Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and main controlling factors of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan Basin

  • Qian YUAN , 1 ,
  • Xihua ZHANG , 1 ,
  • Yangui CHEN 1 ,
  • Xiao CHEN 1 ,
  • Ran LIU 1 ,
  • Wei WANG 1 ,
  • Xiaoliang BAI 1 ,
  • Siqiao PENG 1 ,
  • Chao GENG 2 ,
  • Haifeng YUAN 3 ,
  • Ya LI 1 ,
  • Guiping SU 1 ,
  • Jiayi ZHONG 1
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development,PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company,Chengdu 610095,China
  • 2. Shunan Gas Mine,PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company,Luzhou 646000,China
  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610051,China

Received date: 2024-09-22

  Revised date: 2025-01-23

  Online published: 2025-02-24

Supported by

The Major Science and Technology Special Project of PetroChina Company Limited(2023ZZ16YJ01)

Abstract

The granular beach of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation was developed during the depositional period in southern Sichuan Basin, and there were several sets of high quality source rocks underlying it, which had great potential for oil and gas resources. The process of oil and gas exploration in the Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan Basin is restricted by the complex conditions of oil and gas accumulation, the unclear understanding of reservoir potential and favorable controlling factors. On the basis of redefining the reservoir development characteristics of Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan region through drilling, seismic, logging and test analysis data, the natural gas sources and hydrocarbon supply capacity of main source rocks are identified, the characteristics of oil and gas transport system and oil and gas charging periods are identified, the accumulation potential is further understood in combination with oil and gas accumulation evolution, and the favorable controlling factors for reservoir formation are further discussed. The study shows that: (1) The reservoir distribution of the Qixia Formation is controlled by high-energy sedimentary facies belts, mainly developed at the top of the Qi-2 Member, with the Northern Slope zone, the low steep slope zone and the southern slope zone as the center in a circular distribution, featuring low porosity and low permeability, and the reservoir space is dominated by dissolution vugs. (2) The comparison of gas sources shows that the natural gas in Qixia Formation is dominated by crude oil cracking gas in the high to over-mature stage, which mainly comes from the underlying Silurian Longmaxi Formation source rock, forming favorable reservoir-forming conditions of “ear source hydrocarbon supply, lower generation and upper reservoir” in space. (3) The fault-type, transport bed type and disintegrated transport hydrocarbon system are identified, especially the fault-type transport system developed by the combination of class Ⅱ and class Ⅲ faults is more conducive to hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. (4) The reservoir of Qixia Formation has at least experienced three distinct hydrocarbon charging episodes: the end of Early Triassic, the beginning of Late Triassic, the beginning of Early Cretaceous and the end of Early Cretaceous. The present oil and gas distribution pattern is mainly influenced by the Himalayan orogeny on oil and gas adjustment. (5) The Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan Basin has favorable conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation, and the main controlling factor of reservoir formation is good preservation conditions, in which the parallel fault-clipped anticline has better preservation conditions than the up-dip direction of the reservoir with higher tectonic point and weaker structural transformation.

Cite this article

Qian YUAN , Xihua ZHANG , Yangui CHEN , Xiao CHEN , Ran LIU , Wei WANG , Xiaoliang BAI , Siqiao PENG , Chao GENG , Haifeng YUAN , Ya LI , Guiping SU , Jiayi ZHONG . Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and main controlling factors of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2025 , 36(6) : 1050 -1067 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2025.01.005

0 引言

四川盆地二叠系碳酸盐岩作为油气勘探的重要领域,长期以来受到广泛关注1-2。其中,中二叠统栖霞组沉积期受水下古隆起和多级坡折带控制,颗粒滩大面积发育,下伏多套潜在烃源岩,油气成藏潜力大3-4。前期众多学者针对四川盆地栖霞组开展了大量的研究工作,主要集中在层序地层学5-7、沉积储层特征与主控因素8-11、白云岩成因12-14等方面,这些研究加深了地质认识,推动了油气勘探的进程,比如,川西北地区双鱼石气田15-16、川中地区的MX42井和GS18井17、川西南地区的PT1井18在栖霞组取得勘探突破。然而,川南地区栖霞组油气勘探仍未取得明显突破,目前已有钻井在栖霞组获得高产且长时间稳产19,充分展示了该地区栖霞组具有良好的油气勘探前景。
由于川南地区经历多期构造运动,不同规模断裂发育,导致油气成藏条件复杂,油气勘探仍然面临诸多挑战,勘探仍处于初期阶段,主要表现为川南地区栖霞组储层特征与分布规律认识模糊,主力烃源岩不明确,油气输导体系识别与展布认识不深入,成藏演化刻画不清晰等问题,影响和制约着下一步油气勘探部署。针对上述问题,本文研究根据钻井岩心、地震解释、测井资料及测试分析资料,以成藏条件特征及其匹配关系为主要研究思路,在重新厘定川南栖霞组储层发育特征的基础上,开展油气源对比确定主力烃源岩并分析其供烃能力,通过油气输导体系刻画和油气成藏时期分析,进一步明确油气成藏演化过程,结合已有实钻井,深入认识成藏潜力,明确成藏主控因素,以期对川南地区中二叠统栖霞组的油气勘探工作提供参考。

1 地质背景

四川盆地是位于扬子地台西部重要的含油气叠合盆地,由于长期处于冈瓦纳大陆与劳亚大陆之间的过渡转换部位,多期构造运动使得盆地内部构造变形强烈,形成多种类型的古隆起、古斜坡等次一级构造单元,多期叠合沉积演化在纵向上形成多套生储盖组合20-22,为油气富集提供了有利条件。其中,加里东晚期构造格局、海西中—晚期裂陷运动导致构造—沉积分异形成的多元供烃、礁滩体规模以及多重输导体系对二叠系油气成藏与演化具有重要影响23-24
四川盆地现今被中—新生代造山带所围限,划分为5个二级构造带25。研究区地处四川盆地南部,构造上横跨川中平缓构造带东南部、川东南低陡背斜带和川东高陡背斜带西南部[图1(a)],南临娄山褶皱带。研究区根据构造幅度,可以划分为帚状北翼斜坡带、帚状低陡带和帚状南翼斜坡带,研究区内主要发育华蓥山断裂带和纳溪断裂带[图1(b)]。二叠系纵向上存在多套优质烃源岩和多种类型碳酸盐岩储层,直接盖层和区域性盖层发育。研究区中二叠统栖霞组沉积期受沿通江—盐亭—长寿克拉通内凹陷影响,凹陷两侧主要为一套碳酸盐岩开阔台地相沉积26,水下古隆起发育,围绕水下古隆起形成大范围的台内高能颗粒滩,为储层发育和油气聚集提供有利条件27。栖霞组岩性上主要分为2段:下部栖一段为深灰色中层至块状泥晶灰岩,泥质含量较高;上部栖二段为浅灰色亮晶生屑灰岩,局部发育白云岩化[图1(c)]。
图1 研究区地质概况

(a)四川盆地构造分区及研究区位置图25-26;(b) 研究区构造分区及井位分布图;(c) 研究区二叠系综合柱状图

Fig.1 Geological background of the study area

2 储层特征与分布

2.1 储层特征

钻井和野外剖面揭示,栖霞组储层岩性主要为褐灰色、浅灰色白云岩、灰质白云岩、云质灰岩及颗粒灰岩。灰质白云岩主要由细晶白云石组成,部分被方解石交代[图2(a)]。白云岩主要由半自形—自形粒状细晶白云石组成,可见雾心亮边结构,晶间被少量方解石充填[图2(b)]。颗粒灰岩中颗粒以砂屑为主,含生物碎屑,可见藻类黏结结构[图2(c)—图2(d)]。颗粒灰岩中发育垂直溶沟与渗流带,小型溶洞被碳酸盐矿物与泥质充填[图2(e)—图2(f)]。
图2 川南地区栖霞组储层岩石学和储集空间特征

(a)B9井,P2 q,3 656 m,细晶灰质白云岩,主要由白云石组成,且被少量方解石交代,含少量生物碎屑(瓣腮、有孔虫),(—);(b)J45井,P2 q 2,2 899 m,细晶白云岩,白云石多呈半自形—自形粒状,部分具有雾心亮边结构,晶间被少量方解石充填,见少量生屑,(—);(c)J45井,P2 q 2,2 931.7 m,亮晶颗粒灰岩,颗粒以砂屑为主,部分生物碎屑(棘皮类、瓣鳃类),胶结物多呈亮晶粒状,(—);(d)J45井,P2 q 2,2 915.1 m,白云质亮晶颗粒灰岩,颗粒以砂屑为主,普遍含藻类黏结结构,含生物碎屑(棘皮类),(—);(e)J45井,P2 q 2,2 919.64~2 919.84 m,颗粒灰岩中发育垂直溶沟,垂直渗流带,小型溶洞,方解石充填;(f)J46井,P2 q 2,3 172.41 m,颗粒灰岩中发育的溶沟被深色碳酸盐与泥质混合充填;(g)J45井,P2 q 2,2 897.5 m,细—中晶白云岩,晶间溶孔发育,(—);(h)YJB剖面,P2 q 2,细晶白云岩,白云石晶间孔及晶间溶孔发育,(—);(i)XYSB剖面,P2 q 2,中晶白云岩,晶间(溶)孔被方解石全充填(染色),(—);(j)YLLX剖面,P2 q 2,中—粗晶白云岩,构造缝发育,(—);(k)J45井,P2 q 2,2 897.8 m,亮晶颗粒灰岩,构造溶蚀缝发育,未充填,(—);(l)J45井,P2 q 2,2 899 m,岩溶作用与云化作用叠加,形成云斑,溶蚀孔洞发育

Fig.2 Reservoir petrology and reservoir space characteristics of Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan

前期研究认为栖霞组储层主要受短期暴露溶蚀、多期云化作用、埋藏溶蚀作用及构造运动影响,溶蚀孔洞和裂缝发育,储层以孔隙—裂缝型为主28-31。通过对栖霞组储层岩心和薄片观察发现,储集空间主要以溶蚀孔洞为主,其次为晶间孔,可见裂缝发育。晶间孔及晶间溶孔多发育在白云岩中,晶间孔孔径小,呈角孔形态,边界平直,而晶间溶孔孔径较大,孔隙形态不规则或欠规则[图2(g)—图2(i)]。构造、溶蚀缝较发育,充填程度低[图2(j),图2(k)]。溶蚀孔洞普遍发育[图2(l)],溶孔一般小于2 mm,多与溶洞伴生,为非选择性溶解形成的孔隙,少数被沥青半充填,溶洞一般大于2 mm。根据川南地区已有钻井显示统计,栖霞组出现井漏油气显示70井次以及钻具放空现象20井次,表明栖霞组储层储集空间与溶蚀孔洞发育密切相关32
储层物性整体表现为低孔低渗的特征,孔隙度分布在2.1%~6%之间,平均为3.2%,渗透率分布在(0.04~6.5)×10-3 μm2之间,平均为0.45×10-3 μm2,局部存在相对高渗透率段[图3(a),图3(b)]。孔隙度与渗透率大致呈正相关关系,具有孔隙型和孔洞型储层特征[图3(c)]。从岩性上看,细晶白云岩的物性相对最好,平均孔隙度为4.2%,平均渗透率为1.31×10-3 μm2,其次为云质灰岩、亮晶颗粒灰岩[图3(c)]。
图3 川南地区中二叠统栖霞组储层孔隙度、渗透率直方图及孔渗关系

Fig.3 Histogram of porosity and permeability and the relation between porosity and permeability of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation reservoir in southern Sichuan

2.2 储层空间分布

研究区栖霞组碳酸盐岩储层沉积相主要为台地相,其中浅水台地内海水的持续动荡更强,有利于颗粒滩的形成并控制着储层的发育规模和质量。
通过“低伽马、低电阻率、低密度、高声波时差、高中子”的测井响应特征和栖二段顶部明显的复波反射地震响应特征,结合区域连井对比分析发现,川南地区栖霞组储层纵向上发育2~4套孔隙型储层,主要集中在栖二段,横向上栖二段距顶约10~20 m稳定发育一套厚度为5~15 m的层状孔隙型储层(图4)。
图4 川南地区栖霞组地震解释剖面(a)与储层连井剖面图(b)(剖面位置见图5)

Fig.4 Seismic interpretation profile (a) and reservoir well connection profile (b) of Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan (the profile position is shown in Fig. 5)

在测井曲线标定和横向对比基础上,结合大量钻井岩心、薄片观察分析,通过单井点控制和栖霞组沉积时期古地貌,认为栖霞组储层平面上主要以帚状北翼斜坡带、帚状低陡带、帚状南翼斜坡带各自为中心呈环状分布,局部白云岩发育,白云岩厚度介于1~8.2 m之间,有利区面积约5 000 km2图5)。
图5 川南地区栖霞组储层厚度分布

Fig.5 Reservoir thickness distribution map of Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan

3 天然气来源与主力烃源岩

3.1 天然气来源与成因

四川盆地中二叠统气藏潜在的烃源岩层由下至上依次为寒武系筇竹寺组泥岩、志留系龙马溪组泥页岩、二叠系凉山组泥页岩33。天然气碳同位素组成与其生气母质类型有紧密联系34-35,由于天然气中乙烷碳同素组成(δ13C2)比甲烷碳同位素组成(δ13C1)更稳定,因此一般用δ13C2来判断天然气的类型及来源36-38
川南地区栖霞组天然气δ13C2值分布于-36.4‰~-34.3‰之间,平均值为-35.35‰,表明主要来源于腐泥型有机质,其中GS19井δ13C2值较F13井更低。天然气乙烷碳同位素分布表明(图6),川南地区栖霞组天然气的δ13C2较川中地区轻,说明母质来源有所不同39
图6 天然气乙烷碳同位素对比 (其中川南地区龙马溪组数据来自缪欢等40

Fig.6 Comparison of natural gas ethane carbon isotopes(the data of Longmaxi Formation was referred to by MIAO,et al.40

川南地区志留系龙马溪组页岩气δ13C2值为-42.8‰—-32.3‰40,与川南地区GS19井、F13井栖霞组天然气相似。前人研究证实GS19井气源为志留系龙马溪组41,F13井与GS19井栖霞组天然气δ13C1值(-33.4‰、-33.2‰)均大于δ13C2值(-34.3‰、-36.4‰),发生明显倒转,进一步证实川南地区栖霞组天然气主要来自于志留系龙马溪组烃源岩42-43。而川中地区高石梯—磨溪区块的栖霞组与该地区寒武系龙王庙组的天然气δ13C2值较为相似,主要来自于下寒武统筇竹寺组烃源岩的贡献44
川南地区栖霞组天然气气体组分显示,甲烷含量分布于92.18%~97.42%之间,平均含量为95.18%,乙烷含量均小于1.00%,丙烷含量非常低,干燥系数分布于0.997 9~0.998 1之间,表现出典型的高演化干气特征。
根据Ln(C1/C2)—Ln(C2/C3)判别法45-46图7),川南地区栖霞组天然气主要为高—过成熟阶段的原油裂解气,少部分处于成熟阶段,整体上与川南地区志留系龙马溪组天然气相似,表明栖霞组天然气与龙马溪组天然气具有亲缘性。而川中地区栖霞组中天然气甲烷含量更高,成熟度明显高于川南地区,进一步表面川南地区栖霞组的油气来源与川中地区不同。
图7 川南地区栖霞组天然气成因及成熟度判识

Fig.7 The genesis and maturity identification diagram of Qixia Formation natural gas in southern Sichuan

3.2 烃源岩供烃能力

上述分析表明,栖霞组天然气主要来自于志留系龙马溪组泥页岩的贡献。川南地区作为志留系龙马溪组烃源岩沉积中心,烃源岩厚度大、面积广。现场资料显示,龙马溪组烃源岩干酪根类型主要为腐泥型47,平均TOC值大于3.0%,R O值为2.1%~2.4%,处于生干气阶段48-52。烃源岩厚度基本大于150 m,其中泸州地区大于600 m,表现出以沉积中心呈环状分布并向外逐渐减薄的趋势,生烃强度高达(40~280)×108 m3/km2,油气供给充足(图8)。
图8 川南地区志留系龙马溪组烃源岩厚度叠生烃强度

Fig.8 Thickness and hydrocarbon generation intensity of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation source rock in southern Sichuan

4 输导体系识别

输导体系是在油气成藏过程中连接烃源岩与圈闭之间的路径系统,可作为优质的油气运移通道,控制油气的富集成藏,主要类型包括断裂型、缝洞型和不整合型53

4.1 断裂型

川南地区栖霞组断裂发育。通过对界市场—泸州地区地震解释剖面分析,根据断裂断开层位和断距进行了断裂分级。Ⅰ级断裂向下断至志留系龙马溪组烃源岩,向上断穿三叠系;Ⅱ级断裂向下断至志留系龙马溪组烃源岩,向上消失在二叠系、三叠系;Ⅲ级断裂以二叠系层间断裂为主[图9(a)]。结合地震解释认为,全区Ⅰ级断裂主要为NE—SW向展布,在帚状北翼斜坡带及帚状南翼斜坡带的发育程度相对帚状低陡带较低[图9(b)]。
图9 川南地区栖霞组断裂分级与Ⅰ级断裂分布

(a)剖面线C—C’地震解释剖面断裂分级;(b)Ⅰ级断裂平面分布

Fig.9 Fault classification and gradeⅠfault distribution of Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan

Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级断裂主要为烃源断裂,为油气长距离运移提供输导条件54,Ⅲ级断裂作为层间断裂,可改善储层渗流能力,提高油气层内运移效率。栖霞组试油和单井生产情况显示,位于Ⅰ级断裂上的Y46井、Y52井、N52井测试产量低,稳产时间短,而距离Ⅰ级断裂较远且Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级断裂发育的F13井、N59井、J30井测试获高产和稳产时间长,表明Ⅰ级断裂向上断穿层位较多,易于破坏圈闭有效性,造成油气逸散,而Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级断裂组合发育更有利于油气聚集。

4.2 缝洞型

川南地区栖霞组储层储集空间研究表明,储层中溶蚀孔洞发育,洞径毫米到厘米级不等,溶孔多与已充填的溶洞伴生,整体充填程度中等,横向可对比追踪。断裂活动形成大面积构造缝后被溶蚀改造,充填程度低,大大提高了储层渗流能力(图10)。此外,储层裂缝中发现残余沥青表明曾经发生过油气运移[图10(c)]。因此,认为储层具备较好的侧向输导能力,发育缝洞型输导体系。
图10 川南地区栖霞组储层裂缝显微特征

(a)YLLX剖面,P2 q 2,细晶白云岩中构造溶蚀缝发育,充填程度低(—);(b)J45井,P2 q 2,2 915.1 m,颗粒灰岩中溶蚀缝发育,充填程度低(—);(c)J45井,P2 q 2,2 934.5 m,颗粒灰岩中构造溶蚀缝发育,缝中充填沥青,(—)

Fig.10 Microscopic characteristics of reservoir fractures in Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan

4.2 不整合型

地震解释剖面显示,受加里东—海西早期构造格局和晚石炭世至早二叠世的云南运动影响,石炭系、泥盆系遭受剥蚀,导致二叠系与下伏的志留系呈不整合接触,形成区域不整合面55-56图11)。不整合界面上下沉积环境变化明显57,为油气横向大范围运移和聚集提供有利通道。
图11 地震解释剖面中区域不整合面(剖面线见图9中D—D’)

Fig.11 Regional unconformity in seismic interpretation section (section line is D-D ' in Fig. 9)

5 油气充注期次

5.1 流体包裹体特征

包裹体岩相学观察表明,研究区栖霞组流体包裹体主要以含烃盐水包裹体、富沥青包裹体共生为主,成群成带分布。白云石晶粒、裂缝充填方解石脉、缝洞充填方解石为主要赋存矿物,可见云质灰岩、灰岩缝洞及晶间微缝隙中充填褐色、深褐色的沥青,沥青无荧光显示,后期进一步充填亮晶方解石(图12)。
图12 川南地区中二叠统栖霞组储层中流体包裹体显微特征

(a) J46井,P2 q 2,3 058.95 m,缝洞充填方解石中含烃盐水包裹体和富沥青包裹体,均一温度为136~139 ℃;(b)J46井,P2 q 2,3 177.73 m,白云石晶粒中含烃盐水包裹体和富沥青包裹体,均一温度为92 ℃;(c)J46井,P2 q 2,3 177.68 m,裂缝充填方解石脉中含烃盐水包裹体和富沥青包裹体,均一温度为132~140 ℃;(d)J46井,P2 q 2,3 177.68 m,放大(c)视域

Fig.12 Microscopic characteristics of fluid inclusions in the Middle Permian Qixia Formation reservoir in southern Sichuan

包裹体显微测温表明,缝洞充填方解石中含烃盐水包裹体均一温度介于126~167 ℃之间,盐度介于5.86‰~23.11‰(wt,NaCl;指质量分数和NaCl等效盐度,下同)之间;白云石晶粒中含烃盐水包裹体均一温度为92 ℃,盐度为9.47‰(wt,NaCl);裂缝充填方解石脉中含烃盐水包裹体均一温度介于122~140 ℃之间,盐度介于6.16‰~7.45‰(wt,NaCl)之间(图13)。包裹体盐度是反映油气成藏过程中流体物理化学性质的重要参数,可以近似反映成岩作用过程中孔隙水溶液的盐度,对于判断成岩环境具有重要意义。随着均一温度升高,流体包裹体温度与盐度之间无明显的相关性,可能由于成岩环境相对开放,比如断裂持续发育等影响,地层流体活动频繁导致58
图13 流体包裹体均一温度、盐度分布与相关性

Fig.13 Distribution and correlation of homogenization temperature and salinity of fluid inclusions

5.2 油气充注期次

沥青作为液态烃蚀变的产物,是油气运移、聚集的重要线索59-60。对栖霞组储层岩石显微观察发现,大量沥青残留在孔隙和裂缝中,代表了储层经历了液态烃充注到液态烃裂解的油气运聚过程(图14)。
图14 川南地区栖霞组储层沥青充填显微特征

(a)YJB剖面,P2 q 2,泥微晶生屑灰岩,缝合线充填沥青;(b)WXDD剖面,P2 q 2,微晶生屑灰岩,缝合线充填沥青;(c)CNDX剖面,P2 q 2,泥微晶生屑灰岩,见沥青;(d)J46井,P2 q 2,3 058.95 m,方解石中充填沥青

Fig.14 Microscopic characteristics of bitumen filling in Qixia Formation reservoir in southern Sichuan

区域埋藏热演化史显示,志留系龙马溪组烃源岩作为川南地区栖霞组主要的油气来源,在中志留世初期(432 Ma)进入低成熟阶段(R O=0.5%~0.7%),生成液态烃;在中二叠世末期(260 Ma)进入成熟阶段(R O=0.7%~1.3%),生成液态烃;在中三叠世初期(238 Ma)进入生湿气阶段(R O=1.3%~2.0%),液态烃开始裂解成气态烃;在早白垩世初期(129 Ma)进入生干气阶段(R O>2.0%),以生气态烃为主;喜马拉雅期盆地大面积抬升后进入生烃停滞阶段(图15)。
图15 川南地区埋藏—热演化史与栖霞组油气充注期次

注:①早三叠世末期的液态烃充注;②晚三叠世末期—早白垩世初期的液态烃与气态烃充注;③早白垩世末期的气态烃充注

Fig.15 Burial-thermal evolution history and oil and gas charging period of the Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan

川南地区栖霞组储层中捕获的与烃类有关的流体包裹体均一温度主要分布在92 ℃、122~147 ℃、162~167 ℃共3个区间,表明至少经历了3期油气充注阶段,即早三叠世末期的液态烃充注,晚三叠世末期—早白垩世初期的液态烃与气态烃充注,早白垩世末期的气态烃充注。气态烃来源于烃源岩进入生湿气—干气阶段时液态烃的裂解(图15)。

6 油气成藏演化及有利主控因素

6.1 油气成藏演化

燕山运动前,四川盆地虽然经过多期以升降运动为主的构造运动,但没有形成大规模褶皱61。晚侏罗世时,盆地内海相烃源岩大量生烃,形成古油藏后裂解成为古气藏,具有原位保存的特点62。而喜马拉雅期四川盆地内部及周缘大规模隆升形成褶皱变形,构造强烈导致古气藏发生调整63。结合油气充注期次和地震解释恢复的古构造,将栖霞组油气成藏演划分为早三叠世末的液态烃充注、晚三叠世末—早白垩世初期的液态烃、气态烃充注,早白垩世末期的气态烃充注、晚白垩世末到现今的气态烃调整充注4个阶段(图16)。
图16 川南地区中二叠统栖霞组油气成藏演化过程

Fig.16 Evolution process of hydrocarbon accumulation of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan

早三叠世末期,为古油藏形成阶段。由于盆地处于挤压作用背景下,泸州古隆起初具雏形,通源断裂发育。此时,龙马溪组烃源岩处于成熟阶段,生成的液态烃沿断裂和不整合面向栖霞组储层运移,古隆起及其周缘是油气运移的主要方向[图16(a)]。
晚三叠世末—早白垩世初期,为古油气藏形成阶段。泸州古隆起继承性发育,构造升降运动导致断裂规模继续扩大,进一步控制油气聚集的方向[图16(b)]。随着埋深加大,地温升高,龙马溪组烃源岩进入生湿气阶段,生成的液态烃以及古油藏中的液态烃开始逐渐裂解形成气态烃。
早白垩世末期,为古气藏形成阶段。此时,龙马溪组烃源岩进入生干气阶段,生成的液态烃和古油气藏中的液态烃基本转化为气态烃,继续通过断裂和不整合面向栖霞组储层充注[图16(c)]。
晚白垩世末—现今,为古气藏调整阶段。喜马拉雅运动使得泸州古隆起大幅度隆升,断裂活动加剧,在古隆起上形成大面积褶皱带和多级连续型断块组合。由于地层抬升导致地层温度、地层压力降低,龙马溪组烃源岩进入生烃停滞,油气供给不足。原来在栖霞组储层中聚集的气态烃逐渐通过断裂向上覆地层逸散,而向处于构造高部位保存较好储层中的气态烃被保留下来,形成现今的油气分配格局[图16(d)]。

6.2 成藏主控因素

目前已有现场测试数据表明,帚状北翼斜坡带高部位的J30井测试日产气8×104 m3,累产气3×108 m3,R202井测井显示含气性好,而位于斜坡带较低部位的B19井测试仅产水。帚状低陡带的N59井测试日产气12×104 m3,累产气3×108 m3,而S12井测试仅产水。帚状南翼斜坡带低隆处的F13测试日产气168×104 m3,累产气8×108 m3,斜坡带较低部位的C12测试微气,大量产水。
综合分析认为,J30井、N59井、F13井栖霞组获得高产主要是Ⅱ级烃源断裂与Ⅲ级层间断裂组合发育,构造样式为平行断层夹持断块型背斜的局部高点,油气保存条件好,有利于油气成藏。斜坡带的R202井栖霞组储层中的油气受喜马拉雅期构造调整较小,油气保存条件好,油气主要向储层上倾方向富集;而帚状北翼斜坡带更低部位B19井附近断裂欠发育,水在低部位储层中聚集,油气保存条件较差。帚状低陡带S12井、帚状南翼斜坡带低洼C12井处Ⅰ级断裂发育,油气发生逸散,油气保存条件较差(图17)。
图17 川南地区中二叠统栖霞组油气成藏模式

Fig.17 Hydrocarbon accumulation pattern of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in southern Sichuan

因此,川南地区栖霞组具备油气成藏的有利条件,成藏主控因素为良好的油气保存条件,其中平行断层夹持断块型背斜相对构造高点(J30井、N59井、F13井)、构造改造较弱的储层上倾方向(R202井)保存条件更好。

7 结论

(1)川南地区栖霞组储层岩性为白云岩、灰质白云岩、云质灰岩及颗粒灰岩,为低孔、低渗储层,局部存在高孔、高渗段。储集空间以溶蚀孔洞为主。储层发育受高能沉积相带控制,主要发育在栖二段顶部,平面上以帚状北翼斜坡带、帚状低陡带和帚状南翼斜坡带为中心各自呈环状分布,有利区面积约达5 000 km2
(2)气源对比表明川南地区栖霞组天然气来源与川中栖霞组明显不同,主要来自于下伏志留系龙马溪组烃源岩,天然气以高—过成熟阶段的原油裂解气为主。龙马溪组优质烃源岩在空间上形成“近源供烃、下生上储”的有利成藏条件。
(3)根据地震解释剖面和显微观察识别出断裂型、缝洞型、不整合型输导体系,其中Ⅱ级断裂与Ⅲ级断裂组合发育的断裂型输导体系更有利于油气运聚成藏。
(4)川南地区栖霞组储层至少经历了早三叠世末期以液态烃充注,晚三叠世初期—早白垩世初期以液态烃与气态烃混合充注,早白垩世末期以气态烃充注3期油气充注阶段。油气成藏演化表明现今油气分布格局主要受喜马拉雅期构造调整作用影响。
(5)川南地区栖霞组具备油气成藏的有利条件,成藏主控因素为良好的油气保存条件。其中平行断层夹持断块型背斜相对构造高点、构造改造较弱的储层上倾方向保存条件更好。
1
朱华,杨光,苑保国,等. 四川盆地常规天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2018,29(10):1475-1485.

ZHU H, YANG G, YUAN B G, et al. Geological conditions, resource potential and exploration direction of conventional gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2018, 29(10):1475-1485.

2
肖钦仁,袁海锋,叶子旭,等. 川中北部地区八角场构造二叠系茅口组白云岩储层成因机制[J].天然气地球科学,2023,34(7):1218-1236.

XIAO Q R, YUAN H F, YE Z X, et al. Genetic mechanism of dolomite reservoir in Permian Maokou Formation in Bajiaochang structure in North Central Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(7):1218-1236.

3
王海真,池英柳,赵宗举,等. 四川盆地栖霞组岩溶储层及勘探选区[J].石油学报,2013,34(5):833-842.

WANG H Z, CHI Y L, ZHAO Z J, et al. Karst reservoirs developed in the Middle Permian Qixia Formation of Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5):833-842.

4
陈宗清. 论四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组天然气勘探[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(3):325-334.

CHEN Z Q. Discussion on gas exploration of Middle Permian Qixia Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(3): 325-334.

5
李凤杰,陈荣林. 四川盆地东北地区中—下二叠统层序地层特征研究[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(5):472-477.

LI F J, CHEN R L. Study on the Middle-Lower Permian sequence stratigraphy in Northeastern area,The Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2008,30(5):472-477.

6
张连进,林攀,兰雪梅,等. 四川盆地双鱼石构造带栖霞组高频层序特征及控储作用[J].地层学杂志,2022,46(4):370-383.

ZHANG L J, LIN P, LAN X M, et al. Characteristics of high-frequency sequence and its controlling effect on reservoir in the Chihsia Formation of Shuangyushi structure, Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Stratigraphy, 2022, 46(4):370-383.

7
胡笙. 四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义[D].成都:西南石油大学,2020.

HU S. Sequence Stratigraphic Characteristics and Geological Significance of the Permian Qixia Stage in Northwestern Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University,2020.

8
郭维. 四川盆地西南部二叠系栖霞组沉积相及储层特征[D].成都:成都理工大学,2012.

GUO W. Sedimentary Facies and Reservoir Characteristics of Qixia Formation of Permian in Southwest Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012.

9
郝毅,谷明峰,韦东晓,等. 四川盆地二叠系栖霞组沉积特征及储层分布规律[J].海相油气地质,2020,25(3): 193-201.

HAO Y, GU M F, WEI D X, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir distribution of the Permian Qixia Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2020,25(3):193-201.

10
苏旺,陈志勇,汪泽成,等. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组沉积特征[J].东北石油大学学报,2016,40(3):41-53.

SU W, CHEN Z Y, WANG Z C, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the western Sichuan area[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2016, 40(3):41-53.

11
林攀. 川西北地区中二叠统栖霞组白云岩储层特征及主控因素[D].成都:西南石油大学,2019.

LIN P. Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of Dolomite Reservoir of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Northwest Sichuan[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2019.

12
许文龙,袁海锋,肖钦仁,等.川西地区中二叠统栖霞组白云岩成因——以江油通口栖霞组剖面为例[J].天然气地球科学,2025,36(5):864-882.

XU W L,YUAN H F, XIAO Q R,et al. Genesis of dolomites of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the western Sichuan Basin: A case study of the section of Qixia Formation in Tongkou, Jiangyou area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2025,36(5):864-882.

13
韩月卿,张军涛,何治亮,等. 川西中二叠统栖霞组白云岩特征与成因[J].石油与天然气地质,2023,44(1):75-88.

HAN Y Q, ZHANG J T, HE Z L, et al. Characteristics and genesis of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation dolostone in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1):75-88.

14
梁茹. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组白云岩成因机制研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2021.

LIANG R. Genetic Mechanism of Dolomites of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Western Sichuan[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2021.

15
蔡珺君,戴瑞瑞,任勇,等. 基于碳酸盐岩储层裂缝表征与产能描述的开发技术对策——以川西北双鱼石区块栖霞组气藏为例[J].断块油气田,2023,30(1):120-128.

CAI J J, DAI R R, REN Y, et al. Development technical countermeasures based on fracture characterization and productivity description of carbonate reservoir:Taking Qixia Formation gas reservoir of Shuangyushi block in northwest Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(1):120-128.

16
李建忠,白斌,白莹,等. 川西北地区二叠系栖霞组超深层气藏流体演化过程与成藏模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(4):627-636.

LI J Z, BAI B,BAI Y,et al.Fluid evolution and hydrocarbon ac-cumulation model of ultra-deep gas reservoirs in Permian Qixia Formation of northwest Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(4):627-636.

17
何文渊,蒙启安,印长海,等. 四川盆地合川-潼南地区栖霞组白云岩天然气地质特征及有利勘探区带[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2022,41(4):1-11.

HE W Y, MENG Q A, YIN C H, et al. Geological characteristics and favorable exploration plays of gas in Qixia Formation dolomite in Hechuan⁃Tongnan area of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2022, 41(4):1-11.

18
杨跃明,杨雨,文龙,等. 四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新进展与前景展望[J].天然气工业,2020,40(7):10-22.

YANG Y M, YANG Y, WEN L, et al. New exploration progress and prospect of Middle Permian natural gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7): 10-22.

19
芦飞凡,谭秀成,钟原,等. 四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞组准同生期砂糖状白云岩特征及成因[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(6): 1134-1148.

LU F F, TAN X C, ZHONG Y, et al. Origin of the penecontemporaneous sucrosic dolomite in the Permian Qixia Formation,northwestern Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1134-1148.

20
罗志立. 龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都: 成都科技大学出版社,1995.

LUO Z L.The Rise of Longmen Mountain Orogenic Belt and the Formation and Evolution of Sichuan Basin[M].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press, 1995.

21
刘德良,宋岩,薛爱民. 四川盆地构造与天然气聚集区带综合研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000.

LIU D L, SONG Y, XUE A M. Comprehensive Study on Structure and Natural Gas Accumulation Zones in Sichuan Basin[M].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2000.

22
王学军,杨志如,韩冰. 四川盆地叠合演化与油气聚集[J].地学前缘,2015,22(3):161-173.

WANG X J, YANG Z R, HAN B. Superposed evolution of Sichuan Basin and its petroleum accumulation[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(3): 161-173.

23
李龙龙,罗开平,刘栩,等. 晚古生代构造—沉积分异对四川盆地二叠系多类型气藏的控制作用[J].石油实验地质,2023, 45(1):60-71.

LI L L, LUO K P, LIU X, et al. Controlling effect of Late Paleozoic tectonic and sedimentary differentiation on multitype gas reservoirs in Permian, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2023, 45(1):60-71.

24
刘树根,孙玮,李智武,等. 四川叠合盆地海相碳酸盐岩油气分布特征及其构造主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):1-17.

LIU S G, SUN W, LI Z W, et al. Distribution characteristics of marine carbonate reservoirs and their tectonic controlling factors across the Sichuan superimposed basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5): 1-17.

25
何治亮,金之钧,李双建,等. 特提斯演化控制下盆地原型、改造与油气差异富集——基于波斯湾盆地与四川盆地的比较分析[J].中国科学(地球科学),2023,53(12):2914-2936.

HE Z L,JIN Z J,LI S J,et al. Prototypes, modifications,and hydrocarbon enrichment variations in basins influenced by Tethyan evolution:A comparative analysis of the Persian Gulf Basin and the Sichuan Basin[J].Science China(Earth Sciences),2023,53(12):2914-2936.

26
宋金民,刘树根,李智武,等. 四川盆地中二叠统油气成藏模式与有利勘探区分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(11): 54-71.

SONG J M, LIU S G, LI Z W, et al. Accumulation model and favorable exploration area distribution of the Middle Permian oil and gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(11): 54-71.

27
谭秀成,刘晓光,陈景山,等. 磨溪气田嘉二段陆表海碳酸盐岩台地内滩体发育规律[J].沉积学报,2009,27(5):995-1001.

TAN X C, LIU X G, CHEN J S, et al. Shoal development within the epicontinental carbonate platform,Jia 2 Member,Lower Triassic,Moxi Gas Field,central Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 995-1001.

28
全子婷,谭秀成,张本健,等. 川西北下二叠统栖霞组微生物丘的发现及地质意义[J].古地理学报,2021,23(6):1110-1124.

QUAN Z T, TAN X C, ZHANG B J, et al. Discovery of microbial mounds of the Lower Permian Qixia Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin and its geological significance[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2021, 32(6):1110-1124.

29
冯明友,张帆,李跃纲,等. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组优质白云岩储层特征及形成机理[J].中国科技论文,2015,10(3):280-286.

FENG M Y, ZHANG F, LI Y G, et al. Characteristics and formation mechanism of Qixia Formation (Middle Permian) dolomite reservoirs in western Sichuan Basin[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2015, 10(3):280-286.

30
白晓亮,杨跃明,杨雨,等. 川西北栖霞组优质白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,41(1): 48-56.

BAI X L, YANG Y M, YANG Y, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of high quality dolomite reservoirs in the Permian Qixia Formation, northwestern Sichuan[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 41(1):48-56.

31
杨雨然,张亚,谢忱,等. 川西北地区中二叠统栖霞组热液作用及其对储层的影响[J].岩性油气藏,2019,31(6):44-53.

YANG Y R, ZHANG Y, XIE C, et al. Hydrothermal action of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin and its effect on reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):44-53.

32
杨文杰,谭秀成,李明隆,等. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区中二叠统栖霞组台内薄层白云岩发育特征与成因[J].中国石油勘探,2022,27(4):75-90.

YANG W J, TAN X C, LI M L, et al. Development characteristics and genesis of thin layered dolomite of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the platform in Weiyuan-Gaoshiti area,Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2022,27(4): 75-90.

33
董才源,谢增业,裴森奇,等. 四川盆地中二叠统天然气地球化学特征及成因判识[J].断块油气田,2018,25(4):450-454.

DONG C Y,XIE Z Y,PEI S Q,et al. Natural gas geochemical characteristics and genetic type identification of Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2018,25(4):450-454.

34
王万春. 天然气、原油、干酪根的氢同位素地球化学特征[J].沉积学报,1996,4(增刊1):131-135.

WANG W C. Geochemical characteristics of hydrogen isotopic compositions of natural gas,oil and kerogen[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1996, 4(S1):131-135.

35
戴金星. 各类天然气的成因鉴别[J].中国海上油气,1992,4(1):11-19.

DAI J X. Identification of various genetic natural gases[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 1992, 4(1):11-19.

36
魏国齐,谢增业,宋家荣,等. 四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系—寒武系天然气特征及成因[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):702-711.

WEI G Q, XIE Z Y, SONG J R, et al. Features and origin of natural gas in the Sinian-Cambrian of central Sichuan paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 702-711.

37
谢增业,张本健,杨春龙,等. 川西北地区泥盆系天然气沥青地球化学特征及来源示踪[J].石油学报,2018,39(10):1103-1118.

XIE Z Y, ZHANG B J, YANG C L, et al. Geochemical characteristics and source trace of the Devonian natural gas and bitumen in northwest Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(10): 1103-1118.

38
倪云燕,张津川,姚立邈,等.碳氢同位素在天然气成因研究中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学,2024,35(11):1897-1909.

NI Y Y,ZHANG J C,YAO L M,et al. Application of carbon and hydrogen isotopes in the natural gas origin study[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2024, 35(11): 1897-1909.

39
戴金星,倪云燕,龚德瑜,等.中国大气田烷烃气碳同位素组成的若干特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2024,51(2):223-233.

DAI J X, NI Y Y, GONG D Y, et al. Characteristics of carbon isotopic composition of alkane gas in large gas fields in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2024,51(2):223-233.

40
黄士鹏,冯子齐,姜华,等. 同源常规非常规天然气组分与同位素分馏差异及控制因素——以四川盆地石炭系黄龙组与志留系龙马溪组为例[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2023,20 (5):34-46.

HUANG S P, FENG Z Q, JIANG H, et al. Differences and control factors of chemic and isotopic fractionation of conventional-unconventional natural gas of the same source: Take the Carboniferous Huanglong Formation gas and Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas in Sichuan Basin as example[J].Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition),2023,20 (5):34-46.

41
谢增业,杨春龙,董才源,等. 四川盆地中泥盆统和中二叠统天然气地球化学特征及成因[J].天然气地球科学,2020,31(4): 447-461.

XIE Z Y,YANG C L,DONG C Y,et al. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of Middle Devonian and Middle Permian natural gas in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(4):447-461.

42
吴伟,罗超,张鉴,等. 油型气乙烷碳同位素演化规律与成因[J].石油学报,2016,37(12): 1463-1471.

WU W, LUO C, ZHANG J, et al. Evolution law and genesis of ethane carbon isotope of oil type gas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(12): 1463-1471.

43
缪欢,姜振学,吴建发,等. 页岩气运移证据及其动态富集模式——以四川盆地南部深层页岩气为例[J].天然气工业, 2024, 44(5): 29-44.

MIAO H, JIANG Z X, WU J F, et al. Migration evidence and dynamic enrichment model of shale gas:Take the deep shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin as an example[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(5): 29-44.

44
白晓亮,陈燕萍,彭思桥,等. 川中高磨地区中二叠统栖霞组天然气成藏条件及过程[J].天然气勘探与开发,2023,46(4):80-90.

BAI X L, CHEN Y P, PENG S Q, et al. Geological conditions and process of gas accumulation in Middle Permian Qixia Formation,Gaoshiti-Moxi area,central Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2023,46(4):80-90.

45
黄光辉,张敏,胡国艺,等. 原油裂解气和干酪根裂解气的地球化学研究(Ⅱ):原油裂解气和干酪根裂解气的区分方法[J].中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2008,38(S2):9-16.

HUANG G H, ZHANG M, HU G Y, et al. Geochemical study on oil⁃cracked gases and kerogen⁃cracked gases (Ⅱ):Discrimination methods between oil-cracked gases and kerogen-cracked gases[J]. Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences), 2008,38(S2):9-16.

46
宋晓波,刘勇,隆轲,等.川西新场地区中三叠统雷口坡组气藏天然气来源[J].天然气地球科学,2024,35(12):2121-2131.

SONG X B,LIU Y,LONG K,et al. Gas source of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation gas reservoir in Xinchang area of western Sichuan Basin,China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(12): 2121-2131.

47
单玄龙,邢健,苏思远,等. 川南长宁地区下古生界五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相与含气性特征[J].吉林大学学报,2023,53(5):1323-1337.

SHAN X L, XING J, SU S Y, et al. Shale lithofacies and gas-bearing characteristics of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Changning area, southern Sichuan[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(5) :1323-1337.

48
邹才能,杨智,孙莎莎,等. “进源找油”:论四川盆地页岩油气[J].中国科学:地球科学,2020,50(7):903–920.

ZOU C N, YANG Z, SUN S S, et al. “Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen”: Shale oil and gas in Sichuan Basin[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2020, 50(7):903–920.

49
肖佃师,赵仁文,杨潇,等. 海相页岩气储层孔隙表征、分类及贡献[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(6):1215-1225.

XIAO D S, ZHAO R W, YANG X, et al. Characterization, classification and contribution of marine shale gas reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1215-1225.

50
张烈辉,何骁,李小刚,等. 四川盆地页岩气勘探开发进展、挑战及对策[J].天然气工业,2021,41(8):143-152.

ZHANG L H, HE X, LI X G, et al. Shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin: Progress, challenge and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 143-152.

51
董大忠,王玉满,李新景,等. 中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(1):19-32.

DONG D Z, WANG Y M, LI X J, et al. Breakthrough and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(1):19-32.

52
刘伟,余谦,闫剑飞,等. 上扬子区志留系龙马溪组富有机质泥岩储层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(3):346-352.

LIU W,YU Q,YAN J F,et al.Characteristics of organicrich mu-dstone reservoirs in the Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Upper Yangtze region[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(3): 346-352.

53
郑见超,李斌,袁倩,等. 塔里木盆地巴楚—塔北地区深层寒武系油气成藏过程与勘探方向[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(1):79-91.

ZHENG J C, LI B, YUAN Q, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation process and exploration direction of the deep Cambrian in Bachu-Tabei area, Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(1): 79-91.

54
李智,张仲培,李双建,等. 川东南綦江地区断裂体系特征及其控藏作用[J].天然气地球科学,2024,35(11):1999-2011. LI Z, ZHANG Z P, LI S J, et al. Characteristics of fault systems and their reservoir control in the Qijiang area of southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(11): 1999-2011

55
四川油气区石油地质志编写组. 中国石油地质志:卷十[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989.

Sichuan Oil and Gas Field Drafting Group of Petroleum Geology of China. Petroleum geology of China: Volume 10[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,1989.

56
李涛. 蜀南地区二叠系烃源岩发育分布与生烃强度[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2020.

LI T. Distribution and Hydrocarbon Generation Intensity for the Permian Source Rocks in southern Sichuan Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2020.

57
赵宗举,周慧,陈轩,等. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪层序岩相古地理及有利勘探区带[J].石油学报,2012,33(增刊2):35-51.

ZHAO Z J, ZHOU H, CHEN X, et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and favorable exploration zones of the Permian in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(S2):35-51.

58
廖芸,张建勇,鲁鹏达,等. 川中北斜坡中二叠统茅口组多期流体活动与成藏过程[J]. 天然气地球科学,2023,34 (11):1927-1940.

LIAO Y, ZHANG J Y, LU P D, et al. Multi-stage fluid activity and accumulation process of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the northern slope of central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(11): 1927-1940.

59
HACKLEY P C,CARDOTT B J.Application of organic petro-graphy in North American shale petroleum systems:A review[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,163:8-51.

60
LI Y, CHEN S, WANG Y, et al. Relationships between hydrocarbon evolution and the geochemistry of solid bitumen in the Guanwushan Formation, NW Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 111: 116-134.

61
孙冬胜,李双建,李建交,等. 塔里木与四川盆地震旦系—寒武系油气成藏条件对比与启示[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1): 249-264.

SU D S, LI S J, LI J J, et al. Insights from a comparison of hydrocar on accumulation conditions of Sinian-Camrian between the Tarim and the Sichuan basins[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1): 249-264.

62
何治亮,陆建林,林娟华,等. 中国海相盆地原型—改造分析与油气有序聚集模式[J]. 地学前缘,2022,29(6):60-72.

HE Z L,LU J L,LI J H,et al. Marine basins in China:A prototype-reconstruction analyses and ordered hydrocar on accumulation patterns[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2022,29(6): 60-72.

63
刘树根,孙玮,钟勇,等. 四川海相克拉通盆地显生宙演化阶段及其特征[J]. 岩石学报,2017,33(4):1058-1072.

LIU S G, SUN W, ZHONG Y, et al. Evolutionary episodes and their characteristics within the Sichuan marine craton basin during Phanerozoic Eon,China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2017,33(4):1058-1072.

Outlines

/