Accumulation conditions and models of natural gas reservoirs in the Xiaoheba Formation of the Lower Silurian in Nanchuan area, Southeast Chongqing

  • Zhiping ZHANG ,
  • Quanfang GAO ,
  • Feng NI ,
  • Yanjing LI ,
  • Guisong HE
Expand
  • Research Institute of Exploration and Development,SINOPEC East China Oil and Gas Company,Nanjing 210019,China

Received date: 2025-01-14

  Revised date: 2025-05-27

  Online published: 2025-09-11

Supported by

The Domestic Upstream Oriented Project of SINOPEC(YTBXD-FCZY-2023-1-02-002)

Abstract

A number of shale gas wells have been drilled with good gas measurement in Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area, Southeast Chongqing. To analyze the natural gas exploration potential of the Xiaoheba Formation, the gas accumulation conditions and accumulation models of the Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area were analyzed based on outcrop, core, well logging, experimental analysis and seismic data. The results show that: (1) The Xiaoheba Formation in the Nanchuan area is a deltaic front and pre-deltaic deposit, mainly composed of siltstone and argillaceous siltstone, with a relatively large thickness. (2) The lithology is tight, showing the characteristics of strong compaction. With an average porosity of 0.84% and an average permeability of 0.1×10-3 μm2, it is an extremely low porosity and tight reservoir. The reservoir space is dominated by micro-fractures and corrosion pores, forming a pore-fracture reservoir. The low mercury removal efficiency indicates that the reservoir has strong horizontal and vertical heterogeneity. (3) There is no obvious correlation with gas measurement and the structure. Adjacent wells on the same platform are different from gas survey locations and thickness, presenting the characteristics of fractured gas reservoirs. (4) Based on the prediction of curvature and seismic properties of the ant body, it is believed that the through-source fractures are the natural gas migration channels of the Xiaoheba Formation. (5) Due to the lateral sealing of Xiaoheba Formation and the sealing of the overlying Hanjiadian Formation, natural gas gathered in the fracture and formed a fractured reservoir accumulation model. The research results guide the Xiaoheba Formation in the upper return fracturing of the old well, which has made a breakthrough in the exploration of Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area. And the research results have important guiding significance to Xiaoheba Formation in Sichuan Basin.

Cite this article

Zhiping ZHANG , Quanfang GAO , Feng NI , Yanjing LI , Guisong HE . Accumulation conditions and models of natural gas reservoirs in the Xiaoheba Formation of the Lower Silurian in Nanchuan area, Southeast Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2025 , 36(12) : 2269 -2279 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2025.06.001

0 引言

四川盆地志留系小河坝组砂岩发现于20世纪50年代1,截至2018年底,小河坝组钻探井50余口,多口井钻遇油气显示或工业气流,如五科1井测试获气1.09×104 m3/d、太13井初测获气19×104 m3/d1-2,JZ1井测试获气2×104 m3/d,PQ2井中途测试获气2.5×104 m3/d,证实了小河坝组具有良好的天然气勘探前景2。前人13-10对小河坝组也进行了大量研究,多聚焦于沉积环境、储层特征11-15、成岩作用16-17、物源分析1018-20、地球化学成藏特征21-22、勘探方向12123及地层划分24等方面。研究早期,有学者认为四川盆地小河坝组为浅海沉积37,但随着研究的不断深入,学界普遍认为该区小河坝组为三角洲沉积环境14-68-10,发育致密储层,并进一步指出成岩作用是导致其致密化的主要原因;同时也提出小河坝组的烃源岩为下伏龙马溪组富有机质页岩,构造—岩性圈闭及岩性圈闭为勘探有利区117-18。但截至目前,在小河坝组尚未获得商业突破,是需要积极探索的新领域1
位于盆地东南缘的南川地区上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组沉积厚层暗色页岩,页岩气资源量丰富,为南川地区乃至四川盆地的重要勘探目的层。截至2024年底,该地区提交页岩气探明储量超3 000×108 m3。在页岩气勘探过程中,多口目的层为龙马溪组的页岩气井在小河坝组钻遇了良好的气测显示,高气测层数为1~4层,厚度介于2~300 m之间,平均为103 m,气测全烃平均介于6.0%~92.8%之间,且多口井节流循环,点火后火焰高2~3 m。鉴于此,笔者选择南川地区作为研究对象,对下志留统小河坝组砂岩天然气成藏条件及成藏模式开展研究,以进一步揭示小河坝组的天然气勘探前景。
笔者通过对南川地区百余口井进行统计分析,以及对三泉镇小河坝组露头观察和采样,综合利用钻井、测井、录井及实验等资料,结合地震属性预测,从沉积特征、储层特征及输导体系等方面分析小河坝组天然气成藏条件及成藏模式,认为天然裂缝的发育是成藏的主控因素。研究成果指导优选页岩气老井上返测试小河坝组,取得勘探突破,对于四川盆地小河坝组气藏的勘探具有重要的指导意义。

1 地质概况

南川地区位于重庆市东南部(简称渝东南),构造上位于四川盆地东南缘的川东高陡构造带。受燕山中晚期NW向挤压和晚期NE向走滑作用等多期构造改造影响,南川地区呈现隆凹相间、东西分带的构造格局,整体表现出东南浅西北深、东南部与剥蚀区相连的特征。南川地区小河坝组内主要发育北东、近南北走向2组断层,总体为北东走向,延伸长度为1~30 km。三级断层断距较大,小于3 km,为构造带的分界断层,其余内部断层为四、五级断层,断距一般为0~1.4 km。结合构造特征,将南川地区划分为5个构造带,由东向西分别为石门、平桥、东胜、阳春沟及神童坝构造带。根据构造形态,平桥构造带可细分为平桥背斜、平桥南斜坡、双河口向斜,东胜构造带分为东胜背斜、东胜南斜坡、袁家沟向斜,阳春沟构造带分为阳春沟断背斜与阳春沟南斜坡(图1)。
图1 南川地区小河坝组顶界构造及含气显示

Fig.1 The top boundary structure and gas display of Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area

露头及钻井揭示,南川地区基底为前震旦系板溪群浅变质岩,自下而上沉积震旦系、寒武系、奥陶系、志留系、二叠系、三叠系和侏罗系,缺失上志留统、泥盆系、石炭系、白垩系、古近系和新近系。其中,下志留统小河坝组上覆于下志留统龙马溪组,下伏于中志留统韩家店组,与上下地层均为整合接触。

2 小河坝组天然气成藏条件

2.1 沉积与地层特征

四川盆地下志留统小河坝组沉积时期为温润潮湿的气候26,盆地东南部沉积环境为低河流能量、欠充沛物源且以悬浮搬运为主的低建设性浅水三角洲1-24-6
位于南川地区三泉镇的小河坝组露头出露完整,厚度为220 m,岩性主要为中—厚层的泥质粉砂岩、钙质粉砂岩夹泥质条带,发育平行层理[图2(a)],下部见生物化石,顶部粒度变粗,为灰白色、灰黄色含泥细砂岩。整体粒度细、泥质含量高,反映了弱物源供给和强水动力的沉积环境。
图2 南川地区小河坝组沉积特征

(a)小河坝组沉积构造;(b)小河坝组单井沉积相图

Fig.2 Sedimentary characteristics of Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area

南川地区钻井揭示小河坝组岩性主要为灰色粉砂岩、灰色粉砂质泥岩、灰色泥质粉砂岩或夹泥质条带,发育平行层理、脉状层理及微型软沉积变形构造,如碟状构造、火焰构造、砂球构造[图2(a)],反映快速沉积的三角洲前缘沉积环境19。小河坝组下部GR曲线表现为高值(100~170 API)、齿化特征,岩性主要为灰色粉砂质泥岩、灰色泥质粉砂岩;上部GR值较下部低,为70~150 API,呈齿化特征,岩性以灰色泥质粉砂岩夹灰色粉砂质泥岩为主,厚度一般介于60~110 m之间,其顶部普遍发育一套低GR值(70~90 API)的粉细砂岩,厚2~20 m。小河坝组GR曲线形态多为钟形或漏斗状,为远沙坝、河口坝沉积微相[图2(b)]。

2.2 储层特征

2.2.1 岩性特征

岩心薄片鉴定显示,南川地区小河坝组岩性为极细粒石英砂岩、亚长石砂岩,岩石颗粒次棱、次圆状,分选好—中等,为点、线、凹凸接触[图3(a)—图3(c)]。全岩X射线衍射分析结果显示,矿物以石英为主,其次为黏土矿物,石英含量为45.5%~64.9%,黏土矿物含量为15.1%~37.9%,长石含量为11%~19.1%,碳酸盐矿物含量为2.1%~16.5%。
图3 NY1井小河坝组砂岩结构镜下特征

(a)3 889.6 m,颗粒定向排列,石英见次生加大,部分压嵌式胶结;(b)3 890.1 m,云母定向排列,石英颗粒次生加大,压嵌式胶结;(c)3 891.1 m,大量云母沿长轴方向定向排列;石英颗粒见大量次生加大,孔隙、压嵌式胶结;(d)3 888.5 m,片状云母发生弯曲变形

Fig.3 Microscopic sandstone construction of Xiaoheba Formation in Well NY1

2.2.2 成岩特征

岩石填隙物主要为泥质和硅质,强压实特征明显,薄片下见颗粒、云母定向排列,部分颗粒呈凹凸接触,为孔隙、压嵌式胶结,大量石英颗粒次生加大,部分长石黏土化[图3(a)—图3(c)]。扫描电镜下云母弯曲变形[图3(d)]。
在一定的条件下,黏土矿物之间可发生转化作用。在压实作用进行的同时,随埋深的加大,压力和温度的增高,黏土矿物层间水逐渐释放,层间阳离子移出,高岭石转化为蒙脱石、伊利石或绿泥石;蒙脱石先形成伊/蒙混层,随成岩作用的增强,最终转化为伊利石或绿泥石。伊/蒙混层黏土矿物中蒙脱石层的含量和成岩作用的强度成反比25。南川地区小河坝组伊利石含量为34%~50%,平均为43.5%,伊/蒙混层平均含量为28.3%。绿泥石平均含量为28.2%,伊/蒙混层比为7.9%,揭示成岩作用强,成岩作用已达到晚成岩期。在同生期及早成岩期的压实、胶结、重结晶的成岩作用使小河坝组砂岩变得相当致密,晚成岩期形成的次生孔隙极少16

2.2.3 储集空间类型及特征

南川地区NY1井小河坝组岩心尺度宏观天然裂缝以层理缝、水平缝、溶蚀缝、收缩缝为主,部分裂缝被方解石、泥质充填,其中缝合线多见于粉砂岩中,缝宽约为1 mm,缝长5~40 cm,溶蚀缝多见于泥质粉砂岩夹泥质条带中,缝宽1~2 mm,缝长10~15 cm[图4(a)]。
图4 南川地区小河坝组储集空间

(a)NY1井岩心;(b)三泉露头剖面;(c)NY1井扫描电镜

Fig.4 Reservoir space of Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area

小河坝组微观储集空间以无机孔为主,少量微裂缝。无机孔主要为粒间溶孔、粒内溶孔、杂基微孔[图4(b)],平均孔直径为48.5 μm,面孔率为3.7%,喉道宽度小于2.5 μm的数量占比为89.9%。扫描电镜下主要见石英粒内溶孔和长石粒内溶孔,偶见黄铁矿颗粒铸膜孔[图4(c)]。高压压汞实验表明,小河坝组砂岩退汞效率低,为26.3%~51.2%,反映小河坝组储层非均质性强。

2.2.4 物性

NY1井小河坝组7个岩心样品分析孔隙度为0.51%~1.15%,平均为0.84%,渗透率为(0.007~0.136)×10-3 μm2,平均为0.1×10-3 μm2。三泉露头剖面20个样品孔隙度一般为1.0%~4.0%,最高为15.4%,平均为3.1%,渗透率为(0.001~0.354)×10-3 μm2,平均为0.056×10-3 μm2,物性好的层段分布于顶部的河口坝砂岩(图5)。小河坝组整体表现为特低孔致密储层(图6)。
图5 南川地区三泉剖面柱状图

Fig.5 The stratigraphic column of Sanquan profile in Nanchuan area

图6 南川地区小河坝组孔隙度分布

Fig.6 Porosity distribution of Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area

2.3 烃源条件

南川地区实钻井揭示小河坝组天然气组分以甲烷为主,含量平均为96.25%,乙烷含量平均为1.32%,天然气碳同位素值偏低,为-34.5‰~-37.5‰,表现为海相腐泥母质来源的油型气特征。龙马溪组页岩气碳同位素值为-32.9‰~-38.3‰,与小河坝组天然气为同源气。龙马溪组下部在南川地区为深水陆棚沉积,优质页岩厚度为30~35 m,TOC值为2.5%~4.5%;有机质类型以Ⅰ型为主,R O值为2.1%~2.5%,处于生成干气阶段26-27,可为小河坝组提供丰富的气源。

2.4 输导体系与成藏

2.4.1 输导体系

NY1井小河坝组包裹体主要沿石英碎屑颗粒的微裂隙(面)成带分布,以及在晚期方解石胶结物内、方解石脉内零星分布。气体包裹体主要为一期,温度为126~137 ℃,对应天然气充注时间为80~60 Ma(中—晚白垩世),与川东地区小河坝组成藏期一致21-22,对应中成岩B期16-17。此时小河坝组已完成致密化成岩作用。
为了明确小河坝组裂缝发育情况,依托三维地震资料,采用曲率与蚂蚁体属性开展裂缝预测。蚂蚁追踪技术又称为断裂自动追踪技术,基于蚁群算法的正反馈机制,在对地震数据体进行数据平滑、边缘检测等一系列解释性处理后,在叠后地震不连续性属性基础之上,通过类似蚂蚁系统的追踪方法完成断层和裂缝的追踪与预测28。曲率属性是一种间接识别裂缝发育位置的方法,对于脆性岩石而言,曲率越大,裂缝越发育。
曲率及蚂蚁融合属性(简称融合属性)剖面揭示,气测显示好的井融合属性特征明显,垂向大尺度天然裂缝发育,气测显示差的井天然裂缝欠发育。如SY36-4井自五峰组—小河坝组垂向裂缝发育,全烃为7.5%~33%,平均为12%,气测异常厚度为116 m[图7(a)]。位于东胜背斜构造高点的6口井,蚂蚁属性几乎空白,天然裂缝不发育,均未在小河坝组钻遇良好气测显示,全烃平均为0.3%[图7(b)]。
图7 典型井断裂属性剖面与气测显示

(a)SY36-4HF井;(b)SY1井

Fig.7 Fracture attribute section and gas logging display of typical well

综合分析认为龙马溪组所产生的页岩气经由裂缝通道垂向运移至小河坝组,局部区域砂岩受构造应力影响,裂缝发育,成为质量较好的储层。发育纵跨龙马溪组、小河坝组的裂缝体系是小河坝组有效成藏的关键因素。

2.4.2 成藏过程

南川地区所在的川东高陡构造带主要为印支期形成,燕山期发展,喜马拉雅期改造定型29,主要受3期构造运动影响:第一期为中燕山期(120~80 Ma),受到雪峰隆起的挤压,研究区内形成北东向断裂;第二期为晚燕山期(80~30 Ma),受持续挤压走滑作用形成南北向断裂29-30图1),主要影响阳春沟构造带;第三期为燕山期末至喜马拉雅期,主要为隆升剥蚀,对研究区内的构造影响较小。
小河坝组气体包裹体表明天然气成藏期为晚燕山期,此时,输导体系和裂缝储集空间已经形成,通源裂缝沟通龙马溪组烃源岩,使得页岩气沿裂缝运移至小河坝组,形成裂缝型气藏。

2.4.3 保存条件

南川地区小河坝组气藏烃源岩为下部的龙马溪组页岩,为下生上储式成藏组合。直接盖层韩家店组为浅水陆棚相,沉积厚层泥岩夹粉砂质泥岩,地层厚度为500~800 m。该套泥岩分布广,岩性密度较下部小河坝组高0.05~0.1 g/cm3,地层分界处测井曲线呈明显的台阶状,说明具有较好的封盖条件,可以形成优质盖层(图8)。小河坝组岩性致密,物性差,可形成侧向封堵。
图8 南川地区小河坝组成藏组合

Fig.8 Gas reservoir-forming assemblage of Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area

3 成藏模式

3.1 含气特征

气测显示不受构造形态控制,且同平台及邻平台各井气测显示差异大,表现为气测异常部位不同、厚度不同、气测曲线形态不同,具有裂缝气藏特征。如位于阳春沟南斜坡的Y52、Y53平台位于逆断层上盘,断层断距为200~300 m,YY52-1井与YY52-2井相距260 m,YY52-2井在小河坝组中下部气测显示全烃为5%~64.9%,平均为42%,气测形态饱满,全烃异常厚度为146 m;YY52-1井在小河坝组顶部气测显示异常,全烃最高为38.5%,形态呈尖峰状,气测异常厚度为6 m。处于高部位的YY53-3井在小河坝组气测显示较差(图9)。位于东胜背斜构造高部位的SY27-3井、SY30-3井在小河坝组无气测异常显示,而位于构造较低部位的SY30-1井、SY30-2井在小河坝组有气测异常显示,2口井仅距305 m,但含气层差异较大,SY30-1井全烃最高为29.6%,厚度仅为2 m,呈尖峰状,而SY30-2井在小河坝组中部及底部均显示气测异常,全烃最高为85.4%,气测异常厚度为27 m(图10)。
图9 Y52、Y53平台小河坝组气测显示对比

Fig.9 Comparison of gas logging display of Xiaoheba Formation in Platforms Y52 and Y53

图10 SY27、SY30平台小河坝组气测显示对比

Fig.10 Comparison of gas logging display of Xiaoheba Formation in Platforms SY27 and SY30

阳春沟、东胜、平桥构造带在小河坝组均有气测显示,从显示结果来看,背斜区气测显示优于斜坡区,背斜区有20余口井气测显示异常,单井平均全烃一般为9.1%~88.7%,斜坡区有10口井钻遇气测异常显示,主要分布在阳春沟南斜坡,单井平均全烃一般为10.0%~63.0%(图1)。由于背斜区受到顶部的张力作用,裂缝较斜坡区更发育,FMI成像测井也验证了这一结果,位于东胜背斜的SY1井小河坝组下部发育17条高阻缝,6条高导缝,位于斜坡的SY9-1井小河坝组发育8条高阻缝,4条高导缝。此外,构造改造强度越强、天然裂缝越发育,阳春沟构造带受两期构造运动影响26,裂缝较东胜、平桥更为发育,因此在阳春沟南斜坡小河坝组也见较好含气显示。

3.2 成藏模式

小河坝组的储层特征、储集空间及气测特征表现出裂缝控藏控储的特征,形成裂缝型成藏模式(图11)。龙马溪组页岩气通过垂向通源裂缝运移至小河坝组裂缝型储层,受岩性致密控制,或上覆韩家店组的封闭性,天然气在裂缝中聚集成藏。在裂缝相对发育的背斜构造、阳春沟南斜坡分布较多,而裂缝欠发育的东胜南斜坡、平桥南斜坡分布较少。
图11 南川地区小河坝组裂缝型成藏模式

Fig.11 Fractured reservoir accumulation model of Xiaoheba Formation in Nanchuan area

利用该模式指导老井SY33-2HF井上返测试,小河坝组气测全烃平均为35.2%,压裂段长为198 m,测试日产气7.0×104 m3,取得了小河坝组的突破。

4 结论

(1)渝东南南川地区小河坝组形成于三角洲前缘、前三角洲环境,主要岩性为灰色粉砂岩、灰色泥质粉砂岩及灰色粉砂质泥岩,矿物以石英为主。
(2)小河坝组岩性致密,具有强压实特征,成岩作用强。储集空间类型为裂缝及无机孔。储层在横向及纵向上非均质性强,相距较近的井气测特征不同。
(3)小河坝组气藏形成于晚燕山期,为下生上储成藏组合,天然气经通源裂缝由龙马溪组运移至小河坝组,在裂缝发育区形成裂缝型气藏,裂缝是成藏的主控因素,裂缝发育区气测显示好,含气性不受构造控制,形成裂缝型成藏模式。
[1]
杨威,魏国齐,李德江,等.四川盆地志留系小河坝组砂岩油气地质特征与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学,2020,31(1):30-31.

YANG W, WEI G Q, LI D J, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration direction of Silurian Xiaoheba Formation in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas, SW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(1):30-31.

[2]
刘洪林,王怀厂,张辉,等.四川盆地东部小河坝组沥青纳米孔隙网络及其成藏意义[J].天然气地球科学,2020,31(6):818-826.

LIU H L, WANG H C, ZHANG H, et al. Nano pore network of asphalt in Xiaoheba Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin and its significance for reservoir formation[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(6):818-826.

[3]
张林,魏国齐,郭英海,等.四川盆地志留系层序地层及有利储集层分布[J].天然气工业,2005,25(5):6-8.

ZHANG L, WEI G Q, GUO Y H, et al. Favorable reservoir distribution in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(5):6-8.

[4]
杨海欧,王长城,李文杰,等.基于微量元素比值分析方法研究川东南地区小河坝组沉积环境和古气候环境[J].岩矿测试,2017,36(3):289-296.

YANG H O, WANG C C, LI W J, et al. Research on the sedimentary and paleoclimate environment of the Xiaoheba Formation in southeastern Sichuan based on the trace elements ratio Method[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis,2017,36(3):289-296.

[5]
朱志军,陈洪德,林良彪,等.川东南—湘西地区志留系小河坝组砂岩微量元素地球化学特征及意义[J].地质科技情报,2010,29(2):24-30,43.

ZHU Z J, CHEN H D, LIN L B, et al. Signification and characteristic of the trace element ratios of the sandstone in Silurian Xiaoheba Formation in southeastern Sichuan Province and western Hunan Province[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2010,29(2):24-30,43.

[6]
郭英海,李壮福,李大华,等.四川地区早志留世岩相古地理[J].古地理学报,2004,6(1):20-29.

GUO Y H, LI Z F, LI D H, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography of the Early Silurian in Sichuan area[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2004,6(1):20-29.

[7]
朱志军,陈洪德,林良彪,等.渝东—湘西地区志留纪小河坝组层序岩相古地理特征及演化[J].地层学杂志,2012,36(3):662-671.

ZHU Z J, CHEN H D, LIN L B, et al. Sequence-based lithofacies and paleogeography of the Silurian Xiaoheba Formation in eastern Chongqing city and western Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy,2012,36(3):662-671.

[8]
柳昊,田亚铭,邓剑,等.川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩储层粒度特征及其环境指示意义[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021,21(14):5668-5675.

LIU H,TIAN Y M,DENG J,et al.Grain size characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Xiaoheba Formation of Silurian in southeastern Sichuan and their environmental indicators[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(14):5668-5675.

[9]
张昭丰,王良军,张立强,等.川东南回龙场地区小河坝组砂岩元素特征及古环境意义[J].天然气地球科学,2020,31(9):1239-1249.

ZHANG Z F,WANG L J,ZHANG L Q,et al.The element cha-racteristics and paleoenvironmental significance of Xiaoheba For-mation sandstone in Huilongchang area,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(9):1239-1249.

[10]
CHENG L X, WANG L J, LUO Y P. Research about distal-basin shallow-river fluvial-dominated delta mode of Xiaoheba Formation of Silurian of southeastern Sichuan Basin and thinking about oil and gas exploration[J]. Petroleum,2020,6(3):234-245.

[11]
王良军,张文凯,胡晓文,等.川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩储层孔隙结构[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2019,46(1):70-79.

WANG L J, ZHANG W K, HU X W, et al. Pore structures of the Xiaoheba Formation tight sandstone reservoirs in southeastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science and Technology Edition),2019,46(1):70-79.

[12]
胡东风,王良军,施泽进,等.四川盆地东南部小河坝组优质储层的形成机制[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017,44(5):543-552.

HU D F, WANG L J, SHI Z J, et al. Study on the formation mechanism of high-quality reservoir of Xiaoheba Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Teconology (Science and Technology Edition),2017,44(5):543-552.

[13]
张文凯,施泽进,田亚铭,等.川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩孔隙类型及成因[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(4):10-19.

ZHANG W K, SHI Z J, TIAN Y M, et al. Pore types and genesis of tight sandstone of Silurian Xiaoheba Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(4):10-19.

[14]
王勇,施泽进,朱平.石柱复向斜及周缘小河坝组致密砂岩储层控制因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2010,37(3):244-248.

WANG Y, SHI Z J, ZHU P. Controlling factors of tight sandstone in Silurian Xiaoheba Formation of Shizhu synclinorium and around area on the eastern edge of Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science&Technology Edition),2010,37(3):244-248.

[15]
韩京,陈波,张家铭,等.鄂西渝东地区志留系小河坝组砂岩储层特征及成岩相研究[J].科学技术与工程, 2016,16(30):52-60.

HAN J, CHEN B, ZHANG J M, et al. Reservoir characteristics and diagenetic facies of Xiaoheba Formation sandstone of Silurian in West Hubei to East Chongqing Province[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(30):52-60.

[16]
王勇,施泽进,刘亚伟,等.鄂西渝东地区石柱复向斜志留系小河坝组致密砂岩成岩作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2011,32(1):75-90.

WANG Y, SHI Z J, LIU Y W, et al. Diagenesis of tight sandstone in the Silurian Xiaoheba Formation of the Shizhu synclinorium, western Hubei-eastern Chongqing area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(1):75-90.

[17]
谢涛,郭英海,沈玉林,等.川东南小河坝组砂岩成岩作用及其演化[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2010,27(6):50-54.

XIE T, GUO Y H, SHEN Y L, et al. The sandstone diagenesis and it's evolution of Xiaoheba Formation in Southeast of Sichuan area[J]. Journal of Guizhou University (Natural Sciences),2010,27(6):50-54.

[18]
朱志军,陈洪德.川东南地区志留系小河坝组砂岩特征及物源分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(6):1590-1600.

ZHU Z J, CHEN H D. Sandstone characteristics and provenance analysis of the sandstone in Silurian Xiaoheba Formation in southeastern Sichuan Province, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2012,42(6):1590-1600.

[19]
罗宏谓.川东南志留系小河坝组物源分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2019.

LUO H W. Provenance of Xiaoheba Formation of Silurian in Southeast Sichuan[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2019.

[20]
王国茹,陈洪德,朱志军,等.川东南—湘西地区志留系小河坝组砂岩中重矿物特征及地质意义[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2011,38(1):7-14.

WANG G R,CHEN H D,ZHU Z J, et al. Characteristics and geological implications of heavy minerals in Lower Silurian Xiaoheba Formation sandstones in Southeast Sichuan-West Hunan[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science &Technology Edition),2011,38(1):7-14.

[21]
刘成林,李景明,蒋裕强,等.川东小河坝砂岩天然气成藏地球化学研究[J].西南石油学院学报,2002,24(1):46-50.

LIU C L, LI J M, JIANG Y Q,et al. Geochemistry research on natural gas reservoir formation of Xiaoheba Formation of Lower Silurian in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2002,24(1):46-50.

[22]
张英,单秀琴,肖芝华,等.五科1井下古生界流体包裹体特征与天然气成藏期分析[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2006,25(1):60-65.

ZHANG Y,SHAN X Q,XIAO Z H,et al. The characteristics of fluid inclusions in Lower Paleozoic system of the Well Wuke 1 and the analysis of the reservoir-forming stage[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology & Geochemistry,2006,25(1):60-65.

[23]
邱玉超,罗冰,夏茂龙,等.四川盆地志留系小河坝组海相碎屑岩勘探方向及潜力[J].天然气勘探与开发,2019,42(1):1-7.

QIU Y C, LUO B, XIA M L, et al. Exploration prospect and potential:Marine clastic rocks of Silurian Xiaoheba Formation, Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Exploration & Development,2019,42(1):1-7.

[24]
谭兵,张锦让,熊益学,等.南川三泉志留系兰多维列统小河坝组电性特征基干剖面的建立与应用[J].地层学杂志,2025,49(1):42-52.

TAN B, ZHANG J R, XIONG Y X, et al. Establishment and application of the electrical characteristics baseline profile in the Hsiaohopa Formation (Llandovery, Silurian) in Sanquan, Nanchuan[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy,2025,49(1): 42-52.

[25]
姜在兴.沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2010.

JIANG Z X. Sedimentology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2010.

[26]
李东海,姚红生,何希鹏,等.复杂构造区常压页岩气地质理论与资源潜力[M].北京:地质出版社, 2022.

LI D H,YAO H S, HE X P, et al. Geological Theory and Resource Potential of Atmospheric Shale Gas in Complex Structure Area[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2022.

[27]
张培先,高全芳,何希鹏,等.南川地区龙马溪组页岩气地应力场特征及对产量影响分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(4):55-65.

ZHANG P X, GAO Q F, HE X P, et al. Characteristics of in-situ stress field and its influence on shale gas production from Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(4):55-65.

[28]
刘宇巍,刘喜武,韩磊,等.地震裂缝预测技术发展现状[J].世界石油工业,2024,31(3):26-34.

LIU Y W, LIU X W, HAN L, et al. Development status of seismic fracture prediction technology[J]. World Petroleum Industry,2024,31(3):26-34.

[29]
马军,房大志,张培先,等.渝东南地区阳春沟构造带五峰组—龙马溪组页岩构造裂缝特征及形成期次解析[J].天然气地球科学,2022,33(7):1117-1131.

MA J, FANG D Z, ZHANG P X, et al. Characteristics and genesis of shale fractures in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of Yangchungou structural belt in Southeast Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2022,33(7):1117-1131.

[30]
高令宇.川东南近南北向断层构造特征及页岩气保存条件研究[D].武汉:长江大学,2024.

GAO L Y. Research on the Characteristics of Near North South Trending Fault Structures and Shale Gas Preservation Conditions in Southeast Sichuan[D]. Wuhan: Yangtze University, 2024.

Outlines

/