Structural characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation models of Shuangcheng Sag, Songliao Basin
Received date: 2019-12-20
Revised date: 2020-03-11
Online published: 2020-06-17
Songliao Basin is a large-scale petroliferous basin with a dual-texture of depression in Mesozoic. There are numerous sags developed in the fault depression and the exploration degree aimed at those sags is low, which makes it a strategic replacement fields in the future exploration. In the big deep fault depressions such as Xujiaweizi Sag, Changling Sag, great breakthroughs in natural gas exploration have achieved and large-scale reserves have been discovered. However, oil and gas exploration has not made a big breakthrough in other Sags. Recently, the breakthrough of oil exploration in Shuangcheng Sag further confirmed the exploration potential in the depression. Previous studies have shown that the hydrocarbon accumulation and distribution in the fault depression of Songliao Basin are controlled by sag structures. According to the structural characteristics of different areas in Shuangcheng Sag, the structure of it can be divided into six models including central fault horst type, central fault graben type, single fault trough type, double fault trough type, multistage fault type and half fault graben type, and seven accumulation models were accordingly constructed. It is pointed out that the four major complex hydrocarbon accumulation zones including central fault buried hill structural belt, buried hill structural belt of slope fault, buried hill structural belt of steep slope fault and strike-slip anticlinal belt will be the favorable exploration areas in Shuangcheng Sag in the future. The faulted anticline, fault block, fault-nose and buried hill traps are the next exploration targets. For those favorable structural belts, multi-layers and multi-objective types of stereoscopic exploration ideas should be applied, and we should give priority to the central fault buried hill structural belt should be given priority in order to achieve discovery. Then, we can extend the exploration areas to slope fault buried hill structural belt and buried hill structural belt of steep slope fault to realize breakthroughs in new zones. And also we should explore the replacement field of lithologic stratum reservoirs in order to implement the benign development in the exploration of this field.
Shi-wei YI , Ming-peng LI , Shu-juan XU , Bao-wen CUI , Qi-an MENG , Xue-qiong WU , Hong-gang CHENG . Structural characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation models of Shuangcheng Sag, Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020 , 31(6) : 761 -772 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.03.008
| 1 |
杜金虎. 松辽盆地中生界火山岩天然气勘探[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010:1-187.
|
| 2 |
赵文智, 邹才能, 冯志强, 等. 松辽盆地深层火山岩气藏地质特征及评价技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(2): 129-142.
|
| 3 |
邹才能, 赵文智, 贾承造, 等. 中国沉积盆地火山岩油气藏形成与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(3): 257-271.
|
| 4 |
谢晓安, 周卓明. 松辽盆地深层天然气勘探实践与勘探领域[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(1): 113-119.
|
| 5 |
冯志强. 松辽盆地庆深大型气田的勘探前景[J].天然气工业, 2006, 26(6) : 1- 5.
|
| 6 |
焦贵浩, 罗霞, 印长海, 等. 松辽盆地深层天然气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 9(9) : 28-31.
|
| 7 |
侯启军, 赵志魁, 王立武, 等. 火山岩气藏——松辽盆地南部大型火山岩气藏勘探理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 1-384.
|
| 8 |
李晶秋, 苗宏伟, 李立立, 等. 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷深层碎屑岩天然气成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2009, 14(4): 34-39.
|
| 9 |
冯子辉, 印长海, 齐景顺, 等. 大型火山岩气田成藏控制因素研究——以松辽盆地庆深气田为例[J].岩石学报, 2010, 26(1): 21-32.
|
| 10 |
杨光, 赵占银, 邵明礼. 长岭断陷CO2气藏与烃类气藏成藏特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2011,38(1):52-58.
|
| 11 |
冯志强, 刘嘉麒, 王璞裙, 等. 油气勘探新领域:火山岩油气藏——松辽盆地大型火山岩气田发现的启示[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(2): 269-279.
|
| 12 |
冯子辉, 印长海, 陆加敏, 等. 致密砂砾岩气形成主控因素与富集规律——以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷下白垩统营城组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(6): 650-656.
|
| 13 |
印长海, 冉清昌, 齐景顺. 双城断陷地质结构与主控断裂形成机制[J].天然气工业, 2009, 29(11): 13-15.
|
| 14 |
印长海, 孙立东, 刘超, 等. 松辽盆地双城地区原油成藏条件与主控因素[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2018, 37(6): 1-6.
|
| 15 |
李丹, 樊薛沛. 长岭断陷结构特征及成因演化模式分析[J].长江大学学报:自然科学版,2016,13(11),11-15.
|
| 16 |
蒙启安, 杨永斌, 金明玉. 断裂对松辽盆地庆深大气田的控制作用[J].石油学报,2006,27(S1):14-17.
|
| 17 |
赵泽辉, 孙平, 罗霞, 等. 松辽断陷盆地火山岩大气田形成条件与勘探实践[J].现代地质,2014,28(3):592-603.
|
| 18 |
赵泽辉, 徐淑娟, 姜晓华, 等. 松辽盆地深层地质结构及致密砂砾岩气勘探[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):12-23.
|
| 19 |
代登亮, 董清水, 任燕宁, 等. 松辽盆地深层箕状断陷岩性气藏成藏规律分析——以王府断陷为例[J]. 世界地质, 2015,34(4):1052-1060.
|
| 20 |
张尔华, 姜传金, 张元高, 等. 徐家围子断陷深层结构形成与演化探讨[J].岩石学报,2010,26(1): 149-157.
|
| 21 |
易士威, 李正文, 焦贵浩, 等. 二连盆地凹陷结构与成藏模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(2): 8-12.
|
| 22 |
杜金虎, 易士威, 王权.华北油田隐蔽油藏勘探实践与认识[J]. 中国石油勘探,2003,8(1):1-10.
|
| 23 |
杜金虎,易士威,卢学军,等. 试论富油凹陷油气分布的“互补性”特征[J].中国石油勘探,2004,9(1):15-22.
|
| 24 |
杜金虎,易士威,雷怀玉,等. 二连盆地岩性地层油藏形成条件与油气分布规律[J].中国石油勘探,2004,9(3):1-5.
|
| 25 |
易士威, 王权. 冀中坳陷富油凹陷勘探现状与勘探思路[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(3):82-85.
|
| 26 |
易士威. 断陷盆地岩性地层油藏分布特征[J].石油学报,2005,26(1):38-41.
|
| 27 |
易士威,刘井旺,伍应权,等. 饶阳凹陷近年潜山勘探的突破与启示[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2010, 15(6): 1-9.
|
| 28 |
赵文智, 方杰. 不同类型断陷湖盆岩性一地层油气藏油气富集规律——以冀中坳陷和二连盆地岩性一地层油气藏对比为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(2): 129-134.
|
| 29 |
冯有良, 徐秀生. 同沉积构造坡折带对岩性油气藏富集带的控制作用——以渤海湾盆地古近系为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(1):22-25.
|
| 30 |
陈广坡, 王天奇, 李林波, 等. 箕状断陷湖盆湖底扇特征及油气勘探——以二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷腾格尔组二段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(1): 63-69.
|
| 31 |
周立宏, 肖敦清, 蒲秀刚, 等. 陆相断陷湖盆复式叠合油气成藏与优势相富集新模式: 以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 7-11.
|
| 32 |
赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 王权, 等. 陆相断陷盆地洼槽聚油理论及其应用: 以渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷和二连盆地为例[J].石油学报, 2011,32(1): 18-24.
|
| 33 |
赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷盆地洼槽聚油理论的发展与勘探实践——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6): 1092-1102.
|
| 34 |
庞玉茂. 冀中坳陷地质结构特征及对油气成藏的影响[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2012.
|
| 35 |
蒋有录,苏圣民,刘华,等.渤海湾盆地新生界沉积洼陷类型及与油气富集的关系[J].石油学报,2019,40(6):635-645.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |