et al. Identification of sweet spots in shale-type and siltstone-type “shale oil systems”:A case study of the Chang 7 Member in Ordos Basin[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae),2023,53(7): 1663-1678.

[28]
罗力元,李勇,何清波,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘海陆过渡相页岩原位含气性评价及其地质应用[J]. 天然气地球科学,2024,35(12): 2215-2227.

LUO L Y,LI Y,HE Q B,et al. In-situ gas-bearing evaluation of marine-continental transitional shale in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin and its geological application[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(12): 2215-2227.

[29]
姜龙燕,钱门辉,何发岐,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区三叠系延长组长7页岩油特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质,2024,46(5): 941-953.

JIANG L Y,QIAN M H,HE F Q,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Chang 7 shale oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation,Fuxian area,Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2024,46 (5): 941-953.

[30]
袁懿琳,荆振华,张斌,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘长7段烃源岩生物标志物特征与沉积环境分析[J]. 天然气地球科学,2025,36(2): 293-306.

YUAN Y L,JIN Z H,ZHANG B,et al. Biomarker characteristics and sedimentary paleoenvironment of Chang 7 source rocks in northern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2025,36(2): 293-306.

[31]
罗力元,李勇,李树新,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大吉地区山2~3亚段海陆过渡相页岩气富集控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2025,36(3): 554-566.

LUO L Y,LI Y,LI S X,et al. Controlling factors of marine and continental transitional shale gas enrichment in Shan23sub-member,Daji area,eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2025,36(3): 554-566.

[32]
刘显阳,刘江艳,王秀娟,等. 陆相淡水湖盆细粒沉积成因机制及页岩油储集特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部三叠系延长组长73亚段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2025,52(1):84-98.

LIU X Y,LIU J Y,WANG X J,et al. Mechanisms of fine-grained sedimentation and reservoir characteristics of shale oil in continental freshwater lacustrine basin: A case study from Chang 73 Sub-member of Triassic Yanchang Formation in southwestern Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2025,52(1): 84-98.

[33]
梁锋,曹哲. 鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区三叠系长7页岩油储层特征、形成环境及富集模式[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(1): 24-40.

LIANG F,CAO Z. Characteristics,formation environment and enrichment model of Triassic Chang 7 shale oil reservoir in Huachi area,Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2025,37(1): 24-40.

[34]
姚宜同,李士祥,赵彦德,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地新安边地区长7致密油特征及控制因素[J],沉积学报,2015,33(3): 625-632.

YAO Y T,LI S X,ZHAO Y D,et al. Characteristics & controlling factors of Chang 7 tight Oil in Xin'anbian area,Orods Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(3): 625-632.

[35]
牟蜚声,尹相东,胡琮,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2024,36(4): 71-84.

MOU F S,YIN X D,HU C,et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of tight oil of Triassic Chang 7 Member in northern Shaanxi area,Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(4): 71-84.

[36]
张莹,刘志峰,陈少平,等. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷烃源岩形成与演化的主控因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2024,51(6):953-965.

ZHANG Y,LIU Z F,CHEN S P,et al. Main controlling factors for the formation and evolution of hydrocarbon source rocks in the Bozhong depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2024,51(6):953-965.

[37]
杨璞,路俊刚,代林锋,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长7段源储结构及其致密油差异富集模式[J]. 世界石油工业,2025,32(3):55-67.

YANG P,LU J G,DAI L F,et al. Source-reservoir structure and its differential enrichment patterns of tight oil in the Chang 7 member of the Heshui area,Ordos Basin[J]. World Petroleum Industry,2025,32(3):55-67.

[38]
刘曦翔,张宇,蒲柏宇,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水致密砂岩大气淡水溶蚀及其油气地质意义[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2019,42(2):48-55.

LIU X X,ZHANG Y,PU B Y,et al. Meteoric water dissolution in deepwater tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and its geological significance[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2019,42(2):48-55.

[39]
王岚,王秀娟,李文厚,等. 陆相坳陷湖盆深水重力流沉积类型、模式及控制因素分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2024,54(6): 1091-1103.

WANG L,WANG X J,LI W H,et al. Analysis of sedimentary types,patterns,and controlling factors of deep-water gravity flow in terrestrial depression lake basins:Taking Chang 7 member of Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2024,54(6): 1091-1103.

[40]
马文忠,王永宏,张三,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区长7段页岩油储层微观特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2021,32(12): 1810-1821.

MA W Z,WANG Y H,ZHANG S,et al. Microscopic characteristics and controlling factors of Chang 7 Member shale oil reservoir in northern Shaanxi area,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2021,32(12): 1810-1821.

[41]
高伟,焦创赟,屈亚龙,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区合水-塔尔湾长7储层特征及成岩作用研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2012,35(4):22-27,8.

GAO W,JIAO C Y,QU Y L,et al. Reservoir characteristics and diagenesis of Yanchang 7 Member in heshui-taerwan,east Gansu Province in Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2012,35(4):22-27,8.

[42]
焦方正,邹才能,杨智. 陆相源内石油聚集地质理论认识及勘探开发实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(6): 1067-1078.

JIAO F Z,ZHOU C N,YANG Z. Geological theory and exploration & development practice of hydrocarbon accumulation inside continental source kitchens[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(6): 1067-1078.

[43]
付金华,刘显阳,李士祥,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段页岩油勘探发现与资源潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探,2021,26(5): 1-11.

FU J H,LIU X Y,LI S X,et al. Discovery and resource potential of shale oil of Chang 7 Member,Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2021,26(5): 1-11.

[44]
张春雨,陈世加,朱星丞,等. 源—储间隔夹层的分类、特征及其对陆相致密储层油气富集的控制作用[J]. 石油学报,2024,45(2):358-373.

ZHANG C Y,CHEN S J,ZHU X C,et al. Classification and characteristics of source-reservoir interlayer and its controlling effect on oil-gas enrichment in continental tight reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(2):358-373.

[45]
陆奕帆,路俊刚,王攀,等. 环县—白豹地区长7段致密油差异分布控制因素[J].世界石油工业,2023,30(6):43-52.

LU Y F,LU J G,WANG P,et al. Factors controlling the differential distribution of oil in the Chang section 7 dense sandstone of the Huanxian-Baibao area[J]. World Petroleum Industry,2023,30(6):43-52.

[46]
宿晓岑,巩磊,高帅,等. 陇东地区长7段致密储集层裂缝特征及定量预测[J]. 新疆石油地质,2021,42(2): 161-167.

SU X C,GONG L,GAO S,et al. Characteristics and quantitative prediction of fractures of tight reservoir in Chang 7 Member in Longdong area[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2021,42(2): 161-167.

[47]
杜晓宇,金之钧,曾联波,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7页岩油储层天然裂缝发育特征与控制因素[J]. 地球科学,2023,48(7): 2589-2600.

DU X Y,JIN Z J,ZENG L B,et al. Development characteristics and controlling factors of natural fractures in Chang 7 shale oil reservoir,Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science,2023,48(7): 2589-2600.

Outlines

/